Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomized, Double - Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Fenebrutinib in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2021-003772-14 |
Trial protocol |
CZ SK HR |
Global end of trial date |
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1 |
This version publication date |
12 Apr 2024
|
First version publication date |
12 Apr 2024
|
Other versions |
v2 |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
GN43271
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT05119569 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Grenzacherstrasse, 124, Basel, Switzerland, CH-4070
|
||
Public contact |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 616878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 616878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Interim
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
29 Mar 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
29 Mar 2023
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of fenebrutinib compared with placebo on the total number of new gadolinium (Gd) - enhancing T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All study subjects were required to read and sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Mar 2022
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Bosnia and Herzegovina: 12
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czechia: 46
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Croatia: 19
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Serbia: 26
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Slovakia: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 4
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
109
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
67
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
109
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were enrolled across 18 sites in 6 countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, Serbia, Slovakia and the United States). This study is still ongoing. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
This study consists of two parts: Double-blind treatment (DBT) phase and an optional Open-label extension (OLE) phase. A total of 129 participants were screened, of which 109 were randomized into the fenebrutinib arm and placebo arm in a 2:1 ratio. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Double Blind Treatment Phase
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received fenebrutinib, 200 milligrams (mg), orally, twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fenebrutinib
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
RO7010939
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants were administered two 100 mg tablets, orally, BID for a total dose of 400 mg of fenebrutinib every day.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
DBT Phase: Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received fenebrutinib matching placebo, orally, BID, for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants were administered two tablets of placebo orally, BID.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Open Label Extension Phase
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
OLE Phase: Fenebrutinib from Fenebrutinib | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants who received fenebrutinib in the DBT phase were given an option to receive fenebrutinib, 200 mg, orally, BID up to a maximum of 192 weeks in the OLE phase. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fenebrutinib
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
RO7010939
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants were administered two 100 mg tablets orally BID for a total dose of 400 mg of fenebrutinib every day.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
OLE Phase: Fenebrutinib from Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants who received fenebrutinib matching placebo in the DBT phase were given an option to receive fenebrutinib, 200 mg, orally, BID up to a maximum of 192 weeks in the OLE phase. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fenebrutinib
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
RO7010939
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants were administered two 100 mg tablets, orally, BID for a total dose of 400 mg of fenbrutinib everyday.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received fenebrutinib, 200 milligrams (mg), orally, twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received fenebrutinib matching placebo, orally, BID, for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received fenebrutinib, 200 milligrams (mg), orally, twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | ||
Reporting group title |
DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received fenebrutinib matching placebo, orally, BID, for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | ||
Reporting group title |
OLE Phase: Fenebrutinib from Fenebrutinib
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants who received fenebrutinib in the DBT phase were given an option to receive fenebrutinib, 200 mg, orally, BID up to a maximum of 192 weeks in the OLE phase. | ||
Reporting group title |
OLE Phase: Fenebrutinib from Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants who received fenebrutinib matching placebo in the DBT phase were given an option to receive fenebrutinib, 200 mg, orally, BID up to a maximum of 192 weeks in the OLE phase. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New Gd - Enhancing T1 Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scans of the Brain Over 12 Weeks | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for Gd enhancing T1 lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The total number of new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions were calculated as the sum of the individual number of new lesions observed at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scans performed at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
106
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0022 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.313
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.149 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.658 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New or Enlarging T2-Weighted Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scans of the Brain Over 12 Weeks | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for new or enlarging T2-weighted lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. Total number of new or enlarging T2-weighted lesions were calculated as the sum of the individual number of new or enlarging lesions at Weeks 4, 8, 12. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scans performed at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
106
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0004 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.265
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.128 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.55 |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Safety population included all participants who received any study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to Week 12
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: Proportion of Participants Free From any New Gd - Enhancing T1 Lesions and New or Enlarging T2 - Weighted Lesions Observed on MRI Scans of the Brain Over 12 Weeks | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for new Gd - enhancing T1 lesions and new or enlarging T2 - weighted lesions were performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model performed on the status of both new T1 Gd+ lesion and new or enlarging T2-weighted lesions post-baseline (present or not) adjusted for the stratification factor(s) presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scans performed at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
106
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0117 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logistic Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
4.005
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.317 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
13.078 |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
OLE Phase: Number of Participants with AEs and SAEs | |||||||||
End point description |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Data collection is still ongoing and the results will be disclosed within 1 year from the Study Completion Date.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
OLE Baseline (DBT Week 12) up to Week 192
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - Data collection is ongoing and results will be disclosed within 1 year from Study Completion Date. [2] - Data collection is ongoing and results will be disclosed within 1 year from Study Completion Date. |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Plasma Concentrations of Fenebrutinib | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Data collection is still ongoing and the results will be disclosed within 1 year from the Study Completion Date.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to Week 192
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Data collection is ongoing and results will be disclosed within 1 year from Study Completion Date. [4] - Data collection is ongoing and results will be disclosed within 1 year from Study Completion Date. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Measured Using Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
C-SSRS=assessment tool used to assess lifetime suicidality of a participant (at baseline) as well as any new instances of suicidality (C-SSRS since last visit). Structured interview prompts recollection of suicidal ideation, including intensity of ideation, behavior, & attempts with actual/potential lethality. Categories have binary responses (yes/no) & include Wish to be Dead; Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts; Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act; Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan; Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent, Preparatory Acts and Behavior; Aborted Attempt; Interrupted Attempt; Actual Attempt (non-fatal); Completed Suicide. Score of 0 is assigned if no suicide risk is present. Score of 1 or higher= suicidal ideation or behavior. Data collection is still ongoing and the results will be disclosed within 1 year from the Study Completion Date.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to Week 192
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Data collection is ongoing and results will be disclosed within 1 year from Study Completion Date. [6] - Data collection is ongoing and results will be disclosed within 1 year from Study Completion Date. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New Gd - Enhancing T1 Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scan of the Brain at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for Gd enhancing T1 lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Week 4. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scan performed at Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
106
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.5889 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.78
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.316 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.922 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New Gd - Enhancing T1 Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scan of the Brain at Week 8 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for Gd enhancing T1 lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Week 8. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scan performed at Week 8
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
101
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0011 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.076
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.016 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.355 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New Gd - Enhancing T1 Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scan of the Brain at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for Gd enhancing T1 lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Week 12. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scan performed at Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
96
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0038 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.104
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.022 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.481 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New or Enlarging T2-Weighted Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scans of the Brain at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for new or enlarging T2-weighted lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Week 4. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scan performed at Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
106
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0958 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.512
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.233 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.126 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New or Enlarging T2-Weighted Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scan of the Brain at Week 8 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for new or enlarging T2-weighted lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Week 8. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scan performed at Week 8
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
101
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.105
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.039 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.283 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
DBT Phase: New or Enlarging T2-Weighted Lesion Rate Observed on MRI Scan of the Brain at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Radiologic evaluation for new or enlarging T2-weighted lesion rate was performed using a standardized MRI protocol at screening, and at Week 12. All MRI scans were read by a centralized reading center for efficacy endpoints. The lesion rate was calculated using a negative binomial regression model adjusted using stratification factor(s) i.e., presence or absence of T1 Gd+ lesions on the screening MRI. Log-transformed number of scans were included in the negative binomial model as an “offset” variable to account for different number of scans. All Randomized Participants set included all randomized participants grouped by treatment as assigned by randomization. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable post-baseline MRI scans.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
MRI scan performed at Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fenebrutinib vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib v DBT Phase: Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
96
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Negative Binomial Regression Model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.053
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.012 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.233 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Up to Week 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety population included all participants who received any study drug. Data collected up to the primary completion date is reported here. Adverse events section will be updated one year after the study completion date.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
26.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
DBT Phase: Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received fenebrutinib matching placebo, orally, BID, for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
DBT Phase: Fenebrutinib
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received fenebrutinib, 200 mg, orally, BID for 12 weeks during the DBT phase. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
13 Jul 2021 |
1. Changes were made to clarify reporting procedures for increase in transaminase.
2. The pharmacokinetic and biomarker samples and collection timepoints were updated.
3. COVID-19 vaccines administration details were added.
4. The exclusion criterion regarding white blood cell count was updated.
5. The eligibility requirement on disease modifying therapy washout periods prior
to study entry was amended to unify across different drug labels/countries.
6. Platelet count ranges for adverse event
management of thrombocytopenia were updated. |
||
15 Dec 2022 |
1. Per recommendations from the independent Data Monitoring Committee (iDMC), additional monitoring visits for liver function tests (alanine transaminase [ALT], aspartate transaminase [AST], total and direct bilirubin) were added to the Schedule of Activities.
2. Guidance was provided for management of participants with abnormal liver function tests.
3. The duration of the optional OLE phase was extended from 96 weeks up to a
maximum of 192 weeks.
4. Language was updated for the Week 12
lumbar puncture, addition of primary and secondary efficacy estimands, inclusion of biotin as a prohibited concomitant medication, clarifications to exclusion criteria, and updates to discontinuation criteria in relation to thrombocytopenia. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |