Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43872   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7291   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study of Chloroprocaine 2% and the active control Ropivacaine 0.75% (AstraZeneca) in ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block for short-duration distal upper limb surgery

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2014-002519-40
    Trial protocol
    AT  
    Global end of trial date
    24 May 2017

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    18 Sep 2021
    First version publication date
    18 Sep 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    CHL.2/01-2014/M
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02385097
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    Study protocol: CRO-14-120
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Sintetica SA
    Sponsor organisation address
    Via Penate 5, Mendrisio, Switzerland, 6850
    Public contact
    Study Management, CROSS SA, 0041 (0)916300510, corporate@croalliance.com
    Scientific contact
    Study Management, CROSS SA, 0041 (0)916300510, corporate@croalliance.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    24 May 2017
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    24 May 2017
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    This study evaluate the Non-inferiority evaluation of Test versus Reference product in terms of proportion of subjects with a successful block for distal upper limb surgeries, without any supplementation in the first 45 min (see definitions below), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block). Successful block: anaesthesia adequate for the surgery (complete sensory block), without any supplementation in the first 45 min (even if surgery lasts for > 45 min), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block). Supplementation: i.v. premedication or general anaesthesia or pre- or intra-operative systemic analgesia or additional local anaesthetic infiltration
    Protection of trial subjects
    In order to avoid any risk for patients, the following exclusion criteria have been considered: 1.Physical findings: Clinically significant abnormal physical findings which could interfere with the objectives of the study. Contraindications to peripheral nerve block anaesthesia. History of neuromuscular diseases to the upper extremities 2.Axillary status: Axillary local infections, surgical scarring and pathological lymph node enlargement 3.ASA physical status: IV-V 4.Further anaesthesia: Patients anticipated to be requiring further anaesthesia (general or local anaesthesia) 5.Chronic pain syndromes: Patients with chronic pain syndromes (taking opioids, antidepressants, anticonvulsant agents) 6.Allergy: Ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the active principle and/or formulations ingredients; ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the amide and ester-type anaesthetics 7.Diseases: Significant history of renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, skin, haematological, endocrine or neurological diseases that could interfere with the aim of the study; ascertained psychiatric diseases, sepsis, blood coagulation disorders, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, terminal kidney failure 8.Medications: Medication known to interfere with the extent of regional blocks (see chloroprocaine and ropivacaine SmPCs) for 2 weeks before the start of the study. Hormonal contraceptives for females were allowed 9.Investigative drug studies: Participation in the evaluation of any investigational product for 3 months before this study, calculated from the first day of the month following the last visit of the previous study 10.Drug, alcohol: History of drug or alcohol abuse 11.Pregnancy: Missing or positive pregnancy test at screening, pregnant or lactating women
    Background therapy
    N/A
    Evidence for comparator
    Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% was chosen as the active control because it represents the gold standard anaesthetic for brachial plexus block procedures and it is commonly used in Germany, Switzerland and other European countries in brachial plexus block procedures. Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% is the only authorised concentration of ropivacaine for this indication
    Actual start date of recruitment
    30 Jan 2015
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Switzerland: 87
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 124
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    211
    EEA total number of subjects
    124
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    147
    From 65 to 84 years
    60
    85 years and over
    4

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The recruitment lasted from April 2015 to May 2017 and occurred in Medical clinics and Hospitals

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Inclusion criteria: 1.Male and female patients scheduled for short duration (< 60 min) distal upper limb surgery under axillary nerve block anaesthesia 2.Age ≥ 18 yo 3.BMI: 18-32 kg/m2 inclusive 4.ASA physical status: I-III 5.Signed ICF before inclusion in the study 6.Comprehension of the purpose of the study, including risks and side effects

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator
    Blinding implementation details
    All the clinical staff members involved in anaesthesia, surgery and study-related activities (Investigator/co-investigators/study nurses) as well as the patients were blind with respect to the administered treatment. Syringes for injection were prepared out of the operating area by a person not involved in any other study-related activity. Only the person preparing the syringe and the CRA in charge of investigational products' accountability were aware of the administered treatments.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Chloroprocaine
    Arm description
    Chloroprocaine 2% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Chloroprocaine HCl 2%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    Chloroprocaine HCl 2% injection (20 mg/mL)

    Arm title
    Ropivacaine
    Arm description
    Naropin®, Ropivacaine 0.75% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ropivacaine HCl 0.75%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Perineural use
    Dosage and administration details
    Naropin®, Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% injectable solution (7.5 mg/mL)

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Started
    106
    105
    Completed
    105
    103
    Not completed
    1
    2
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    overall trial
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    overall trial Total
    Number of subjects
    211 211
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    147 147
        From 65-84 years
    60 60
        85 years and over
    4 4
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    54.0 ± 17.1 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    131 131
        Male
    80 80
    Ethnic group
    Units: Subjects
        White
    205 205
        Asian
    4 4
        Other (Mestizo)
    2 2
    Subject's Status
    Units: Subjects
        Inpatient
    82 82
        Outpatient
    129 129
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Enrolled set
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    All enrolled subjects. This analysis set was used for demographic, baseline and background characteristics

    Subject analysis set title
    Full Analysis Set (FAS)
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    all randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of study anaesthetics administration. This analysis set was used for sensitivity analyses and secondary efficacy analyses

    Subject analysis set title
    Per Protocol set (PP)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    All randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of anaesthetic administration and primary efficacy evaluation, with no major deviations that could affect the primary efficacy results. This analysis set was used for the primary efficacy analysis and secondary efficacy analyses

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety set
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All patients who received at least one dose of the investigational medicinal product. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses

    Subject analysis sets values
    Enrolled set Full Analysis Set (FAS) Per Protocol set (PP) Safety set
    Number of subjects
    211
    209
    197
    209
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
        From 65-84 years
        85 years and over
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    54.0 ± 17.1
    54.1 ± 17.2
    54.0 ± 17.4
    54.1 ± 17.2
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    131
    129
    123
    129
        Male
    80
    80
    74
    80
    Ethnic group
    Units: Subjects
        White
    205
    203
    192
    203
        Asian
    4
    4
    3
    4
        Other (Mestizo)
    2
    2
    2
    2
    Subject's Status
    Units: Subjects
        Inpatient
    82
    82
    80
    82
        Outpatient
    129
    127
    117
    127

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Chloroprocaine
    Reporting group description
    Chloroprocaine 2% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL

    Reporting group title
    Ropivacaine
    Reporting group description
    Naropin®, Ropivacaine 0.75% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL

    Subject analysis set title
    Enrolled set
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    All enrolled subjects. This analysis set was used for demographic, baseline and background characteristics

    Subject analysis set title
    Full Analysis Set (FAS)
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    all randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of study anaesthetics administration. This analysis set was used for sensitivity analyses and secondary efficacy analyses

    Subject analysis set title
    Per Protocol set (PP)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    All randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of anaesthetic administration and primary efficacy evaluation, with no major deviations that could affect the primary efficacy results. This analysis set was used for the primary efficacy analysis and secondary efficacy analyses

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety set
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All patients who received at least one dose of the investigational medicinal product. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses

    Primary: Percentage of patients with successful block for distal upper limb surgeries_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of patients with successful block for distal upper limb surgeries_FAS
    End point description
    Non-inferiority evaluation of Test versus Reference product in terms of proportion of patients with a successful block* for distal upper limb surgeries, without any supplementation** (i.e. no general anaesthesia or pre- and intra-operative systemic analgesia and no additional anaesthetic infiltration) in the first 45 min, calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block). *Successful block: anaesthesia adequate for the surgery (complete sensory block), without any supplementation in the first 45 min (even if surgery lasts for > 45 min), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block). **Supplementation: i.v. premedication or general anaesthesia or pre- or intra-operative systemic analgesia or additional local anaesthetic infiltration.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit2, day 1 (day of surgery)
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Full Analysis Set (FAS)
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    104
    209
    Units: nr of patients
        pt who achieved a successful block
    96
    97
    193
        pt who did not achieve a successful block
    9
    7
    16
    Attachments
    Untitled (Filename: 20180416-c120-csr_primary efficacy data.pdf)
    Statistical analysis title
    proportion of subjects with a successful block FAS
    Statistical analysis description
    The proportion of subjects (FAS set) who achieved a successful block, defined as anaesthesia adequate for the surgery, without any supplementation in the first 45 min from the time of readiness for surgery (see § 9.5.1.2), was 89/98 (90.8%) with Chloroprocaine HCl 2% and 92/99 (92.9%) with Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% (Table 14.2.1.1).
    Comparison groups
    Chloroprocaine v Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    209
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [1]
    P-value
    = 0.0125
    Method
    binomial regression
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [1] - Results of the statistical analysis on the FAS (sensitivity analysis) confirmed the results obtained with the PP set (primary analysis), with 96/105 (91.4%) patients with a successful block for Chloroprocaine HCl 2% and 97/104 (93.3%) patients with a successful block for Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% (Table 14.2.1.2), and a derived 95% confidence interval of -0.091, 0039 (p-value=0.0125) (Table 14.2.1.5).

    Primary: Percentage of patients with successful block for distal upper limb surgeries _PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of patients with successful block for distal upper limb surgeries _PP
    End point description
    Non-inferiority evaluation of Test versus Reference product in terms of proportion of patients with a successful block* for distal upper limb surgeries, without any supplementation** (i.e. no general anaesthesia or pre- and intra-operative systemic analgesia and no additional anaesthetic infiltration) in the first 45 min, calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block). *Successful block: anaesthesia adequate for the surgery (complete sensory block), without any supplementation in the first 45 min (even if surgery lasts for > 45 min), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block). **Supplementation: i.v. premedication or general anaesthesia or pre- or intra-operative systemic analgesia or additional local anaesthetic infiltration.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/ day 1 (day of surgery)
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Per Protocol set (PP)
    Number of subjects analysed
    98
    99
    197
    Units: nr of patients
        pt who achived successful block
    89
    92
    181
        pt who did not achive successful block
    9
    7
    16
    Attachments
    Untitled (Filename: 20180416-c120-csr_primary efficacy data.pdf)
    Statistical analysis title
    frequency of patients with a successful block PP
    Statistical analysis description
    The proportion of subjects (PP set) who achieved a successful block, defined as anaesthesia adequate for the surgery, without any supplementation in the first 45 min from the time of readiness for surgery (see § 9.5.1.2), was 89/98 (90.8%) with Chloroprocaine HCl 2% and 92/99 (92.9%) with Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% (Table 14.2.1.1).
    Comparison groups
    Ropivacaine v Chloroprocaine
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    197
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [2]
    P-value
    = 0.021
    Method
    binomial regression
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [2] - The overall proportion of subjects with a successful block (all centres) was compared between treatment groups using a binomial regression model, with the factors treatment and analysis centre as fixed effects. Results showed that non-inferiority of Chloroprocaine HCl 2% with respect to Ropivacaine HCl 0.75%, administered by axillary injection under ultrasound guidance, was confirmed (Table 14.2.1.3).

    Secondary: Time to onset of sensory block_PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to onset of sensory block_PP
    End point description
    Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of sensory block in the 4 nerve territories
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1 (day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [3]
    99 [4]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.0 (10.0 to 15.0)
    15.0 (10.0 to 15.0)
    Notes
    [3] - Nr of subjects with event:96 Nr of censored subjects: 2
    [4] - Nr of subjects with event:95 Nr of censored subjects: 4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to onset of sensory block_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to onset of sensory block_FAS
    End point description
    Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of sensory block in the 4 nerve territories
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1 (day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [5]
    104 [6]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.0 (10.0 to 15.0)
    15.0 (10.0 to 15.0)
    Notes
    [5] - Nr of subjects with event:103 Nr of censored subjects: 2
    [6] - Nr of subjects with event:100 Nr of censored subjects: 4
    Statistical analysis title
    aa
    Comparison groups
    Ropivacaine v Chloroprocaine
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    209
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.0896
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Time to Onset of Motor Block _PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Onset of Motor Block _PP
    End point description
    Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of motor block
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1 /day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [7]
    99 [8]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.0 (5.0 to 10.0)
    10.0 (5.0 to 10.0)
    Notes
    [7] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [8] - Nr of subjects with event:96 Nr of censored subjects: 3
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to Onset of Motor Block _FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Onset of Motor Block _FAS
    End point description
    Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of motor block
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1 /day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [9]
    104 [10]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.0 (5.0 to 10.0)
    10.0 (5.0 to 10.0)
    Notes
    [9] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [10] - Nr of subjects with event:101 Nr of censored subjects: 3
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to regression of sensory block_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to regression of sensory block_FAS
    End point description
    Was deemed to have occurred when cold sensation and sensitive perception had returned (if assessable) in at least one nerve territory.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [11]
    104 [12]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    68.0 (64.0 to 75.0)
    451.0 (413.0 to 480.0)
    Notes
    [11] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [12] - Nr of subjects with event:95 Nr of censored subjects: 9
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to regression of sensory block_PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to regression of sensory block_PP
    End point description
    Was deemed to have occurred when cold sensation and sensitive perception had returned (if assessable) in at least one nerve territory.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [13]
    99 [14]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    69.5 (65.0 to 75.0)
    444.0 (413.0 to 475.0)
    Notes
    [13] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [14] - Nr of subjects with event:91 Nr of censored subjects: 8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to regression of motor block_PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to regression of motor block_PP
    End point description
    Was deemed to have occurred when motor score was ≥ 3 in at least one nerve territory.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [15]
    99 [16]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    65.0 (63.0 to 69.0)
    405.0 (384.0 to 460.0)
    Notes
    [15] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [16] - Nr of subjects with event:89 Nr of censored subjects: 10
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to regression of motor block_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to regression of motor block_FAS
    End point description
    Was deemed to have occurred when motor score was ≥ 3 in at least one nerve territory.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [17]
    104 [18]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    65.0 (60.0 to 69.0)
    415.0 (388.0 to 460.0)
    Notes
    [17] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [18] - Nr of subjects with event:92 Nr of censored subjects: 12
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to administration of rescue anaesthesia or rescue analgesia_PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to administration of rescue anaesthesia or rescue analgesia_PP
    End point description
    Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to administration of the first rescue anaesthesia or analgesia (supplementation) (if applicable) NOTE: 0 was entered as results. According to the CSR, NC (not calculated) was the correct answer, not possible to enter.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    45 min from the time of readiness of surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [19]
    99 [20]
    Units: hour
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 0)
    0 (0 to 0)
    Notes
    [19] - Nr of subjects with event:9 Nr of censored subjects: 89
    [20] - Nr of subjects with event:7 Nr of censored subjects: 92
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to administration of rescue anaesthesia or rescue analgesia_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to administration of rescue anaesthesia or rescue analgesia_FAS
    End point description
    Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to administration of the first rescue anaesthesia or analgesia (supplementation) (if applicable) NOTE: 0 was entered as results. According to the CSR, NC (not calculated) was the correct answer, not possible to enter.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    45 min from the time of readiness of surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [21]
    104 [22]
    Units: hour
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 0)
    0 (0 to 0)
    Notes
    [21] - Nr of subjects with event:9 Nr of censored subjects: 96
    [22] - Nr of subjects with event:7 Nr of censored subjects: 97
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to first post-operative analgesia_PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to first post-operative analgesia_PP
    End point description
    Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the first post-operative analgesia. NOTE: For Chloroprocaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 200.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both. For Ropivacaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 783.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [23]
    99 [24]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 0)
    0 (0 to 0)
    Notes
    [23] - Nr of subjects with event: 48 Nr of censured subjects: 50
    [24] - Nr of subjects with event: 45 Nr of censured subjects: 54
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to first post-operative analgesia_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to first post-operative analgesia_FAS
    End point description
    Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the first post-operative analgesia NOTE: For Chloroprocaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 205.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both. For Ropivacaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 822.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [25]
    104 [26]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 0)
    0 (0 to 0)
    Notes
    [25] - Nr of subjects with event:49 Nr of censored subjects: 56
    [26] - Nr of subjects with event:46 Nr of censored subjects: 58
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to eligibility for home discharge_PP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to eligibility for home discharge_PP
    End point description
    Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the time when the criteria for discharge were met, even if, according to the hospital procedures, the patient was discharged from the hospital at a later time
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to 24h post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    98 [27]
    99 [28]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    164.0 (155.0 to 171.0)
    380.0 (209.0 to 450.0)
    Notes
    [27] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [28] - Nr of subjects with event:99 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to eligibility for home discharge_FAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to eligibility for home discharge_FAS
    End point description
    Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the time when the criteria for discharge were met, even if, according to the hospital procedures, the patient was discharged from the hospital at a later time
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to 24h post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine
    Number of subjects analysed
    105 [29]
    104 [30]
    Units: minute
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    161.0 (155.0 to 170.0)
    355.5 (206.0 to 450.0)
    Notes
    [29] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    [30] - Nr of subjects with event:104 Nr of censored subjects: 0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: global incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    global incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
    End point description
    Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring or worsening after the first dose of IMP
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to day 6 +/- 1 after surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety set
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    105
    209
    Units: number of event
    number (not applicable)
        total nr of TEAEs
    115
    153
    268
        related
    0
    12
    12
        not related
    115
    141
    256
        mild
    68
    92
    160
        moderate
    46
    46
    92
        severe
    1
    15
    16
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Incidence of neurological symptoms

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Incidence of neurological symptoms
    End point description
    Number of patients with Neurological Symptoms (e.g. paraesthesia, motor function problems and pain at the injection site) Following syntomps have been investigated: Burning Tingling Pins and needles sensation (for category title, summarized as "pins sensation") Pricking Aching Numbness Hypoesthesia Pain surgery site At Day 7±1, pain at surgery site was not evaluated and diffuse hair loss, headache and Itching were evaluated.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to day 6 +/- 1 after surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety set
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    104
    209
    Units: nr of patients
    number (not applicable)
        Discharge_Burning_Mild
    4
    1
    5
        Discharge_Burning_Moderate
    4
    0
    4
        Discharge_Burning_Severe
    0
    0
    0
        Discharge_Burning_Tot
    8
    1
    9
        Discharge_Tingling_Mild
    4
    9
    13
        Discharge_Tingling_Moderate
    5
    15
    20
        Discharge_Tingling_Severe
    0
    2
    2
        Discharge_Tingling_Tot
    8
    25
    33
        Discharge_pins sensation_Mild
    1
    4
    5
        Discharge_pins sensation_Moderate
    0
    1
    1
        Discharge_pins sensation_Severe
    0
    0
    0
        Discharge_pins sensation_Tot
    1
    5
    6
        Discharge_Pricking_Mild
    5
    3
    8
        Discharge_Pricking_Moderate
    3
    1
    4
        Discharge_Pricking_Severe
    0
    1
    1
        Discharge_Pricking_Tot
    8
    5
    13
        Discharge_Aching_Mild
    7
    4
    11
        Discharge_Aching_Moderate
    4
    1
    5
        Discharge_Aching_Severe
    0
    1
    1
        Discharge_Aching_Tot
    10
    6
    16
        Discharge_Numbness_Mild
    1
    6
    7
        Discharge_Numbness_Moderate
    1
    12
    13
        Discharge_Numbness_Severe
    0
    9
    9
        Discharge_Numbness_Tot
    2
    27
    29
        Discharge_Hypoesthesia_Mild
    4
    8
    12
        Discharge_Hypoesthesia_Moderate
    1
    5
    6
        Discharge_Hypoesthesia_Severe
    0
    1
    1
        Discharge_Hypoesthesia_Totale
    5
    14
    19
        Discharge_Pain surgery site_Mild
    0
    1
    1
        Discharge_Pain surgery site_Moderate
    0
    0
    0
        Discharge_Pain surgery site_Severe
    0
    0
    0
        Discharge_Pain surgery site_Tot
    0
    1
    1
        Day 7±1_Burning_mild
    5
    3
    8
        Day 7±1_Burning_moderate
    1
    1
    2
        Day 7±1_Burning_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Burning_tot
    6
    4
    10
        Day 7±1_Tingling_mild
    5
    5
    10
        Day 7±1_Tingling_moderate
    0
    2
    2
        Day 7±1_Tingling_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Tingling_tot
    5
    6
    11
        Day 7±1_pins sensation_mild
    1
    0
    1
        Day 7±1_pins sensation_moderate
    1
    0
    1
        Day 7±1_pins sensation_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_pins sensation_tot
    2
    0
    2
        Day 7±1_Pricking_mild
    2
    4
    6
        Day 7±1_Pricking_moderate
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Pricking_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Pricking_tot
    2
    4
    6
        Day 7±1_Aching_mild
    3
    3
    6
        Day 7±1_Aching_moderate
    1
    0
    1
        Day 7±1_Aching_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Aching_tot
    4
    3
    7
        Day 7±1_Numbness_mild
    1
    2
    3
        Day 7±1_Numbness_moderate
    1
    1
    2
        Day 7±1_Numbness_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Numbness_tot
    2
    3
    5
        Day 7±1_Hypoesthesia_mild
    5
    5
    10
        Day 7±1_Hypoesthesia_moderate
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Hypoesthesia_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Hypoesthesia_tot
    5
    5
    10
        Day 7±1_diffuse hair loss_mild
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_diffuse hair loss_moderate
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_diffuse hair loss_severe
    0
    1
    1
        Day 7±1_diffuse hair loss_tot
    0
    1
    1
        Day 7±1_headache_mild
    1
    0
    1
        Day 7±1_headache_moderate
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_headache_severe
    1
    0
    1
        Day 7±1_headache_tot
    2
    0
    2
        Day 7±1_Itching_mild
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Itching_moderate
    0
    1
    1
        Day 7±1_Itching_severe
    0
    0
    0
        Day 7±1_Itching_tot
    0
    1
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Heart rate (HR)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Heart rate (HR)
    End point description
    for safety assessment The following normal ranges Heart Rate parameters will be used: 50-90 beats/min
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety set
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    104
    209
    Units: beats/minute
    median (confidence interval 95%)
        screening
    72.0 (50 to 110)
    72.0 (50 to 99)
    72.0 (50 to 110)
        baseline
    72.0 (51 to 102)
    70.0 (45 to 104)
    71.0 (45 to 104)
        discharge
    70.0 (46 to 99)
    72.0 (47 to 100)
    71.0 (46 to 100)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Blood Pressure (BP)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Blood Pressure (BP)
    End point description
    for safety assessment. The following normal ranges Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure parameters will be used: Systolic Blood Pressure: 100-139 mmHg Diastolic Blood Pressure: 50-89 mmHg
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety set
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    104
    209
    Units: mmHg
    median (confidence interval 95%)
        Systolic BP at screening
    136.0 (88 to 200)
    132.0 (105 to 182)
    132.0 (88 to 200)
        Systolic BP at baseline
    135.0 (98 to 187)
    137.5 (106 to 194)
    135.0 (98 to 194)
        Systolic BP at discharge
    130.0 (90 to 185)
    129.0 (90 to 186)
    129.0 (90 to 186)
        Diastolic BP at screening
    80.0 (43 to 110)
    80.0 (50 to 104)
    80.0 (43 to 110)
        Diastolic BP at baseline
    78.0 (54 to 120)
    80.0 (60 to 113)
    80.0 (54 to 120)
        Diastolic BP at discharge
    74.0 (50 to 99)
    75.0 (50 to 99)
    75.0 (50 to 99)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)
    End point description
    for safety assessment. The following normal ranges SpO2 parameters will be used: Peripheral Oxygen Saturation: ≥ 95%
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
    End point values
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety set
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    104
    209
    Units: percent
    median (confidence interval 95%)
        baseline
    97.00 (92.0 to 100.0)
    97.00 (90.0 to 100.0)
    97.00 (90.0 to 100.0)
        discharge
    98.00 (94.0 to 100.0)
    98.00 (94.0 to 100.0)
    98.00 (94.0 to 100.0)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    from Visit 1 - Screening to Telephonic Follow-up (from Days -14/1 to Day 7±1)
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    AEs monitored from the screening visit, immediately after informed consent signature, up to the telephonic follow-up. Particular attention was given to systemic and local toxicity symptoms, neurological symptoms (e.g. paraesthesia, motor function problems and pain at the injection site) and allergic reactions. NO SAE occurred.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    20.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Chloroprocaine
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Ropivacaine
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Safety Set
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety Set
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 105 (0.00%)
    0 / 104 (0.00%)
    0 / 209 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Chloroprocaine Ropivacaine Safety Set
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    58 / 105 (55.24%)
    76 / 104 (73.08%)
    134 / 209 (64.11%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Procedural pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    48 / 105 (45.71%)
    41 / 104 (39.42%)
    89 / 209 (42.58%)
         occurrences all number
    50
    43
    93
    Vascular disorders
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 105 (0.00%)
    1 / 104 (0.96%)
    1 / 209 (0.48%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Hypoaesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 105 (8.57%)
    38 / 104 (36.54%)
    47 / 209 (22.49%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    44
    54
    Paraesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 105 (16.19%)
    28 / 104 (26.92%)
    45 / 209 (21.53%)
         occurrences all number
    22
    40
    62
    Burning sensation
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 105 (10.48%)
    5 / 104 (4.81%)
    16 / 209 (7.66%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    5
    16
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 105 (2.86%)
    1 / 104 (0.96%)
    4 / 209 (1.91%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    1
    4
    Sensorimotor disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 105 (0.00%)
    1 / 104 (0.96%)
    1 / 209 (0.48%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Injection site pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 105 (5.71%)
    5 / 104 (4.81%)
    11 / 209 (5.26%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    5
    11
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 105 (0.95%)
    4 / 104 (3.85%)
    5 / 209 (2.39%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    5
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 105 (0.00%)
    1 / 104 (0.96%)
    1 / 209 (0.48%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    Erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 105 (0.00%)
    1 / 104 (0.96%)
    1 / 209 (0.48%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 105 (0.00%)
    1 / 104 (0.96%)
    1 / 209 (0.48%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 105 (10.48%)
    6 / 104 (5.77%)
    17 / 209 (8.13%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    6
    18

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    06 Nov 2014
    Amendment 1.0, final protocol version 2.0 dated 17SEP2014. The following points have been added: Inclusion in the study of inpatients beside outpatients Urine pregnancy test for women at screening visit An impartial witness can sign the informed consent form when the subject is physically unable to sign due to the distal upper limb injury Normal ranges for haemodynamic variables and ECG Recommended maximal deviations from the scheduled block assessment times. The secondary study variable “time to home discharge” has been changed into “time to eligibility for home discharge” A typing mistake at § 8.2 has been corrected An address at § 16.4 has been changed A reference at § 17 has been changed
    18 Dec 2014
    Amendament 2.0, final protocol version 3.0 dated 3DEC2014. The following changes have been introduced: The study will be performed as double blind and not as observer-blind Assessment of neurological symptoms as safety secondary endpoint Clinical justification of the chosen non-inferiority limit Clinical justification of the expected success rate in both treatment arms Conditions that will be used for establishing the convergence failure of the binomial regression model and, consequently, for applying the Poisson regression model with a robust error variance A mistake in the exclusion criteria n. 6 has been corrected. Discharge criteria based on the modified Aldrete’s scale have been corrected. The e-mail address for SAE reporting has been changed. The name of one of the companies in charge of the study monitoring has changed In § 13.1 a sentence has been added. Some additional minor changes have been introduced.
    30 Jul 2015
    Amendment Nr. 4, protocol final version 4.0 dated 22MAY2015 The present amendment introduces the following changes in the study protocol: -A new Clinical Site has been involved in the study to replace the German site of Marburg, following the negative opinion of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Marburg, which rejected the study on the basis of statistical considerations about the non-inferiority margin. On the contrary, the German Regulatory Authority BfArM approved the study without any concern. In Switzerland the study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Ticino and by the Regulatory Authority Swissmedic. -Prof. Hinnerk Wulf, MD. Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the University Hospital of Marburg is now Medical Adviser -One of the companies in charge of the study monitoring has changed -The sample size of the study has been recalculated using a higher power (85% instead of 80%) -It has been further clarified that the reference time for calculating the scheduled time interval of the post-surgery assessments is the time of surgery end
    10 Nov 2015
    Amendment 5, final protocol version 5.0 dated 9OCT2015 The present amendment introduces the following changes in the study protocol: - A second Clinical Site in Austria (clinical centre N. 4) has been involved in the study - The Swiss Site of Bellinzona (clinical centre N. 3) has terminated its participation in the study due to enrolment difficulties - Prof. Oliver Kimberger, Medical Director of Orthopedic and Trauma Anesthesia, Department of General Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine of the Medical University of Vienna (clinical centre N. 1), is now the coordinating investigator in Austria - The definitions of sensory and motor block regression have been clarified - The definition of analysis centres has been introduced The rationale for the change is the need to replace the Swiss site of Bellinzona following its withdrawal from the study due to difficulties with patients’ recruitment and to introduce the definition of analysis centres for the study statistical analysis. This amendment is considered substantial because it introduces a new Clinical Site and the definition of the analysis centres, which will be used as fixed effect in the regression model of the primary efficacy analysis instead of the clinical centres.
    28 Dec 2016
    Amendment 7 dated 13DEC2016. The present amendment introduces the following changes to the study protocol: -Clinical site N. 4 (Klagenfurt, Austria. Principal Investigator: Prof. R. Likar) will enrol 36 and not 60 patients as previously planned. The 24 patients not enrolled at this site will be redistributed. These patients will be enrolled at site N. 1 (16 patients) and N.2 (8 patients), as also detailed below. -Clinical site N. 1 (Vienna, Austria. Principal Investigator: Prof. O. Kimberger) will enrol 16 additional patients for a total of 88 patients (72 patients as originally planned + 16 additional patients) -Clinical site N. 2 (Gravesano, Switzerland. Principal Investigator: Dr. C. Camponovo) will enrol 8 additional patients for a total of 80 patients (72 patients as originally planned + 8 additional patients) -The reason for exclusion from the Per Protocol set "more than 20% of the actual block assessment times outside the recommended ranges" has to be changed into "deviations from the actual block assessment times until readiness for surgery outside the recommended ranges that can bias the evaluation of the time of readiness for surgery"

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon May 06 14:13:50 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA