Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Conditioned Autologous Serum Therapy (Orthokine) on the dorsal root ganglion in patients with chronic radiculalgia (RADISAC)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2021-005124-38
    Trial protocol
    ES  
    Global end of trial date
    30 Jan 2025

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    29 Mar 2025
    First version publication date
    29 Mar 2025
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    RADISAC
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    DARYD
    Sponsor organisation address
    Sabino Arana 38, Barcelona, Spain,
    Public contact
    DARYD, DARYD, martahoms7@gmail.com
    Scientific contact
    DARYD, DARYD, martahoms7@gmail.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    07 Mar 2025
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    30 Jan 2025
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    30 Jan 2025
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To assess whether therapy with conditioned autologous serum on the dorsal root ganglion reduces neuropathic pain in patients with persistent lower limb radiculalgia
    Protection of trial subjects
    The principal investigator was the contact person for the patients, who made the first visit, the procedures and the 30-day, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. Nevertheless, the patients had a Pain Unit telephone number and an email at their disposal to contact the principal investigator whenever they needed to.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    15 Nov 2021
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy, Ethical reason, Scientific research
    Long term follow-up duration
    12 Months
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 70
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    70
    EEA total number of subjects
    70
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    46
    From 65 to 84 years
    24
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    -

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    70
    Number of subjects completed
    70

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Experimental group
    Arm description
    Treatment aply: Puulse Radiofrecuency + Autologus Conditioned Serum
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Authologus Conditioned Serum
    Investigational medicinal product code
    PS-8229-2010
    Other name
    Authologus conditioned Serum (Orthokine)
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection, Solution for infusion in pre-filled syringe, Solution for injection/infusion in pre-filled syringe
    Routes of administration
    Infiltration
    Dosage and administration details
    4mL

    Arm title
    Control Group
    Arm description
    Treatment aply: Puulse Radiofrecuency + 0'9% Saline Serum
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Serum Saline
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0'9% serum saline
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion, Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Infiltration
    Dosage and administration details
    4mL

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Experimental group Control Group
    Started
    35
    35
    Completed
    35
    35

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Experimental group
    Reporting group description
    Treatment aply: Puulse Radiofrecuency + Autologus Conditioned Serum

    Reporting group title
    Control Group
    Reporting group description
    Treatment aply: Puulse Radiofrecuency + 0'9% Saline Serum

    Subject analysis set title
    Control group
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    All patiets included in study recived RDF therapy on the DRG for 8 minutes (45 V) of the root affects. At the end of the RFP therapy, a 3mL dose of autologus serum therapy (AST, Orthokine) will be administered on the DRG in patients of exeprimental group; and a 3mL dose of 0.9% physiological saline in patients in the contol group

    Subject analysis set title
    Experimental group
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    All patiets included in study recived RDF therapy on the DRG for 8 minutes, (45 V) of the root affects. At the end of the RFP therapy, a 3mL dose of autologus serum therapy (AST, Orthokine) will be administered on the DRG in patients of exeprimental group; and a 3mL dose of 0.9% physiological saline in patients in the control group

    Primary: Level of Pain (VSG)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Level of Pain (VSG)
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    30 days / 3 months / 6 months /12 months
    End point values
    Control group Experimental group
    Number of subjects analysed
    35
    35
    Units: scale of pain (0-10)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.64 ( 2.37 )
    3.16 ( 2.02 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Mixed linear model
    Statistical analysis description
    To determine the evolution for each of the variables during the 4 follow-up visits (30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months), a mixed model for repeated measures or a generalized linear model for repeated measures will be carried out, as appropriate. All analyzes will be carried out by intention to treat (ITT)
    Comparison groups
    Experimental group v Control group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    70
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.05 [1]
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -
         upper limit
    -
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [1] - significant p value < 0.05

    Secondary: Neuropathic pain

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Neuropathic pain
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    30 days/ 3 months/ 6 months / 12 months
    End point values
    Experimental group Control Group Control group Experimental group
    Number of subjects analysed
    35
    35
    35
    35
    Units: DN4 (0-10)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    5.15 ( 1.73 )
    5.17 ( 2.49 )
    3.61 ( 2.43 )
    4.39 ( 2.25 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Mixed linear model
    Comparison groups
    Control group v Experimental group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    70
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.05 [2]
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [2] - Significant p< 0.05

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Throughout the period in which patients received treatment and subsequent follow-up visits, both complications and adverse effects were recorded.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Additionally, apart from the scheduled visits at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, patients had direct access to a phone line for the unit, allowing them to contact the principal investigator in case they experienced any adverse effects.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    SEFV-H: SISTEMA ESPA
    Dictionary version
    1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Adverse events Experimental Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients of the Experimental Group who experienced adverse effects.

    Reporting group title
    Adverse events control group
    Reporting group description
    Patients of the control group who experienced adverse effects.

    Serious adverse events
    Adverse events Experimental Group Adverse events control group
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 35 (0.00%)
    0 / 35 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0.02%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Adverse events Experimental Group Adverse events control group
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 35 (0.00%)
    0 / 35 (0.00%)
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: There were no no-serious adverse events.

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    At the 12-month follow-up, a lower number of patients were observed during the analysis, as some of them, due to persistent symptoms, preferred to pursue other types of treatment and were therefore excluded from the final analysis.

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38007491
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 02 17:18:57 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA