Clinical Trial Results:
The Estimated 12-Hour Serum Lithium Level Pilot Study
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2022-000034-42 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
27 Jun 2023
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
15 Oct 2024
|
First version publication date |
15 Oct 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2022-001
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Palle Juul-Jensens, Aarhus, Denmark,
|
||
Public contact |
Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Department of Affective Disorders, 0045 23420661, karkoe@rm.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Department of Affective Disorders, 0045 23420661, karkoe@rm.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
03 Jun 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
31 May 2023
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
27 Jun 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To investigate the distribution of serum lithium levels during the 24 hours after the most recent lithium dose.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Trial participation involved 9 blood tests over a period of 24 hours, including late at night and early morning. For each participant, we evaluated whether it was necessary to wake patients early in the morning. If it was deemed unsafe for the participant, we skipped this blood test.
|
||
Background therapy |
Treatment-as-usual based on clinical indication | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 Apr 2022
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 23
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
23
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
23
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
21
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
2
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients on a stable dose of lithium | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
1. Age ≥18 years. 2. Treatment with lithium. 3. On a stable lithium dose, i.e., no dose change within the past 5 days. 4. Lithium prescribed as one daily dose administered in the evening. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
eLi12 validation trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Lithium | ||||||
Arm description |
On a stable dose of lithium | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lithium
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Stable dose of lithium, no predefined dose. The individual dose was based on clinical indication.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
eLi12 validation trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Analysis on all participants
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
When including all blood tests (excluding those at 0 and 12 hours), the mean difference from the measured se-Li compared to the 12-hour se-Li level was 0.14 mEq/L, while the difference was 0.07 mEq/L for eLi12 (p<0.0001). The difference between the measured se-Li and the 12-hour level was larger at the more extreme time points, e.g., at 4, 19 or 20 hours, with eLi12 being notably closer to the 12-hour se-Li level even at these extreme time points. For example, after 20 hours, the measured mean se-Li was 0.21 (34%) lower than the 12-hour se-Li level, while the mean eLi12 was only 0.07 (12%) lower.
Among blood tests taken between 3 and 24 hours after the most recent lithium dose, 99 out of 102 (97%) eLi12 estimations were closer to the 12-hour se-Li compared to the measured se-Li concentrations. At no time point did eLi12 estimate an unexpectedly high 12-hour se-Li level.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Lithium
|
||
Reporting group description |
On a stable dose of lithium | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Analysis on all participants
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
When including all blood tests (excluding those at 0 and 12 hours), the mean difference from the measured se-Li compared to the 12-hour se-Li level was 0.14 mEq/L, while the difference was 0.07 mEq/L for eLi12 (p<0.0001). The difference between the measured se-Li and the 12-hour level was larger at the more extreme time points, e.g., at 4, 19 or 20 hours, with eLi12 being notably closer to the 12-hour se-Li level even at these extreme time points. For example, after 20 hours, the measured mean se-Li was 0.21 (34%) lower than the 12-hour se-Li level, while the mean eLi12 was only 0.07 (12%) lower.
Among blood tests taken between 3 and 24 hours after the most recent lithium dose, 99 out of 102 (97%) eLi12 estimations were closer to the 12-hour se-Li compared to the measured se-Li concentrations. At no time point did eLi12 estimate an unexpectedly high 12-hour se-Li level.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
eLi12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary endpoint was whether eLi12 could estimate a 12-hour se-Li level within an acceptable range of the measured 12-hour se-Li level without giving falsely high or low se-Li values. All se-Li data from participants with a measured se-Li level at 12 hours and at least one other time point was included for analyses.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
For ewach participant, we took blood tests during 24 hours after the lithium dose.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical analyses | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Lithium v Analysis on all participants
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
46
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.07
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.06 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.08 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.01
|
|
|||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
During participation and the subsequent 3 days.
|
||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10.0
|
||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Adverse events
|
||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: There were no non-serious adverse events |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |