Clinical Trial Results:
A prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study of Chloroprocaine 2% and the active control Ropivacaine 0.75% (AstraZeneca) in ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block for short-duration distal upper limb surgery
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-002519-40 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
24 May 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
18 Sep 2021
|
First version publication date |
18 Sep 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CHL.2/01-2014/M
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02385097 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
Study protocol: CRO-14-120 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Sintetica SA
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Via Penate 5, Mendrisio, Switzerland, 6850
|
||
Public contact |
Study Management, CROSS SA, 0041 (0)916300510, corporate@croalliance.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Study Management, CROSS SA, 0041 (0)916300510, corporate@croalliance.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
24 May 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
24 May 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
This study evaluate the Non-inferiority evaluation of Test versus Reference product in terms of proportion of subjects with a successful block for distal upper limb surgeries, without any supplementation in the first 45 min (see definitions below), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block).
Successful block: anaesthesia adequate for the surgery (complete sensory block), without any supplementation in the first 45 min (even if surgery lasts for > 45 min), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block).
Supplementation: i.v. premedication or general anaesthesia or pre- or intra-operative systemic analgesia or additional local anaesthetic infiltration
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
In order to avoid any risk for patients, the following exclusion criteria have been considered:
1.Physical findings: Clinically significant abnormal physical findings which could interfere with the objectives of the study. Contraindications to peripheral nerve block anaesthesia. History of neuromuscular diseases to the upper extremities
2.Axillary status: Axillary local infections, surgical scarring and pathological lymph node enlargement
3.ASA physical status: IV-V
4.Further anaesthesia: Patients anticipated to be requiring further anaesthesia (general or local anaesthesia)
5.Chronic pain syndromes: Patients with chronic pain syndromes (taking opioids, antidepressants, anticonvulsant agents)
6.Allergy: Ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the active principle and/or formulations ingredients; ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the amide and ester-type anaesthetics
7.Diseases: Significant history of renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, skin, haematological, endocrine or neurological diseases that could interfere with the aim of the study; ascertained psychiatric diseases, sepsis, blood coagulation disorders, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, terminal kidney failure
8.Medications: Medication known to interfere with the extent of regional blocks (see chloroprocaine and ropivacaine SmPCs) for 2 weeks before the start of the study. Hormonal contraceptives for females were allowed
9.Investigative drug studies: Participation in the evaluation of any investigational product for 3 months before this study, calculated from the first day of the month following the last visit of the previous study
10.Drug, alcohol: History of drug or alcohol abuse
11.Pregnancy: Missing or positive pregnancy test at screening, pregnant or lactating women
|
||
Background therapy |
N/A | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% was chosen as the active control because it represents the gold standard anaesthetic for brachial plexus block procedures and it is commonly used in Germany, Switzerland and other European countries in brachial plexus block procedures. Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% is the only authorised concentration of ropivacaine for this indication | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
30 Jan 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Switzerland: 87
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 124
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
211
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
124
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
147
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
60
|
||
85 years and over |
4
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The recruitment lasted from April 2015 to May 2017 and occurred in Medical clinics and Hospitals | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Inclusion criteria: 1.Male and female patients scheduled for short duration (< 60 min) distal upper limb surgery under axillary nerve block anaesthesia 2.Age ≥ 18 yo 3.BMI: 18-32 kg/m2 inclusive 4.ASA physical status: I-III 5.Signed ICF before inclusion in the study 6.Comprehension of the purpose of the study, including risks and side effects | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
All the clinical staff members involved in anaesthesia, surgery and study-related activities (Investigator/co-investigators/study nurses) as well as the patients were blind with respect to the administered treatment.
Syringes for injection were prepared out of the operating area by a person not involved in any other study-related activity. Only the person preparing the syringe and the CRA in charge of investigational products' accountability were aware of the administered treatments.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Chloroprocaine | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Chloroprocaine 2% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Chloroprocaine HCl 2%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Chloroprocaine HCl 2% injection (20 mg/mL)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Ropivacaine | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Naropin®, Ropivacaine 0.75% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine HCl 0.75%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Naropin®, Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% injectable solution (7.5 mg/mL)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Enrolled set
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All enrolled subjects. This analysis set was used for demographic, baseline and background characteristics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Full Analysis Set (FAS)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
all randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of study anaesthetics administration. This analysis set was used for sensitivity analyses and secondary efficacy analyses
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Per Protocol set (PP)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of anaesthetic administration and primary efficacy evaluation, with no major deviations that could affect the primary efficacy results. This analysis set was used for the primary efficacy analysis and secondary efficacy analyses
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety set
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received at least one dose of the investigational medicinal product. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Chloroprocaine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Chloroprocaine 2% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL | ||
Reporting group title |
Ropivacaine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Naropin®, Ropivacaine 0.75% Solution for injection, single administration by axillary nerve route 20 mL | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Enrolled set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All enrolled subjects. This analysis set was used for demographic, baseline and background characteristics
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Full Analysis Set (FAS)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
all randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of study anaesthetics administration. This analysis set was used for sensitivity analyses and secondary efficacy analyses
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Per Protocol set (PP)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All randomised patients who fulfilled the study protocol requirements in terms of anaesthetic administration and primary efficacy evaluation, with no major deviations that could affect the primary efficacy results. This analysis set was used for the primary efficacy analysis and secondary efficacy analyses
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received at least one dose of the investigational medicinal product. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of patients with successful block for distal upper limb surgeries_FAS | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Non-inferiority evaluation of Test versus Reference product in terms of proportion of patients with a successful block* for distal upper limb surgeries, without any supplementation** (i.e. no general anaesthesia or pre- and intra-operative systemic analgesia and no additional anaesthetic infiltration) in the first 45 min, calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block).
*Successful block: anaesthesia adequate for the surgery (complete sensory block), without any supplementation in the first 45 min (even if surgery lasts for > 45 min), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block).
**Supplementation: i.v. premedication or general anaesthesia or pre- or intra-operative systemic analgesia or additional local anaesthetic infiltration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit2, day 1 (day of surgery)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: 20180416-c120-csr_primary efficacy data.pdf) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
proportion of subjects with a successful block FAS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The proportion of subjects (FAS set) who achieved a successful block, defined as anaesthesia adequate for the surgery, without any supplementation in the first 45 min from the time of readiness for surgery (see § 9.5.1.2), was 89/98 (90.8%) with Chloroprocaine HCl 2% and 92/99 (92.9%) with Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% (Table 14.2.1.1).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Chloroprocaine v Ropivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0125 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
binomial regression | ||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Results of the statistical analysis on the FAS (sensitivity analysis) confirmed the results obtained with the PP set (primary analysis), with 96/105 (91.4%) patients with a successful block for Chloroprocaine HCl 2% and 97/104 (93.3%) patients with a successful block for Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% (Table 14.2.1.2), and a derived 95% confidence interval of -0.091, 0039 (p-value=0.0125) (Table 14.2.1.5). |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of patients with successful block for distal upper limb surgeries _PP | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Non-inferiority evaluation of Test versus Reference product in terms of proportion of patients with a successful block* for distal upper limb surgeries, without any supplementation** (i.e. no general anaesthesia or pre- and intra-operative systemic analgesia and no additional anaesthetic infiltration) in the first 45 min, calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block).
*Successful block: anaesthesia adequate for the surgery (complete sensory block), without any supplementation in the first 45 min (even if surgery lasts for > 45 min), calculated from the time of readiness for surgery (complete sensory block).
**Supplementation: i.v. premedication or general anaesthesia or pre- or intra-operative systemic analgesia or additional local anaesthetic infiltration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/ day 1 (day of surgery)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: 20180416-c120-csr_primary efficacy data.pdf) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
frequency of patients with a successful block PP | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The proportion of subjects (PP set) who achieved a successful block, defined as anaesthesia adequate for the surgery, without any supplementation in the first 45 min from the time of readiness for surgery (see § 9.5.1.2), was 89/98 (90.8%) with Chloroprocaine HCl 2% and 92/99 (92.9%) with Ropivacaine HCl 0.75% (Table 14.2.1.1).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ropivacaine v Chloroprocaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
197
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
binomial regression | ||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The overall proportion of subjects with a successful block (all centres) was compared between treatment groups using a binomial regression model, with the factors treatment and analysis centre as fixed effects. Results showed that non-inferiority of Chloroprocaine HCl 2% with respect to Ropivacaine HCl 0.75%, administered by axillary injection under ultrasound guidance, was confirmed (Table 14.2.1.3). |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to onset of sensory block_PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of sensory block in the 4 nerve territories
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1 (day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Nr of subjects with event:96 Nr of censored subjects: 2 [4] - Nr of subjects with event:95 Nr of censored subjects: 4 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to onset of sensory block_FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of sensory block in the 4 nerve territories
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1 (day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Nr of subjects with event:103 Nr of censored subjects: 2 [6] - Nr of subjects with event:100 Nr of censored subjects: 4 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
aa | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ropivacaine v Chloroprocaine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0896 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to Onset of Motor Block _PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of motor block
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1 /day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [8] - Nr of subjects with event:96 Nr of censored subjects: 3 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to Onset of Motor Block _FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time period from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to achievement of motor block
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1 /day of surgery), up to 1 h after last perineural injection
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [9] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [10] - Nr of subjects with event:101 Nr of censored subjects: 3 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to regression of sensory block_FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Was deemed to have occurred when cold sensation and sensitive perception had returned (if assessable) in at least one nerve territory.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [11] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [12] - Nr of subjects with event:95 Nr of censored subjects: 9 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to regression of sensory block_PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Was deemed to have occurred when cold sensation and sensitive perception had returned (if assessable) in at least one nerve territory.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [13] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [14] - Nr of subjects with event:91 Nr of censored subjects: 8 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to regression of motor block_PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Was deemed to have occurred when motor score was ≥ 3 in at least one nerve territory.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [15] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [16] - Nr of subjects with event:89 Nr of censored subjects: 10 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to regression of motor block_FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Was deemed to have occurred when motor score was ≥ 3 in at least one nerve territory.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at treatment-visit 2/day 1, up to 12 hrs after surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [17] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [18] - Nr of subjects with event:92 Nr of censored subjects: 12 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to administration of rescue anaesthesia or rescue analgesia_PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to administration of the first rescue anaesthesia or analgesia (supplementation) (if applicable)
NOTE: 0 was entered as results. According to the CSR, NC (not calculated) was the correct answer, not possible to enter.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
45 min from the time of readiness of surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [19] - Nr of subjects with event:9 Nr of censored subjects: 89 [20] - Nr of subjects with event:7 Nr of censored subjects: 92 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to administration of rescue anaesthesia or rescue analgesia_FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to administration of the first rescue anaesthesia or analgesia (supplementation) (if applicable)
NOTE: 0 was entered as results. According to the CSR, NC (not calculated) was the correct answer, not possible to enter.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
45 min from the time of readiness of surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [21] - Nr of subjects with event:9 Nr of censored subjects: 96 [22] - Nr of subjects with event:7 Nr of censored subjects: 97 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to first post-operative analgesia_PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the first post-operative analgesia.
NOTE:
For Chloroprocaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 200.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both.
For Ropivacaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 783.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [23] - Nr of subjects with event: 48 Nr of censured subjects: 50 [24] - Nr of subjects with event: 45 Nr of censured subjects: 54 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to first post-operative analgesia_FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the first post-operative analgesia
NOTE:
For Chloroprocaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 205.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both.
For Ropivacaine: Lower limit of the confidence interval was 822.0, upper was NC (not calculated). For avoiding error, 0 (zero) was entered for both
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [25] - Nr of subjects with event:49 Nr of censored subjects: 56 [26] - Nr of subjects with event:46 Nr of censored subjects: 58 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to eligibility for home discharge_PP | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the time when the criteria for discharge were met, even if, according to the hospital procedures, the patient was discharged from the hospital at a later time
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to 24h post surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [27] - Nr of subjects with event:98 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [28] - Nr of subjects with event:99 Nr of censored subjects: 0 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to eligibility for home discharge_FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Time from completion of the final perineural injection (time 0 h) to the time when the criteria for discharge were met, even if, according to the hospital procedures, the patient was discharged from the hospital at a later time
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to 24h post surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [29] - Nr of subjects with event:105 Nr of censored subjects: 0 [30] - Nr of subjects with event:104 Nr of censored subjects: 0 |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
global incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring or worsening after the first dose of IMP
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to day 6 +/- 1 after surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of neurological symptoms | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Number of patients with Neurological Symptoms (e.g. paraesthesia, motor function problems and pain at the injection site)
Following syntomps have been investigated:
Burning
Tingling
Pins and needles sensation (for category title, summarized as "pins sensation")
Pricking
Aching
Numbness
Hypoesthesia
Pain surgery site
At Day 7±1, pain at surgery site was not evaluated and diffuse hair loss, headache and Itching were evaluated.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to day 6 +/- 1 after surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Heart rate (HR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
for safety assessment
The following normal ranges Heart Rate parameters will be used:
50-90 beats/min
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Blood Pressure (BP) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
for safety assessment.
The following normal ranges Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure parameters will be used:
Systolic Blood Pressure: 100-139 mmHg Diastolic Blood Pressure: 50-89 mmHg
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
for safety assessment.
The following normal ranges SpO2 parameters will be used:
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation: ≥ 95%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from surgery day to 24 hrs post surgery
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from Visit 1 - Screening to Telephonic Follow-up (from Days -14/1 to Day 7±1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
AEs monitored from the screening visit, immediately after informed consent signature, up to the telephonic follow-up. Particular attention was given to systemic and local toxicity symptoms, neurological symptoms (e.g. paraesthesia, motor function problems and pain at the injection site) and allergic reactions.
NO SAE occurred.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
20.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Chloroprocaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ropivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety Set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
06 Nov 2014 |
Amendment 1.0, final protocol version 2.0 dated 17SEP2014.
The following points have been added:
Inclusion in the study of inpatients beside outpatients
Urine pregnancy test for women at screening visit
An impartial witness can sign the informed consent form when the subject is physically unable to sign due to the distal upper limb injury
Normal ranges for haemodynamic variables and ECG
Recommended maximal deviations from the scheduled block assessment times.
The secondary study variable “time to home discharge” has been changed into “time to eligibility for home discharge”
A typing mistake at § 8.2 has been corrected
An address at § 16.4 has been changed
A reference at § 17 has been changed |
||
18 Dec 2014 |
Amendament 2.0, final protocol version 3.0 dated 3DEC2014.
The following changes have been introduced:
The study will be performed as double blind and not as observer-blind
Assessment of neurological symptoms as safety secondary endpoint
Clinical justification of the chosen non-inferiority limit
Clinical justification of the expected success rate in both treatment arms
Conditions that will be used for establishing the convergence failure of the binomial regression model and, consequently, for applying the Poisson regression model with a robust error variance
A mistake in the exclusion criteria n. 6 has been corrected.
Discharge criteria based on the modified Aldrete’s scale have been corrected.
The e-mail address for SAE reporting has been changed.
The name of one of the companies in charge of the study monitoring has changed
In § 13.1 a sentence has been added.
Some additional minor changes have been introduced.
|
||
30 Jul 2015 |
Amendment Nr. 4, protocol final version 4.0 dated 22MAY2015
The present amendment introduces the following changes in the study protocol:
-A new Clinical Site has been involved in the study to replace the German site of Marburg, following the negative opinion of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Marburg, which rejected the study on the basis of statistical considerations about the non-inferiority margin. On the contrary, the German Regulatory Authority BfArM approved the study without any concern. In Switzerland the study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Ticino and by the Regulatory Authority Swissmedic.
-Prof. Hinnerk Wulf, MD. Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the University Hospital of Marburg is now Medical Adviser
-One of the companies in charge of the study monitoring has changed
-The sample size of the study has been recalculated using a higher power (85% instead of 80%)
-It has been further clarified that the reference time for calculating the scheduled time interval of the post-surgery assessments is the time of surgery end
|
||
10 Nov 2015 |
Amendment 5, final protocol version 5.0 dated 9OCT2015
The present amendment introduces the following changes in the study protocol:
- A second Clinical Site in Austria (clinical centre N. 4) has been involved in the study
- The Swiss Site of Bellinzona (clinical centre N. 3) has terminated its participation in the study due to enrolment difficulties
- Prof. Oliver Kimberger, Medical Director of Orthopedic and Trauma Anesthesia, Department of General Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine of the Medical University of Vienna (clinical centre N. 1), is now the coordinating investigator in Austria
- The definitions of sensory and motor block regression have been clarified
- The definition of analysis centres has been introduced
The rationale for the change is the need to replace the Swiss site of Bellinzona following its withdrawal from the study due to difficulties with patients’ recruitment and to introduce the definition of analysis centres for the study statistical analysis.
This amendment is considered substantial because it introduces a new Clinical Site and the definition of the analysis centres, which will be used as fixed effect in the regression model of the primary efficacy analysis instead of the clinical centres.
|
||
28 Dec 2016 |
Amendment 7 dated 13DEC2016.
The present amendment introduces the following changes to the study protocol:
-Clinical site N. 4 (Klagenfurt, Austria. Principal Investigator: Prof. R. Likar) will enrol 36 and not 60 patients as previously planned. The 24 patients not enrolled at this site will be redistributed. These patients will be enrolled at site N. 1 (16 patients) and N.2 (8 patients), as also detailed below.
-Clinical site N. 1 (Vienna, Austria. Principal Investigator: Prof. O. Kimberger) will enrol 16 additional patients for a total of 88 patients (72 patients as originally planned + 16 additional patients)
-Clinical site N. 2 (Gravesano, Switzerland. Principal Investigator: Dr. C. Camponovo) will enrol 8 additional patients for a total of 80 patients (72 patients as originally planned + 8 additional patients)
-The reason for exclusion from the Per Protocol set "more than 20% of the actual block assessment times outside the recommended ranges" has to be changed into "deviations from the actual block assessment times until readiness for surgery outside the recommended ranges that can bias the evaluation of the time of readiness for surgery"
|
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |