Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase IIIb Parallel Group, Open Label Study of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Monotherapy (PEG-IFN, Ro 25-8310) Compared to Untreated Control in Children with HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B in the Immune Active Phase
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-002732-70 |
Trial protocol |
GB BE DE PL IT BG |
Global end of trial date |
18 Oct 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v2(current) |
This version publication date |
22 Apr 2022
|
First version publication date |
24 Jul 2016
|
Other versions |
v1 |
Version creation reason |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
YV25718
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01519960 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel, Switzerland, CH-4070
|
||
Public contact |
Roche Trial Information Hotline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 61 6878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Roche Trial Information Hotline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 61 6878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
Yes
|
||
EMA paediatric investigation plan number(s) |
EMEA-000298-PIP01-08 | ||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
Yes
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
19 Nov 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
18 Oct 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
This randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the use of peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) monotherapy versus untreated control in pediatric participants with hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the immune active phase. The study compared efficacy and safety between groups and evaluated the pharmacokinetics of PEG-IFN following administration of a body surface area (BSA)-based dosing regimen.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The investigators have ensured that this study was conducted in full conformance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki or with the laws and regulations of the country in which the research was conducted, whichever afforded the greater protection to the individual. The study has fully adhered to the principles outlined in “Guideline for Good Clinical Practice” International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Tripartite Guideline or with local law if it afforded greater protection to the participant. For studies conducted in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) countries, the investigators have ensured compliance with the EU Clinical Trial Directive (2001/20/EC). The investigators have additionally ensured adherence to the basic principles of “Good Clinical Practice” as outlined in the current version of 21 Code of Federal Regulations, subchapter D, part 312, “Responsibilities of Sponsors and Investigators”; part 50, “Protection of Human Subjects”; and part 56, “Institutional Review Boards”. In other countries where “Guideline for Good Clinical Practice” exists, Roche and the investigators have strictly ensured adherence to the stated provisions.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
11 Jul 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety, Efficacy, Ethical reason, Regulatory reason, Scientific research | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
5 Years | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Ukraine: 13
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 6
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Australia: 10
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Bulgaria: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
China: 76
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Israel: 9
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Russian Federation: 19
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
161
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
20
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
82
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
79
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 211 individuals were screened for entry into the study. Of these, there were 161 participants enrolled in the study and included in the main analyses. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and received PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 micrograms (mcg) was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 square meters (m^2), 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; greater than (>) 1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Peginterferon alfa-2a
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Pegasys
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Peginterferon alfa-2a was given as SC injection once weekly for 48 weeks and dosed according to BSA category as specified in the protocol. Possible doses ranged from 45 to 180 mcg.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and were evaluated for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. As the study is open-label, participants did not receive any investigational or placebo treatment during the 48-week principal observation period (POP). For ethical reasons, participants in Group B had a reduced visit schedule (every 12 weeks) compared to participants in Group A through the end of 24-week follow-up. After completing the POP, the same PEG-IFN regimen administered in Group A was offered to participants in Group B who had not experienced hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The offer remained for up to 1 year following the Week 48 visit. From the time a given participant switched to PEG-IFN, he/she was no longer included in Group B. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Peginterferon alfa-2a
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Pegasys
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Peginterferon alfa-2a was given as SC injection once weekly for 48 weeks and dosed according to BSA category as specified in the protocol. Possible doses ranged from 45 to 180 mcg.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Group C: PEG-IFN Monotherapy With Advanced Fibrosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants with advanced fibrosis were allocated (not randomized) to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Peginterferon alfa-2a
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Pegasys
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Peginterferon alfa-2a was given as SC injection once weekly for 48 weeks and dosed according to BSA category as specified in the protocol. Possible doses ranged from 45 to 180 mcg.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. [2] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. [3] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. [4] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and received PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 micrograms (mcg) was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 square meters (m^2), 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; greater than (>) 1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and were evaluated for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. As the study is open-label, participants did not receive any investigational or placebo treatment during the 48-week principal observation period (POP). For ethical reasons, participants in Group B had a reduced visit schedule (every 12 weeks) compared to participants in Group A through the end of 24-week follow-up. After completing the POP, the same PEG-IFN regimen administered in Group A was offered to participants in Group B who had not experienced hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The offer remained for up to 1 year following the Week 48 visit. From the time a given participant switched to PEG-IFN, he/she was no longer included in Group B. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group C: PEG-IFN Monotherapy With Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with advanced fibrosis were allocated (not randomized) to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and received PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 micrograms (mcg) was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 square meters (m^2), 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; greater than (>) 1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||
Reporting group title |
Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and were evaluated for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. As the study is open-label, participants did not receive any investigational or placebo treatment during the 48-week principal observation period (POP). For ethical reasons, participants in Group B had a reduced visit schedule (every 12 weeks) compared to participants in Group A through the end of 24-week follow-up. After completing the POP, the same PEG-IFN regimen administered in Group A was offered to participants in Group B who had not experienced hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The offer remained for up to 1 year following the Week 48 visit. From the time a given participant switched to PEG-IFN, he/she was no longer included in Group B. | ||
Reporting group title |
Group C: PEG-IFN Monotherapy With Advanced Fibrosis
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants with advanced fibrosis were allocated (not randomized) to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and received PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 micrograms (mcg) was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 square meters (m^2), 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; greater than (>) 1.51 m^2, 180 mcg.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and were evaluated for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. As the study is open-label, participants did not receive any investigational or placebo treatment during the 48-week principal observation period (POP). For ethical reasons, participants in Group B had a reduced visit schedule (every 12 weeks) compared to participants in Group A through the end of 24-week follow-up. After completing the POP, the same PEG-IFN regimen administered in Group A was offered to participants in Group B who had not experienced hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The offer remained for up to 1 year following the Week 48 visit. From the time a given participant switched to PEG-IFN, he/she was no longer included in Group B.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Group C: PEG-IFN Monotherapy With Advanced Fibrosis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with advanced fibrosis were allocated (not randomized) to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
All Groups Combined
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy or were evaluated as untreated control for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. Participants with advanced fibrosis were allocated (not randomized) to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy for the same duration. For those who received PEG-IFN treatment, each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Group D: Switch to PEG-IFN Monotherapy
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis who did not receive treatment and had not experienced HBeAg seroconversion were allowed to switch to PEG-IFN monotherapy. Treatment was given over 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBeAg Seroconversion at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment (EOT)/POP in Groups A and B [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of hepatitis B envelope antibody (anti-HBe). The percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized participants regardless of treatment received.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Analysis stratified by hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype A versus non-A genotypes and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than (<) 5 times (×) upper limit of normal (ULN) versus greater than or equal to (≥) 5 × ULN at Baseline. The OR was calculated using Group B as reference.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis v Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
151
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0043 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
5.43
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.54 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
19.2 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Breslow-Day | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis v Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
151
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3732 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Breslow-Day | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBeAg at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [2] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBeAg at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroconversion at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [3] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBsAg and the presence of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). The percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Normal ALT at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [4] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Normal ALT was defined as ALT less than or equal to (≤) ULN, where each ULN was given by the laboratory at which the sample was analyzed. The percentage of participants with normal ALT at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [4] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) <20,000 International Units per Milliliter (IU/mL) at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [5] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [6] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [6] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [7] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT/POP in Groups A and B [8] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [8] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBeAg Seroconversion at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [9] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. The percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [9] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBeAg at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [10] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBeAg at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [10] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBsAg Seroconversion at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [11] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs. The percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [11] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBsAg at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [12] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBsAg at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [12] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Normal ALT at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [13] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Normal ALT was defined as ALT ≤ ULN, where each ULN was given by the laboratory at which the sample was analyzed. The percentage of participants with normal ALT at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [13] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [14] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [14] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [15] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [15] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA Undetectable at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [16] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA undetectable at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [16] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [17] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [17] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP in Groups A and B [18] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||||||
Notes [18] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative Serum ALT Level in Groups A and B [19] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative ALT at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed as a factor of the laboratory-specific ULN (for example, 1 × ULN, 2 × ULN, 3 × ULN). ITT Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table. Values entered as "99999" mean that the calculation was not performed because no participants provided data for the visit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [19] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative HBV DNA Level in Groups A and B [20] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative HBV DNA at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. ITT Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table. Values entered as "99999" mean that the calculation was not performed because no participants provided data for the visit.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [20] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Quantitative HBV DNA Level in Groups A and B [21] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative HBV DNA from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. ITT Population. All participants were included in the endpoint analysis. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table. Values entered as "99999" mean that the calculation was not performed because no participants provided data for the visit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [21] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBeAg at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [22] | ||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBeAg at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug (if assigned) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [22] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBsAg Seroconversion at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [23] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs. The percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [23] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBsAg at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [24] | ||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBsAg at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [24] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Normal ALT at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [25] | ||||||||
End point description |
Normal ALT was defined as ALT ≤ ULN, where each ULN was given by the laboratory at which the sample was analyzed. The percentage of participants with normal ALT at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [25] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [26] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [26] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [27] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [27] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA Undetectable at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [28] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA undetectable at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [28] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [29] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [29] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [30] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [30] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBeAg Seroconversion at EOT in Group C [31] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. The percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [31] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBeAg at EOT in Group C [32] | ||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBeAg at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [32] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBsAg Seroconversion at EOT in Group C [33] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs. The percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [33] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBsAg at EOT in Group C [34] | ||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBsAg at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [34] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Normal ALT at EOT in Group C [35] | ||||||||
End point description |
Normal ALT was defined as ALT ≤ ULN, where each ULN was given by the laboratory at which the sample was analyzed. The percentage of participants with normal ALT at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [35] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT in Group C [36] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [36] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT in Group C [37] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [37] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA Undetectable at EOT in Group C [38] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA undetectable at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [38] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT in Group C [39] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [39] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT in Group C [40] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48
|
||||||||
Notes [40] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative Serum ALT Level in Group C [41] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative ALT at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed as a factor of the laboratory-specific ULN (for example, 1 × ULN, 2 × ULN, 3 × ULN). Safety Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [41] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative HBV DNA Level in Group C [42] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative HBV DNA at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. Safety Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [42] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Quantitative HBV DNA Level in Group C [43] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative HBV DNA from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. Safety Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [43] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measure (LSM) in Groups A, B, C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Liver elastography was performed to assess elasticity and extent of hepatic fibrosis. The change in LSM from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants in expressed in kilopascals (kPa). Positive changes in LSM values corresponded to an increase in stiffness and hepatic fibrosis. Liver Substudy Population: All participants who consented to participate in the liver elasticity substudy. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Estimated Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) by BSA Category | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
AUC was estimated using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. The AUC at steady-state was averaged among participants who received PEG-IFN and reported by BSA category. Categories of BSA-based dosing used in the analysis were as follows: 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. The estimated AUC was expressed in hours by nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL). PK Substudy Population: All participants who consented to participate in the PK substudy. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total combined number of participants who provided evaluable data across all BSA categories. The number of participants who provided evaluable data within each BSA category (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Pre-dose (0 hours) at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24; post-dose (24-48, 72-96, 168 hours) during Weeks 1, 24 (up to 24 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with >15% Drop in Height Percentile for Age in Groups A and B [44] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with >15% drop in height percentile for age from Baseline to each visit was reported. Safety Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [44] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with >15% Drop in Weight Percentile for Age in Groups A and B [45] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with >15% drop in weight percentile for age from Baseline to each visit was reported. Safety Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table. Values entered as "99999" mean that the calculation was not performed because no participants provided data for the visit.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [45] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with >15% Drop in Height Percentile for Age in Group C [46] | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with >15% drop in weight percentile for age from Baseline to each visit was reported. Safety Population.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 30, 36; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Notes [46] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Height for Age Z-Score in Groups A and B [47] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The difference between the population mean and raw scores was calculated as the height for age z-score. Mean absolute values at Baseline were reported. The change from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in units of standard deviations. Safety Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [47] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Weight for Age Z-Score in Groups A and B [48] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The difference between the population mean and raw scores was calculated as the weight for age z-score. Mean absolute values at Baseline were reported. The change from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in units of standard deviations.Safety Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table. Values entered as "99999" mean that the calculation was not performed because no participants provided data for the visit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [48] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Height for Age Z-Score in Group C [49] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The difference between the population mean and raw scores was calculated as the height for age z-score. Mean absolute values at Baseline were reported. The change from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in units of standard deviations. Safety Population.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Weeks 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [49] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Weight for Age Z-Score in Group C [50] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The difference between the population mean and raw scores was calculated as the weight for age z-score. Mean absolute values at Baseline were reported. The change from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in units of standard deviations. Safety Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [50] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion at 24 Weeks After EOT in Group C [51] | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. The percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion at 24 weeks after EOT was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Safety Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
Notes [51] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Serum ALT Level in Groups A and B [52] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative ALT from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed as a factor of the laboratory-specific ULN (for example, 1 × ULN, 2 × ULN, 3 × ULN). ITT Population. All participants were included in the endpoint analysis. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table. Values entered as "99999" mean that the calculation was not performed because no participants provided data for the visit.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [52] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative HBeAg Level in Groups A and B [53] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative HBeAg at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 Paul Ehrlich Institute units per milliliter (PEIU/mL). ITT Population. All participants were included in the endpoint analysis. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [53] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative HBeAg Level in Groups A and B [54] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative HBeAg from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 PEIU/mL. ITT Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [54] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative HBsAg Level in Groups A and B [55] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative HBsAg at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. ITT Population. All participants were included in the endpoint analysis. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [55] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative HBsAg Level in Groups A and B [56] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative HBsAg from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. ITT Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [56] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Serum ALT Level in Group C [57] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative ALT from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed as a factor of the laboratory-specific ULN (for example, 1 × ULN, 2 × ULN, 3 × ULN). Safety Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48; FU Weeks 4, 12, 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [57] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative HBeAg Level in Group C [58] | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative HBeAg at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 PEIU/mL. Safety Population. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [58] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative HBeAg Level in Group C [59] | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative HBeAg from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 PEIU/mL. Safety Population. "Number of subjects analyzed" reflects the total number of participants who provided evaluable data at any timepoint. The number of participants who provided evaluable data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Notes [59] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Quantitative HBsAg Level in Group C [60] | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quantitative HBsAg at each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. Safety Population.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [60] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative HBsAg Level in Group C [61] | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in quantitative HBsAg from Baseline to each visit was averaged among all participants and expressed in log10 IU/mL. Safety Population.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48; FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Notes [61] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBeAg Seroconversion Over Time in Groups A and B [62] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, FU Years: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [62] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Justification: Groups A an B were randomized and formal statistical analyses were carried out to compare the arms. Participants in Group C were allocated to treatment for ethical reasons, and only descriptive results were reported. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBeAg at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with loss of HBeAg at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBsAg Seroconversion at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of hepatitis B envelope antibody (anti-HBe). The percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized participants regardless of treatment received.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Loss of HBsAg at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of hepatitis B envelope antibody (anti-HBe). The percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized participants regardless of treatment received.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Normal ALT at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
Normal ALT was defined as ALT ≤ ULN, where each ULN was given by the laboratory at which the sample was analyzed. The percentage of participants with normal ALT at EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) <20,000 International Units per Milliliter (IU/mL) at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA Undetectable at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBV DNA undetectable at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Combined HBeAg Seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 Weeks after the End of Switch Treatment Period: Switch Group | ||||||||
End point description |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as loss of HBeAg and the presence of anti-HBe. HBV DNA was quantified using PCR by Roche Taqman. The percentage of participants with combined HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT/POP was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method. ITT Population.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From Baseline to FU Week 24 (up to 72 weeks overall)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety Population
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
18.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group A: PEG-IFN Monotherapy Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and received PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group B: Untreated Control Without Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis were randomized and were evaluated for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. As the study is open-label, participants did not receive any investigational or placebo treatment during the 48-week POP. For ethical reasons, participants in Group B had a reduced visit schedule (every 12 weeks) compared to participants in Group A through the end of 24-week follow-up. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group C: PEG-IFN Monotherapy With Advanced Fibrosis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with advanced fibrosis were allocated (not randomized) to receive PEG-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group D: Switch to PEG-IFN Monotherapy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis who did not receive treatment and had not experienced HBeAg seroconversion were allowed to switch to PEG-IFN monotherapy. Treatment was given over 48 weeks with a 24-week follow-up and an additional ongoing 4.5-year extended follow-up. Each dose of 45 to 180 mcg was based on BSA and given as a once-weekly SC injection for 48 weeks. BSA-based dosing was as follows: 0.51-0.53 m^2, 45 mcg; 0.54-0.74 m^2, 65 mcg; 0.75-1.08 m^2, 90 mcg; 1.09-1.51 m^2, 135 mcg; >1.51 m^2, 180 mcg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group A - Long Term Follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis: 4.5-year extended follow-up | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group B - Long Term Follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis: 4.5-year extended follow-up | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group C Long Term Follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with advanced fibrosis: 4.5-year extended follow-up | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group D - Long Term Follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without advanced fibrosis who did not receive treatment and had not experienced HBeAg seroconversion were allowed to switch to PEG-IFN monotherapy: 4.5-year extended follow-up | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
24 Oct 2011 |
The protocol was amended primarily for the addition of exploratory biomarker objectives. Corresponding laboratory procedures, including the collection of DNA specimens, were added to the study assessments. The timeline for liver elasticity assessment was also expanded to FU Year 2. |
||
04 Apr 2012 |
Under this protocol amendment, liver biopsy was now required within 2 years of Baseline to ensure participants had not progressed to cirrhosis, and a liver elasticity assessment was added at EOT/POP. New entry criteria were also added for participants in Group B who opted to switch to PEG-IFN. |
||
17 May 2013 |
Some liver biopsy assessments were removed to minimize participant discomfort, and ophthalmological examinations could now be performed 6 months before Baseline. Eligibility criteria were also updated for both administrative and safety purposes. Dose reduction guidelines were updated, and additional safety monitoring parameters were added. |
||
28 May 2014 |
Eligibility criteria were updated including the removal of HBV antibody screening requirements, explanation of normal hemoglobin range, exclusion of participants with renal impairment. Additionally, participants with ALT > 10 × ULN were now excluded from switching to PEG-IFN in Group D. Scoring guidelines for liver fibrosis were also added. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |