Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2022-002385-32
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:APHP211057
    National Competent Authority:France - ANSM
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2022-07-07
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedFrance - ANSM
    A.2EudraCT number2022-002385-32
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Immediate versus delayed treatment with azathioprine or rituximab in anti-myelin oligodendrocytes glycoprotein (anti-MOG) antibodies associated acute demyelinating syndromes in children: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Traitement immédiat versus retardé par azathioprine ou rituximab dans les maladies démyélinisantes associées aux anticorps anti-myéline oligodendrocytes glycoprotéine (anti-MOG) chez l'enfant : un essai clinique contrôlé randomisé
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Immediate versus delayed treatment with azathioprine or rituximab in anti-myelin oligodendrocytes glycoprotein (anti-MOG) antibodies associated acute demyelinating syndromes in children: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Traitement immédiat versus retardé par azathioprine ou rituximab dans les maladies démyélinisantes associées aux anticorps anti-myéline oligodendrocytes glycoprotéine (anti-MOG) chez l'enfant : un essai clinique contrôlé randomisé
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    IDAR
    IDAR
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberAPHP211057
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
    B.1.3.4CountryFrance
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportministère de la santé (DGOS)
    B.4.2CountryFrance
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationDRCI of Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
    B.5.2Functional name of contact point
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street Address1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, hopital Saint-Louis
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityParis
    B.5.3.3Post code75010
    B.5.3.4CountryFrance
    B.5.4Telephone number3301 44 84 17 45
    B.5.5Fax number330144 84 17 01
    B.5.6E-mailmalika.yahmi@aphp.fr
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name IMUREL 25 mg
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderASPEN
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameazathioprine
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNAzathioprine
    D.3.9.1CAS number 446-86-6
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB05647MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number25
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name RIXATHON
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderSandoz GmbH
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameRIXATHON®
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Concentrate for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNRituximab
    D.3.9.1CAS number 174722-31-7
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB12570MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number500
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 3
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name méthylprednisolone
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameméthylprednisolone
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Powder for solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNMethylprednisolone
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameMethylprednisolone
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB08872MIG
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 4
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Prednisolone
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameprednisolone
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNPrednisolone
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive namePrednisolone
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB10018MIG
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 5
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name AZATHIOPRINE EG 50mg
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderEG LABO
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameazathioprine
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNAzathioprine
    D.3.9.1CAS number 446-86-6
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB05647MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number50
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    myelin oligodendrocytes glycoprotein antibody associated diseases (MOGAD)
    maladies démyélinisantes associées aux anticorps anti-myéline oligodendrocyte glycoprotéine (MOG).
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    myelin oligodendrocytes glycoprotein antibody associated diseases
    maladies démyélinisantes associées aux anticorps anti-myéline oligodendrocyte glycoprotéine
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease Yes
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    - Compare the efficacy of immediate (at first attack) azathioprine (AZA) or rituximab (RTX) treatment in children with MOG antibodies positive diseases with delayed treatment (at second attack), on the annualized relapse rate at 24 months.
    - The primary endpoint will be the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 24 months.
    - Comparer l’efficacité du traitement immédiat (à la première crise) par azathioprine (AZA) ou rituximab (RTX) versus le traitement retardé (à la seconde poussée), chez les enfants atteints de maladies à anticorps MOG positif, sur le taux annualisé de poussée, à 24 mois.
    - Le critère de jugement principal sera le taux annualisé de rechute à 24 mois.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    • To compare the efficacy between azathioprine (AZA) and rituximab (RTX) in immediate (at first attack) treatment in children with MOGAD
    • To compare separately the efficacy between immediate-AZA with dealayed-treatment and immediate-RTX with delayed treatment
    • Evaluate the efficacy of immediate treatment with delayed treatment on other clinical outcomes:
    o Annualized relapse rate at 12 months
    o Time to first relapse after the first attack
    o Percentage of patients free of relapses over 24 months
    o Motor disability outcome
    o Cognitive outcome
    o Visual outcome
    o Fatigue
    o Depression
    o Quality of life
    • Evaluate the efficacy on MRI outcomes
    • Evaluate the efficacy through modulation of immunological mechanism between treated and not treated patients
    • Follow immunological markers of treatment efficacy such as neurofilament (Nfl)
    • Verify the safety and tolerance of the treatment
    • Comparer l’efficacité du traitement par AZA ou RTX immédiat (1ère crise) chez les enfants atteints de MOGAD
    • Comparer séparément l’efficacité entre le traitement immédiat par AZA et le traitement retardé et entre le traitement immédiat par RTX et le traitement retardé
    • Evaluer l’efficacité du traitement immédiat vs le traitement retardé sur d’autres critères cliniques :
    o Taux de rechute annualisé à 12 mois
    o Délai de 1ère rechute après la 1ère poussée
    o Pourcentage de patients sans rechute sur les 24 mois
    o Handicap moteur
    o Difficultés cognitives
    o Séquelles visuelles
    o Fatigue
    o Dépression
    o Qualité de vie
    • Evaluer l’efficacité sur les critères IRM
    • Evaluer l’efficacité à travers la modulation des mécanismes immunologiques entre les patients traités rapidement et non traités rapidement
    • Suivre les marqueurs immunologiques de l’efficacité du traitement comme les neurofilaments (nfl)
    • Vérifier la tolérance et la sécurité du traitement.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Children  18 years old and  6 years old at baseline
    - Children weight ≥ 20 kg
    - All ADS with confirmed anti-MOG-Abs at onset including any acute neurologic symptom with a duration of more than 24H of inflammatory causes (including optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, rhombencephalitis, ADEM, NMOSD) Without any previous treatment other than steroids
    - Informed consent signed by both parents and the child
    - Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) < 5.5
    - Affiliated to French social security regime
    - Enfant de 6 ans ou plus et de moins de 18 ans à la baseline
    - Poids ≥ 20 kg
    - Tous les patients ayant un diagnostic d’une maladie démyélinisante avec présence confirmée d’anticorps anti-MOG au début de la maladie quelle que soit la présentation de la poussée clinique (névrite optique, encéphalomyélite aigue disséminée, myélite aigue transverse…) ayant durée plus de 24H et de cause inflammatoire sans traitement corticoïdes antérieur
    - Consentement éclairé signé par les deux parents
    - Score échelle Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) < 5.5
    - Affilié à un régime de sécurité sociale
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    - Current infection with SARS-COV2 (positive PCR)
    - Any prior allergy to azathioprine or rituximab
    - Any prior history of uncontrolleduncontrolled cancer during the last 2 years
    - Uncontrolled infections (Hepatitis B, C and HIV)
    - Any prior history of cardiac dysfunction and/or hypertension
    - Any progressive or non-relapsing form demyelinating diseases
    - Any previous treatment with natalizumab, daclizumab, fingolimod, methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab in the last 6 months, or determined by the treating physician to have residual immune suppression from these or other immunosuppressive treatments
    - CD4+, CD8+, or CD19+ absolute cell count, wbc, neutrophiles in blood at screening below lower limits of normal (LLN)
    - Creatinine>30µmol/L
    - Platelets <70 000mm3
    - Haemoglobin < 8g/dL
    - Acute renal insufficiency (clearance < 30)
    - Prior documented history of hemostase perturbation > 2 X witnesses
    - Prior documented history of increased liver enzyme level (ASAT and/or ALAT) > 2N.
    - TP <70%
    - Total bilirubin > 2N
    - Any patient with allopurinol treatment and immunosupressive treatment
    - Patients with two inactive TPMT alleles (homozygous deficient or double heterozygote)
    - Pregnancy or lactating woman or wish for future pregnancy
    - Refusal to have a double effective contraception during the follow-up and until one year (12 months) after the end of the experimental treatment



    - Infection en cours par SARS-COV2 (PCR positive)
    - Antécédent d’allergie à l’azathioprine ou au rituximab
    - Antécédent de cancer non contrôlé durant les deux dernières années
    - Infections non contrôlées (Hépatite B, C et VIH)
    - Tout antécédent de dysfonction cardiaque et / ou d’hypertension
    - Tout forme de maladie démyélinisante progressive ou ne rechutant pas
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    - Analysis of primary endpoint will be based on intent-to-treat analysis. The primary endpoint will be the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 24 months.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    24 months
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    The secondary endpoints are other clinical, imaging, immunological and biological outcome and tolerance and safety of treatment.

    • Comparison between immediate-AZA and immediate- RTX
    - Annualized relapse rate at 12 and 24 months
    • Comparison between immediate-AZA and delayed-treatment
    - Annualized relapse rate at 12 and 24 months
    • Comparison between immediate-RTX and delayed-treatment
    - Annualized relapse rate at 12 and 24 months
    • Other clinical outcome for comparing immediate- and delayed-treatment
    - Annualized relapse rate at 12 months
    - Time to first relapse (2nd attack) will be defined as time from randomization to the date of first relapse, with right-censoring in case of loss of follow-up
    - Percentage of patients free of relapses over 24 months
    - Motor disability outcome will be assessed with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (see section 18.5.1) every 6 months which is a frequently used score in pediatric MS for neurological disability40-42. The EDSS is an ordinal scale used for assessing neurologic impairment based on a neurological examination. It consists of scores in each of seven central functional systems (FSs) that are then combined to determine the EDSS steps (ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS)). The FSs are Visual, Brain Stem, Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, and Cerebral functions. EDSS is a widely used and accepted instrument to evaluate disability status at a given time and, longitudinally, to assess disability progression in clinical studies in MS other MOG-Abs-ADS related studies.
    - Visual Acuity, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months performed by a pediatric ophthalmologist.
    - Cognitive function: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)-V for children more than 6 years at 6 months of randomization and at 2 years43 would be performed by a neuropsychologist
    - Fatigue: Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) every 6 months43, this is an auto-questionnaire with 9 questions which would take aproximatly 10 min to fill. For children less than 6 the neuropsychologist would fill the questionnaire with the parents and the child
    - Depression: Major Depression Inventory for Children (MDI-C) every 6 months, this is an auto-questionnaire with 79 questions and would take approximately 15 min to fill.
    - Quality of life: Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) inventory every 6 months43, this is an auto and hetero-questionnaire with 23 questions which would take approximately 10 min.
    - All questionnaires will be filled with the neuropsychologist with child or the child alone and parents will fill it alone.
    • Radiological outcome
    • Immunological studies

    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    3, 6, 12, 24 months
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    To compare the efficacy of immediate (at first attack) azathioprine (AZA) or rituximab (RTX) treatme
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial3
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned9
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Month 30
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years4
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 86
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 16
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Yes
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 70
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) No
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally Yes
    F.3.3.6.1Details of subjects incapable of giving consent
    inclusion of children
    inclusion des enfants
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state86
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 86
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 86
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    At the end of the study, the treatment would be given as standard of care not as investigational product if the patient had an attack and/or MRI activity or stopped if there was no attack and/or MRI activity during the study.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
    G.4.1Name of Organisation rare disease network (centre de reference maladies rares maladies inflammatoires rares du cerveau et de la moelle MIRCEM
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2022-08-31
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2022-08-10
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 09:23:54 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA