E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Irritable Bowel syndrome Functional Abdominal Pain Not otherwise specified |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Chronic abdominal pain due to irritable bowels |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Digestive System Diseases [C06] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
This study's primary objective is to investigate the effectiveness of peppermint oil capsules compared to placebo capsules on abdominal pain reduction in children with irritable bowel syndrome or functional abdominal pain- not otherwise specified. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Secondary aims are to study the effect of peppermint oil capsules on other disease-related outcomes. These are recently defined outcome measures for trials in children with chronic abdominal pain: degree of reduction in pain frequency and pain intensity, percentage of patients with adequate improvement of complaints, hours of absenteeism, quality of life, feelings of anxiety & depression, bowel habits, taste, ease of use and side effects of the treatment. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
• Children aged between 8 and 18 years • Diagnosis of IBS or FAP-NOS according to the Rome IV criteria • Exclusion of underlying organic disorders after routine laboratory testing initiated by their general practitioner or treating physician as part of standard of care • In patients without alarm symptoms only celiac screening (anti-transglutaminase antibodies and IgA), and faecal calprotectin are necessary.37 In patients with diarrhea faecal testing for Giardia Lambliae will be added. If alarm symptoms are present, further diagnostic testing (like a full blood count, CRP, liver tests or an ultrasound) to rule out an organic disorder, is left to the discretion of the treating physician. • An average daily pain rate of ≥2 on the Wong Baker Faces Pain Scale (This is a validated pain scale to measure pain intensity).36 • Informed Consent by both parents and by children aged ≥ 12 years. No informed consent from parents is necessary for children >16 years.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
• Current treatment by another health care professional for abdominal symptoms • Previous use of peppermint oil for abdominal complaints • Known hypersensitivity to mints or peppermint oil • Gastrointestinal blood loss • Recurrent or unexplained fevers • Decreased growth velocity • History of previous abdominal surgeries in the past 3 months • Significant chronic health condition requiring specialty care (e.g., lithiasis, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, sickle cell, cerebral palsy, hepatic, hematopoietic, renal, endocrine, or metabolic diseases) that could potentially impact the child’s ability to participate or confound the results of the study • Known concomitant organic gastrointestinal disease • Current use of drugs which influence gastrointestinal motility, such as erythromycin, azithromycin, butyl scopolamine, domperidone, mebeverine and Iberogast. If laxatives are being used (in patients with IBS-C) they can continue using them during the study. • Current use of proton-pump inhibitors • Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language • Pregnancy or current lactation. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary endpoint is the percentage of children showing > 30% reduction in abdominal pain intensity after 8 weeks of treatment from baseline. Abdominal pain intensity will be scored with the Wong-Baker faces scale, during 7 consecutive days, using a smartphone abdominal pain app. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
At the end of the treatment, 8 weeks (T2) after baseline (T0). Other time points in this study are halfway treatment (T1 = 4 weeks) and after 4 weeks of follow-up (T3=12 weeks) |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
• Change in pain duration: abdominal pain duration will be scored in minutes of abdominal pain per day during 7 consecutive days, using the smartphone abdominal pain app at T0, T1, T2 and T3.
• Change in pain frequency: abdominal pain frequency will be scored as the average amount of days with pain during 7 consecutive days, using the smartphone abdominal pain app at T0, T1, T2 and T3.
• Change in abdominal pain intensity: abdominal pain intensity will be scored during a period of 7 consecutive days using a 10-point Wong-Baker faces scale, using daily the smartphone abdominal pain app at T0, T1, T2 and T3.
• Change in Quality of Life: Quality of life is measured by the Dutch version of the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory questionnaire (PedsQL 4.0). It will be measured at baseline (T0) and after 8 weeks (T2, end of treatment). • Change in depression and anxiety score: depression and anxiety scores are measured by the Revised Anxiety and Depression Scale-short version (RCADS-25) at T0 and T2.
• School absences during the treatment: hours of school absence in the previous are measured by a self-designed questionnaire at T0, T1, T2, and T3.
• Use of pain rescue medication during the treatment (like paracetamol or NSAIDs): assessed by the smart phone app, on which patients can record the use of rescue pain medication. It will be measured at T0, T1, T2, and T3.
• Expectancy of the treatment: expectations of both parents separately, and the child of the treatment on a scale of 0 (no improvement) to 10 (very much improved) are measured by a self-designed questionnaire at start of baseline period.
• Change in defecation pattern: change in defecation pattern is scored using the smart phone app, on which patients can record daily stool frequency and consistency according to the Bristol Stool Scale. This will be measured at T0, T1, T2 and T3.
• Adequate relief: patients and parents will be asked whether they/their child has adequate relief of IBS/FAP-NOS symptoms using a single question ("Did you/your child have adequate relief of IBS/FAP-NOS symptoms (abdominal discomfort/pain, bowel habits, and other symptoms like nausea and bloating) over the past week?") scored on a dichotomous scale (Yes/No). This instrument will be measured at 4 weeks (T1), at the end of treatment (T2), and at 12 weeks (4-week follow-up (T3).
• Health status: the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) will be applied as a multi-attribute utility measure of health status and will be used in the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. It is suitable for assessing children, but because children may be too young to provide reliable and valid information about their own health status, proxy measurements will be taken from parents. The health utilities derived from the HUI-3 have been anchored with 1 indicating perfect health and 0 indicating death. Quality adjusted life years (QALY) will be calculated by taking the sum of the utility of health states over time by the time in between successive measurements. It will be measured at start of the baseline period, and at 8 weeks.
• Costs: the Dutch Health and Labour Questionnaire (HLQ) will be adapted to the study setting to measure the direct and indirect costs of health care utilization, work absenteeism by parents, and school absenteeism by children. It will be measured at T0 and T2.
• Safety of peppermint oil use: incidence of adverse events will be reported by the participants from the time of informed consent until the 4 weeks follow-up using open questions: “did you experience other symptoms than usual, that may have been caused by the study medication?
• Taste and ease of use of peppermint oil capsules. Taste of capsules will be scored after 8 weeks using a single question: did you like the taste of the pills: not at all/ not so much/ it was okay/ it was nice/ it was very nice. Ease of use of capsules will also be scored after 8 weeks using a single question: how easy were the pills to use and swallow? Very easy/ easy/ reasonable/ difficult/ very difficult.
• Other study parameters are subject characteristics like age, sex, previous treatments, duration of symptoms before start study and family history.
• Association between SNP’s in placebo genes and response to peppermint oil capsules, placebo capsules and peppermints will be determined by collecting DNA through a saliva swab. DNA samples will be genotyped using the Infinium Global Screening Array. Variants previously identified to be associated with the placebo effect will be extracted from the imputed data and analyzed in a candidate gene approach.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
time points are T0 = baseline; T1 = 4 weeks after starting treatment; T2 = 8 weeks after starting treatment/ end of treatment period; T3= 4 weeks of follow-up after end of treatment. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | No |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
a third group will receive regular mint sweets (a plausible placebo) |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 3 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 12 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |