Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    BF2.649 in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea syndrome (OSA), and treated by nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP), but still complaining of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS).

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2009-017248-14
    Trial protocol
    DE   BE   ES   FI   SE   DK   BG  
    Global end of trial date
    22 Mar 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    02 Mar 2022
    First version publication date
    02 Mar 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    P 09-08
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Bioprojet Pharma
    Sponsor organisation address
    9 rue Rameau, Paris, France, 75002
    Public contact
    Clinical Development Director, Bioprojet Pharma, 33 147 03 66 33, contact@bioprojet.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Development Director, Bioprojet Pharma, 33 147 03 66 33, contact@bioprojet.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    20 Dec 2018
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    21 Jun 2013
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    22 Mar 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The first objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BF2.649 given at 5-, 10-, or 20 mg per day versus placebo, during 12 weeks for the double blind period, for the treatment of the excessive diurnal sleepiness in patients with moderate to severe Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) who experience residual sleepiness despite regular nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) use.
    Protection of trial subjects
    In order to avoid useless patient exposure, 2 futility analyses were planned when 60 and 120 patients had completed the double-blind phase of the study.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    12 Aug 2011
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 17
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 110
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 21
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 37
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    North Macedonia: 13
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    244
    EEA total number of subjects
    231
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    215
    From 65 to 84 years
    29
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    During the screening visit, the investigator checked the inclusion and exclusion criteria and performed all required screening assessments. From this visit, a 14-day wash-out period started. 298 patients were screened for inclusion. Of those, 244 patients (81.9%) were eligible for entry into the study

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Double-blind period (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind)
    Arm description
    12-week double-blind period starting with an escalating dose period with BF2.649 given at 5-, 10-, or 20 mg per day, followed by treatment with the selected dose.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Pitolisant
    Investigational medicinal product code
    BF2.649
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    1 capsule per day, containing ¼, ½, or one 20 mg tablet of BF2.649

    Arm title
    Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Arm description
    12-week double-blind period with placebo.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    1 capsule per day, containing placebo (lactose)

    Number of subjects in period 1
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Started
    183
    61
    Completed
    174
    58
    Not completed
    9
    3
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    3
    1
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    4
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -
         Protocol deviation
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind)
    Reporting group description
    12-week double-blind period starting with an escalating dose period with BF2.649 given at 5-, 10-, or 20 mg per day, followed by treatment with the selected dose.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Reporting group description
    12-week double-blind period with placebo.

    Reporting group values
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind) Total
    Number of subjects
    183 61 244
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    159 56 215
        65 years and over
    24 5 29
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    53.8 ± 10.5 51.0 ± 10.6 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    34 8 42
        Male
    149 53 202

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind)
    Reporting group description
    12-week double-blind period starting with an escalating dose period with BF2.649 given at 5-, 10-, or 20 mg per day, followed by treatment with the selected dose.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Reporting group description
    12-week double-blind period with placebo.

    Primary: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) - Double-blind period

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) - Double-blind period
    End point description
    ESS score measured persistent daytime sleepiness or sleep propensity for adult patients in ITT (Intention-to-treat) population. The ESS score was the sum of the eight sub-scores and can range from 0 to 24 with higher scores representing greater sleepiness. A score greater than 10 was considered as abnormal sleepiness.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and end of double-blind period
    End point values
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Number of subjects analysed
    183
    61
    Units: Score
        arithmetic mean (full range (min-max))
    -5.52 (-18.5 to 3.0)
    -2.75 (-16.0 to 8.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    For the ITT Population this model showed a statistically significant treatment effect (p < 0.001), with a least squares mean estimate of the difference between the 2 treatment groups of -2.6 (95% CI: [-3.9; -1.4]). This shows a statistically significant effect of pitolisant compared to placebo in reducing excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with OSA.
    Comparison groups
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) v Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    244
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -
         upper limit
    -

    Secondary: Epworth Response (R1)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Epworth Response (R1)
    End point description
    Reaching an absolute value of the ESS inferior to 11 in the ITT population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From beginning of treatment to end of double-blind (treatment and placebo arms).
    End point values
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Number of subjects analysed
    183
    61
    Units: percent
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    56.3 (48.8 to 63.6)
    42.6 (30.0 to 55.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Epworth Response (R2)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Epworth Response (R2)
    End point description
    Either reaching an absolute ESS inferior to 11 or an improvement from baseline of at least 3 in the ITT population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From beginning of treatment to end of double-blind (treatment and placebo arms).
    End point values
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Number of subjects analysed
    183
    61
    Units: percent
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    71.0 (63.9 to 77.5)
    54.1 (40.8 to 66.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Pichot Fatigue Scale

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pichot Fatigue Scale
    End point description
    The Pichot questionnaire was a practical 24-item self-rating account with three homogeneous subscales of 8 items each which measure depressive mood, asthenia-fatigue, and anxiety parameters, respectively. A score > 22 indicates excessive fatigue. This endpoint was measured in the ITT population
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    This test was performed at V2 and Visits 6 (end of double-blind period).
    End point values
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Number of subjects analysed
    183
    61
    Units: Score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -3.8 ± 5.6
    -2.9 ± 5.9
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinical Global Impression (CGI)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
    End point description
    The CGI was a 3-item observer-rated scale which measures illness severity (CGI-S), global improvement or change (CGI-C), and therapeutic response. The CGI was measured in the ITT population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The CGI-S (illness severity) was performed at V1 and V2, CGI-C (global improvement or change) at V6, V7 (end of double-blind period).
    End point values
    BF2.649 Treatment Arm (Double-blind) Placebo Arm (Double-blind)
    Number of subjects analysed
    183
    61
    Units: percent
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    78.0 (71.1 to 84.0)
    53.4 (39.9 to 66.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    The period of observation for the double-blind period extended from the time the patient gave informed consent (Visit 1; D0) until one month after the last visit (Visit 7; D91).
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events is 2% for the Double-blind period.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    19.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Double-blind - BF2.649 Treatment Arm
    Reporting group description
    Patients receiving BF2.649 during double-blind period.

    Reporting group title
    Double-blind - Placebo Arm
    Reporting group description
    Patients receiving placebo during double-blind period.

    Serious adverse events
    Double-blind - BF2.649 Treatment Arm Double-blind - Placebo Arm
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 183 (1.09%)
    0 / 61 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Irritable bowel syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 183 (0.55%)
    0 / 61 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Musculoskeletal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 183 (0.55%)
    0 / 61 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Double-blind - BF2.649 Treatment Arm Double-blind - Placebo Arm
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    77 / 183 (42.08%)
    18 / 61 (29.51%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    27 / 183 (14.75%)
    7 / 61 (11.48%)
         occurrences all number
    28
    8
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 183 (2.73%)
    1 / 61 (1.64%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 183 (3.28%)
    1 / 61 (1.64%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Nasal congestion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 183 (0.55%)
    2 / 61 (3.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 183 (9.29%)
    2 / 61 (3.28%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    2
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 183 (3.28%)
    0 / 61 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    0
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 183 (2.19%)
    0 / 61 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 183 (2.73%)
    5 / 61 (8.20%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    6
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 183 (3.28%)
    0 / 61 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    06 Apr 2011
    A questionnaire was added at the end of treatment to confirm the absence of amphetamine-like withdrawal symptoms. For patients who only participated in the double-blind period, the questionnaire was completed by phone three days after V6 and during V7 (last visit). The sleep diary to be completed in the morning was composed of eight questions, the first four were about the sleep of the previous night and the last four were about the preceding day. It was specified that a call center could join the patient to ask the questions of the diary. Dates of first patient in and last patient out were adjusted accordingly (FPI: 15 April 2011; LPO: 30 November 2012).
    06 Oct 2011
    Initially, baseline ESS score was defined as the mean of scores at V1 and V2. However, as previous treatments were discontinued at V1, it seemed fair to take V2 only into account for the baseline value. The modalities of completion of the sleep diary changed: it could either be in a paper or electronic (phone calls) format and had to be completed on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday preceding the next visit in order to avoid the week-end where the patient changes his/her life rhythm. New participating Investigators were added.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 04 01:59:02 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA