Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Etude de la dose-réponse au bronchodilatateur puis recherche de dose du bronchodilatateur par la technique de l'interruption du débit chez l'enfant siffleur âgé de 2,5 à 6 ans - Etude DORESI.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2011-002261-38
    Trial protocol
    FR  
    Global end of trial date
    23 Jan 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    21 Sep 2023
    First version publication date
    21 Sep 2023
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Article

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    P100504
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01470755
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
    Sponsor organisation address
    1, avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France, 75010
    Public contact
    Dr BEYDON Nicole, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, nicole.beydon@aphp.fr
    Scientific contact
    Dr BEYDON Nicole, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, nicole.beydon@aphp.fr
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    06 Feb 2017
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    23 Jan 2014
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    23 Jan 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Estimer la relation dose-effet du bronchodilatateur chez le jeune enfant siffleur par la technique de l'interruption du débit aérien.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Children recruited only with their consent and with their parents consents.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    25 Jan 2012
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 106
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    106
    EEA total number of subjects
    106
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    106
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Start of recruitment : 25/01/2012 End of recruitment : 23/01/2014 recruitment centers : Hôpital Armand Trousseau – Paris, Hôpital Robert Debré – Paris, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve - Montpellier

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Any patient aged 2 years 6 months and 6 years 11 months referred for a pulmonary function test with bronchodilator test, because of recurrent wheezing on at least 3 occasions in the past year. Absence of BD intake in the 12 hours before the examination. Parents who gave signed consent for the study

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Inclusion/randomization (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator
    Blinding implementation details
    The children included will receive 2 successive doses of bronchodilator (BD) at 30 minutes interval, with a Rint measurement between 20 and 30 minutes after each dose. Two doses per child will be tested according to 4 designs that will be randomized. These doses will be evaluated blind to the person measuring the Rint.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    400 µg Salbutamol (100+300)
    Arm description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400)
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Salbutamol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Ventoline
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 or 200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400, 600, or 800 μg) of salbutamol.

    Arm title
    600 µg Salbutamol (100+500)
    Arm description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 600)
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Salbutamol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Ventoline
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral suspension in pre-filled oral applicator
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 or 200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400, 600, or 800 μg) of salbutamol.

    Arm title
    800 µg Salbutamol
    Arm description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 800)
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Salbutamol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Ventoline
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral suspension in pre-filled oral applicator
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 or 200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400, 600, or 800 μg) of salbutamol.

    Arm title
    400 µg Salbutamol
    Arm description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400)
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Salbutamol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Ventoline
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral suspension in pre-filled oral applicator
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The dosage schedules − first and second doses of salbutamol received 30 min apart − were as follows: 100 + 300, 100 + 500, 200 + 200, and 200 + 600 μg (Figure 1), delivered via a new valve-holding chamber (Vortex®, Pari, Starnberg, Germany). At baseline and 30 min after each dose, pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation [SpO2] and heart rate) and Rint measurements during expiration (MicroRint, Micro Medical Ltd, Rochester, UK, or SpiroDyn’R, Dyn’R Ltd, Aix-en-Provence, France) were recorded by an investigator blinded to the doses received by the child.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    400 µg Salbutamol (100+300) 600 µg Salbutamol (100+500) 800 µg Salbutamol 400 µg Salbutamol
    Started
    27
    26
    28
    25
    Completed
    26
    22
    26
    25
    Not completed
    1
    4
    2
    0
         Didn't complete Rint measurements
    1
    4
    1
    -
         Protocol deviation
    -
    -
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Inclusion/randomization
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Inclusion/randomization Total
    Number of subjects
    106 106
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    106 106
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    4.8 (3.1 to 6.9) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    43 43
        Male
    63 63
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Method
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 or 200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400, 600, or 800 μg) of salbutamol. Data were analyzed using mixed modeling approach with an inhibitory maximal effect (Imax) model, to account for a sparse sampling design. Simulations were performed to predict the percentage of children with significant Rint reversibility at several doses.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Method
    Number of subjects
    99
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    99
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    4.8 (3.1 to 6.9)
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    38
        Male
    61

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    400 µg Salbutamol (100+300)
    Reporting group description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400)

    Reporting group title
    600 µg Salbutamol (100+500)
    Reporting group description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 600)

    Reporting group title
    800 µg Salbutamol
    Reporting group description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 800)

    Reporting group title
    400 µg Salbutamol
    Reporting group description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400)

    Subject analysis set title
    Method
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Rint was measured at baseline, and after random assignment to a first dose (100 or 200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400, 600, or 800 μg) of salbutamol. Data were analyzed using mixed modeling approach with an inhibitory maximal effect (Imax) model, to account for a sparse sampling design. Simulations were performed to predict the percentage of children with significant Rint reversibility at several doses.

    Primary: Rint reversibility

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Rint reversibility
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    after random assignment to a first dose (100 or 200 μg) and a second dose (cumulative dose: 400, 600, or 800 μg) of salbutamol.
    End point values
    400 µg Salbutamol (100+300) 600 µg Salbutamol (100+500) 800 µg Salbutamol 400 µg Salbutamol Method
    Number of subjects analysed
    26
    22
    26
    25
    99
    Units: binary
        Positive response (decrease of at least 35%)
    9
    8
    9
    10
    36
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Repeated Rint measurements were simultaneously analyzed in all patients by mixed effect modeling approach which can compensate for the lack of individual information by borrowing strength from the whole data, and therefore, allow for precise parameter estimation even with sparse sampling design.Each parameter was composed of two parts: a fixed effect which represented the median value of this parameter in the study population;a random effect which accounted for the interindividual variability
    Comparison groups
    400 µg Salbutamol (100+300) v 600 µg Salbutamol (100+500) v 800 µg Salbutamol v 400 µg Salbutamol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    99
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [1]
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [1] - dose-response

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    During all the study period (25/01/2012 - 23/01/2014)
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    No Adverse event has been reported to the sponsor during the study duration.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    Internal document
    Dictionary version
    1
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: There are no non-serious adverse events reported in this study

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    25 May 2012
    Addition of beta2-adrenergic receptor genotyping study as a source of variation in bronchodilator dose-response
    21 Mar 2013
    Participation of the Physiology-Functional Explorations Department of the Robert Debré Hospital in Paris in the genetic study complementary to the DORESI study

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun Apr 28 20:32:06 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA