Clinical Trial Results:
A pilot phase II study with BRENTUXIMAB VEDOTIN as pre-ASCT induction therapy in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients non responding to IGEV salvage treatment.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-003934-33 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
12 Oct 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
20 May 2021
|
First version publication date |
20 May 2021
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
FIL_Bridge_synopsis |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
FIL_BRidge
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02244021 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
piazza Turati 5, Alessandria , Italy,
|
||
Public contact |
Secretariat, Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus, 0039 0131206129, segreteria@filinf.it
|
||
Scientific contact |
Secretariat, Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus, 0039 0131206129, segreteria@filinf.it
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
15 Oct 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
12 Oct 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the activity of brentuximab vedotin in terms of complete remission (CT scan and FDG-PET negative) in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s Lymphoma not responding (FDG-PET positive) to salvage treatment with IGEV.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Appropriate precautions should be taken during infusion of the drug, with regular monitoring of vital signs, drugs available for the treatment of anaphylactic reaction, and a physician in attendance. Patients treated with brentuximab vedotin should be monitored closely during the infusion and be advised of the potential to develop allergy-like symptoms post-infusion.
Infusion-related reactions may occur during the infusion of brentuximab vedotin. The infusion should be administered at a site properly equipped and staffed to manage anaphylaxis should it occur. The patient should be observed for 60 minutes following the first infusion of brentuximab vedotin.
During this observation period, the IV line should remain open for at least 1 hour to allow administration of IV drugs if necessary. All supportive measures consistent with optimal patient care will be given throughout the study according to medical judgment and institution standards.
If anaphylaxis occurs, immediately and permanently discontinue administration of brentuximab vedotin and administer appropriate medical therapy.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Apr 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 13
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
13
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
13
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
12
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
1
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Thirteen patients recruited in Italy from first december 2014, with date of last completed at 27 October 2017 | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Inclusion criteria: 1. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification 2. Patients at the first line salvage therapy 4. FDG-PET positivity after two cycles of IGEV treatment 5. PBPCs should have been collected after the first or the second IGEV cycle 6. Age≥ 18 years 7. ECOG performance status of 0- | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Baseline (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Single Arm | ||||||
Arm description |
After registration and eligibility check patients will receive a total of 4 courses of the study drug, one every three weeks. Brentuximab vedotin will be administered intravenously at the dose of 1.8 mg/kg. Brentuximab vedotin is to be administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle via a 30 minute intravenous (IV) infusion. | ||||||
Arm type |
Single arm study | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Brentuximab vedotin
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for dispersion for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Brentuximab vedotin will be administered intravenously at the dose of 1.8 mg/kg. Brentuximab vedotin is to be administered on Day 1 of each 21-day via a 30 minute intravenous (IV) infusion.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Baseline
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Single Arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
After registration and eligibility check patients will receive a total of 4 courses of the study drug, one every three weeks. Brentuximab vedotin will be administered intravenously at the dose of 1.8 mg/kg. Brentuximab vedotin is to be administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle via a 30 minute intravenous (IV) infusion. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Comparison
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Comparison for single arm study
|
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Efficacy Evaluation | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Patients will be considered for assessment of efficacy if they have received four courses of Brentuximab vedotin and underwent FDG-PET and CT scan as prescribed by the study protocol.
Complete Response will be defined according to recently updated international criteria (Cheson 2007), assuming that a negative PET is defined by Deauville scores 1, 2 and 3.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Patients assessed for efficacy after 4 cycles of brentuximab vedotin and evaluated by FDG-PET and CT scan. Patients was considered in CR with PET defined by Deauville Score from 1 to 3.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Patients treated with 4 cycles of Brentuximab Vedotin |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary Efficacy end-point | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
This study will be managed as a pilot phase II trial with a fixed sample size of 13 patients. We do not have results of previous studies with single agent SGN-35 in patients at first diagnosis. For efficacy we considered as precautionary measure the response from PET greater than 30%, regarded as inferior margin of confidence interval at 95%, according to the binomial distribution. So, we expect to observe 8 responsive patients from 13 enrolled (62%, 95%CI 32-86%)
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Single Arm v Comparison
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
20
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [2] | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.179 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
One- sample Binomial test | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Exact Binomial Distribution | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.5
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.19 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.81 | |||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The complete response (CR, according to PET Deauville 1-3) rate was estimated by means of exact binomial distribution, with Clopper-Pearson binomial 95% confidence intervals. For efficacy we considered as precautionary measure the response from PET greater than 30%, regarded as inferior margin of confidence interval at 95%, according to the binomial distribution |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Safety Evaluation | ||||||||||||
End point description |
For safety we considered neurotoxicity as the most significant event with a frequency for any grade ≤50%. Based on the binomial distribution we expect to observe ≤ 2 events for 13 enrolled patients (15%, 95%CI 2-45%), so with toxicity less than 50%, respect to the higher margin of confidence interval at 95%.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Patients treated with at least 1 cycle of Brentuximab Vedotin.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Patients treated with at least 1 cycle of Brentuximab Vedotin |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary Safety end-point | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Result expressed with th exact binomial distribution, with Clopper-Pearson binomial 95% confidence intervals.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Single Arm v Comparison
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
26
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [4] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Exact Binomial Distribution | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.31
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.09 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.61 | ||||||||||||
Notes [4] - We observed 4 neurotoxicity: 2 of CTCAE grade 1, both in 3th cycle (hypoesthesia and cramps) and 2 of CTACE grade 2 (1st cycle, dysesthesia and tingling (upper arms); and 4th cycle, paresthesia). Than 4/13, 31% (95%CI 9-61%), with the upper margin greater than 50%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Response after Brentuximab Vedotine and ASCT | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Complete Remission after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in the 10 patients evaluable for efficacy
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Patients evaluable for efficacy |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Response after brentuximab vedotin and ASCT | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Considering the full treatment (4BV + consolidation with ASCT) over the 10 assessable patients, 8 CR and 2 PD, were observed with a CR rate of 80% (95CI 44-97%).
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Single Arm v Comparison
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
20
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [6] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Exact Binomial Distribution | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.44 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.97 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Observational |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Progression Free Survival | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The progression-free survival was measured from the start of treatmentt to the date of progressive disease or death for any causa, within one year after the end of treatment of the last patient enrolled.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Progression Free Survival | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Kaplan Meier estimate at 12 months of follow-up, from the date of start treatment.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Single Arm v Comparison
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
26
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [7] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Kaplan Meier estimates | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.46
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.19 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.7 | ||||||||||||
Notes [7] - One arm pilot phase 2 study |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Patients were considered for assessment of safety if they have received at least one administration of Brentuximab Vedotin.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
NCI CTC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
4.03
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Single Arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients treated with at least one administration of Brentuximab Vedotin. Reported patients with of any grade CTCAE. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
01 Mar 2017 |
It was revised the evaluation of Deauville score. In detail:
"11.2 Rules for PET interpretation:
Following the international recommendations on the use of the Deauville five point scale (Deauville 5ps) for clinical routine and clinical trials using FDG-PET/CT in the initial staging and assessment of treatment response in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) (Barrington et al. 2014; Cheson et al. 2014), FDG-PET negativity will be defined in accord to Deauville five-point scale for the evaluation of primary end points. These criteria have been purposely risen for interim-PET interpretation and rely on visual, semi-quantitative assessment according to a 5-point scale for intensity of residual FDG uptake scoring, with liver as reference organ for positivity cutoff. According to these criteria, a score value equal to 1, 2 and 3 will be considered negative while a value equal to 4 and 5 will be considered positive." |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |