Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2022-002012-23
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:SL79.22
    National Competent Authority:Germany - PEI
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2022-07-25
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedGermany - PEI
    A.2EudraCT number2022-002012-23
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Multi-national Phase IIIb, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of STALORAL® Birch 300 IR in Children and Adolescents 5 to 17 Years old with Birch Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis with or without Asthma
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A Multi-national Phase IIIb Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of STALORAL® Birch 300 IR in Children and Adolescents 5 to 17 Years old with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis induced by Birch Pollen with or without Asthma.
    STALORAL® Birch 300 IR will be compared to placebo and neither the patients not the doctors will know the treatment taken by the patients.
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    YOBI
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberSL79.22
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorSTALLERGENES
    B.1.3.4CountryFrance
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportSTALLERGENES
    B.4.2CountryFrance
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationSTALLERGENES
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointEdita DOLIMIER
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street Address6 rue Alexis de Tocqueville
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityANTONY
    B.5.3.3Post code92160
    B.5.3.4CountryFrance
    B.5.4Telephone number+33662236373
    B.5.6E-mailedita.dolimier@stallergenesgreer.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name STALORAL BIRCH 300 IR
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderSTALLERGENES
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationGermany
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Sublingual spray, solution
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSublingual use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNBirch pollen allergen extract
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameBETULA
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB128126
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit BAU/ml Bioequivalent Allergy Unit(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number300
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) Yes
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name STALORAL BIRCH 10 IR
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderSTALLERGENES
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationGermany
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Sublingual spray, solution
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSublingual use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNBirch pollen allergen extract
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameBETULA
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB128126
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit BAU/ml Bioequivalent Allergy Unit(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number10
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) Yes
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSublingual spray, solution
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSublingual use
    D.8 Placebo: 2
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSublingual spray
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSublingual use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Birch Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis induced by birch pollen
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Immune System Diseases [C20]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.0
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10001728
    E.1.2Term Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004853
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To demonstrate clinical efficacy of STALORAL® Birch 300 IR on Allergic Rhino-Conjunctivitis (ARC) symptoms and rescue medication use during the second birch pollen season of the trial, in children and adolescents with birch pollen-induced ARC
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Key secondary: Assess the effect of STALORAL® Birch 300 IR on symptoms and medications along with rhinoconjunctivitis-associated quality of life during the second birch pollen season
    Other:
    • Assess combined ARC symptoms and medications score during the worst birch pollen period, each year and over two consecutive pollen seasons
    • Assess changes in the ARIA classification
    • Assess individual symptoms and medication scores, asthma status and control, Oral Allergy Syndrome (OAS), quality of life of patients, patient immunological status, health-economic parameters, patient medication compliance over two consecutive pollen seasons
    • Assess an exploratory symptom and medication score over two consecutive birch pollen seasons
    • Evaluate the safety and clinical tolerability of STALORAL® Birch 300 IR in children and adolescents 5 to 17 years old with birch pollen associated ARC
    • Setup a serum bank to improve the knowledge of the allergic disease and of the mechanisms of immunotherapy
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Able to sign and date the informed consent/assent prior to any trial-specific procedure.
    (Parents and/or authorised legal representatives will have to give written informed consent for minors in their custody. Children and adolescents will be asked to sign an assent form, dependent on country-specific requirements and Investigator assessment.)
    2. Covered by a health insurance system as per local regulation.
    Demographics and Medical History
    3. Aged ≥5 to ≤17 years old at the randomisation visit.
    4. Documented, physician diagnosed, clinically relevant history of moderate to severe ARC induced by birch pollen (with or without asthma) despite having received treatment with symptom-relieving medication during at least 1 previous birch pollen season for ages 4 through 6 or at least 2 previous birch pollen seasons for ages 7 through 17 years at screening.
    5. A Retrospective ARC Total Symptom Score based on the previous birch pollen season ≥ 12 out of a maximum possible score of 18 as evaluated by the patient or by the parent/authorised legal representative AND a retrospective score of at least 30 on a general VAS (0-100) on the severity of symptoms as evaluated by the patient or by the parent/authorised legal representative if the patient is not able to perform the assessment.
    Screening Tests and Evaluations
    6. Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) to Betula pendula at screening visit (the SPT is considered positive if it results in a wheal diameter ≥ 3.0 mm [with positive control (histamine) ≥ 3.0 mm and negative control < 0 mm]). The Sponsor will accept to include patients who have a documented positive SPT in their medical records if this SPT was performed during the previous 6 months preceding the screening visit at the same investigational site in which they are enrolled.
    7. Positive specific IgE to pollen allergens of Betula pendula at screening (CAP-RAST birch pollen allergens specific IgE ≥ 0.7 kU/L).
    8. Patients with non-clinically relevant co-sensitization to other inhalant allergens such as e.g., grass/rye, mites or animal dander can be enrolled, but only if:
    -the CAP-class with the referring allergen has to be at least 2 CAP-classes below the CAP-class for birch, and/or
    -the SPT-wheal has to be 2 mm smaller than the SPT-wheal for birch, and
    -clinical symptoms* and exposure to these allergens during the 2 IMP treatment periods are not anticipated (based on the clinical judgement and medical records) e.g., by not having regular contact the respective animal such as cat at home.
    *Relevant clinical symptoms of respiratory allergy are 4 nasal symptoms (runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose), associated or not to 2 eye related items (itchy eyes, watery eyes), associated or not to asthma (mainly cough, wheezing, shortness of breath).
    9. Negative urine pregnancy test on all female patients who have had their menarche prior to randomisation.
    Lifestyle Considerations
    10. Internet access at home or via a portable device so that patients or the parent/authorised legal representative can complete the eDiary daily via internet during the birch pollen seasons covered by the trial protocol.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Medical history
    1. Any clinical deterioration of asthma (i.e., asthma exacerbation) that resulted in emergency procedure/treatment or treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to randomisation.
    2. For patients ≥7 years old:
    Reduced lung function at randomisation defined as Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 70% of the predicted value.
    For patients with asthma, this is assessed on the patient’s usual asthma controller medication*. The following wash-out periods apply for as-needed asthma reliever medication: at least a 6-hour wash-out of Short-Acting Beta Agonists (SABAs), a 12-hour wash-out for ultra LABAs, 24 h wash-out for ultra-LABAs and 5 days or 5 half-lives for Inhaled Corticosteroids.
    *In order to ensure that the asthmatic patients with a mild to moderate asthma status is controlled by treatment steps 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2022), the proper continuous asthma treatment i.e., “controller” is maintained. Only the asthma “reliever” medications must be stopped before performing spirometry. If an asthma medication is used as both ‘controller’ and ‘reliever’, such as inhaled corticosteroids (in combination with formoterol (LABA)), it must not be stopped before spirometry.
    Note: This criterion does not need to be fulfilled if the patient is <7 years old, as s/he cannot perform reproducible FEV1 manoeuvres despite coaching and is not considered as having a diagnosis of asthma.
    3. Uncontrolled asthma with asthmatic therapies consistent with steps 4 or 5 as defined by Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2022) received within 12 months prior to entry in the trial. Eligible asthmatic patients will be those with mild and moderate asthma controlled by treatment(s) consistent with GINA 2022 treatment Steps 1, 2 or 3.
    4. Oral inflammations such as oral lichen planus, oral ulcerations or oral mycosis.
    5. Acute or chronic inflammatory or infectious upper airway diseases (excepted mild to moderate asthma) including recurrent acute or chronic sinusitis.
    Note: Patients with fever, flu or an upper respiratory tract infection at Visit 1 (screening visit) must be treated appropriately. They can be randomised at Visit 2 (randomisation visit) only if the infectious episode is resolved.
    6. History of eosinophilic oesophagitis.
    7. A relevant history of systemic allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis with cardiorespiratory symptoms, generalised urticaria or severe facial angioedema) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may constitute an increased safety concern.
    8. Any disease that prohibits the use of adrenaline (e.g., hyperthyroidism).
    9. Any severe, uncontrolled disease that, upon investigator judgment, could increase the risk for trial patients (including but not limited to cardiovascular insufficiency, any severe or unstable lung diseases, endocrine diseases, clinically significant renal or hepatic diseases, haematological disorders, diseases of the immune system including autoimmune diseases and immune deficiencies of current clinical relevance, active malignancies).
    Screening Tests and Evaluations
    10. Any significant abnormal laboratory parameter or alteration in vital signs that could increase the risk for the patient, in the opinion of the Investigator.
    Medication
    11. Ongoing treatment with any allergy immunotherapy product including Specific Immunotherapy (SIT), or past full courses of SIT against birch pollen terminated for less than 5 years or past courses of SIT for other allergens terminated for less than 6 months prior to start of randomisation.
    12. Patients requiring continuous treatment with systemic corticosteroids for any indications.
    13. Patients requiring continuous treatment with β-blockers or with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs).
    14. Treatment with an immunosuppressive (ATC code L04 or L01) within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
    15. Hypersensitivity to any excipient of the IMP/Placebo or contraindication to the use of rescue medications (i.e., antihistamine and nasal corticosteroids).
    16. Patients following a strict low sodium diet as the trial treatment contains 590 mg of sodium chloride per vial in a 10 mL solution.
    Other
    17. Breastfeeding females (lactating)
    18. Sexually active females of childbearing potential or who have had their first menarche prior to randomisation who are not taking and/or willing to use either 1 highly effective contraceptive method or 2 clinically accepted contraceptive method until the end of the trial (depending on the local regulation):
    -Abstinence
    -Acceptable highly effective methods of contraception
    19. Participation in any clinical trial within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
    20. Change in residence between geographical regions since the last birch pollen season or anticipated relocation away from the geographical region during the pre-determined birch pollen seasons for more than 2 weeks.
    21. Patients who are non-compliant and/or uncooperative, in the Investigator’s opinion.
    22. Possible dependency of the patient or patient s’ parents/authorised legal representative(s) on Sponsor or Investigators/sub-Investigators or trial personnel.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The average ARC Total Combined Score (TCS0-38) is defined as the average of the daily (non-missing) ARC TCS0-38.
    The daily ARC TCS0-38 is the sum of the ARC Daily Symptom Score (0-18) (DSS0-18) and the ARC Daily Medication Score (0-20) (DMS0-20) and thus ranges from 0 to 38 points: TCS0-38 = DSSS0-18 + DMS0-20.
    • The DSS0-18 is the sum of 6 ARC symptoms scores with 4 rhinitis related items (runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose) and 2 eye related items (itchy eyes, watery eyes): each symptom is rated on a 4- point scale from 0 to 3:
    - 0 = No symptom;
    - 1 = Mild symptoms, i.e., sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness, easily tolerated;
    - 2 = Moderate symptoms, i.e., definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable;
    - 3 = Severe symptoms, i.e., sign/symptom that is hard tolerate, that causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping.
    • The DMS0-20 is based on rescue medication intake (oral antihistamine tablets scored 0 or 6, ocular antihistamines scored 0 to 6 and nasal corticosteroids scored 0 to 8) and ranges from 0 to 20.
    • Note: Oral corticosteroids are prohibited rescue medication for the management of ARC in the frame of the trial. However, in the event of asthma exacerbation, oral corticosteroids may be prescribed. If so, they will be considered as concomitant treatments to manage an adverse event and a DMS of 20 on each day of intake will be imputed to patients who took oral corticosteroids.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    End of the study
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    Key secondary Efficacy variables:
    • The average ARC Combined Symptom Medication Score (CSMS0-6) is defined as the average of the daily (non-missing) ARC CSMS0-6 with CSMS0-6 defined as: CSMS0-6= DSS0-3 +DMS0-3
    - The DSS0-3 is calculated as the average of the 6 scores for each individual ARC symptom (runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, itchy eyes, watery eyes) rated on a 4- point scale from 0 to 3 (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe).
    - The DMS0-3 is based on rescue medication intake and ranges from 0 to 3 (0=No rescue medication taken; 1=antihistamine as eye drops and/or oral form; 2=nasal corticosteroid; 3= oral corticosteroid as a concomitant treatment to manage asthma exacerbation, if the case arises).
    • The average DSS0-18 calculated as the average of the daily (non-missing) DSS0-18
    • The average DMS0-20 calculated as the average of the daily (non-missing) DMS0-20.
    • The overall RQLQ(S) score and the overall PRQLQ score, calculated as the mean of responses.

    Other secondary Efficacy variables:
    • The average ARC TCS0-38 and the average CSMS0-6 will also be analysed to answer other secondary efficacy endpoints.
    • The Proportion of Symptom-Controlled Days (PSCD2-0) calculated as the proportion of days during the birch pollen season with no rescue medication intake (DMS0-20=0) and controlled symptoms (DSS0-18 ≤2).
    • Controlled patient (CP), i.e., patient with 25%, 50% or 75% of symptom-controlled days (CP25, CP50 and CP75 based on PSCD2-0) during the birch pollen season
    • The Proportion of Not-Controlled Days (PNCD) calculated as the proportion of days during the birch pollen season with one of the following:
    - at least one individual symptom score = 2 and DMS0-20>0, or
    - at least two individual symptom scores = 2 whatever the DMS0-20, or
    - at least one individual symptom score = 3 whatever the DMS0-20.
    • The 6 average individual ARC symptom scores (scale 0-3) for runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, itchy eyes, watery eyes rated as defined above, calculated as the average of the daily (non-missing) individual symptom scores.
    • The average DSS0-18 and the average DMS0-20 as well as the average DSS0-3 and the average DMS0-3 will also be analysed to answer other secondary efficacy endpoints.
    • The average Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS score) of the intensity of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms is calculated as the average of the daily (non-missing) VAS scores during the birch pollen season. The score ranges from 0 to 100.
    • The rescue medication intake for each patient (Yes/No).
    • The proportion of days with rescue medication.
    • ARIA classes.
    • Asthma (yes/no).
    • Severity of asthma: mild/moderate/severe as per classification by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2022.
    • The ACQ total score, corresponding to the mean of the scores obtained for each of the 7 questions of the questionnaire.
    • The ACQ score per dimension.
    • OAS: absence / presence.
    • The individual domain RQLQ(S) and PRQLQ scores calculated as the means of the items in each domain.
    • The patient’s health state described by the EQ-5D-Y or the EQ-5D-Y proxy using 5 dimensions and a VAS score.
    • The overall PAQLQ score corresponding to the mean of all 23 responses and the individual domain scores corresponding to the means of the items in those domains.

    Other variables:
    • Immunological markers [serum IgE (total, specific to birch pollen, specific to Bet v 1) and IgG4 (specific to birch pollen and specific to Bet v 1)].
    • Health-economic variables will be:
    - days at school or work lost due to ARC for the patients
    - working days lost for the parents due to their child’s ARC
    - ARC-related extra-visits to the physician
    - days of allergic asthma-related hospitalisation.
    • Treatment compliance: excellent, good, poor (and reasons for poor compliance).

    Exploratory variables:
    • The exploratory mixed combined symptom and medication score mCSMS0-100 as defined by the ARIA-EAACI task force. The mCSMS0-100 is based on the VAS for global allergy symptoms and is weighted according to the patient rescue medication use and to the VAS level.

    Safety variables:
    • Adverse events (including severity and relatedness to treatment).
    • Adverse events of special interest (Anaphylactic reactions including anaphylactic shocks; Severe laryngo-pharyngeal reactions; Autoimmune disorders; Eosinophilic oesophagitis; Tooth and oral/mucosal discolouration).
    • Routine laboratory tests.
    • Weight, physical examinations and vital signs.
    • Pulmonary function (FEV1 measured by spirometry).
    • Laboratory investigations (haematology, clinical biochemistry, immunological parameters).
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    End of first pollen season
    End of the study
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned10
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA80
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    last visit of the last patient
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months20
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months20
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 1398
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Yes
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 629
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Yes
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 769
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) No
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others Yes
    F.3.3.7.1Details of other specific vulnerable populations
    Children and adolescents
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state150
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 1398
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 1398
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2022-11-16
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2022-11-15
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 10:39:21 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA