Clinical Trial Results:
Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-Enhanced MRI of the breast: comparison of gadoterate meglumine versus gadobenate dimeglumine at 3 Tesla
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-005498-21 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
25 Jan 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
30 Sep 2020
|
First version publication date |
30 Sep 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
NA
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Bracco
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Via Caduti di Marcinelle 13, Milano, Italy, 20134
|
||
Public contact |
Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, 0043 4040048200, thomas.helbich@meduniwien.ac.at
|
||
Scientific contact |
Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, thomas.helbich@meduniwien.ac.at
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
24 Aug 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
15 Dec 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
25 Jan 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The aim of this study is to intraindividually compare the use of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance, Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy) and gadoterate meglumine (DOTAREM, Guerbet, France) for breast MR imaging by using a prospective study design, evaluated independently by blinded readers.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
insurance, patient informed consents
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
16 Nov 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 104
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
104
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
104
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
100
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
4
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
consecutive women presenting for the assessment of abnormal breast imaging findings (ie, classified as BI-RADS 0, 4, or 5) on mammography, tomosynthesis, or ultrasound were eligible for this study. Excluded women below 18 years of age, women who were pregnant or lactating or treatment of breast, contraindication to MRI | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Consecutive women presenting for the assessment of abnormal breast imaging findings (ie, classified as BI-RADS 0, 4, or 5) on mammography, tomosynthesis, or ultrasound were eligible for this study. Excluded women below 18 years of age, women who were pregnant or lactating or treatment of breast, contraindication to MRI | ||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||
Number of subjects started |
104 | ||||||
Number of subjects completed |
104 | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Each
reader was blinded to all clinical and radiological information.
|
||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
comparison | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
gadobenate
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0,0075mmol/kg
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
CE-MRI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The analysis was performed on a
per-breast basis; thus, the accuracy of L-CEM vs. CE-MRI to
analyze multifocality or multicentricity was not assessed.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
CEM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The analysis was performed on a
per-breast basis; thus, the accuracy of L-CEM vs. CE-MRI to
analyze multifocality or multicentricity was not assessed.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
comparison
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
CE-MRI
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The analysis was performed on a
per-breast basis; thus, the accuracy of L-CEM vs. CE-MRI to
analyze multifocality or multicentricity was not assessed.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
CEM
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The analysis was performed on a
per-breast basis; thus, the accuracy of L-CEM vs. CE-MRI to
analyze multifocality or multicentricity was not assessed.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Comparison | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
na
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
accuracy | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The analysis was performed on a
per-breast basis; thus, the accuracy of L-CEM vs. CE-MRI to
analyze multifocality or multicentricity was not assessed.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CE-MRI v CEM
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
208
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
1 day
|
||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10.0
|
||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
all subjects
|
||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 4% | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
NA |