Clinical Trial Results:
Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, 24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Everolimus + Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Versus (vs.) a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients (EVITA)
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2009-013780-19 |
Trial protocol |
ES |
Global end of trial date |
03 Mar 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
01 Apr 2016
|
First version publication date |
01 Apr 2016
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CRAD001AES07
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01169701 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Novartis Pharma AG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland,
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Disclosure Office, Novartis Pharma AG, 41 613241111,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Disclosure Office, Novartis Pharma AG, 41 613241111,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
03 Mar 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
03 Mar 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The objective of the study was to compare the cardiovascular profile of an everolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppressive regimen with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolic acid regimen in maintenance renal transplant patients.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was in compliance with the ethical principles derived from the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines. All the local regulatory requirements pertinent to safety of trial subjects were also followed during the conduct of the trial. In addition, the patients’ usual medications were administered throughout the study treatment period, until the final study assessments were completed. Medications necessary to treat infections, rejection episodes and adverse events were permitted but could require termination of the study medication. Concomitant medications which, according to their summary of product characteristics could interfere with tacrolimus (drug interactions) or everolimus, were avoided. In addition, the administration of therapies with medicinal products that potentiate the nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus (amphotericin B, ketoconazole, azapropazone and diclofenac) and therapies that interfere in the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, were avoided. All other immunosuppressive medicinal products that were not those specified in the protocol were not permitted, except those required to manage rejection episodes. Calcium channel blockers, or H2 receptor antagonists continuously, for up to four weeks prior to randomisation were accepted. Treatment with steroids was allowed according to the routine clinical practice of the site.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
06 Aug 2010
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 71
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
71
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
71
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
65
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
6
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
This study was conducted at 9 kidney transplant centers in Spain. The enrolment of 80 maintenance renal transplant patients, between 18 and 70 years, who had had a first or second kidney transplant in the last 3 years was anticipated. Eighty patients were enrolled, of which 71 were included in the study. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients continued with the same dose of tacrolimus+MPA as they were on prior to the start of the study (tacrolimus at levels of 4-7 ng/ml). Tacrolimus was administered as either Prograf® (twice a day) or Advagraf® (once daily in the morning) and could not be changed during the study. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) could be administerd as Myfortic® (720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day) or Cell-Cept®(1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients in treatment with Prograf® took it twice a day and patients with Advagraf® once daily in the morning. In both cases, administration of the drug was performed in a consistent manner with respect to the time of day and meals. The capsules were administered on an empty stomach or at least 1 hour before, or 2 to 3 hours after the ingestion of food, to achieve maximum absorption.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
MFS (Myfortic®): dose 720-1440 mg/day
MMF (Cell-Cept®): dose 1000-2000 mg/day
Although the following doses of MPA were permitted:
MFS (Myfortic®): dose 360-1440 mg/day
MMF (Cell-Cept®): dose 500-2000 mg/day
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Everolimus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
The investigational drug was everolimus (Certican®) for oral administration containing trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml, taken simultaneuously with MPA every 12 hours. Tacrolimus was also administered and are detailed under dose and administration. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Everolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Certican®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Everolimus was taken twice daily simultaneously with MPA every 12 hours. Morning and evening doses were taken before, after or during meals according to the patient’s choice and always in the same way. The starting dose (day 1) of everolimus with tacrolimus was 2 mg in the evening, maintaining full dose of Prograf® in the morning and reducing it to 50% in the evening. In the case of Advagraf®, 75% of the dose was administered in the morning. On Day 2 and 3, 2 mg of everolimus was administered in the morning and 2 mg in the evening, without tacrolimus. On Day 4-5 the everolimus trough levels were determined and adjusted between 5-8 ng/ml. The dose was adjusted by increasing the dose of everolimus if the trough level was less than 5 ng/ml and reducing the dose if the trough level was greater than 8 ng/ml. A follow-up trough level was performed on day 8 to ensure that the level was between 5-8 ng/ml. The same dose of MPA was continued as patient was on prior to starting the study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients in treatment with Prograf® took it twice a day and patients with Advagraf® once daily in the morning. In both cases, administration of the drug was performed in a consistent manner with respect to the time of day and meals. The capsules were administered on an empty stomach or at least 1 hour before, or 2 to 3 hours after the ingestion of food, to achieve maximum absorption.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Mycophenolic Acid (MPA)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
MFS (Myfortic®): dose 720-1440 mg/day
MMF (Cell-Cept®): dose 1000-2000 mg/day
Although the following doses of MPA were permitted:
MFS (Myfortic®): dose 360-1440 mg/day
MMF (Cell-Cept®): dose 500-2000 mg/day
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolic Acid (MPA)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients continued with the same dose of tacrolimus+MPA as they were on prior to the start of the study (tacrolimus at levels of 4-7 ng/ml). Tacrolimus was administered as either Prograf® (twice a day) or Advagraf® (once daily in the morning) and could not be changed during the study. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) could be administerd as Myfortic® (720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day) or Cell-Cept®(1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Everolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The investigational drug was everolimus (Certican®) for oral administration containing trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml, taken simultaneuously with MPA every 12 hours. Tacrolimus was also administered and are detailed under dose and administration. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolic Acid (MPA)
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients continued with the same dose of tacrolimus+MPA as they were on prior to the start of the study (tacrolimus at levels of 4-7 ng/ml). Tacrolimus was administered as either Prograf® (twice a day) or Advagraf® (once daily in the morning) and could not be changed during the study. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) could be administerd as Myfortic® (720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day) or Cell-Cept®(1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day). | ||
Reporting group title |
Everolimus
|
||
Reporting group description |
The investigational drug was everolimus (Certican®) for oral administration containing trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml, taken simultaneuously with MPA every 12 hours. Tacrolimus was also administered and are detailed under dose and administration. |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was assessed by echocardiogram where the left ventricular mass index was calculated. The presence of LVM was defined as > 49.2 g/m^2.7 in men and >46.7 g/m^2.7 in women. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Analysis population included the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set, who had both baseline and month 24 values, were analyzed. The ITT included participants who received at least one dose of study medication and at least one post baseline LVMI value.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Month 24
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set [2] - Intent to Treat (ITT) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
LV Mass Index by Visit ITT Population-Tacrolimus | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
LVMI was summarised by visit, presenting absolute values and changes with respect to the baseline value. An analysis of repeated measures was also conducted for the LVMI with treatment and the visit considered as fixed factors and LVMI baseline as covariate. The assessment of the primary endpoint was performed by means of the determination of the change in LVM between the visit at 24 months and the baseline visit, between the two treatment groups.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) v Everolimus
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
56
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.7753 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-13.45 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.307 | |||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
LV Mass Index by Visit ITT Population-Everolimus | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
LVMI was summarised by visit, presenting absolute values and changes with respect to the baseline value. An analysis of repeated measures was also conducted for the LVMI with treatment and the visit considered as fixed factors and LVMI baseline as covariate. The assessment of the primary endpoint was performed by means of the determination of the change in LVM between the visit at 24 months and the baseline visit, between the two treatment groups.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Everolimus v Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolic Acid (MPA)
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
56
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.7753 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-11.28 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.261 | |||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Utilizing the SphygmoCor Device, ECG leads placed at the carotid and femoral arteries provided the measure of the pulse wave at that particular arterial location. The distance between the two vascular beds divided by the pulse wave time shift provided a measure of the pulse wave velocity. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Safety Analysis Set [4] - Safety Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
A major cardiovascular event (MACE) included acute myocardial infarction, insertion or replacement of implantable defibrillator, peripheral vascular disorders, congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass, other events, percutaneous coronary intervention, and stroke. This secondary endpont examined the percentage of participants with MACE. This included the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set: The ITT included participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post baseline LVMI value.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Month 24
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Intent to Treat Population. MACE=major cardiovascular event [6] - Intent to Treat Population. MACE=major cardiovascular event |
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Renal Function as Measured by Estimated Glomerular Fltration Rate (eGFR) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
This secondary endpoint assessesrRenal function as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Estimated GFR was calculated using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Month 6, month 12, month 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Safety Analysis Set [8] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death, and Lost to Follow Up | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death, and lost to follow-up events was calculated using relative frequency. The population analyzed was the Intent to Treat (ITT) population. The ITT included participants who received at least one dose of study medication and at least one post baseline LVMI value.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [9] - Intent to Treat Population. BPAR=biopsy-proven acute rejection [10] - Intent to Treat Population. BPAR=biopsy-proven acute rejection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Troponin I and collagen type 1 C- telopeptide (ICTP) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
This secondary endpoint assesses change from baseline in cardiovascular biomarkers in both treatment arms. Blood samples were collected to analyze Troponin I and collagen type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [11] - Safety Analysis Set. ICTP=collagen type 1 C-telopeptide. [12] - Safety Analysis Set. ICTP=collagen type 1 C-telopeptide. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean 24 hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Bressure (Change from Baseline) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Mean 24 hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 12, month 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [13] - Safety Analysis Set [14] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Renal Function Measured by Serum Creatinine | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Renal function was measured by serum creatinine. Serum samples were collected to analyze serum creatinine. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Month 6, month 12, month 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [15] - Safety Analysis Set [16] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Renal Function as Measured by Creatinine Clearance | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Renal function was measured by creatinine clearance. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Month 6, month 12, month 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [17] - Safety Analysis Set [18] - Safety Analsysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood samples were collected to analyze HbA1c. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [19] - Safety Analysis Set. [20] - Safety Analysis Set. |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood samples were collected to analyze myeloperoxidase (MPO). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [21] - Safety Analysis Set [22] - Safety Analysis Set. |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Fraction (NT-proBNP) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood samples were collected to analyze N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide fraction (NT-proBNP). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [23] - Safety Analysis Set [24] - Safety Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Type 1 Procollagen Amino-Terminal- Propeptide (PINP) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood samples were collected to analyze Type 1 procollagen amino-terminal- propeptide (PINP). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [25] - Safety Analysis Set [26] - Safety Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers, C-reactive Protein (CRP) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood samples were collected to analyze C-reactive protein (CRP). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Participants from the safety analysis set were considered for this analysis. The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For each time point, only participants, who had values at both baseline and the given time point, were analyzed for that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [27] - Safety Analysis Set [28] - Safety Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse events are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All adverse events reported in this record are from date of First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Consistent with EudraCT disclosure specifications, Novartis has reported under the Serious adverse events field “number of deaths resulting from adverse events” all those deaths, resulting from serious adverse events that are deemed to be causally related to treatment by the investigator.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Everolimus
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Everolimus | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tacrolimus
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Tacrolimus | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
25 Mar 2010 |
As a result of an exhaustive review with new participants, the exclusion criteria were extended in order to achieve a more defined study population. |
||
30 Apr 2010 |
Changes in the study design (visit windows) were detected and included in this amendment. |
||
28 Jun 2010 |
At the time of purchasing the study medication it was confirmed that not only was it necessary to supply the doses of 0.5 mg and 1 mg Certican but also the 0.25 mg dose. For this reason sections 4.3.1 and 4.4.1 of the protocol were changed. |
||
02 Feb 2011 |
During the course of the study, it was verified that the determination of glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb1Ac) during the Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at 2 hours was not relevant as changes are not appreciable until days or even months; thus it was decided to remove this measurement. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |