Clinical Trial Results:
Patient Satisfacation of Propofol versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation during Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-002428-17 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
30 Apr 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
17 Mar 2021
|
First version publication date |
17 Mar 2021
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Full data set |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2013052044
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01934088 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Herlev Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
|
||
Public contact |
Jeppe Thue Jensen, Gastroenheden D, Herlev Hospital, 0045 26136032, jeppe.thue.jensen.01@regionh.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Jeppe Thue Jensen, Gastroenheden D, Herlev Hospital, 0045 26136032, jeppe.thue.jensen.01@regionh.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Apr 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Apr 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Apr 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To study if patients with inflammatory bowel disease prefer sedation with propofol or midazolam/fentanyl for their colonoscopy, and if the sedation of choice can increase adherence to treatment program
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Trial subjects were randomized to one of two possible standard treatments available in our department. The treatments were unmodified.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Sep 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 130
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
130
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
130
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
110
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
20
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients included were ≥18 years of age and were scheduled for colonoscopy as part of our standard of care for IBD, or as part of diagnostic workup in patients suspected for having IBD. 320 patients were screened. 130 patients were included. Of the 190 patients declining inclusion, 133 opted out due to specific sedation preferences. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Propofol sedation | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Deep sedation with propofol administered by a designated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Propofol "B. Braun"
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
N01AX10
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Emulsion for injection/infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Propofol 10 mg/ml Emulsion.
Induction with bolus 20-80 mg (100 minus patient age) and subsequent induction bolus corresponding to half the initial dose 10-40 mg.
Sedation maintenance with bolus 10-20 mg every 1-2 minute, if the patients shows signs of being awake, or is otherwise respiratory and cirkulatory stable.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Moderate sedation was administered by a dedicated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. Initial Fentanyl dose of 0.05 mg (≤60 years of age) and 0.025 mg (≥61 years of age) was administered at least five minutes prior to procedure. Induction dose with Midazolam was 1-5 mg and 0.5-2 mg for maintenance when necessary. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fentanyl "B. Braun
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
N05CD08, N01AH01
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection/infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Induction dose with Midazolam was 1-5 mg and 0.5-2 mg for maintenance when necessary.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fentanyl "B. Braun
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
N01AH01
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraventricular use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Sedation was administered by a dedicated nurse supervised by the endoscopist according to local protocol.12 Initial Fentanyl dose of 0.05 mg (≤60 years of age) and 0.025 mg (≥61 years of age) was administered at least five minutes prior to procedure.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Propofol sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Deep sedation with propofol administered by a designated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Moderate sedation was administered by a dedicated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. Initial Fentanyl dose of 0.05 mg (≤60 years of age) and 0.025 mg (≥61 years of age) was administered at least five minutes prior to procedure. Induction dose with Midazolam was 1-5 mg and 0.5-2 mg for maintenance when necessary. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Propofol sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
63 patients. Age at study, mean years (SD) 41.9 (13.3). ASA class, mean (SD) 1.38 (0.49); BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) 24.8 (4.0); Sedative drug mg, mean (SD) 342 (139);Sedation time minutes, mean (SD) 29.9 (11.5); Sleep score 1-5 during intervention, mean (SD)1=awake, 5=asleep: 4.71 (0.72)
Indication for colonoscopy, no. (%) Diagnostic 19 (30); Evaluation of disease activity at suspected flare 25 (40); Evaluation of disease activity during remission 9 (14); Surveillance for cancer 10 (16).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
67 patients. Age at study, mean years (SD) 41.2 (14.0); ASA class, mean (SD) 1.38 (0.49); BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) 24.4 (3.7); Sedative drug mg (Midazolam/Fentanyl), mean (SD)2.4 (0.5) / 0.06 (0.02); Sedation time minutes, mean (SD) 29.1 (13.6); Sleep score 1-5 during intervention, mean (SD) 1=awake, 5=asleep: 1.31 (0.74).
Indication for colonoscopy, no. (%): Diagnostic 18 (27); Evaluation of disease activity at suspected flare 24 (36); Evaluation of disease activity during remission 18 (27); Surveillance for cancer 7 (10)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Propofol sedation
|
||
Reporting group description |
Deep sedation with propofol administered by a designated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. | ||
Reporting group title |
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation
|
||
Reporting group description |
Moderate sedation was administered by a dedicated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. Initial Fentanyl dose of 0.05 mg (≤60 years of age) and 0.025 mg (≥61 years of age) was administered at least five minutes prior to procedure. Induction dose with Midazolam was 1-5 mg and 0.5-2 mg for maintenance when necessary. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Propofol sedation
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
63 patients. Age at study, mean years (SD) 41.9 (13.3). ASA class, mean (SD) 1.38 (0.49); BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) 24.8 (4.0); Sedative drug mg, mean (SD) 342 (139);Sedation time minutes, mean (SD) 29.9 (11.5); Sleep score 1-5 during intervention, mean (SD)1=awake, 5=asleep: 4.71 (0.72)
Indication for colonoscopy, no. (%) Diagnostic 19 (30); Evaluation of disease activity at suspected flare 25 (40); Evaluation of disease activity during remission 9 (14); Surveillance for cancer 10 (16).
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
67 patients. Age at study, mean years (SD) 41.2 (14.0); ASA class, mean (SD) 1.38 (0.49); BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) 24.4 (3.7); Sedative drug mg (Midazolam/Fentanyl), mean (SD)2.4 (0.5) / 0.06 (0.02); Sedation time minutes, mean (SD) 29.1 (13.6); Sleep score 1-5 during intervention, mean (SD) 1=awake, 5=asleep: 1.31 (0.74).
Indication for colonoscopy, no. (%): Diagnostic 18 (27); Evaluation of disease activity at suspected flare 24 (36); Evaluation of disease activity during remission 18 (27); Surveillance for cancer 7 (10)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Patient satisfaction with sedation | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The satisfaction questionnaire consists 13 items. Each item can be scored from 1-5, with 5 representing a better experience with the sedation.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Satisfaction questionnaire is completed before discharge from the recovery area.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Table 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
One-Way Analysis of Variance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Comparison of satisfaction scores
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation v Propofol sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
126
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
During the procedure and within 1 hour of discharge
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Apnea with bag valve ventilation: 1 patient. Hypoxia (< 92% saturation): 6 patients. Hypotension: 7 patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
SNOMED CT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Propofol sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Deep sedation with propofol administered by a designated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Midazolam/fentanyl sedation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Moderate sedation was administered by a dedicated nurse supervised by the endoscopist. Initial Fentanyl dose of 0.05 mg (≤60 years of age) and 0.025 mg (≥61 years of age) was administered at least five minutes prior to procedure. Induction dose with Midazolam was 1-5 mg and 0.5-2 mg for maintenance when necessary. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
Small sample size. Large proportion of screened patients excluded due to specific sedation preferences. Lack of a properly validated satisfaction questionnaire. |