Clinical Trial Results:
Perioperative Methadone for ameliorating postoperative pain and reduction in postoperative opioid consumption in hip fracture patients – Dosage adjusting pilot-study
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2022-001857-22 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
04 Apr 2023
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
24 May 2024
|
First version publication date |
24 May 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
Methadone-010922
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT05581901 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Hospital Sønderjylland
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Kresten Philipsensvej 15, Aabenraa, Denmark, 6200
|
||
Public contact |
Jesper Ougaard Schønnemann , Department of Orthopaedics, +45 79976170, Jesper.Ougaard.Schoennemann1@rsyd.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Jesper Ougaard Schønnemann , Department of Orthopaedics, +45 79976170, Jesper.Ougaard.Schoennemann1@rsyd.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
18 Mar 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
04 Apr 2023
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Apr 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The objective is to investigate whether doses greater than 0.10 mg/kg are tolerated with no increased risk of respiratory depression, side-effects, or prolonged stay in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). This is to ensure that the doses used in the literature are tolerated by the elderly and fragile.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
To minimize any risk regarding Methadone administration a specialist in anesthesiology will be present at administration and will supervise subsequent observation. Medical equipment for emergencies are readily available.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
03 Oct 2022
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 32
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
32
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
32
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
1
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
17
|
||
85 years and over |
14
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients will be screened for inclusion in the emergency department by the orthopedic resident on duty. The patient and next of kin will receive verbal as well as written information about the study, and should be made aware of the study within the first four hours after arrival. They receive two hours to consider. Consent is written and voluntary. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Every patient presenting with an acute hip fracture in the period of the study will be screened for inclusion by the Orthopedic resident. This will ensure sufficient knowledge regarding 'Good Clinical Practice' and the treatment of hip fractures. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Treatment (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Single blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Treatment allocation follows the continual reassessment method. The investigator utilizes an adaptive algorithm to assign three patients at a time to one of three dose-groups. An un-blinded nurse prepare the study drug. Carer and subject remain unaware of treatment allocation.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
0.10 mg/kg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients in this group has been allocated to receive 0.10 mg/kg of methadone. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methadone Streuli
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The purchased ampoules contain a sterile solution ready for injection. Study medicine is withdrawn by primary caregiver from the emergency department and is administered by the treating certified nurse anesthetist. The Methadone is administered intravenously at the beginning of the hip fracture surgery (10 minutes before knife-to-skin). The medicine is only administered this one time.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
0.15 mg/kg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
These patients were allocated to receive 0.15 mg/kg methadone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methadone Streuli
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The purchased ampoules contain a sterile solution ready for injection. Study medicine is withdrawn by primary caregiver from the emergency department and is administered by the treating certified nurse anesthetist. The Methadone is administered intravenously at the beginning of the hip fracture surgery (10 minutes before knife-to-skin). The medicine is only administered this one time.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
0.20 mg/kg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
These patients were allocated to receive 0.20 mg/kg methadone perioperatively. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methadone Streuli
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The purchased ampoules contain a sterile solution ready for injection. Study medicine is withdrawn by primary caregiver from the emergency department and is administered by the treating certified nurse anesthetist. The Methadone is administered intravenously at the beginning of the hip fracture surgery (10 minutes before knife-to-skin). The medicine is only administered this one time.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Included patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All included patients who have completed the trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
0.10 mg/kg
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients in this group has been allocated to receive 0.10 mg/kg of methadone. | ||
Reporting group title |
0.15 mg/kg
|
||
Reporting group description |
These patients were allocated to receive 0.15 mg/kg methadone | ||
Reporting group title |
0.20 mg/kg
|
||
Reporting group description |
These patients were allocated to receive 0.20 mg/kg methadone perioperatively. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Included patients
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All included patients who have completed the trial
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary outcome was respiratory depression, which is a binary parameter defined as a respiratory frequency of <10/min and a peripheral oxygen saturation of <94 % despite 4 liters of oxygen/min. The data source was both the observation chart filled in by the primary caregiver at PACU and observation charts filled in at the ward. The nurse at PACU continuously monitored peripheral oxygen saturation and respiratory frequency until the patient could be discharged to the ward. At the orthopedic ward respiratory depression was registered upon arrival and after 6, 24 and 72 hours after surgery by nurses at the ward.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
72 hours post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No patients in this group included in statistical analysis |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Continual Reassessment Method | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
This trial uses the Bayesian continual reassessment method.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
0.10 mg/kg v 0.15 mg/kg
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
The mean posterior estimate of toxicity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.07
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.04
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Length of stay at the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
We registered the length of stay at the PACU as hours for each patient. The data source was the observation chart filled in by the primary caregiver at PACU. Discharge from PACU conformed to the national guidelines from the Danish Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Medicine (DASAIM). Thus, patients had to either meet criteria regarding peripheral oxygen saturation, arousal, and pain level or go through an assessment by an anesthesiologist before discharge.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-12 hours
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No patient included in the statistical analysis in this group |
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Linear regression | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
we conducted linear regression analysis. We applied bootstrapped confidence intervals in our linear regression model.
|
||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
0.10 mg/kg v 0.15 mg/kg
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.62 [3] | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Linear | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - (CI -1.48; 0.89) |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Amount of antidote needed | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The number of times administration of antidote (Naloxone) was necessary. The limited number of observations precluded the possibility of conducting meaningful statistical analysis. Only one patient received antidote accounting for two out of the 120 possible observations.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
72 hours post surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No patient in this group included in statistical analysis |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Opioid consumption | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
We registered postoperative opioid consumption as a mean consumption of rescue morphine equivalents in each group upon arrival and within the first 6 hours after surgery, within the first 24 hours after surgery, and within the first 72 hours after surgery. We calculated the morphine equivalent dose for different types of opioids. The data source was the medical chart and nurses filled in the amount on the observation chart.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-72 hours post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - No patient included in statistical analysis in this group. |
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
negative binomial regression | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
We used a negative binomial regression due to the integer-like nature of the administered dosage. We applied clustered standard errors on the patient ID level, as we deemed the variation distribution within subjects non-reproducible. We used the mean consumption of rescue morphine equivalents from each group in our calculations.
|
||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
0.10 mg/kg v 0.15 mg/kg
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.34 | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
negative binomial regression | ||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Incidence risk ratio (IRR) | ||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.19
|
||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.69 | ||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.07 | ||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Post Operative Nausea or Vomiting (PONV) | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
We registered PONV binomial as present or not at 6 and 24 hours after surgery. The data source was the patient's statement at the time, which we entered on the observation chart.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-24 hours post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Patient not included in statistical analysis |
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fisher's exact test | ||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
0.10 mg/kg v 0.15 mg/kg
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Post Operative Pain Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
We asked patients to assess their pain intensity at the hip using the VRS as this is a validated scale for hip fracture patients. The scale provides patients with six choices and they must choose the one that best describes their pain. The choices are: 0 (no pain), 1 (slight pain), 2 (moderate pain), 3 (severe pain), 4 (extreme pain), and 5 (unbearable/worst imaginable pain). We asked them to assess pain intensity upon arrival at the ward and at 6, 24, and 72 hours after surgery. The data source was the patient's statement at the time, which we entered on the observation chart.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-72 hours post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
The first 12 days after study drug administration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Adverse events were continuously monitored through the hospital stay. After discharge every included patient had a 12-day follow-up phone call where they completed a questionnaire with the investigator.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
none | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
All included patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All of the 31 patients who were exposed to study drug. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |