Clinical Trial Results:
Paracervical block (PCB) during II-trimester abortion – a randomized controlled trial
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2010-020780-21 |
Trial protocol |
SE |
Global end of trial date |
30 Apr 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
31 Mar 2021
|
First version publication date |
31 Mar 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
W2010IM
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01617564 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Karolinska Institutet
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
17177, Stockholm, Sweden,
|
||
Public contact |
Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Karolinska Institutet, kristina.gemzell@ki.se
|
||
Scientific contact |
Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Karolinska Institutet, kristina.gemzell@ki.se
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Apr 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Apr 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Apr 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Can the number of women who experience severe pain (VAS> 7) during induced abortion after 13 weeks of gestation, be reduced through the use of PCBs with Marcain ® as a method of pain relief during abortion?
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained prior to participating in any study-related activity.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
29 May 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Sweden: 102
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
102
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
102
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
102
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Women were recruited from a gynaecological clinic in Sweden between during May 2012 until April 2015. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Women who were 18 years or older, gestational age from 13 weeks and being able to understand Swedish were screened for participation. 589 women had a second-trimester abortion during the time period, 276 of those women were informed and invited to participate in the study, and 113 women were recruited. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (Placebo). | |||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sodium Chloride
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intracervical use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The PCB was administered as a 2–4 mm deep paracervical injection into the mucosa at two sites (2 and 8 o’clock), and was applied by using a Kobac’s needle or an ordinary injection needle (0.8 × 80 mm)during a speculum examination. The procedure lasted for 5 min. The PCB was applied 1 h after the first dose of misoprostol.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Bupivacaine | |||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml local anaesthesia (bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml) | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Bupivacaine
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intracervical use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The PCB was administered as a 2–4 mm deep paracervical injection into the mucosa at two sites (2 and 8 o’clock), and was applied by using a Kobac’s needle or an ordinary injection needle (0.8 × 80 mm) during a speculum examination. The procedure lasted for 5 min. The PCB was applied 1 h after the first dose of misoprostol.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (Placebo). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml local anaesthesia (bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (Placebo). | ||
Reporting group title |
Bupivacaine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml local anaesthesia (bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml) |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Highest pain intensity | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Can paracervical block (PCB) administered before the onset of pain decrease women’s pain experience during secondtrimester medical termination of pregnancy (MToP)? Pain was measured by VAS (visual analogue scale) where VAS 7-10 = severe pain.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Pain was measured at misoprostol initiation (baseline) and repeated every 30 min until fetal expulsion. The primary outcome was at any time point.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in highest pain intensity VAS 7-10 | |||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Bupivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
102
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.292 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Generalized estimating equations model | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
- | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Misoprostol initiation (baseline) and repeated every 30 min until fetal expulsion.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
ICD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (Placebo). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received a PCB (Paracervical block) with 20 ml local anaesthesia (bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
Nearly 60% of the invited women did notwant to participate in the study (fear of needles and fear of receiving the placebo) therefore women who tolerate pain may have been overrepresented in the study population. | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573530 |