E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
type-2 diabetes mellitus that do not reach adequate glycemic control on their current sulfonylurea monotherapy |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
type-2 diabetes mellitus that do not reach adequate glycemic control on their current sulfonylurea monotherapy |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases [C18] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 15.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10045242 |
E.1.2 | Term | Type II diabetes mellitus |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10027433 - Metabolism and nutrition disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
1. To demonstrate that add-on to glimeperide vildagliptin is superior to NPH insulin with respect to the incidence of the combined endpoint, defined as a blood glucose target (HbA1c below 7.0%) without any confirmed hypoglycemic events (BG measurement < 3.9mM (71mg/dL)) and weight gain (+3%) in T2DM patients.
2. To demonstrate that add-on to glimepiride vildagliptin is superior to NPH insulin with respect to the rate of of confirmed hypoglycemic events (BG measurement < 3.9mM (71mg/dL)) in T2DM patients.
|
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
• To evaluate the incidence of severe hypoglycemic events in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemic events in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate the proportion of patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride who reach their blood glucose target (HbA1c below 7.0%) without any confirmed hypoglycemic events.
• To evaluate body weight changes between Visit 2 and study end in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate the change in HbA1c, between Visit 2 and study end in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate treatment satisfaction between Visit 2 and study end in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride by using the TSQM-9 questionnaire.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Age > 18 and < 85 years
2. Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
3. Confirmed diagnosis of T2DM.
4. Contraindicated or intolerant to take metformin.
5. HbA1c of ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 8.5% as determined by a central laboratory at Visit 1 and judged by the investigator to be inadequately controlled that requires the expansion of the current anti diabetic therapy.
6. Patients treated with any SU for at least the prior 12 weeks including a stable dose of glimepiride of 4mg (or if not tolerated, the maximal tolerated dose up to 4mg) for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Patients who are taking any other anti-diabetes drug (oral or injection) other than an SU component in the preceding 12 weeks.
2. Use of any prohibited medication as per protocol section 6.6.
3. A history or evidence of any of the following:
a. Acute metabolic conditions such a ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis or hyperosmolar state (including diabetic precoma or coma) within the past 6 months.
b. Current diagnosis of congestive heart failure (NYHA III or IV).
c. Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months.
d. Coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention within the past 6 months
e. Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or reversible ischemic neurologic deficit within the past 6 months.
f. Unstable angina within the past 3 months.
g. Sustained and clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia (patients with premature ventricular contractions if deemed not clinically significant may be enrolled).
h. Active substance abuse, alcohol abuse and history of alcohol-related diseases within the past 2 years.
i. Type 1 diabetes, monogenic diabetes, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury, or secondary forms of diabetes (e.g. Cushing’s syndrome or acromegaly-associated diabetes).
j. Malignancy of an organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin) treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
k. hepatic disorder defined as:
• Acute or chronic liver disease, evidence of hepatitis, cirrhosis or portal hypertension.
• History of imaging abnormalities that suggest liver disease (except hepatic steatosis), such as portal hypertension, capsule scalloping, cirrhosis.
l. Evidence of active pancreatitis within the 1 month prior to baseline assessment
4. Any of the following significant laboratory abnormalities as assessed at Visit 1:
a. Clinically significant renal dysfunction: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30mL/min/1.73m2 (via modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula).
b. alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3x upper limit of normal (ULN), confirmed by repeat measure within 3 working days.
c. Total bilirubin (except patients with Gilbert`s disease) > 2x ULN, confirmed by repeat measure within 3 working days.
d. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities which, in the opinion of the investigator, cause the patient to be considered inappropriate for inclusion in the study.
5. Concurrent medical condition that may interfere with the interpretation of efficacy and safety data during the study.
6. Patients who do not agree to take the study medication and do not want to follow the procedure as required by the study protocol.
7. Patients taking the SU component for longer than 5 years before Visit 1.
8. BMI < 21 or > 45 kg/m2 at Visit 1.
9. Donation of blood (500ml) or significant blood loss equaling to at least one unit of blood within the past 2 weeks of start of study or a blood transfusion within the past 12 weeks or planned regular transfusions during the study period.
10. Potentially unreliable, inability to comply with the study procedures or medications, and/or judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for the study.
11. Use of an investigative drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug, whichever is longer.
12. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs with similar chemical structures
13. Study personnel or first degree relatives of investigator(s) must not be included in the study.
14. Women
o who are pregnant or breast feeding (pregnancy defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test (> 5 mIU/ml))
o who are menstruating and capable of becoming pregnant* and not practicing a medically approved method of contraception (Pearl Index <1**) during and up to at least 4 weeks after the end of treatment. A negative pregnancy test (serum) for all women and for girls entering menarche is required before Randomization.
*definition of post-menopausal: 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH levels >40 mIU/m or 6 weeks post surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy
**examples of particularly reliable methods with Pearl Index (PI) <1, according to guidelines of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe:
• Combination pill with estrogen and gestagen (no mini-pill, PI=0.1-0.9)
• Vaginal ring (NuvaRing®, PI=0.65 uncorr.; 0.4 corr.)
• Contraceptive patch (EVRA®, PI= 0.72 uncorr.; 0.9 corr.)
• Estrogen-free ovulation inhibitors (Cerazette®, PI=0.14)
• Progestin-containing contraceptives (Implanon®, PI=0-0.08)
• Injectable 3-month depot progestins (PI=0.3-1.4; 0.88 corr.)
• Intra-uterine progestine device (Mirena®, PI=0.16)
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
1. To demonstrate that add-on to glimeperide vildagliptin is superior to NPH insulin with respect to the incidence of the combined endpoint, defined as a blood glucose target (HbA1c below 7.0%) without any confirmed hypoglycemic events (BG measurement < 3.9mM (71mg/dL)) and weight gain (+3%) in T2DM patients.
2. To demonstrate that add-on to glimepiride vildagliptin is superior to NPH insulin with respect to the rate of of confirmed hypoglycemic events (BG measurement < 3.9mM (71mg/dL)) in T2DM patients.
|
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
• To evaluate the incidence of severe hypoglycemic events in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemic events in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate the proportion of patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride who reach their blood glucose target (HbA1c below 7.0%) without any confirmed hypoglycemic events.
• To evaluate body weight changes between Visit 2 and study end in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate the change in HbA1c, between Visit 2 and study end in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride.
• To evaluate treatment satisfaction between Visit 2 and study end in patients treated with vildagliptin versus NPH insulin add-on to glimepiride by using the TSQM-9 questionnaire.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 71 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |