Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A RANDOMIZED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF GANETESPIB IN COMBINATION WITH DOCETAXEL VERSUS DOCETAXEL ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2012-004349-34
    Trial protocol
    HU   GB   DE   CZ   BE   ES   PL   SI   AT   NL   IT  
    Global end of trial date
    02 Dec 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    24 Mar 2016
    First version publication date
    24 Mar 2016
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    9090-14
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01798485
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.
    Sponsor organisation address
    45 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA , United States, 02421
    Public contact
    President, Chief Executive Officer , Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp., +1 781-541-7261,
    Scientific contact
    VP Clinical Research, Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp., +1 781-541-7156,
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    19 Jan 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    02 Dec 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Compare overall survival (OS) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with adenocarcinoma histology treated with ganetespib in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone.
    Protection of trial subjects
    All Investigators obtained Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for this protocol and written informed consent prior to study initiation in adherence with 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 50 and 21 CFR 56. This trial was designed and monitored in accordance with Sponsor procedures, which comply with the ethical principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) as required by the major regulatory authorities, and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to the start of any protocol-specific evaluations or screening procedures, the Investigator (or designated staff) explained the nature of the study and its risks and benefits to the patient (or the patient’s legal representative). Each patient received an informed consent document with patient information. Patients were to be given ample time to read the information and the opportunity to ask questions. Informed consent was required to be obtained from each patient prior to performing any protocol-specific evaluations. One copy of the signed informed consent document was given to the patient, and another was retained by the Investigator.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    20 Mar 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 79
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Slovenia: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 52
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 39
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czech Republic: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 53
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 28
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 82
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Croatia: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Romania: 94
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 34
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Serbia: 99
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ukraine: 43
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    696
    EEA total number of subjects
    420
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    474
    From 65 to 84 years
    222
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    209 sites screened at least one patient and 175 sites randomized at least one patient.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    1220 patients with advanced NSCLC of adenocarcinoma histology diagnosed ≥6 months prior to study entry were screened. 696 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two arms and stratified by: • ECOG (0 versus 1) • Screening total LDH levels (normal vs. elevated) • Geographic region (North America and Western Europe vs. Rest of World)

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    This study was open-label due to the inability to blind patients and investigative site staff to the distinct side effects of ganetespib, ie, diarrhea.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Arm description
    Ganetespib (150 mg/m^2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) were administered as separate 1-hour IV infusions on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Administration of ganetespib preceded the administration of docetaxel. Ganetespib was administered again on Day 15 of each cycle.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ganetespib
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    STA-9090
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Concentrate for solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Ganetespib (150 mg/m^2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) were administered as separate 1-hour IV infusions on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Administration of ganetespib preceded the administration of docetaxel. Ganetespib was administered again on Day 15 of each cycle. After docetaxel treatment ceased, participants whose disease has not progressed continued to receive ganetespib alone until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient's withdrawal of consent.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Docetaxel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Taxotere, Docecad
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Concentrate for solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Docetaxel was given after ganetespib in the experimental treatment arm. Docetaxel, 75 mg/m^2, was administered according to prevailing practice and Investigator decision, generally until disease progression, intolerability, or patient's withdrawal of consent.

    Arm title
    Docetaxel
    Arm description
    Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle by 1-hour IV infusion.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Docetaxel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Taxotere, Docecad
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Concentrate for solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Docetaxel was given after ganetespib in the experimental treatment arm. Docetaxel, 75 mg/m^2, was administered according to prevailing practice and Investigator decision, generally until disease progression, intolerability, or patient's withdrawal of consent.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Started
    347
    349
    Safety Population as of 23 Dec 2015
    338
    342
    Randomized as of 19 October 2015
    335
    337
    Completed
    1
    59
    Not completed
    346
    290
         Clinical progression
    35
    24
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    27
    31
         Physician decision
    14
    10
         Objective disease progression
    152
    106
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    32
    40
         Death
    25
    22
         Sponsor decision
    61
    54
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    3

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Reporting group description
    Ganetespib (150 mg/m^2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) were administered as separate 1-hour IV infusions on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Administration of ganetespib preceded the administration of docetaxel. Ganetespib was administered again on Day 15 of each cycle.

    Reporting group title
    Docetaxel
    Reporting group description
    Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle by 1-hour IV infusion.

    Reporting group values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel Total
    Number of subjects
    347 349 696
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        <65 years
    227 247 474
        >=65 years
    120 102 222
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    60.9 ± 8.93 60.1 ± 8.69 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    141 135 276
        Male
    206 214 420
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Asian
    1 1 2
        Black or African American
    1 6 7
        White
    341 340 681
        Unknown or Not Reported
    4 2 6
    Geographic region
    Units: Subjects
        North America
    41 44 85
        Western Europe
    101 96 197
        Rest of World
    205 209 414
    Smoking history
    Units: Subjects
        Never Smoked
    62 62 124
        Ever Smoked
    282 284 566
        Unknown
    3 3 6
    Stage at Initial Diagnosis
    Units: Subjects
        I/II
    22 19 41
        IIIA
    18 18 36
        IIIB
    52 52 104
        IV
    254 258 512
        Unknown
    1 2 3
    ECOG at Study Entry
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participants' disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living activities of the participant and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis.
    Units: Subjects
        0 = Fully Active
    124 125 249
        1 = Restrictive but Ambulatory
    223 224 447
        2 = Ambulatory Unable to Work
    0 0 0
        3 = Limited Self-care
    0 0 0
        4 = Completely Disabled
    0 0 0
    Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at Study Entry
    Units: Subjects
        Normal
    246 247 493
        Elevated
    101 102 203
    Brain Metastasis
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    65 55 120
        No
    282 294 576
    Bone Metastasis
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    115 100 215
        No
    232 249 481
    Intra-Thoracic Metastasis only
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    95 120 215
        No
    252 229 481
    Time from Advanced NCSLC Diagnosis to Consent
    Units: months
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    11.54 ± 5.995 11.76 ± 7.74 -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Reporting group description
    Ganetespib (150 mg/m^2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) were administered as separate 1-hour IV infusions on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Administration of ganetespib preceded the administration of docetaxel. Ganetespib was administered again on Day 15 of each cycle.

    Reporting group title
    Docetaxel
    Reporting group description
    Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle by 1-hour IV infusion.

    Primary: Overall Survival as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Overall Survival as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    335 [1]
    337 [2]
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.9 (9 to 12.3)
    10.5 (8.6 to 12.2)
    Notes
    [1] - Randomized population
    [2] - Randomized population
    Statistical analysis title
    OS - Primary study hypothesis
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary study hypothesis was tested at a 2-sided, 0.05 significance level using a stratified log-rank test.
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.3293 [3]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    1.111
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.899
         upper limit
    1.372
    Notes
    [3] - P-value was from stratified log-rank test (strata: screening LDH, screening ECOG and geographic region).
    Statistical analysis title
    OS - Futility analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Futility analysis for the first Interim Analysis which had a database cutoff of 19 October 2015. For the first interim analysis, if the lower limit of the 2-sided 99.5% confidence interval for the Hazard Ratio was greater than 0.75, then the study could be stopped for futility, based on Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) recommendation. Hazard ratio and 99.5% CI were calculated using the stratified Cox Proportional Hazards model (strata: screening LDH, screening ECOG and geographic region).
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [4]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    1.111
    Confidence interval
         level
    99.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.821
         upper limit
    1.503
    Notes
    [4] - Futility

    Secondary: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Progression-free Survival (PFS) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    The progression-free interval is the interval from the date of randomization until tumor progression per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), clinical progression, or death from any cause in the absence of progressive disease, whichever occurs first. Data represents the investigator's assessment. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    335 [5]
    337 [6]
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    4.2 (3.8 to 4.4)
    4.3 (3.6 to 5.6)
    Notes
    [5] - Randomized population
    [6] - Randomized population
    Statistical analysis title
    PFS
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.1186 [7]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    1.161
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.961
         upper limit
    1.403
    Notes
    [7] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Overall Survival (OS) In Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Overall Survival (OS) In Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    OS was measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Elevated LDH includes values above the upper limit of normal.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    99 [8]
    98 [9]
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    7.1 (5.4 to 11)
    9 (6.2 to 10.3)
    Notes
    [8] - Randomized participants with elevated LDH at screening
    [9] - Randomized participants with elevated LDH at screening
    Statistical analysis title
    OS - Elevated Screening LDH Patients
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    197
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.2506 [10]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    1.232
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.865
         upper limit
    1.754
    Notes
    [10] - Significance level of 0.05. P-value was from stratified log-rank test (strata: screening ECOG and geographic region).

    Secondary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Objective Response Rate (ORR) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose best overall response, as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), was either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). CR was defined as the disappearance (or normalization) of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    335 [11]
    337 [12]
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    13.7 (10.2 to 17.9)
    16 (12.3 to 20.4)
    Notes
    [11] - Randomized patients
    [12] - Randomized patients
    Statistical analysis title
    Objective Response Rate
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.448 [13]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [13] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Disease Control Rate (DCR) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Disease Control Rate (DCR) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose best overall response, as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), was either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). CR was defined as the disappearance (or normalization) of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. For participants with a best response of SD, duration of SD must be for at least 6 weeks or 12 weeks.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    335 [14]
    337 [15]
    Units: percentage of participants
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        >=6 weeks
    64.5 (59.1 to 69.6)
    60.8 (55.4 to 66.1)
        >=12 weeks
    46 (40.5 to 51.5)
    46.9 (41.5 to 52.4)
    Notes
    [14] - Randomized patients
    [15] - Randomized patients
    Statistical analysis title
    DCR: >=6 weeks
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.339 [16]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [16] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    DCR: >= 12 weeks
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.817 [17]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [17] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DOR) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DOR) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Only participants who achieved a confirmed response (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) were included in the DOR analysis. CR was defined as the disappearance (or normalization) of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    46 [18]
    54 [19]
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    5.8 (3 to 5.9)
    5.8 (4.3 to 6.9)
    Notes
    [18] - Randomized participants who had a confirmed response
    [19] - Randomized participants who had a confirmed response
    Statistical analysis title
    DOR
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    100
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0111 [20]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    2.344
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.207
         upper limit
    4.551
    Notes
    [20] - P-value was from stratified log-rank test (strata: screening LDH, screening ECOG and geographic region).

    Secondary: Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    The progression-free interval is the interval from the date of randomization until tumor progression per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), clinical progression, or death from any cause in the absence of progressive disease, whichever occurs first. Data represents the investigator's assessment. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Elevated LDH includes values above the upper limit of normal.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    99 [21]
    98 [22]
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    3 (2.4 to 4)
    2.8 (2.2 to 4.1)
    Notes
    [21] - Randomized participants who had an elevated screening LDH
    [22] - Randomized participants who had an elevated screening LDH
    Statistical analysis title
    PFS- eLDH
    Statistical analysis description
    Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH)
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    197
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.5191 [23]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    1.112
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.797
         upper limit
    1.551
    Notes
    [23] - Significance level of 0.05. P-value was from stratified log-rank test (strata: screening ECOG and geographic region).

    Secondary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose best overall response, as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), was either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). CR was defined as the disappearance (or normalization) of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Elevated LDH includes values above the upper limit of normal. Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [24]
    0 [25]
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    ( to )
    ( to )
    Notes
    [24] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    [25] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Disease Control Rate (DCR) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Disease Control Rate (DCR) in Participants With an Elevated Screening Lactate Dehydrogenase (eLDH) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose best overall response, as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), was a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). CR was defined as the disappearance (or normalization) of all target lesions. PR was defined as <=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. The duration of SD must be for at least 6 weeks or 12 weeks. Elevated LDH includes values above the upper limit of normal. Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [26]
    0 [27]
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    ( to )
    ( to )
    Notes
    [26] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    [27] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Emergence of New Metastatic Lesion (TNL) as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Emergence of New Metastatic Lesion (TNL) as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    TNL was defined as time from the randomization date to the first day of radiological progression that included new metastatic lesions. Participants with no new metastatic lesions were censored at the date of the most recent radiological assessment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    335 [28]
    337 [29]
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    8.1 (6.5 to 9.7)
    8.7 (7.2 to 11.6)
    Notes
    [28] - Randomized patients
    [29] - Randomized patients
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to New Metastatic Lesion
    Comparison groups
    Docetaxel v Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.1343 [30]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    1.233
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.937
         upper limit
    1.621
    Notes
    [30] - Significance level of 0.05. Stratified log-rank test (strata: screening LDH, screening ECOG and geographic region).

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease Due to Any New Metastatic Lesion as of 19 October 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease Due to Any New Metastatic Lesion as of 19 October 2015
    End point description
    Progressive disease was due to either new metastatic lesions only or new metastatic lesions and target tumor growth.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    335 [31]
    337 [32]
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    34.9
    30.6
    Notes
    [31] - Randomized participants
    [32] - Randomized participants
    Statistical analysis title
    PD Due to New Metastatic Lesion
    Comparison groups
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel v Docetaxel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    672
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.25 [33]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [33] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as of 23 December 2015

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as of 23 December 2015
    End point description
    Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that occurred from the time of first dose through 30 days after the last dose of study medication. The Investigator graded the severity of AEs according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) criteria: Grade 1 = Mild Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death A Serious AE (SAE) is defined as any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or constitutes an important medical event.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    338 [34]
    342 [35]
    Units: participants
        >=1 AE
    317
    307
        >=1 AE with CTCAE grade of 3 or 4
    222
    184
        >=1 SAE
    139
    107
        >=1 AE leading to dose reduction
    61
    37
        >=1 AE leading to delayed dose
    125
    55
        >=1 AE leading to study drug discontinuation
    31
    36
        >=1 SAE leading to study drug discontinuation
    19
    15
        >=1 SAE leading to hospitalization
    109
    87
        >=1 SAE with outcome of death
    40
    30
        >=1 AE with first occurrence during Cycle 1-2
    280
    280
        >=1 AE with first occurrence during Cycle 1-4
    304
    299
        >=1 AE with first occurrence during Cycle 1-6
    312
    302
    Notes
    [34] - Safety population
    [35] - Safety population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Patient-Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the European Quality Of Life - Five Dimensions - Three Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Survey

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Patient-Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the European Quality Of Life - Five Dimensions - Three Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Survey
    End point description
    The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. An overall EQ-5D-3L index was calculated (see EuroQoL website, http://www.euroqol.org/eq-5d-products/eq-5d-3l.html), with an index of 1.0 representing full health and and "0" represents dead, with some health states being worse than dead (<"0"). Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-treatment), Day 63 (Cycle 3 Day 1), Day 105 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and end of trial
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [36]
    0 [37]
    Units: participants
    Notes
    [36] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    [37] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Patient-Reported Symptom Improvement as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) Version 4 Test

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Patient-Reported Symptom Improvement as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) Version 4 Test
    End point description
    The FACT-L contains 4 general subscales and a Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS). General subscales include: Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social/ Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), and Functional Well-Being (FWB). The LCS assesses symptoms commonly reported by lung cancer patients (e.g., shortness of breath, weight loss, and tightness in the chest). The FACT-L total score ranges from 0 to 136, higher scores represent better QOL. Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (pre-treatment), Day 63 (Cycle 3 Day 1), Day 105 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and end of trial
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [38]
    0 [39]
    Units: participants
    Notes
    [38] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    [39] - Data were not summarized due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Other pre-specified: Exploratory Biomarker Analyses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Exploratory Biomarker Analyses
    End point description
    Exploratory biomarker analyses was to assess correlation between biomarkers and clinical outcome. However data were not analyzed due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    End point type
    Other pre-specified
    End point timeframe
    up to 36 months
    End point values
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel Docetaxel
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [40]
    0 [41]
    Units: participants
    Notes
    [40] - Data were not analyzed due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    [41] - Data were not analyzed due to the early termination of the study due to futility.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    up to 36 months
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    18.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Docetaxel
    Reporting group description
    Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle by 1-hour IV infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Reporting group description
    Ganetespib (150 mg/m^2) and docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) were administered as separate 1-hour IV infusions on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Administration of ganetespib preceded the administration of docetaxel. Ganetespib was administered again on Day 15 of each cycle.

    Serious adverse events
    Docetaxel Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    107 / 342 (31.29%)
    139 / 338 (41.12%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    175
    195
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Cancer pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neoplasm progression
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 342 (3.22%)
    16 / 338 (4.73%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 11
    1 / 16
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 10
    0 / 11
    Vascular disorders
    Deep vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Jugular vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Superior vena cava syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Venous thrombosis limb
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Cancer surgery
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Asthenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    7 / 338 (2.07%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    7 / 9
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 342 (0.88%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Death
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 342 (1.17%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 2
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General physical health deterioration
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    5 / 338 (1.48%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    1 / 6
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    Multi-organ failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Non-cardiac chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Strangulated hernia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Sudden cardiac death
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 342 (0.88%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    Sudden death
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 3
    Immune system disorders
    Drug hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Immunodeficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute respiratory failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 2
    Aspiration
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Atelectasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 342 (3.22%)
    9 / 338 (2.66%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 12
    0 / 9
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 2
    Haemoptysis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pleural effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 342 (1.17%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Pneumonitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    Pneumothorax
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 342 (1.46%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    Pulmonary fibrosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory distress
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Respiratory failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    Psychiatric disorders
    Completed suicide
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Confusional state
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mental status changes
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    Psychotic disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Investigations
    Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    White blood cell count decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Ankle fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Concussion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hip fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infusion related reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    4 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Joint dislocation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial fibrillation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bradycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac arrest
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac tamponade
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiopulmonary failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ischaemic cardiomyopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pericardial effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Pericarditis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Aphasia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypersomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ischaemic stroke
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Loss of consciousness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Paraesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Seizure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Somnolence
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    4 / 338 (1.18%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    3 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 342 (0.88%)
    6 / 338 (1.78%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    3 / 3
    3 / 6
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Febrile neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 342 (3.22%)
    19 / 338 (5.62%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    10 / 11
    20 / 20
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 342 (2.92%)
    12 / 338 (3.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    14 / 15
    13 / 14
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Retinal detachment
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colitis ischaemic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    15 / 338 (4.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    15 / 15
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dry mouth
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastric perforation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haematemesis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Ileus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ileus paralytic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal perforation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    Large intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mesenteric artery thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oesophageal stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Stomatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subileus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    3 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hepatitis toxic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute kidney injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haematuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bone pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Anal abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bacteraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 342 (1.17%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    3 / 4
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchopneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    5 / 338 (1.48%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 5
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Device related infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Device related sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diverticulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Empyema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Erysipelas
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Escherichia bacteraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neutropenic sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oesophageal candidiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oral candidiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Perirectal abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peritonsillar abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    12 / 338 (3.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    4 / 12
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    Pseudomembranous colitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary tuberculosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 342 (0.58%)
    3 / 338 (0.89%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    4 / 338 (1.18%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    4 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subcutaneous abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 342 (0.29%)
    0 / 338 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urosepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 342 (0.88%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 3
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    Hyperkalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyponatraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    2 / 338 (0.59%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypovolaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolic acidosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 342 (0.00%)
    1 / 338 (0.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Docetaxel Ganetespib and Docetaxel
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    293 / 342 (85.67%)
    308 / 338 (91.12%)
    Investigations
    Weight decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 342 (5.26%)
    38 / 338 (11.24%)
         occurrences all number
    22
    50
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Infusion related reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 342 (3.22%)
    17 / 338 (5.03%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    32
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 342 (6.14%)
    24 / 338 (7.10%)
         occurrences all number
    30
    41
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 342 (4.97%)
    22 / 338 (6.51%)
         occurrences all number
    23
    30
    Neuropathy peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    33 / 342 (9.65%)
    41 / 338 (12.13%)
         occurrences all number
    52
    63
    Peripheral sensory neuropathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 342 (6.73%)
    15 / 338 (4.44%)
         occurrences all number
    29
    18
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    70 / 342 (20.47%)
    59 / 338 (17.46%)
         occurrences all number
    144
    106
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 342 (5.26%)
    20 / 338 (5.92%)
         occurrences all number
    54
    39
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    94 / 342 (27.49%)
    109 / 338 (32.25%)
         occurrences all number
    255
    243
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Asthenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    48 / 342 (14.04%)
    51 / 338 (15.09%)
         occurrences all number
    109
    100
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 342 (4.97%)
    19 / 338 (5.62%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    26
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    72 / 342 (21.05%)
    79 / 338 (23.37%)
         occurrences all number
    123
    130
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    29 / 342 (8.48%)
    28 / 338 (8.28%)
         occurrences all number
    30
    39
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    19 / 342 (5.56%)
    26 / 338 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    30
    33
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    26 / 342 (7.60%)
    35 / 338 (10.36%)
         occurrences all number
    31
    41
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    47 / 342 (13.74%)
    149 / 338 (44.08%)
         occurrences all number
    64
    327
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    68 / 342 (19.88%)
    59 / 338 (17.46%)
         occurrences all number
    103
    86
    Stomatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    36 / 342 (10.53%)
    32 / 338 (9.47%)
         occurrences all number
    52
    40
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 342 (6.73%)
    36 / 338 (10.65%)
         occurrences all number
    27
    46
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    31 / 342 (9.06%)
    34 / 338 (10.06%)
         occurrences all number
    36
    45
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    41 / 342 (11.99%)
    55 / 338 (16.27%)
         occurrences all number
    56
    59
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia
         subjects affected / exposed
    84 / 342 (24.56%)
    76 / 338 (22.49%)
         occurrences all number
    98
    93
    Rash
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 342 (4.68%)
    19 / 338 (5.62%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    21
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 342 (2.34%)
    23 / 338 (6.80%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    23
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 342 (5.85%)
    17 / 338 (5.03%)
         occurrences all number
    35
    24
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 342 (4.09%)
    24 / 338 (7.10%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    28
    Bone pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 342 (4.97%)
    19 / 338 (5.62%)
         occurrences all number
    24
    26
    Myalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    28 / 342 (8.19%)
    38 / 338 (11.24%)
         occurrences all number
    52
    64
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 342 (4.39%)
    18 / 338 (5.33%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    23
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    35 / 342 (10.23%)
    52 / 338 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    49
    66
    Hyponatraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 342 (2.63%)
    26 / 338 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    46

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    19 Aug 2013
    New secondary objective added: “Evaluate and compare the emergence of metastatic lesions in the two treatment groups”.
    10 Mar 2014
    The patient population was revised to a “Target Patient Population” (TPP) defined as: Patients with second-line advanced NSCLC of adenocarcinoma histology diagnosed ≥6 months prior to study entry whose tumors are negative for both EGFR mutations and ALK translocations. Secondary endpoints were added: Compare PFS between the 2 treatment arms in TPP and Compare OS between the 2 treatment arms in patients with eLDH at screening in TPP. Removed duration of treatment (DOT) as a secondary endpoint. Removed mutant KRAS as a population in which to compare OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR. KRAS status was included within the objective of “Assess the correlation between biomarkers, including KRAS status, and clinical outcome.” Increased sample size from N=500 to N=850 Increased number of study centers from up to 140 to up to 250 Increased duration of recruitment to 28 months including a prolonged ramp-up period.
    17 Nov 2014
    The primary analysis population was revised to all randomized patients. Secondary efficacy endpoints and analyses were revised from PFS in the TPP and OS for eLDH patients in the TPP to PFS for all randomized patients and OS for patients with eLDH. Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints and Analyses were revised to a single subpopulation of interest, patients with eLDH at screening, for whom PFS will be analyzed. The “Other Secondary Objective” to compare OS in patients with eLDH5 was removed.
    17 Aug 2015
    The number of patients for combination arm (N=425) was added. Addition of a +/- 15 minute window to the rest period between ganetespib and docetaxel infusion. Addition of "Dose may also be recalculated for a weight change of <10%". Other administrative changes. No changes in primary or secondary endpoints.
    21 Sep 2015
    Addition of gastrointestinal perforation as an identified risk with ganetespib.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    The study was stopped after the first Interim Analysis due to futility. Efficacy is based on a 05-10-2015 data cut for the first interim analysis. Safety is based on the final database locked on 23-12-2015.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 11:36:03 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA