E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10033128 |
E.1.2 | Term | Ovarian cancer |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Part A – proof-of-concept: 1. To determine the equivalence of the Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) of the reduced, boosted dose of olaparib and the regular dose. Part B – clinical evaluation: 1. To determine if efficacy by progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with high grade ovarian cancer receiving olaparib maintenance therapy who are in response following completion of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, treated with the lower equivalent boosted dose of olaparib is non-inferior to patients treated with the regular dose of olaparib; 2. To determine if tolerance by dose reductions due to toxicity in patients treated with the lower equivalent boosted dose of olaparib is non-inferior to patients treated with the regular dose of olaparib.
|
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Part A - proof-of-concept: 1. To determine whether boosting reduces the inter- and intrapatient PK variability of olaparib; 2. To describe the safety of boosted olaparib. Part B - clinical evaluation: 1. To investigate whether health status, tolerance and satisfaction of patients treated with the boosted low dose olaparib is comparable to patients treated with the regular dose of olaparib; 2. To evaluate whether treatment response of boosted versus regular olaparib can be determined with cell-free tumor nucleic acids (ctDNA) as pharmacodynamic biomarker; 3. To describe toxicity of the lower equivalent boosted dose of olaparib compared to the regular dose of olaparib; 4. To compare cost-effectiveness of the lower equivalent boosted dose of olaparib compared to the regular dose of olaparib.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Part A – proof of concept • Subjects who start or are on treatment with olaparib tablets 300mg BID, according to the drug label and physician’s discretion; • Subjects who are able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to screening; • Age of 18 years or older; • Able to measure the outcome of the study in this subject (e.g. patient availability; willing and being able to undergo repeated plasma sample collection); • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.
Part B – clinical evaluation • Subjects who start on treatment with olaparib tablets, according to the drug label and physician’s discretion; • Subjects who are able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to screening; • Age of 18 years or older; • Able to measure the outcome of the study in this subject (e.g. patient availability; willing and being able to undergo sample collection for PK and PD purposes); • Expected to be on olaparib treatment for ≥ 3 months; • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Part A + B • Concurrent use of other anti-cancer therapies; • Concurrent use of potent inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 as assessed with the KNMP “G-standaard”; • Known contra-indications for treatment with cobicistat in line with the summary of product characteristics;
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Part A – proof of concept 1. AUC0-12h for the regular and boosted olaparib will be determined using non-compartmental analysis for the primary objective. Hereto, multiple PK samples will be collected after one week of each treatment regimen at the following times: pre-dose, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours after olaparib intake. If possible, additional PK samples will be taken after 10 and 12 hours.
Part B – clinical evaluation 1. Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization until the date of either objective radiological disease progression or biochemical progression combined with clinical progression or death; o Objective radiological disease progression will be assessed according to RECIST version 1.1; o Biochemical disease progression will be assessed with serum CA-125 according to the GCIG criteria; o Clinical progression will be assessed by treating physician; 2. The number of patients who require a dose reduction due to toxicity will be registered.
|
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Part A – proof of concept PK assessment will be performed after one week of treatment.
Part B - clinical evaluation PFS and dose reductions will be followed up untill progression on every visit. Hereto, visits will be at baseline, after 4, 8, 12 weeks of therapy and every 3 months thereafter.
|
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Part A – proof of concept 1. Inter- and intrapatient variability in olaparib pharmacokinetics with and without cobicistat is calculated using non-compartmental analysis of PK data; 2. Adverse events and laboratory safety will be monitored and scored according to the CTCAEv5.0 to describe the safety of boosted olaparib treatment.
Part B – clinical evaluation 1. Health status and satisfaction of patients will be monitored with the CTSQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires; 2. ctDNA will be determined from plasma samples; 3. Adverse events and laboratory safety will be monitored and scored according to the CTCAEv5.0 to describe the safety of boosted olaparib treatment; 4. Costs for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be assessed by the iMTA Productivity Cost Quetstionnaire (iPCQ) and iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaires (iMCQ). Health status will be monitored with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Part A - proof of concept: 1. Analysis of olaparib in plasma will be analyzed after data collection. 2. Safety assessment on every study visit
Part B - clinical evaluation 1. Will be measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy and every 6 months untill progression. 2. Plasma samples will be taken at baseline and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of therapy. 3. Safety assessment on every study visit. 4. Cost questionnaires on baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy and every 6 months untill progression. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | Yes |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
Part A is cross over. Part B is parallel |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 3 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 4 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |