E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Moderate to Severe left-sided Active Ulcerative Colitis |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Moderate to Severe left-sided Active Ulcerative Colitis |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Digestive System Diseases [C06] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10045365 |
E.1.2 | Term | Ulcerative colitis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004856 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Primary Objective: Induction To evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod treatment compared to placebo in inducing clinical remission, in participants with moderate to severe active left-sided UC. Primary Objective: Maintenance To evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod maintenance treatment compared to placebo in inducing or maintaining clinical remission, in participants with clinical response at I-week 6 after induction treatment with cobitolimod. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Secondary Objectives: Induction • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of cobitolimod compared to placebo. • To evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod treatment compared to placebo in clinical symptoms, endoscopy and histology endpoints. • To evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod treatment compared to placebo in other secondary endpoints. Secondary Objectives: Maintenance • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of cobitolimod compared to placebo. • To evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod maintenance treatment compared to placebo in clinical symptoms, endoscopy and histology endpoints. • To evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod maintenance treatment compared to placebo in other secondary endpoints. • To evaluate HRQoL and health economics |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Inclusion Criteria: Induction 1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age. 2. Established diagnosis of UC, with minimum time from diagnosis of at least 3 months before screening visit 1b. 3. Moderate to severe active left-sided UC (disease should extend 15 cm or more above the anal verge and not beyond the splenic flexure) determined by a 3-component Mayo score of 5 to 9 with an endoscopic subscore ≥2 (in sigmoid or descending segments) assessed by central reading of endoscopy, and with stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores, assessed by eDiary, each ≥1. 4. Have inadequate response, loss of response or be intolerant of at least one of the following treatments: a. Oral GCS b. AZA/6-MP c. Biologics, JAK-inhibitors, or other approved advanced therapies for UC 5. Allowed to receive a therapeutic dose of the following UC drugs during the study: a. Oral GCS therapy (≤20 mg prednisone or equivalent/day) provided that the dose has been stable for 2 weeks prior to visit 1b, or oral Budesonide MMX® therapy (9 mg/day) initiated at least 8 weeks before visit 1b, provided that the dose has been stable for 2 weeks prior to visit 1b. b. Oral 5-ASA/SP compounds, provided that the dose has been stable for 2 weeks prior to visit 1b and initiated at least 8 weeks before visit 1b. c. AZA/6-MP provided that the dose has been stable for 8 weeks prior to visit 1b and initiated at least 3 months before visit 1b. 6. Ability to understand the treatment, willingness to comply with all study requirements, and ability to provide informed consent.
Inclusion Criteria: Maintenance Participants are eligible to be included in the maintenance study if they have achieved clinical response at I-week 6 and have adhered to the protocol procedures of the induction study. Clinical response is defined by a decrease in the 3-component Mayo score (rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and endoscopy) of at least two (2) points and at least 35% from I-week 0 with either a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least one (1) point or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Exclusion Criteria: Induction 1. Suspicion of differential diagnosis such as Crohn’s enterocolitis, ischaemic colitis, radiation colitis, indeterminate colitis, infectious colitis, diverticular disease, associated colitis, microscopic colitis, massive pseudopolyposis or non-passable stenosis. 2. Acute fulminant UC, toxic megacolon and/or signs of systemic toxicity. 3. UC limited to the rectum (disease extending <15 cm above the anal verge) or extending beyond the splenic flexure. 4. Have failed treatment with more than three advanced therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab or tofacitinib) of two different therapeutic classes (anti-TNF, anti-integrins, anti-IL12/23, JAKinhibitors, or other approved advanced therapies for UC). 5. Have had surgery for treatment of UC. 6. History of malignancy, unless treated with no relapse of the disease and ≥ 5 years since last treatment (cured) or treated (cured) basal cell or squamous cell in situ carcinoma. 7. History or presence of any clinically significant disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, could impact on the participant’s ability to adhere to the protocol and protocol procedures, or would confound the study result or compromise participant safety. 8. Concomitant treatment with cyclosporine, methotrexate, tacrolimus, or advanced therapies such as infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab or tofacitinib, or similar immunosuppressants and immunomodulators at enrolment. Any prior treatment with such drugs must have been discontinued at least 8 weeks prior to visit 1b (except for ustekinumab, which must have been discontinued at least 12 weeks prior to visit 1 b) or have non-measurable serum concentration levels. 9. Treatment with rectal GCS, 5-ASA/SP or tacrolimus within 2 weeks before visit 1b. 10. Long-term treatment (>14 days) with antibiotics or NSAIDs within 2 weeks prior to visit 1b (one short treatment regimen for antibiotics, occasional use of NSAIDs and low dose NSAIDs as prophylactic therapy is allowed). 11. Serious known active infection including history of latent or active tuberculosis, documented history of past or current tuberculosis, or living with or having frequent close contact with people with active tuberculosis or with a positive tuberculosis test according to current regulations for 12 weeks preceding randomisation. Serious infections include, but is not limited to, HIV, HBV, or HCV infections. 12. Gastrointestinal infections including positive Clostridium difficile stool assay. (Local laboratory reports must be available in accordance with normal clinic practice, to confirm that the current episode of disease exacerbation is not due to infection). 13. Females who are lactating or have a positive serum pregnancy test during the screening period. 14. Women of childbearing potential not using highly effective (failure rate < 1%) contraceptive methods throughout the duration of the study. 15. Concurrent participation in another clinical study with investigational therapy or previous use of investigational therapy within 5 half-lives and within at least 30 days after last treatment of the experimental product prior to enrolment. 16. Previous exposure to cobitolimod or have a known allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to any of the study intervention excipients (sodium methyl parahydroxybenzoate, sodium propyl parahydroxybenzoate, citric acid, anhydrous or disodium hydrogenphosphate dihydrate)
Exclusion Criteria Maintenance: Participants will not be eligible for the maintenance study if they are not willing to comply with all further study requirements. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Primary Endpoint: Induction Proportion of participants with clinical remission at I-week 6, defined by the 3-component Mayo score, i) rectal bleeding of 0, ii) stool frequency of 0 or 1 (with at least one (1) point decrease from I-week 0 if 1 at I-week 0), and iii) endoscopic score of 0 or 1
Primary Endpoints: Maintenance Primary Efficacy Proportion of participants with clinical remission at M-week 45, defined by the 3-component Mayo score, i) rectal bleeding of 0, ii) stool frequency of 0 or 1 (with at least one (1) point decrease from I-week 0 if 1 at I-week 0), and iii) endoscopic score of 0 or 1. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Timepoint primary endpoint Induction: Induction week 6 Timepoint primary endpoint Maintenance: Maintenance week 45 |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Secondary Endpoints: Induction Safety: • incidence of AEs • incidence of SAEs • vital signs • physical examination • laboratory findings Key Secondary Efficacy: • Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with symptomatic remission at I-week 6. Other Secondary Efficacy: • Proportion of participants with clinical response at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with normalisation of stool frequency at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with absence of rectal bleeding at I-week 6. • Mean stool frequency at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with histologic improvement at I-week 6 Proportion of participants with histologic remission at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with mucosal healing at I-week 6 • Mean ln-transformed faecal calprotectin at I-week 6. • Mean 3-component and 4-component Mayo scores at I-week 6 • Mean IBDQ total score at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with an improvement in IBDQ total score at I-week 6 compared to I-week 0.
Secondary Endpoints: Maintenance Safety • incidence of AEs • incidence of SAEs • vital signs • physical examination • laboratory findings Key Secondary Efficacy: • Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement at M-week 45. • Proportion of participants with clinical remission at M-week 45 and steroid-free for at least 8 weeks prior. • Proportion of participants with clinical remission at M-week 45 among those who achieved clinical remission at I-week 6. • Proportion of participants with symptomatic remission at M-week 45. Other Secondary Efficacy: • Proportion of participants with histologic improvement at M-week 45. • Proportion of participants with histologic remission at M-week 45. • Proportion of participants with mucosal healing at M-week 45. • Proportion of participants with clinical response at M-week 45 • Proportion of participants with absence of rectal bleeding at M-week 45. • Proportion of participants with normalisation of stool frequency at M-week 45. • Mean stool frequency at M-week 45. • Mean ln-transformed faecal calprotectin at Mweek 45. • Mean 3-component and 4-component Mayo scores at M-week 45. • Mean IBDQ total score at M-week 45. • Proportion of participants with an improvement in IBDQ total score at M-week 45 compared to I-week 0. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Time point secondary endpoint induction: Key secondary efficacy Induction-week 6 Other secondary efficacy Induction-week 6 Time point secondary endpoint maintenance: Key secondary efficacy maintenance-week 45 Other secondary efficacy Maintenance-week 45 |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | Yes |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | Yes |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 3 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 17 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 130 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Argentina |
Australia |
Brazil |
Canada |
Colombia |
Israel |
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of |
Mexico |
New Zealand |
South Africa |
Taiwan |
United States |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Georgia |
Russian Federation |
Turkey |
Ukraine |
Serbia |
Austria |
Belgium |
Bulgaria |
Croatia |
Czechia |
Denmark |
France |
Germany |
Hungary |
Italy |
Lithuania |
Netherlands |
Norway |
Poland |
Portugal |
Romania |
Slovakia |
Spain |
Sweden |
United Kingdom |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 9 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |