Clinical Trial Results:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo controlled, Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Potential Effect of Tezepelumab on the Humoral Immune Response to Seasonal Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccination in Adolescent and Young Adult Participants with Moderate to Severe Asthma (VECTOR)
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2022-003286-37 |
Trial protocol |
Outside EU/EEA |
Global end of trial date |
18 Jul 2022
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
21 Jan 2023
|
First version publication date |
21 Jan 2023
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
D5180C00031
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT05062759 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
AstraZeneca AB
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Södertälje, Södertälje, Sweden, 151 85
|
||
Public contact |
Global Clinical Head, AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center, +1 87724094 79, information.center@astrazeneca.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Global Clinical Head, AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center, +1 87724094 79, information.center@astrazeneca.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
Yes
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
22 Jul 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
18 Jul 2022
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with ICH/GCP, applicable regulatory requirements, and the AstraZeneca policy on Bioethics. The Principal Investigator or designee ensured that each patient (or parent/legally authorised representative) was given full and adequate oral and written information about the nature, purpose, possible risk, and benefit of the study. Informed consent/assent was obtained from all patients (and some parents/legally authorised representatives) before performing any study tests or procedures.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
23 Aug 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 70
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
70
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
0
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
43
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
27
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
This study was conducted in 15 study centres in the United States between 23 August 2021 and 18 July 2022. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
The Screening period was 2 to 3 weeks before randomisation. 81 patients signed informed consent and 70 patients were randomized. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive tezepelumab or placebo. All the study assessments were performed as per the Schedule of Activities. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Monitor, Subject, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Tezepelumab | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of tezepelumab 210 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by accessorized pre-filled syringe (APFS). | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tezepelumab
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received 1 injection of tezepelumab 210mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received 1 injection of placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of tezepelumab 210 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by accessorized pre-filled syringe (APFS). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of tezepelumab 210 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by accessorized pre-filled syringe (APFS). | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Post-vaccination strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or Microneutralization antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Week 12 to Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza A H1N1, Placebo vs Teze | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometric Least square (LS) mean ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.65
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.98 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Yamagata Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.83
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Victoria Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometric LS mean ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.99
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.71 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.37 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Post-vaccination strain-specific microneutralization (MN) antibody GMFRs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Week 12 to Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza A H1N1, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.73
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza A H3N2, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Victoria Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.23
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Yamagata Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.89
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.48 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Post-vaccination strain-specific serum HAI antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza A H1N1, Placebo vs Teze | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.74
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.04 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Yamagata Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.96
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Victoria Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometric LS mean ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.03
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.46 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Post-vaccination strain-specific serum MN antibody GMTs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza A H1N1, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.79
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza A H3N2, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.76
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Victoria Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.99
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Influenza B Yamagata Lineage, Placebo vs Teze | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Ratio of placebo over tezepelumab.
Results based on ANCOVA model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tezepelumab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Geometeric LS mean ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.03
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.52 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of patients with post-vaccination strain-specific antibody response at Week 16 with antibody response defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI antibody titer [1] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal hypothesis testing was performed, as this is a descriptive study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of patients with post-vaccination strain-specific antibody response at Week 16 with antibody response defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in MN antibody titer [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal hypothesis testing was performed, as this is a descriptive study |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of patients with post-vaccination strain-specific HAI antibody titer ≥ 40 [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal hypothesis testing was performed, as this is a descriptive study. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of patients with post-vaccination strain-specific MN antibody titer ≥ 40 [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of tezepelumab on the humoral immune response following seasonal influenza virus vaccination in adolescent and young adult participants with moderate to severe asthma was assessed.
Vaccine immunogenicity analysis set consisted of all randomised patients who received the influenza vaccine plus at least 1 dose of tezepelumab or placebo, had pre and post vaccination HAI or MN antibody measurements, had no influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16), and had no protocol deviation, judged to have the potential to interfere with the generation or interpretation of an antibody response.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal hypothesis testing was performed, as this is a descriptive study |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Serum tezepelumab concentrations [5] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Tezepelumab serum concentrations were summarized using descriptive statistics at each visit.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set consisted of all patients who received tezepelumab and from whom PK blood samples were obtained and assumed not to be affected by factors such as protocol deviations.
Here, the arbitrary value 9999.9999 represent "Not calculated as > 50% of concentrations are below Lower limit of quantification (0.010 ug/mL)"
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 0, Week 12, Week 16 and Week 28
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: The Placebo arm did not receive Tezepelumab, therefore serum concentration for tezepelumab cannot be measured in placebo arm. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Immunogenicity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Immunogenicity assessments were performed.
ADA prevalence was defined as patients who are ADA positive at any time including baseline. Persistently positive was defined as having at least two post-baseline ADA positive measurements (with ≥16 weeks between first and last positive) or an ADA positive result at the last available post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following treatment. Treatment emergent ADA (ADA incidence) was defined as the sum of treatment induced ADA and treatment boosted ADA.
Safety analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 28
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From the date of the first dose of study drug, throughout the treatment period up to the follow-up period or end of the study visit (Week 28)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received at least 1 injection of tezepelumab 210 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks by APFS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
22 Feb 2022 |
The primary rationale for this amendment is to introduce a primary database lock after the end of treatment at Visit 7 (Week 16) and to update safety information based on the most recent Investigator’s Brochure, Version 5.0, dated 21 Oct 2021. Additional changes include APFS device malfunction, medical device deficiencies, and Appendix F Medical Device Adverse Events (AEs) to align with International Organisation for Standardisation 14155 and European Medical Device Regulation. In addition, the vaccine immunogenicity analysis set definition was updated to exclude patients who experience influenza infection prior to Visit 7 (Week 16). Other minor changes included clarification of Schedule of Assessments for participants who prematurely discontinue study intervention. In addition, minor formatting and editorial administrative revisions were made throughout the protocol for clarification purposes. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |