Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43881   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7295   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase IIa, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 3% LTX-109 compared to Placebo for nasal decolonisation of Staphylococcus aureus

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2022-001938-11
    Trial protocol
    SE  
    Global end of trial date
    24 Oct 2022

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    13 Sep 2023
    First version publication date
    13 Sep 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    C22-109-08
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Pharma Holdings AS
    Sponsor organisation address
    Killengreensgate 8, postbox 1288, Tromsø, Norway, NO-9263
    Public contact
    Johnny Ryvoll, VP projects, Pharma Holdings AS, ryvoll@pharmaholdings.no
    Scientific contact
    Johnny Ryvoll, VP projects, Pharma Holdings AS, ryvoll@pharmaholdings.no
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    24 Oct 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    24 Oct 2022
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    24 Oct 2022
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of LTX-109 (3%) gel in an intensive dosing regimen to anterior nares in healthy volunteers who have persistent carriage of S. aureus.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are compliant with the ICH GCP E6 (R2) guidance, the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, and applicable local regulatory requirements. It was the responsibility of the Investigator/authorised associate to give each potential study subject adequate verbal and written information before any study specific assessments were performed. The information included the objectives and the procedures of the study as well as any risks or inconvenience involved. It was emphasised that participation in the study was voluntary and that the subject could withdraw from participation at any time and for any reason, without any prejudice. All subjects were given the opportunity to ask questions about the study and were given sufficient time to consider participation before signing the Informed consent form (ICF). Before performing any study-related procedures, the ICF had to be signed by the subject and by the person who conducted the informed consent discussion. A copy of the subject information including the signed ICF was provided to the subject. The ICF process was carried out in 2 steps. At the first screening visit (Visit 1), the subject was provided with the written study information and was informed about the study. The subjects signed an ICF for nasal swab for the first MSSA verification. At Visit 1 the first nasal swab was performed in line with Inclusion criterion No 3 but no other criteria were checked. A positive result of the first nasal swab at Visit 1 had to be available prior to Visit 2. Subjects who tested positive for S. aureus at Visit 1 were asked to come back for comprehensive information about the study and subsequent signing of the full ICF covering their participation in the remaining part of the study. Following the subjects’ signing of second ICF, all eligibility criteria were checked at Visit 2 and verified at Visit 3 prior to dosing.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    30 Aug 2022
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 27
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    27
    EEA total number of subjects
    27
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    27
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Subjects were recruited from CTC’s database of healthy volunteers, as well as from strategic marketing campaigns. Advertisements in social media and other media (newspapers, internet, radio, local distribution of flyers et c.) were used to reach the target audience.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 153 subjects were screened and 27 were randomised and dosed in the study. Most non-randomised subjects (n=113) were screening failures, most commonly due to not being persistent nasal carriers of S. aureus (MSSA) (n=104). Twelve subjects withdrew consent prior to randomisation and 1 subject was lost to follow-up.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst
    Blinding implementation details
    This was a double-blind study. The allocation of treatments was not disclosed until clean file had been declared and the database had been locked. LTX-109 and the placebo were identical in appearance.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1
    Arm description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 1.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    LTX-109 3%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Day 1: all subjects were dosed 4 times, during an intensive dosing regimen for 4 ½-hours (every 1 ½ hours at 0, 1 ½, 3 and 4 ½hours). Before the first application of IMP, the nose was cleansed with sodium chloride (0.9 % NaCl). On each dosing occasion, a large drop (diameter approx., 8 to 9 mm corresponding to approx. 250 μL) of the assigned treatment (LTX-109 or placebo) was applied into each nostril and distributed to cover the whole area of the nostril by a qualified healthcare professional. It was important that the volume was large enough to cover the whole inner area of the nose. A nasal bandage was used to prevent the liquid from leaking. The subjects lied in an approximately 30-degree supine position during the application. After application of the IMP to both nostrils, the nostrils were gently squeezed together and were gently massaged. Subjects had to remain in the 30-degree supine position for 5 minutes after each IMP application.

    Arm title
    Placebo Cohort 1
    Arm description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 1.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Day 1: all subjects were dosed 4 times, during an intensive dosing regimen for 4 ½-hours (every 1 ½ hours at 0, 1 ½, 3 and 4 ½hours). Before the first application of IMP, the nose was cleansed with sodium chloride (0.9 % NaCl). On each dosing occasion, a large drop (diameter approx., 8 to 9 mm corresponding to approx. 250 μL) of the assigned treatment (LTX-109 or placebo) was applied into each nostril and distributed to cover the whole area of the nostril by a qualified healthcare professional. It was important that the volume was large enough to cover the whole inner area of the nose. A nasal bandage was used to prevent the liquid from leaking. The subjects lied in an approximately 30-degree supine position during the application. After application of the IMP to both nostrils, the nostrils were gently squeezed together and were gently massaged. Subjects had to remain in the 30-degree supine position for 5 minutes after each IMP application.

    Arm title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 2
    Arm description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 2.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    LTX-109 3%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Day 1: all subjects were dosed 4 times, during an intensive dosing regimen for 4 ½-hours (every 1 ½ hours at 0, 1 ½, 3 and 4 ½hours). Before the first application of IMP, the nose was cleansed with sodium chloride (0.9 % NaCl). On each dosing occasion, a large drop (diameter approx., 8 to 9 mm corresponding to approx. 250 μL) of the assigned treatment (LTX-109 or placebo) was applied into each nostril and distributed to cover the whole area of the nostril by a qualified healthcare professional. It was important that the volume was large enough to cover the whole inner area of the nose. A nasal bandage was used to prevent the liquid from leaking. The subjects lied in an approximately 30-degree supine position during the application. After application of the IMP to both nostrils, the nostrils were gently squeezed together and were gently massaged. Subjects had to remain in the 30-degree supine position for 5 minutes after each IMP application.

    Arm title
    Placebo Cohort 2
    Arm description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 2.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Day 1: all subjects were dosed 4 times, during an intensive dosing regimen for 4 ½-hours (every 1 ½ hours at 0, 1 ½, 3 and 4 ½hours). Before the first application of IMP, the nose was cleansed with sodium chloride (0.9 % NaCl). On each dosing occasion, a large drop (diameter approx., 8 to 9 mm corresponding to approx. 250 μL) of the assigned treatment (LTX-109 or placebo) was applied into each nostril and distributed to cover the whole area of the nostril by a qualified healthcare professional. It was important that the volume was large enough to cover the whole inner area of the nose. A nasal bandage was used to prevent the liquid from leaking. The subjects lied in an approximately 30-degree supine position during the application. After application of the IMP to both nostrils, the nostrils were gently squeezed together and were gently massaged. Subjects had to remain in the 30-degree supine position for 5 minutes after each IMP application.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Started
    9
    5
    9
    4
    Completed
    9
    5
    9
    4

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 1.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Cohort 1
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 1.

    Reporting group title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 2
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 2.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Cohort 2
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 2.

    Reporting group values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2 Total
    Number of subjects
    9 5 9 4 27
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    9 5 9 4 27
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0 0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    30.89 ( 12.22 ) 39.20 ( 13.10 ) 31.67 ( 12.21 ) 36.75 ( 9.430 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    2 3 6 4 15
        Male
    7 2 3 0 12

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 1.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Cohort 1
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 1.

    Reporting group title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 2
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 2.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Cohort 2
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 2.

    Subject analysis set title
    LTX-109 3%
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This subject analysis set represents the active treatment groups receiving LTX-109.

    Subject analysis set title
    Placebo
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This subject analysis set represents the groups receiving placebo treatment.

    Primary: Number of subjects on LTX-109 vs placebo with complete bacterial eradication period lasting for 6 hours – the Operation Window

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects on LTX-109 vs placebo with complete bacterial eradication period lasting for 6 hours – the Operation Window
    End point description
    Eradication of bacteria is defined as non-presence of S. aureus (MSSA) in quantitative cultures (<5 CFU/mL). Non persistent MSSA carriers are not included in the analysis (e.g., subjects with no growth of S.aureus at time 0 are omitted from the analysis). Subjects need to be eradicated at both 6 and 12 hours to be defined as “Yes”.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From 6 to 12 hours after start of treatment, corresponding to the “Operation Window”.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    9
    Units: Number of subjects
        Yes
    2
    1
        No
    14
    8
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between LTX-109 and placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The number of subjects on LTX-109 versus placebo with bacterial eradication period lasting for 6 hours, from 6 to 12 hours after start of treatment (the OW) was analysed using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level of the test was targeted at 0.0500. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of subjects with complete eradication during the Operation Window between the treatment groups.
    Comparison groups
    LTX-109 3% v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    25
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 1
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Number of subjects on LTX-109 vs placebo with bacterial eradication at 4 ½, 6 and 12 hours after start of treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects on LTX-109 vs placebo with bacterial eradication at 4 ½, 6 and 12 hours after start of treatment
    End point description
    Eradication of bacteria is defined as non-presence of S. aureus (MSSA) in quantitative cultures (<5 CFU/mL). Non persistent MSSA carriers are not included in the analysis (e.g., subjects with no growth of S.aureus at time 0 are omitted from the analysis).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At 4 ½, 6 and 12 hours after start of treatment.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    9
    Units: Number of subjects
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIME POINT: 4H 30MIN - Yes
    7
    1
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIME POINT: 4H 30MIN - No
    9
    8
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIME POINT: 6H - Yes
    5
    2
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIME POINT: 6H - No
    11
    7
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIME POINT: 12H - Yes
    4
    1
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIME POINT: 12H - No
    12
    8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage change in colony forming units/mL (CFU/mL) from baseline to 4 ½, 6 and 12 hours after start of treatment (Relative change from baseline)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage change in colony forming units/mL (CFU/mL) from baseline to 4 ½, 6 and 12 hours after start of treatment (Relative change from baseline)
    End point description
    Eradication of bacteria is defined as non-presence of S. aureus (MSSA) in quantitative cultures (<5 CFU/mL). Non persistent MSSA carriers are not included in the analysis (e.g., subjects with no growth of S.aureus at time 0 are omitted from the analysis).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At pre-dose (baseline) and at 4 1/2, 6 and 12 hours after start of treatment.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    9
    Units: percent
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN
    -93.8 ( 13.6 )
    4600 ( 13600 )
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H
    -97.6 ( 5.76 )
    208 ( 62048 )
        Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H
    -77.1 ( 69.2 )
    71.2 ( 460 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects on LTX-109 versus placebo with bacterial eradication period lasting for 48 hours, from 6 to 54 hours after start of treatment (the “48 hours Eradication Window”)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects on LTX-109 versus placebo with bacterial eradication period lasting for 48 hours, from 6 to 54 hours after start of treatment (the “48 hours Eradication Window”)
    End point description
    Eradication of bacteria is defined as non-presence of S. aureus (MSSA) in quantitative cultures (<5 CFU/mL). Non persistent MSSA carriers are not included in the analysis (e.g., subjects with no growth of S.aureus at time 0 are omitted from the analysis). Subjects need to be eradicated at all timepoints from 6 to 54 hours to be defined as “Yes”.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From 6 to 54 hours after start of treatment (the “48 hours Eradication Window”).
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    9
    Units: Number of subjects
        Yes
    0
    1
        No
    16
    8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Occurrence and frequency of adverse events (AEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Occurrence and frequency of adverse events (AEs)
    End point description
    The grading of the severity/intensity of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of subjects
        Any AE
    8
    4
    6
    2
        Any SAE
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Any AE leading to withdrawal from study
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Any AE leading to death
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Causality to IMP - Unlikely Related
    7
    2
    2
    1
        Causality to IMP - Possibly Related
    1
    2
    3
    1
        Causality to IMP - Probably Related
    5
    2
    3
    1
        Causality to Hibiscrub - Unlikely Related
    7
    4
    6
    2
        Causality to Hibiscrub - Possibly Related
    0
    1
    0
    0
        Causality to Hibiscrub - Probably Related
    1
    0
    1
    0
        Severity - Mild
    8
    4
    6
    2
        Severity - Moderate
    4
    0
    0
    0
        Severity - Severe
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Severity - Life-Threatening
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Severity - Death
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinically significant (CS) changes in laboratory parameters

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinically significant (CS) changes in laboratory parameters
    End point description
    Safety laboratory values were specified and documented as normal, abnormal not clinically significant, or abnormal clinically significant. Abnormal values assessed as clinically significant were reported as AEs. If an abnormal value was associated with corresponding clinical signs or symptoms, the sign/symptom had to be reported as the AE.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Blood samples for the analysis of clinical chemistry and haematology were collected through venepuncture or an indwelling venous catheter at screening, pre-dose Day 1 (baseline), 54 hours after first dose and at the end-of-study visit Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of CS abnormal findings
    0
    2
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinically significant (CS) changes in vital signs

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinically significant (CS) changes in vital signs
    End point description
    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse were measured in supine position after 10 minutes of rest. Any vital signs outside of normal ranges were specified and documented as clinically significant or not clinically significant. Abnormal post-IMP administration findings assessed as clinically significant were reported as AEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse) were measured at screening, pre-dose Day 1 (baseline) at 24 hours and 54 hours after first dose and at the end-of-study visit on Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of CS abnormal findings
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinically significant (CS) changes in physical examination findings

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinically significant (CS) changes in physical examination findings
    End point description
    A complete physical examination included assessments of the head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, skin, thyroid, neurological, lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen (liver and spleen), lymph nodes and extremities. Any abnormalities were specified and documented as clinically significant or not clinically significant. Abnormal post-IMP administration findings assessed by the Investigator as clinically significant were reported as AEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    A physical examination was performed at screening and at the end-of-study visit on Day 7 (Visit 5).
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of CS abnormal findings
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Local tolerability assessed by qualified health care professional: Erythema

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Local tolerability assessed by qualified health care professional: Erythema
    End point description
    Local erythema was assessed in left and right nostril and graded using a 4-graded scale (1 none/2 mild/3 moderate/4 severe).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-dose and at 1 ½ h, 4 ½ h, 6 h, 12 h post first dose), Day 3 (54 h post first dose) and at end-of-study visit Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9 [1]
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of subjects
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - NONE
    8
    5
    9
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - MILD
    1
    0
    0
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - NONE
    9
    5
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MILD
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - NONE
    7
    5
    7
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MILD
    2
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MODERATE
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - NONE
    8
    5
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - MILD
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - NONE
    9
    5
    8
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MILD
    0
    0
    1
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - NONE
    9
    4
    7
    3
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MILD
    0
    1
    2
    1
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - NONE
    7
    5
    6
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - MILD
    1
    0
    3
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - NONE
    9
    3
    8
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - MILD
    0
    2
    1
    0
    Notes
    [1] - Subjects at Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H = 8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Local tolerability assessed by qualified health care professional: Swelling

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Local tolerability assessed by qualified health care professional: Swelling
    End point description
    Local swelling was assessed in left and right nostril and graded using a 4-graded scale (1 none/2 mild/3 moderate/4 severe).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-dose and at 1 ½ h, 4 ½ h, 6 h, 12 h post first dose), Day 3 (54 h post first dose) and at end-of-study visit Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9 [2]
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of subjects
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - NONE
    9
    5
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - MILD
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    5
    6
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - MILD
    0
    0
    2
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H30MIN- MODERATE
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - NONE
    8
    5
    4
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - MILD
    1
    0
    4
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H30MIN- MODERATE
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - NONE
    6
    5
    5
    2
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MILD
    2
    0
    3
    2
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MODERATE
    1
    0
    0
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - SEVERE
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - NONE
    7
    5
    6
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MILD
    2
    0
    3
    0
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - NONE
    8
    5
    8
    3
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - MILD
    0
    0
    1
    1
        LEFT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - NONE
    9
    5
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - MILD
    0
    0
    1
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - NONE
    8
    4
    8
    2
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - MILD
    1
    1
    1
    2
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - NONE
    8
    4
    8
    2
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - MILD
    1
    1
    1
    2
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - NONE
    7
    3
    7
    3
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - MILD
    2
    1
    2
    1
        RIGHT: Visit 3,Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H30MIN- MODERATE
    0
    1
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - NONE
    5
    2
    4
    2
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MILD
    4
    2
    4
    2
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MODERATE
    0
    1
    1
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - NONE
    7
    5
    7
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MILD
    2
    0
    2
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - NONE
    7
    5
    8
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - MILD
    1
    0
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - MODERATE
    0
    0
    1
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - NONE
    7
    5
    8
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - MILD
    2
    0
    1
    0
    Notes
    [2] - Subjects at Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H = 8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Local tolerability assessed by qualified health care professional: Lesions

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Local tolerability assessed by qualified health care professional: Lesions
    End point description
    Local lesions were assessed in left and right nostril and graded using a 4-graded scale (1 none/2 mild/3 moderate/4 severe).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-dose and at 1 ½ h, 4 ½ h, 6 h, 12 h post first dose), Day 3 (54 h post first dose) and at end-of-study visit Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9 [3]
    5
    9
    4
    Units: Number of subjects
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - NONE
    8
    5
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - MILD
    1
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - NONE
    8
    5
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - MILD
    1
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - NONE
    8
    5
    9
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MILD
    1
    0
    0
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - NONE
    9
    4
    8
    4
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MILD
    0
    1
    0
    0
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MODERATE
    0
    0
    1
    0
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - NONE
    8
    5
    9
    4
        LEFT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, PRE-DOSE - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    4
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN - MILD
    0
    1
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - NONE
    9
    4
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN - MILD
    0
    1
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - NONE
    9
    3
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H - MILD
    0
    2
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - NONE
    8
    4
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H - MILD
    1
    1
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - NONE
    7
    5
    9
    4
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H - MILD
    1
    0
    0
    0
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY - NONE
    9
    5
    9
    4
    Notes
    [3] - Subjects at Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H = 8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Local tolerability assessed by subject: Pruritus (Absolute change from baseline)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Local tolerability assessed by subject: Pruritus (Absolute change from baseline)
    End point description
    Each nostril was evaluated separately using a Visual analogue scale (VAS).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-dose and at 1 ½ hours, 4 ½ hours, 6 hours and 12 hours post first dose), Day 3 (54 hours post first dose) and at the end-of-study visit Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9 [4]
    5
    9
    4
    Units: (VAS) (mm)
    arithmetic mean (standard error)
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN
    14.7 ( 18.1 )
    1.2 ( 2.7 )
    4.7 ( 10.3 )
    -11.8 ( 16.5 )
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN
    6.7 ( 19.5 )
    11.8 ( 26.4 )
    17.3 ( 21.5 )
    -4.3 ( 27.6 )
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H
    13.2 ( 30.6 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    1.9 ( 5.7 )
    -11.0 ( 18.3 )
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H
    9.6 ( 20.8 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    1.0 ( 2.0 )
    -12.5 ( 16.6 )
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H
    0.4 ( 2.0 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    0.7 ( 2.0 )
    -11.8 ( 16.5 )
        LEFT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY
    -2.2 ( 7.2 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    -12.5 ( 16.6 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN
    10.9 ( 16.4 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    1.3 ( 2.7 )
    -11.5 ( 17.8 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN
    16.6 ( 19.7 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    14.3 ( 21.5 )
    -11.3 ( 18.0 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H
    12.0 ( 21.5 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    1.6 ( 3.1 )
    -12.5 ( 17.3 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H
    11.3 ( 15.8 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    -1.1 ( 9.7 )
    -12.5 ( 17.3 )
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H
    -3.0 ( 8.5 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    -2.8 ( 8.3 )
    -11.8 ( 17.6 )
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY
    -7.0 ( 15.4 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    -2.8 ( 8.3 )
    -12.5 ( 17.3 )
    Notes
    [4] - Subjects at Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H = 8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Local tolerability assessed by subject: Discomfort (Absolute change from baseline)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Local tolerability assessed by subject: Discomfort (Absolute change from baseline)
    End point description
    Each nostril was evaluated separately using a VAS.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-dose and at 1 ½ hours, 4 ½ hours, 6 hours and 12 hours post first dose), Day 3 (54 hours post first dose) and at the end-of-study visit Day 7.
    End point values
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    9 [5]
    5
    9
    4
    Units: (VAS) (mm)
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN
    32.6 ( 25.2 )
    -2.2 ( 4.9 )
    30.9 ( 22.3 )
    23.5 ( 37.0 )
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN
    36.9 ( 37.8 )
    8.6 ( 27.7 )
    42.1 ( 26.7 )
    18.8 ( 26.4 )
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H
    32.0 ( 38.5 )
    -2.0 ( 6.9 )
    8.4 ( 15.4 )
    -0.8 ( 1.5 )
        LEFT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H
    22.6 ( 29.1 )
    -1.2 ( 5.9 )
    0.6 ( 9.2 )
    -0.8 ( 1.5 )
        LEFT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H
    16.4 ( 23.9 )
    -2.6 ( 5.8 )
    -4.0 ( 7.3 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
        LEFT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY
    5.7 ( 18.2 )
    -3.2 ( 7.2 )
    -4.2 ( 7.2 )
    -0.8 ( 1.5 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 1H 30MIN
    34.1 ( 22.3 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    25.9 ( 19.9 )
    15.3 ( 21.0 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 4H 30MIN
    40.0 ( 38.3 )
    4.0 ( 8.9 )
    44.9 ( 27.6 )
    12.3 ( 18.1 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 6H
    33.9 ( 39.8 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    8.6 ( 11.4 )
    -0.8 ( 1.5 )
        RIGHT: Visit 3, Day 1, TIMEPOINT: 12H
    27.4 ( 36.5 )
    0.6 ( 1.3 )
    3.3 ( 12.8 )
    8.3 ( 18.6 )
        RIGHT: Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H
    12.3 ( 24.3 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    -2.3 ( 7.0 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
        RIGHT: Visit 5, Day 7, END OF STUDY
    3.7 ( 20.3 )
    0.0 ( 0.0 )
    -2.3 ( 7.0 )
    -0.8 ( 1.5 )
    Notes
    [5] - Subjects at Visit 4, Day 3, TIMEPOINT: 54H = 8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    25.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 1.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Cohort 1
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 1.

    Reporting group title
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 2
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents LTX-109 3% Cohort 2.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Cohort 2
    Reporting group description
    On Day 1, subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either LTX-109 (n=18) or placebo (n=9). Cohort (1 [8 doses] or 2 [6 doses]) was used as a stratification variable to preserve the 2:1 treatment randomisation ratio in each cohort (LTX-109 n=9 or placebo n=5/4). This arm represents Placebo Cohort 2.

    Serious adverse events
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    LTX-109 3% Cohort 1 Placebo Cohort 1 LTX-109 3% Cohort 2 Placebo Cohort 2
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 9 (88.89%)
    4 / 5 (80.00%)
    6 / 9 (66.67%)
    2 / 4 (50.00%)
    Vascular disorders
    Flushing
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 4 (25.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 9 (44.44%)
    2 / 5 (40.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    2
    1
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Application site pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 9 (44.44%)
    2 / 5 (40.00%)
    4 / 9 (44.44%)
    1 / 4 (25.00%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    2
    6
    2
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Eye disorders
    Central serous chorioretinopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Eye irritation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Visual impairment
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Dyspepsia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Flatulence
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Lip blister
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Oral pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    2
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dry throat
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Epistaxis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    0
    Nasal congestion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    2 / 9 (22.22%)
    1 / 4 (25.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    2
    1
    Nasal discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    0
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Paranasal sinus discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Sinus pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Throat irritation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dry skin
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Rash
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Rhinitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 4 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 18 18:37:51 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA