Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

    • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).

    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44338   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7368   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    An interventional, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator, flexible-dose study on the efficacy of vortioxetine versus escitalopram on cognitive dysfunction in patients with inadequate response to current antidepressant treatment of major depressive disorder

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    		 2014-000231-16
    Trial protocol
    		 DE   FI   SK  
    Global end of trial date
    01 Mar 2016

    Results information
    Results version number
    		 v1(current)
    This version publication date
    19 Feb 2017
    First version publication date
    19 Feb 2017
    Other versions

    Trial information

    		 Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    15907A
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    		 -
    US NCT number
    		 NCT02272517
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    		 -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    H. Lundbeck A/S
    Sponsor organisation address
    Ottiliavej 9, Valby, Denmark, 2500
    Public contact
    Lundbeck Clinical Trials, H. Lundbeck A/S, LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
    Scientific contact
    Lundbeck Clinical Trials, H. Lundbeck A/S, LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    01 Mar 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    01 Mar 2016
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    01 Mar 2016
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    This study aims at evaluating the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with inadequate response to current antidepressant treatment.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and ICH Good Clinical Practice (1996)
    Background therapy
    		 -
    Evidence for comparator
    		 -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    02 Dec 2014
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Slovakia: 19
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 37
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Serbia: 35
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    101
    EEA total number of subjects
    66
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    100
    From 65 to 84 years
    1
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    		 Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    		 -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    		 In- or outpatients with a primary diagnosis of MDD according to DSM-IV-TR™ criteria, as confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), who had a Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥22 at the Screening Visit. Patients had to be candidates for a switch due to inadequate response to antidepressant

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Period 1 (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    		 Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    		 Double blind
    Roles blinded
    		 Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg
    Arm description
    		 -
    Arm type
    		 Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    vortioxetine 10 mg/day
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Brintellix, Trintellix
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10 mg/day; encapsulated tablets, orally, 8 weeks

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    powder-filled capsules, orally, 1 week After 8-week, double-blind treatment period, patients entered a 1-week, double-blind, taper-down period: patients treated with vortioxetine received placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    vortioxetine 20 mg/day
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Brintellix, Trintellix
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    20 mg/day; encapsulated tablets, orally, 8 weeks

    Arm title
    		 Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Arm description
    		 -
    Arm type
    		 Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Escitalopram 20 mg/day
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    20mg/day; encapsulated tablets, orally, 8 weeks;

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Escitalopram 10 mg/day
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10 mg/day; encapsulated tablets, orally, 8 weeks

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    powder-filled capsules, orally, 1 week After 8-week, double-blind treatment period, patients entered a 1-week, double-blind, taper-down period: patients treated with 10mg/day escitalopram received placebo

    Number of subjects in period 1
    		Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Started
    51
    50
    Completed
    47
    45
    Not completed
    4
    5
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    1
         Administrative
    -
    1
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    3
    1
         Not treated
    1
    1
         Protocol deviation
    -
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    		 Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg
    Reporting group description
    		 -

    Reporting group title
    Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Reporting group description
    		 -

    Reporting group values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg Total
    Number of subjects
    		 51 50 101
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    		 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    		 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    		 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    		 0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    		 0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    		 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    		 51 49 100
        From 65-84 years
    		 0 1 1
        85 years and over
    		 0 0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    		 46.7 ( 10.6 ) 49.7 ( 10.3 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    		 40 35 75
        Male
    		 11 15 26
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        White
    		 51 50 101

    End points

    		 Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg
    Reporting group description
    		 -

    Reporting group title
    Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Reporting group description
    		 -

    Primary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
    End point description
    Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a cognitive test designed to assess psychomotor speed of performance requiring visual perception, spatial decision-making, and motor skills. It consists of 133 digits and requires the patient to substitute each digit with a simple symbol in a 90-second period. Each correct symbol is counted, and the total score ranges from 0 (less than normal functioning) to 133 (greater than normal functioning)
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    8.46 ( 1.2 )
    6.46 ( 1.21 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.228
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    2
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -1.28
         upper limit
    		 5.28

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in University of San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment – Brief (UPSA-B) total score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in University of San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment – Brief (UPSA-B) total score
    End point description
    The UPSA-B is a role-play based performance test designed to assess functional skills in patients with mental illness. The UPSA-B consists of two subscales: managing finances (for example, counting correct change, writing a check to pay a bill) and communication with others (for example, dialing an emergency telephone number, rescheduling a medical appointment). Raw scores of the two subscales are converted to scaled scores from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better functional capacity.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    49
    48
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    10.79 ( 1.02 )
    9.45 ( 1.08 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    97
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.3457
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.34
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -1.47
         upper limit
    		 4.15

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Rey Auditory Visual Learning Test (RAVLT) score: Acquisition

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Rey Auditory Visual Learning Test (RAVLT) score: Acquisition
    End point description
    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT) is a cognitive test designed to assess verbal learning and memory, including immediate memory, efficiency of learning, retroactive and encoding versus retrieval. The RAVLT consists of a number of tasks where the RAVLT acquisition (learning) is the total number of correctly recalled words from three lists of words with a possible score between 0 and 45. The higher score the better performance
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    4.62 ( 0.7 )
    3.96 ( 0.73 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.5
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.66
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -1.27
         upper limit
    		 2.59

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Rey Auditory Visual Learning Test (RAVLT) score. Delayed recall

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Rey Auditory Visual Learning Test (RAVLT) score. Delayed recall
    End point description
    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT) is a cognitive test designed to assess verbal learning and memory, including immediate memory, efficiency of learning, retroactive and encoding versus retrieval. The RAVLT consists of a number of tasks where RAVLT delayed recall (memory) is the number of correctly recalled words at the end of the test battery from one list of words with a possible score between 0 and 15. The higher score the better performance
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    1.84 ( 0.32 )
    1.41 ( 0.33 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.3347
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.42
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -0.44
         upper limit
    		 1.29

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) score
    End point description
    Trail Making Test (TMT) is a cognitive test designed to assess scanning, visuomotor tracking, executive function, and cognitive flexibility. It consists of two parts, A and B. Part A assesses cognitive processing speed. The lower the score the faster the processing speed
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -7.54 ( 1.76 )
    -9.35 ( 1.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.4684
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.81
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -3.12
         upper limit
    		 6.73

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) score
    End point description
    TMT is a cognitive test designed to assess scanning, visuomotor tracking, executive function, and cognitive flexibility. It consists of two parts, A and B. Part B examines executive functioning and ability to shift cognitive set. The lower the score the faster the ability to shift cognitive set
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -29.15 ( 4.55 )
    -26.61 ( 4.63 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.6896
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -2.54
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -15.16
         upper limit
    		 10.08

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Simple Reaction Time (SRT)

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Simple Reaction Time (SRT)
    End point description
    Simple Reaction Time (SRT) is designed to assess psychomotor speed. The patient presses a "yes" button, whenever an onscreen playing card is turned over. The lower score the better performance
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Scores
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.069 ( 0.017 )
    -0.076 ( 0.018 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.7726
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.007
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -0.041
         upper limit
    		 0.055

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Choice Reaction Time (CRT)

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Choice Reaction Time (CRT)
    End point description
    Choice Reaction Time (CRT) is designed to assess visual attention. The patient presses a "yes" button whenever an onscreen playing card is turned over and is red, or a "no" button if the card is not red. The lower score the better performance
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.053 ( 0.013 )
    -0.034 ( 0.014 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.3118
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.019
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -0.055
         upper limit
    		 0.018

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) score: Congruent

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) score: Congruent
    End point description
    Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) is a cognitive test designed to assess the ability to inhibit a prepotent response to reading words while performing a task that requires attention control. The STROOP comprises two sheets with 50 words on each, and each word is the name of a colour. In the Congruent STROOP Sheet, the word and ink colour match. The lower the score the faster the processing speed
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -11.6 ( 1.37 )
    -8.2 ( 1.45 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.0827
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -3.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -7.25
         upper limit
    		 0.45

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) score: Incongruent

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) score: Incongruent
    End point description
    Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) is a cognitive test designed to assess the ability to inhibit a prepotent response to reading words while performing a task that requires attention control. The STROOP comprises two sheets with 50 words on each, and each word is the name of a colour. In the Incongruent STROOP Sheet, the word and ink colour do not match. The lower the score the greater the cognitive flexibility
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -23.93 ( 2.83 )
    -17.52 ( 2.96 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.1035
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -6.42
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -14.17
         upper limit
    		 1.34

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Perceived Deficits Questionnaire – Depression (PDQ-D) total score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Perceived Deficits Questionnaire – Depression (PDQ-D) total score
    End point description
    Patient-reported cognitive function outcome including attention concentration, retrospective memory, prospective memory, and, planning organization. The total score of the 20 items ranges from 0 to 80 with higher scores reflecting greater subjective cognitive dysfunction as perceived by the patient
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -23.41 ( 1.81 )
    -19.27 ( 1.88 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Escitalopram 10-20mg v Vortioxetine 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.1163
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -4.14
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -9.32
         upper limit
    		 1.05

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score
    End point description
    The PHQ-9 is a patient-rated scale designed to screen for and to assess severity of depression. The PHQ-9 consists of questions on each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria for depression asking if they have bothered the patient over the last 2 weeks. The 9 questions are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 27 with higher scores reflecting greater severity
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -10.74 ( 0.73 )
    -9.49 ( 0.77 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    92
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.2372
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -1.25
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -3.34
         upper limit
    		 0.84

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Clinical Global Impression – Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Clinical Global Impression – Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score
    End point description
    The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -1.74 ( 0.14 )
    -1.42 ( 0.15 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    92
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.1247
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -0.73
         upper limit
    		 0.09

    Secondary: Clinical Global Impression – Global Improvement (CGI-I) score at Week 8

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Clinical Global Impression – Global Improvement (CGI-I) score at Week 8
    End point description
    The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    2.24 ( 0.13 )
    2.38 ( 0.13 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    92
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.4659
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -0.49
         upper limit
    		 0.23

    Secondary: Change from baseline to Week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) total score

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Change from baseline to Week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) total score
    End point description
    The FAST is a clinician-rating scale designed to assess difficulty in functioning. The FAST assesses 6 specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships, leisure time. The total score of the 24 items ranges from 0 to 72 with higher scores reflecting more serious difficulties
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 8
    End point values
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20mg Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    48
    45
    Units: Score
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -16.99 ( 1.78 )
    -16.35 ( 1.85 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Comparison to Escitalopram
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine 10-20mg v Escitalopram 10-20mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    93
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.8023
    Method
    		 Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    		 Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.64
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 -5.74
         upper limit
    		 4.45

    Adverse events

    		 Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    First dose to follow-up
    Assessment type
    		 Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    		 MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    18.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Escitalopram 10-20 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Escitalopram 10-20 MG

    Reporting group title
    Vortioxetine 10-20 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Vortioxetine 10-20 MG

    Serious adverse events
    		 Escitalopram 10-20 mg Vortioxetine 10-20 mg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 49 (0.00%)
    0 / 50 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    		 Escitalopram 10-20 mg Vortioxetine 10-20 mg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 49 (20.41%)
    17 / 50 (34.00%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 49 (4.08%)
    5 / 50 (10.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    6
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 49 (12.24%)
    4 / 50 (8.00%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    8
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 49 (10.20%)
    13 / 50 (26.00%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    14
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 49 (6.12%)
    2 / 50 (4.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    2

    More information

    		 Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)
    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)
    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats
    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun May 25 17:38:24 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA