Clinical Trial Results:
ChAracterizing the Remission status in patients with Ulcerative Colitis treated by 5-ASA
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2022-001683-10 |
Trial protocol |
BE |
Global end of trial date |
01 Feb 2024
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
23 Jul 2026
|
First version publication date |
23 Jul 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
BIRD2022001
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT05992142 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
BIRD vzw (Belgian IBD Research & Development)
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Leuvensesteenweg 643, Zaventem , Belgium, 1930
|
||
Public contact |
Ingrid Arijs, BIRD vzw, +32 0499 31 70 05, ingrid.arijs@birdgroup.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
Ingrid Arijs, BIRD vzw, +32 0499 31 70 05, ingrid.arijs@birdgroup.be
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Feb 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 Feb 2024
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
01 Feb 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this trial is to describe the percentage of the different levels of remission (clinical, endoscopic, histological, biological), in UC patients, treated by 5-ASA for at least 6 months, free of concomitant UC medications for at least 3 months and presenting for a routine follow-up visit.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This clinical trial was conducted in compliance with the most recent version of the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the principles of Good Clinical Practice, and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. The study was conducted on the basis of prior informed consent by the subjects to participate in the study.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
17 Jan 2023
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 200
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
200
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
200
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
153
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
45
|
||
85 years and over |
2
|
||
|
|||||||
|
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Between January 2023 and February 2024 a total of 205 patients were screened and 200 patients were enrolled (2 patients were excluded for analysis). First Patient In (FPI) was on 17Jan2023. Last Patient In (LPI) was on 23Jan2024. Last Patient Out (LPO) was on 1Feb2024. | ||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
UC patients (≥ 18 years) to whom 5-ASA has been prescribed for at least 6 months with dose stable for at least 2 weeks prior to inclusion. Patients were free of concomitant UC medication (corticosteroids, immunomodulators, biologics, JAK inhibitors, S1PR modulators or IP) for at least 3 months. Patients were recruited during a routine visit. | ||||||
|
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
|
Arms
|
|||||||
|
Arm title
|
Included patients for analysis | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
5-ASA | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
5-ASA
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet, Suppository, Rectal foam, Gastro-resistant granules, Rectal suspension, Gastro-resistant tablet, Granules
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Rectal use, Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
5-ASA : All possible dosages and forms of administration (oral and/or rectal) prescribed in routine practice according to locally approved SmPC's - the study does not interfere with the therapeutic decisions of the treating physician at any point.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
| Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: 200 patients were enrolled, but only 198 patients were analysed. Two patients were excluded from analysis due to protocol violations. |
|||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Included patients for analysis
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
|
|||||||
End point title |
the percentage of Complete Clinical Remission (CCR) [1] | ||||||
End point description |
Complete Clinical Remission is defined as PRO-2 = 0 and no bowel urgency (PRO-2 : Stool Frequency and Rectal Bleeding)
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||
| Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive statistics were performed for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||
|
|||||||
End point title |
the percentage of Endoscopic Remission (ER) [2] | ||||||
End point description |
Endoscopic remission is defined by an endoscopic MAYO subscore (MES) of 0 or 1 and by a Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) of 0 or 1
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||
| Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive statistics were performed for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||
|
|||||||
End point title |
the percenage of Complete Endoscopic Remission (CER) [3] | ||||||
End point description |
Complete endoscopic remission is defined as Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) of 0 and by Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) of 0
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||
| Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive statistics were performed for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||
|
|||||||
End point title |
the percentage of Histological Remission (HR) [4] | ||||||
End point description |
Histological remission is defined by the absence of any acute inflammatory activity on the biopsies according to the Geboes score, including Geboes 0-1
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||
| Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive statistics were performed for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||
|
|||||||
End point title |
the percentage of Biological Remission (BR) [5] | ||||||
End point description |
Biological Remission is defined by FCP < 150 μg/g (FCP : Fecal Calprotectin)
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||
| Notes [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive statistics were performed for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||
|
|||||||
End point title |
the percentage of Deep Remission (DR) [6] | ||||||
End point description |
Deep Remission is defined as a combination of Complete Clinical Remission, Complete Endoscopic Remission and Histological Remission.
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||
| Notes [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive statistics were performed for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
the proportion of prescription of different current 5-ASA regimens (administration form) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
to describe the prescription of different current 5-ASA regimens (administration form)
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
the proportion of prescription of different current 5-ASA regimens (dose for oral monotherapy) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
to describe the prescription of different current 5-ASA regimens (dose for oral monotherapy only)
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||
End point title |
to describe adherence to 5-ASA treatment | ||||||||
End point description |
Adherence to 5-ASA was assessed using the MARS-5 questionnaire (higher score represents higer adherence)
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
End point title |
to describe Quality of Life (Symptoms) | ||||||||
End point description |
Quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Health-Scale questionnaire, based on four questions using a visual analogue scale (with maximum score 100). For the question related to 'symptoms' higher scores mean more severe symptoms.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion Visit
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
End point title |
to describe Quality of Life (impact on decision making in patients lives) | ||||||||
End point description |
Quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Health-Scale questionnaire, based on four questions using a visual analogue scale (with maximum score 100). For the question related to 'impact on decision-making in patients lives' higher scores mean more impact on daily activities.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
End point title |
to describe Quality of Life (worry about the disease) | ||||||||
End point description |
Quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Health-Scale questionnaire, based on four questions using a visual analogue scale (with maximum score 100). For the question related to 'worry about the disease' higher scores mean more worry.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion Visit
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
End point title |
to describe quality of life (general well-being) | ||||||||
End point description |
Quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Health-Scale questionnaire, based on four questions using a visual analogue scale (with maximum score 100). For the question related to 'general well-being' with lower scores mean better well-being.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Inclusion visit
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From signature of informed consent form up to completion of the study for that participant.
For SAE's up to 30 days after the study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
27
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
UC patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Only 3 adverse events occurred (in 3 patients). Therefore none of the adverse event meet the criterium of 5%. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
03 Oct 2023 |
- Updated timelines for fecal calprotectin assessment and clarification on the conditions for the windows of the fecal calprotectin assessment and sigmoidoscopy
- addition of possibility to capture routine biochemistry/fecal calprotectin results from maximum 1 month prior to screening/inclusion visit on the condition 5-ASA treatment remained stable in between.
- Update duration of study for a patient (based on updated timeline for fecal calprotectin assessment)
- Updated exclusion criteria to specify patients on UC-approved medication used for another indication should be excluded
- Alignment between primary objective and primary endpoint with addition of biological remission
- Additional clarifications for some study procedures
- Changes to the Physician's questionnaire to capture information on potential change of current 5-ASA treatment
|
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
| None reported | |||