Clinical Trial Results:
Staining efficacy and safety of Methylene Blue enemas in patients undergoing flexible rectosigmoidoscopy
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-000452-18 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
24 Jun 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
11 Oct 2022
|
First version publication date |
11 Oct 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
CSR |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CB-17-03/01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
Study protocol: CRO-13-111 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Cosmo Technologies
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Riverside 2, 49 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Grand Canal Dock, Dublin,, Dublin, Ireland, D02 KV60
|
||
Public contact |
Study Management, CROSS S.A., +41 916300510, cbanyai@cosmopharma.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Study Management, CROSS S.A., 0867015703 916300510, cbanyai@cosmopharma.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
25 Jul 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
24 Jun 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
24 Jun 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of the study is the evaluation of the mucosal staining efficacy after single rectal dose of two Methylene Blue enema formulations containing, respectively, 0.002% methylene blue (Formulation A) and 0.02% methylene blue (Formulation B), in patients undergoing a rectosigmoidoscopy for various reasons.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Discrete measures of vital signs (blood pressure - BP, heart rate - HR, peripheral oxygen saturation - SpO2) were recorded prior to, during and after the end of the endoscopy.
|
||
Background therapy |
The subjects, who received Formulation A, also received a commercial cleansing enema (Clisma-Lax 133 mL, by Sofar S.p.A., Italy; batch: R0330; expiry: MAY17) and took it at home following the instructions enclosed with the product. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
A total dose of 100 mL of Methylene Blue enema composition was selected for the present study. When administering formulation A, the dose contained methylene blue 0.002%. With formulation B, methylene blue was 0.02%. These new formulations were tested in order to verify the ability to stain the sigmoidal and rectal (distal) colonic mucosa when administered through an enema cleansing preparation before a rectosigmoidoscopy. Formulation A, with the lower methylene blue concentration, was designed to be administered after the cleansing enema with the aim of staining the mucosa after the gut is cleansed through a previously administered cleansing enema. Formulation B combines both the cleansing and the staining properties and was designed to be administered alone, without any additional cleansing enema. The concentration of methylene blue in formulation B was increased by 10 times, because the affinity of methylene blue for faeces is higher than that for the intestinal mucosa. Since formulation B is administered when the gut lumen is not yet cleansed from faeces, the higher methylene blue concentration aimed at obtaining the same mucosal staining efficacy as with formulation A. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 Mar 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 5
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
5
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
5
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
5
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The subjects were assigned a consecutive study number. The subjects received their individual clinical supply package, including the investigational medicinal product (IMP) for their treatment. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
From day -15 to day -1, out-patients scheduled for rectosigmoidoscopy were informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to sign the informed onsent form for inclusion in the trial. Their medical history was evaluated and recorded. The subjects underwent a physical examination. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Day of Endoscopy (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Not blinded. Patients were assigned on their treatment based on a consecutive study number.
|
|||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Formulation A | |||||||||
Arm description |
Methylene Blue enema | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methylene Blue enema
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Enema
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Rectal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.002% of methylene blue in 100 mL of product
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Formulation B | |||||||||
Arm description |
Methylene Blue enema, 0.02% of methylene blue in 100 mL of product | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methylene Blue enema
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Enema
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Rectal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.02% of methylene blue in 100 mL of product
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Formulation A
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Methylene Blue enema | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Formulation B
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Methylene Blue enema, 0.02% of methylene blue in 100 mL of product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Formulation A
|
||
Reporting group description |
Methylene Blue enema | ||
Reporting group title |
Formulation B
|
||
Reporting group description |
Methylene Blue enema, 0.02% of methylene blue in 100 mL of product | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Enrolled Set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
all enrolled subjects
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety Set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
all subjects who received at least one dose of the IMP. This analysis set was used for safety analyses.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Efficacy set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
the efficacy set was defined as all treated subjects who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of IMP intake and efficacy measure collection, without major deviations that could affect the efficacy results. This analysis set was used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Evaluation of the mucosal staining efficacy of the two test Methylene Blue enema Formulations, named A and B. [1] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discontinuation.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discontinuation.
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discontinuation. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discont [3] - No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discont [4] - No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discont |
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Day 1-Day of the endoscopy
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
No adverse events or serious adverse events occurred during the study. No discontinuation due to any
treatment emergent adverse event occurred during the study.
No clinically meaningful effect of methylene blue on vital signs or subjects’ health conditions was observed
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
21
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No adverse events or serious adverse events occurred during the study. No discontinuation due to any treatment emergent adverse event occurred during the study. No clinically meaningful effect of methylene blue on vital signs or subjects’ health conditions was observed |
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
31 Jul 2013 |
Protocol amendment 1 issued on 31JUL13 was reviewed and approved by the IEC
on 16SEP13. Ref. nr. CE ICH 254/13. |
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
No analysis could be conducted on the efficacy variables of the study due to premature study discontinuation. |