Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of ITF2984 in Acromegalic patients.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-003183-31
    Trial protocol
    CZ   IT   NL   HU   ES   RO   PL   FR  
    Global end of trial date
    08 Feb 2016

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    10 May 2020
    First version publication date
    10 May 2020
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    DSC/13/2984/05
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02111044
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    ITALFARMACO S.p.A.
    Sponsor organisation address
    Via dei Lavoratori, 54, Cinisello Balsamo (MI), Italy, 20092
    Public contact
    Clinical Scientist, ITALFARMACO S.p.A., +39 0264431, s.manzoni@italfarmaco.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Scientist, ITALFARMACO S.p.A., +39 0264431, s.manzoni@italfarmaco.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    08 Feb 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    08 Feb 2016
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    08 Feb 2016
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To investigate the effect of treatment on GH and IGF-1 concentrations.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was carried out in accordance with the principles enunciated in the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) harmonised tripartite guideline regarding Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (E6 Consolidated Guidance) the Declaration of Helsinki, the European and local regulations, and the Italfarmaco/contract research organisation (CRO) standard operating procedures (SOPs).
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    13 Jan 2014
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Serbia: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 11
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Romania: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czech Republic: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 14
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 10
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    48
    EEA total number of subjects
    40
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    43
    From 65 to 84 years
    5
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The study enrolled patients with active acromegaly, de novo or partial responder to previous treatment with somatostatin analogs. Due to the small number of de novo patients, the recruitment of these patients should be at least 1/3 of the total enrolment.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    For patients who had previously received medical therapy for acromegaly a washout period, before study entry, of 3 months for long-acting formulation of somatostatin analogs, 2 weeks for octreotide sc, 2 months for pegvisomant and/or cabergoline was foreseen.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial by sequence (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Not applicable, this was a randomised open-label study.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Octreotide 100- ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 1000
    Arm description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Octreotide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Octreotide 100 mcg/ml, solution for injection in prefilled syringe: Each prefilled syringe with l ml of solution for injection contains 100 mcg of octreotide as octreotide acetate. Octreotide 100 mcg sc was administered three times daily (t.i.d) for 4 weeks

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ITF2984
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Glass pre-filled syringes containing 1 ml of ready to use s.c. solution of ITF2984 diacetate: ITF2984 500 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 1000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 2000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks.

    Arm title
    ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 2000
    Arm description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: ITF2984 500 mcg bid Octreotide 100 mcg tid ITF2984 1000 mcg bid ITF2984 2000 mcg bid. Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Octreotide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Octreotide 100 mcg/ml, solution for injection in prefilled syringe: Each prefilled syringe with l ml of solution for injection contains 100 mcg of octreotide as octreotide acetate. Octreotide 100 mcg sc was administered three times daily (t.i.d) for 4 weeks,

    Investigational medicinal product name
    IFT2984
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Glass pre-filled syringes containing 1 ml of ready to use s.c. solution of ITF2984 diacetate: ITF2984 500 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 1000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks ITF2984 2000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks.

    Arm title
    ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 2000 - Octreotide 100
    Arm description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Octreotide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Octreotide 100 mcg/ml, solution for injection in prefilled syringe: Each prefilled syringe with l ml of solution for injection contains 100 mcg of octreotide as octreotide acetate. Octreotide 100 mcg sc was administered three times daily (t.i.d) for 4 weeks,

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ITF2984
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Glass pre-filled syringes containing 1 ml of ready to use s.c. solution of ITF2984 diacetate: ITF2984 500 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 1000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 2000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks.

    Arm title
    ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500
    Arm description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid. Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Octreotide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Octreotide 100 mcg/ml, solution for injection in prefilled syringe: Each prefilled syringe with l ml of solution for injection contains 100 mcg of octreotide as octreotide acetate. Octreotide 100 mcg sc was administered three times daily (t.i.d) for 4 weeks,

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ITF2984
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Glass pre-filled syringes containing 1 ml of ready to use s.c. solution of ITF2984 diacetate: ITF2984 500 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 1000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks, ITF2984 2000 mcg sc b.i.d for 4 weeks.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Octreotide 100- ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 1000 ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 2000 ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 2000 - Octreotide 100 ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500
    Started
    12
    12
    12
    12
    Completed
    11
    11
    7
    11
    Not completed
    1
    1
    5
    1
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    1
    1
    1
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    -
    -
    3
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Octreotide 100- ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 1000
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 2000
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: ITF2984 500 mcg bid Octreotide 100 mcg tid ITF2984 1000 mcg bid ITF2984 2000 mcg bid. Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 2000 - Octreotide 100
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid. Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    Octreotide 100- ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 1000 ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 2000 ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 2000 - Octreotide 100 ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500 Total
    Number of subjects
    12 12 12 12 48
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    10 11 11 10 42
        From 65-84 years
    2 1 1 2 6
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    8 7 8 6 29
        Male
    4 5 4 6 19
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 2000-500-1000 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000-2000 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 - 500 - 2000 - Octreotide 100 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 - 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 2000-500-1000 - safety ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000-2000 - safety ITF2984 1000 - 500 - 2000 - Octreotide 100 - safety ITF2984 2000 - 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500 - safety Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects
    11
    12
    12
    12
    41
    43
    47
    42
    41
    43
    46
    42
    41
    42
    43
    42
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    9
    11
    11
    10
    9
    11
    11
    10
        From 65-84 years
    2
    1
    1
    2
    2
    1
    1
    2
    Age continuous
    Units:
        
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    7
    7
    8
    6
        Male
    4
    5
    4
    6

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Octreotide 100- ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 1000
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 2000
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: ITF2984 500 mcg bid Octreotide 100 mcg tid ITF2984 1000 mcg bid ITF2984 2000 mcg bid. Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 1000 - ITF2984 500 - ITF2984 2000 - Octreotide 100
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 2000 - ITF2984 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, through Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive the following sequence of study treatments: - ITF2984 2000 mcg bid - ITF2984 1000 mcg bid - Octreotide 100 mcg tid - ITF2984 500 mcg bid. Each period of treatment lasted 4 weeks, and was followed by a washout period of 2 weeks.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 2000-500-1000 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 1000-2000 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 - 500 - 2000 - Octreotide 100 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 - 1000 - Octreotide 100 - ITF2984 500 - safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of at least one study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set was defined as all randomised subjects that received the study drug with at least 1 evaluation of the primary endpoint (GH and IGF-1 value) after the study drug intake.

    Primary: Change from baseline in GH level at the end of each month of treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in GH level at the end of each month of treatment
    End point description
    The primary analysis of the primary variables assessed whether the reduction from baseline in GH and IGF-1 levels was > 0 separately for each treatment. The secondary analysis of the primary variables assessed evidence of a dose-response for ITF2984; the effect of each of the ITF2984 doses was compared with octreotide. In addition, the lowest ITF dose (ITF2984 500 μg) was compared with each of the other doses
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    EoT in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4. Each Period is represented by one-month treatment. "overall" data are reported in the system. Complete data for the 4 treatment periods are attached.
    End point values
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    42
    43
    42
    41
    43
    46
    42
    41
    42
    43
    42
    Units: μg/L
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Overall
    -1.28 ( 7.884 )
    -1.01 ( 4.224 )
    -3.47 ( 9.535 )
    -5.57 ( 11.354 )
    9.16 ( 8.797 )
    9.10 ( 9.970 )
    9.45 ( 11.079 )
    10.40 ( 12.734 )
    7.88 ( 9.722 )
    8.15 ( 7.888 )
    6.24 ( 6.081 )
    4.82 ( 5.307 )
    Attachments
    Summary of GH Levels
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 500 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    83
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [1]
    P-value
    = 0.1955
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of geometric means
    Point estimate
    1.14
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.93
         upper limit
    1.4
    Notes
    [1] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg vs ITF2984 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    85
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [2]
    P-value
    = 0.0048
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.75
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.61
         upper limit
    0.91
    Notes
    [2] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg vs ITF2984 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [3]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.52
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.43
         upper limit
    0.64
    Notes
    [3] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [4]
    P-value
    = 0.1226
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.85
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.7
         upper limit
    1.04
    Notes
    [4] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    83
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [5]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.49
         upper limit
    0.73
    Notes
    [5] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    82
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [6]
    P-value
    = 0.0165
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.66
         upper limit
    0.96
    Notes
    [6] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 500 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    85
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [7]
    P-value
    = 0.3134
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.91
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.76
         upper limit
    1.09
    Notes
    [7] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    89
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [8]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.68
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.57
         upper limit
    0.82
    Notes
    [8] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline v ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [9]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.48
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.4
         upper limit
    0.57
    Notes
    [9] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.

    Primary: Change from baseline in IGF-1 level at the end of each month of treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in IGF-1 level at the end of each month of treatment
    End point description
    The primary analysis of the primary variables assessed whether the reduction from baseline in GH and IGF-1 levels was > 0 separately for each treatment. The secondary analysis of the primary variables assessed evidence of a dose-response for ITF2984; the effect of each of the ITF2984 doses was compared with octreotide. In addition, the lowest ITF dose (ITF2984 500 μg) was compared with each of the other doses
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    EoT in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4. Each Period is represented by one-month treatment. "overall" data are reported in the system. Complete data for the 4 treatment periods are attached.
    End point values
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    41
    43
    42
    41
    42
    47
    42
    41
    42
    43
    42
    Units: nmol/L
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Overall
    -27.948 ( 24.6531 )
    -9.572 ( 17.1436 )
    -22.983 ( 20.4323 )
    -36.253 ( 20.6453 )
    81.524 ( 26.3922 )
    80.653 ( 25.7428 )
    81.962 ( 31.3650 )
    84.368 ( 26.8854 )
    53.576 ( 25.7877 )
    71.175 ( 26.8510 )
    57.282 ( 26.0949 )
    48.115 ( 25.8697 )
    Attachments
    Summary of IGF-1 level
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 500 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    82
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [10]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of the geometric means
    Point estimate
    1.39
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.25
         upper limit
    1.55
    Notes
    [10] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg vs ITF2984 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [11]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of the geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.79
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.71
         upper limit
    0.88
    Notes
    [11] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg vs ITF2984 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    83
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [12]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of the geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.63
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.56
         upper limit
    0.7
    Notes
    [12] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 1000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [13]
    P-value
    = 0.092
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of the geometric means
    Point estimate
    1.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.98
         upper limit
    1.23
    Notes
    [13] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF2984 2000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Secondary analysis: Treatment and dose comparisons using linear mixed effects model. Treatment comparisons are presented as treatment ratios of the above geometric means, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model (see Primary analysis). The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients in each arm. Since it is a crossover study, the subjects in the two groups are the same and therefore the comparison is intra-group.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    83
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [14]
    P-value
    = 0.0144
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    adjusted ratio of the geometric means
    Point estimate
    0.87
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.78
         upper limit
    0.97
    Notes
    [14] - A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    Octreotide 100 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - Baseline v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    82
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [15]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.61
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.54
         upper limit
    0.7
    Notes
    [15] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 500 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - Baseline v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [16]
    P-value
    = 0.0188
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.85
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.75
         upper limit
    0.97
    Notes
    [16] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 1000 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - Baseline v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    90
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [17]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.67
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.59
         upper limit
    0.77
    Notes
    [17] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2000 mcg - EoT vs Baseline
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis: Mean change from Baseline to End of Treatment using linear mixed-effects model. A linear mixed model was fitted to the change in log-transformed GH level from Baseline to the end of each month of treatment. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the log-transformed baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - Baseline v ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - EoT
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [18]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Adjusted geometric mean
    Point estimate
    0.53
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.47
         upper limit
    0.61
    Notes
    [18] - The mean change from baseline to the end of treatment for each treatment was presented as the geometric mean for the ratio End of treatment concentration: Baseline concentration, adjusted for the effects described in the linear mixed model. The system inappropriately adds up the number of patients at Baseline and EoT.

    Secondary: Number of patients with reduction of GH < 1.0 mcg/l and/or normalization of IGF-1 at the end of each month of treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients with reduction of GH < 1.0 mcg/l and/or normalization of IGF-1 at the end of each month of treatment
    End point description
    The number and percentage of subjects with reduction of GH < 1.0 μg/L and normalisation of IGF-1, the number and percentage of subjects with reduction of GH < 1.0 μg/L and the number and percentage of subjects with normalisation of IGF-1 at the end of each treatment period were presented for each treatment/period combination (16 combinations) and by treatment (combining periods)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    EoT in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4. Each Period is represented by one-month treatment. "overall" data are reported in the system. Complete data for the 4 treatment periods are attached.
    End point values
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    43
    47
    42
    Units: number
    number (not applicable)
        Overall - GH <0.1 mcg/L - YES
    1
    0
    1
    2
        Overall - GH <0.1 mcg/L - NO
    40
    42
    42
    40
        Overall - IGF-1 normalization - YES
    14
    5
    11
    21
        Overall - IGF-1 normalization - NO
    27
    37
    32
    21
        Overall - GH <0.1 mcg/L and IGF-1 norm - YES
    1
    0
    1
    2
        Overall - GH <0.1 mcg/L and IGF-1 norm - NO
    40
    42
    42
    40
    Attachments
    Reduction of GH
    Normalization of IGF-1
    Reduction of GH and Norm of IGF-1
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 500 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Normalization of IGF-1 levels at the end of treatment period because the models for Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L at the end of treatment period and Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [19]
    P-value
    = 0.0234
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.04
         upper limit
    0.79
    Notes
    [19] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a normalization of IGF-1 (nmol/ml) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 1000 mcg vs ITF 2985 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Normalization of IGF-1 levels at the end of treatment period because the models for Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L at the end of treatment period and Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    90
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [20]
    P-value
    = 0.2259
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.62
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.55
         upper limit
    12.55
    Notes
    [20] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a normalization of IGF-1 (nmol/ml) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 2000 mcg vs ITF 2985 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Normalization of IGF-1 levels at the end of treatment period because the models for Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L at the end of treatment period and Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    85
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [21]
    P-value
    = 0.0003
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    15.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.61
         upper limit
    68.41
    Notes
    [21] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a normalization of IGF-1 (nmol/ml) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 1000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Normalization of IGF-1 levels at the end of treatment period because the models for Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L at the end of treatment period and Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    88
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [22]
    P-value
    = 0.2311
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.46
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.13
         upper limit
    1.65
    Notes
    [22] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a normalization of IGF-1 (nmol/ml) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 2000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Normalization of IGF-1 levels at the end of treatment period because the models for Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L at the end of treatment period and Reduction of GH levels to <1.0 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    83
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [23]
    P-value
    = 0.079
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.75
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.89
         upper limit
    8.53
    Notes
    [23] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a normalization of IGF-1 (nmol/ml) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.

    Secondary: Number of patients with reduction of GH <2.5 mcg/L and/or normalizatin of IGF-1 at the end of each month of treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients with reduction of GH <2.5 mcg/L and/or normalizatin of IGF-1 at the end of each month of treatment
    End point description
    The number and percentage of subjects with reduction of GH < 2.5 μg/L and/or normalisation of IGF-1 at the end of each treatment period was presented for each treatment/period combination (16 combinations) and by treatment (combining periods). Data on the normalization of IGF-1 alone are reported among those on the endpoint "Number of patients with reduction of GH <1.0 mcg/L and/or normalization of IGF-1 at the end of each month of treatment".
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    EoT in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4. Each Period is represented by one-month treatment. "overall" data are reported in the system. Complete data for the 4 treatment periods are attached.
    End point values
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    43
    47
    42
    Units: number
    number (not applicable)
        Overall - GH <2.5 mcg/L - YES
    7
    3
    8
    19
        Overall - GH <2.5 mcg/L - NO
    34
    39
    35
    23
        Overall - GH <2.5 mcg/L and IGF-1 norm - YES
    4
    2
    4
    14
        Overall - GH <2.5 mcg/L and IGF-1 norm - NO
    37
    40
    39
    28
    Attachments
    Reduction of GH
    Reduction of GH and norm of IGF-1
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 500 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, again adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L at the end of treatment period because the model for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [24]
    P-value
    = 0.1878
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.28
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.04
         upper limit
    1.86
    Notes
    [24] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a reduction of GH level to < 2.5 (mcg/litre) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 1000 mcg vs ITF 2985 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, again adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L at the end of treatment period because the model for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    90
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [25]
    P-value
    = 0.2135
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.35
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.49
         upper limit
    22.71
    Notes
    [25] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a reduction of GH level to < 2.5 (mcg/litre) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 2000 mcg vs ITF 2985 500 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, again adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L at the end of treatment period because the model for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    85
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [26]
    P-value
    = 0.0001
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    43.77
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.43
         upper limit
    298.09
    Notes
    [26] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a reduction of GH level to < 2.5 (mcg/litre) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 1000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, again adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L at the end of treatment period because the model for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB v ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    88
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [27]
    P-value
    = 0.9509
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.95
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.21
         upper limit
    4.39
    Notes
    [27] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a reduction of GH level to < 2.5 (mcg/litre) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.
    Statistical analysis title
    ITF 2985 2000 mcg vs Octreotide 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment comparisons are presented as odds ratio, again adjusted for the effects described above in the generalised linear mixed logistic regression model. Analytical statistics are presented uniquely for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L at the end of treatment period because the model for Reduction of GH levels to <2.5 mgc/L and Normalization of IGF-1 at the end of treatment failed to converge.
    Comparison groups
    ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB v Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    83
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [28]
    P-value
    = 0.0011
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    12.45
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.79
         upper limit
    55.46
    Notes
    [28] - A generalised linear mixed logistic regression model was fitted to the response to treatment based on a reduction of GH level to < 2.5 (mcg/litre) at the end of the Treatment Period. Explanatory variables fitted were: treatment, the baseline value for each period, and period. Subject was included as a random effect. If any data were missing, the Kenward-Roger adjusted degrees of freedom were used.

    Secondary: Number of patients with improvement of signs and symptoms of acromegaly at the end of each month of treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients with improvement of signs and symptoms of acromegaly at the end of each month of treatment
    End point description
    The number of subjects showing an improvement in signs and symptoms of acromegaly was presented for each treatment/period combination (16 combinations), and by treatment (combining periods). For each of the signs and symptoms a subject was deemed to have improved within a treatment period for a particular sign and symptom if during the period there was a reduction in that sign and symptom. Improvement was summarised for each signs and symptom by treatment period. Overall data are reported. For single periods and single signs and symptoms, see the attached table.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    EoT in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4. Each Period is represented by one-month treatment. "overall" data are reported in the system. Complete data for the 4 treatment periods are attached.
    End point values
    Octreotide 100 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 500 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 1000 mcg - ITT - CfB ITF2984 2000 mcg - ITT - CfB
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    43
    47
    42
    Units: number
    number (not applicable)
        Overall - Headache - YES
    8
    14
    17
    12
        Overall - Headache - NO
    33
    28
    27
    30
        Overall - Excessive sweating - YES
    9
    13
    16
    19
        Overall - Excessive sweating - NO
    32
    29
    28
    22
        Overall - Joint pain - YES
    15
    16
    16
    19
        Overall - Joint pain - NO
    26
    26
    28
    22
        Overall - Fatigue - YES
    16
    17
    14
    15
        Overall - Fatigue - NO
    25
    25
    30
    27
        Overall - Soft tissue swelling - YES
    14
    12
    17
    14
        Overall - Soft tissue swelling - NO
    27
    30
    27
    28
        Overall - Numbness/tingling of extremities - YES
    13
    8
    13
    8
        Overall - Numbness/tingling of extremities - NO
    28
    34
    31
    34
        Overall - Health status - YES
    10
    16
    24
    18
        Overall - Health status - NO
    31
    26
    20
    24
        Overall - Across all signs and symptoms - YES
    32
    31
    38
    39
        Overall - Across all signs and symptoms - NO
    9
    11
    6
    3
    Attachments
    Sign and symptoms
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    AE were assessed at Randomization /crossover (day O; visits 2, 5, 8, 11); during the 4 periods of treatment of 4 weeks each (V3, V6, V9, V12); during follow-up /EW (V4, V7, V10, V13, V14)
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    17.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    OCR100μg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 500μg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 1000μg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    ITF2984 2000μg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    OCR100μg ITF2984 500μg ITF2984 1000μg ITF2984 2000μg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Hyperhydrosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Severe ketoacidosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    OCR100μg ITF2984 500μg ITF2984 1000μg ITF2984 2000μg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    25 / 41 (60.98%)
    22 / 43 (51.16%)
    27 / 47 (57.45%)
    25 / 42 (59.52%)
    Investigations
    GGT increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    1
    0
    ALT increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    0
    0
    AST increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Blood ALP increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Injection site erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    2 / 43 (4.65%)
    2 / 47 (4.26%)
    4 / 42 (9.52%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    2
    4
    Injection site pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 41 (4.88%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    2 / 47 (4.26%)
    4 / 42 (9.52%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    2
    4
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    2 / 47 (4.26%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    2
    0
    Injection site pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 41 (7.32%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    1
    1
    Injection site nodule
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    0
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    0
    Chest discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Injection site inflammation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Injection site mass
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Injection site urticaria
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Injection site vescicles
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Injection site reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 41 (21.95%)
    2 / 43 (4.65%)
    8 / 47 (17.02%)
    7 / 42 (16.67%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    3
    8
    8
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    4 / 47 (8.51%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    4
    0
    abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 41 (4.88%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    1
    3
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    2 / 47 (4.26%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    2
    2
    Abdominal distention
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    1
    1
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 41 (9.76%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    1
    1
    1
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Haemorrhoids
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Periodontal inflammation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Saliva altered
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Toothache
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 41 (0.00%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Flatulence
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Proctalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    0 / 43 (0.00%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperglycaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 41 (2.44%)
    1 / 43 (2.33%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    2

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    23 Jul 2014
     An update was made to the emergency safety procedures. In particular, it was clarified that any SAE had to be reported within 24 hours using the SAE form available in the eCRF. Faxing an SAE form could be done in case of technical issues (backup procedure).  The nonclinical results, clinical results, and study rationale sections in the introduction were updated with information from recently completed studies.  A minimum baseline GH value was added to the inclusion criteria (GH at baseline > 2.5 μg/L).  The following exclusion criteria were added: - Subjects with additional active malignant disease within the last 5 years (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix); - Subjects with a marked baseline prolongation of QT/QTc interval, i.e., a mean QT/QTc > 450 ms after 3 consecutive measurements at least 5 minutes apart; - Subjects with abnormal coagulation, prothrombin time, or activated partial thromboplastin time increased by 30% above normal limits; - Subjects who had a history or presence of pancreatitis at the moment of the screening visit; - Subjects with severely decreased renal function (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL or 176 μmol/L).  It was clarified in the section on study procedures that at screening, if it was necessary to confirm the active acromegaly by 2-hour 5 –point mean GH and oral glucose test that the instructions provided in the laboratory manual needed to be followed.  was clarified that a subject diary would be used in the study and specified throughout the section on study procedures when this diary needed to be collected.  The summary of risk management was updated with the most recent information.  The PK Analysis Set was added to the statistical methods section.  It was corrected in the statistical section that the interim analysis was not blinded.
    11 Nov 2014
     Serbia was added to the list of participating countries.  The criterion excluding subjects with significant cardiovascular morbidity within the 3 months preceding enrolment was updated to “subjects who had had a significant cardiovascular disease in the 3 months prior to inclusion such as congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), unstable angina, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, sustained clinically significant bradycardia, advanced heart block, or with a history of acute myocardial infarction.”  A recommendation on dose adjustment of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or medicinal products to control the electrolyte balance and insulin and antidiabetic agents was added to the section on concomitant medication. In addition, a recommendation on clinical monitoring for HR in case bradycardic agents were used was added.  HcAb1 was added to the list of clinical chemistry parameters to be evaluated.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    No limitations or caveats are applicable to this summary of the results.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 06:47:16 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA