Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Local Anesthetic Distribution: A Comparison of 5 and 15 milliliters of ropivacaine 0.75% for ultrasound guided interscalene plexus blockade

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-004219-36
    Trial protocol
    AT  
    Global end of trial date
    01 Apr 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    16 May 2021
    First version publication date
    16 May 2021
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Manuscript

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    MR-ISB-1
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02175069
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Paracelsus Mediznische Privatuniversität, Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, perioperative Medizin und Intensiv
    Sponsor organisation address
    Muellner Haupstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria, 5020
    Public contact
    Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, Paracelsus Medical University, 43 57255, p.gerner1@salk.at
    Scientific contact
    Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, Paracelsus Medical University, 43 57255, p.gerner1@salk.at
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    01 Apr 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    01 Apr 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The aim of this study is to confirm that the frequency of epidural spread correlates with higher volumes of local anesthetic injection (5ml vs 20ml) after interscalene brachial plexus block.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Standard clinical care for routine procedure
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    15 Jan 2014
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 30
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    30
    EEA total number of subjects
    30
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    28
    From 65 to 84 years
    2
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    A total of 30 patients scheduled to undergo shoulder surgery were included. Eligible patients were identified and approached consecutively during their pre-surgical evaluation in the anaesthesia clinic one day prior to surgery, informed about the study, and if they agreed to participate, were asked to provide written consent.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Of the 31 patients deemed eligible for participation, thirty (96.8%) agreed to participate.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Study
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind [1]
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    On the day of surgery, an unblinded anaesthesia nurse not otherwise involved in the study prepared the study medication according to the randomisation result in the envelope. All blocks were performed in the MRI scanner anteroom, by a blinded single practitioner (GF) with many years of experience in regional anaesthesia.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Low Volume Group
    Arm description
    Patients received 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.0125 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ropivacaine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    5 ml ropivacaine 0.75%

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Gadopentetat-Dimeglumine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection/infusion
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    0.0125mmol

    Arm title
    High Volume Group
    Arm description
    Patients received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.05 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ropivacaine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Gadopentetat-Dimeglumine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection/infusion
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    0.05mmol

    Notes
    [1] - The number of roles blinded appears inconsistent with a single blinded trial. It is expected that there will be one role blinded in a single blind trial.
    Justification: The block provider (anesthesiologist) was not blinded.
    Number of subjects in period 1
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Started
    15
    15
    Completed
    15
    15
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Analysis
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind [2]
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Low Volume Group
    Arm description
    Patients received 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.0125 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Gadopentetat-Dimeglumine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection/infusion
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    0.0125mmol

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ropivacaine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    5 ml ropivacaine 0.75%

    Arm title
    High Volume Group
    Arm description
    Patients received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.05 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Gadopentetat-Dimeglumine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection/infusion
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    0.05mmol

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ropivacaine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%

    Notes
    [2] - The number of roles blinded appears inconsistent with a single blinded trial. It is expected that there will be one role blinded in a single blind trial.
    Justification: The block provider (anesthesiologist) was not blinded.
    Number of subjects in period 2
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Started
    15
    15
    Completed
    15
    15

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Low Volume Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.0125 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).

    Reporting group title
    High Volume Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.05 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).

    Reporting group values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group Total
    Number of subjects
    15 15 30
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    50 ± 17 55 ± 14 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    6 9 15
        Male
    9 6 15
    procedure type
    Units: Subjects
        Arthroscopic
    10 13 23
        Open
    5 2 7
    BMI
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    26.3 ± 5.4 26.7 ± 4.7 -
    Craniocaudad distance
    Craniocaudal distance
    Units: mm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    115.6 ± 10.1 115.3 ± 10.3 -
    Transaxial distance
    Units: mm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    127.1 ± 18.1 126.2 ± 16.3 -
    Neck coefficient
    Units: none
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.92 ± 0.12 0.92 ± 0.12 -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Low Volume Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.0125 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).

    Reporting group title
    High Volume Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.05 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).
    Reporting group title
    Low Volume Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.0125 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).

    Reporting group title
    High Volume Group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (Naropin®; AstraZeneca Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) mixed with 0.05 mmol of the contrast dye, gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Magnevist® 0.5 mmol ml-1; Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany).

    Primary: epidural spread

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    epidural spread
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    during MRI
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        no epidural spread
    13
    13
        epidural spread
    2
    2
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    High Volume Group v Low Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    = 1
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: spread around intervertebral foramen

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    spread around intervertebral foramen
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during MRI
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        no spread
    15
    11
        spread
    0
    4
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    = 0.032
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: spread around phrenic nerve

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    spread around phrenic nerve
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during MRI
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        no spread
    13
    1
        spread
    2
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: intramuscular spread

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    intramuscular spread
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during MRi
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        spread
    6
    15
        no spread
    9
    0
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: time to start of pca

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    time to start of pca
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during study
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: minutes
        median (standard deviation)
    498 ± 245
    755 ± 230
    Statistical analysis title
    mannw
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.013
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: PCA ropivacaine consumption

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    PCA ropivacaine consumption
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during study
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: milliliters
        median (standard deviation)
    142 ± 42
    118 ± 117
    Statistical analysis title
    mannw
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.71
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: diclofenac consumption

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    diclofenac consumption
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during study
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        no diclofenac
    9
    12
        diclofenac
    6
    3
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.23
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: paracetamol consumption

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    paracetamol consumption
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during study
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        no paracetamol
    9
    11
        paracetamol
    6
    4
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.44
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: piritramid consumption

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    piritramid consumption
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    during study
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: patients
        no piritramid
    12
    14
        piritramid
    3
    1
    Statistical analysis title
    chisq
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.28
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: pain at rest

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    pain at rest
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    postop
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: VAS
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.47 ± 1.36
    0.43 ± 1.36
    Statistical analysis title
    ANOVA
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.98
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: pain with movement

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    pain with movement
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    postop
    End point values
    Low Volume Group High Volume Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    15
    Units: vas
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    1.07 ± 2.09
    0.50 ± 1.87
    Statistical analysis title
    anova
    Comparison groups
    Low Volume Group v High Volume Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.89
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Entire Study Period
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    10.0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: There were no minor adverse events.

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2686513
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 09:01:45 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA