Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A phase I/II trial of IMA970A plus CV8102 following a single pre-vaccination infusion of cyclophosphamide in patients with very early, early and intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma after any standard treatments

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2015-003389-10
    Trial protocol
    DE   BE   ES   IT  
    Global end of trial date
    20 Dec 2019

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    07 Apr 2021
    First version publication date
    07 Apr 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    HepaVac-101
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03203005
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale"
    Sponsor organisation address
    Via Mariano Semmola 142, Naples, Italy, 80131
    Public contact
    Clinical Trial Information, HepaVac Consortium @ Istituto Nazionale Tumori G. "Pascale", 0039 0815903624, info@hepavac.eu
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trial Information, HepaVac Consortium @ Istituto Nazionale Tumori G. "Pascale", 0039 0815903624, info@hepavac.eu
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    20 Dec 2019
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    20 Dec 2019
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    20 Dec 2019
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of the present phase I/II study is to investigate whether treatment with IMA970A plus CV8102 following a single pre-vaccination infusion of cyclophosphamide (CY) is safe and tolerable, and able to induce a T-cell response in very early, early and intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after any standard treatment and without any evidence of active disease that warrant further treatment.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was performed in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki, International Council on Harmonization/GCP guidelines and all applicable and ethical regulatory requirements. The study was approved by national regulatory agencies and the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) competent for the coordinating investigator and the IECs responsible for each study site in accordance with the local legislation in each participating country. All subjects were fully informed about nature, scope and possible consequences of the clinical trial in a language appropriate for the subject and they provided written informed consent before study-related procedures were performed. Following precautionary safety measures were implemented into the trial to assure the safety of patients: - Facilities and equipment for resuscitation have to be in place when performing vaccinations with IMA970A and CV8102 to shorten reaction times in case of life- threatening anaphylactic reactions. - Staggered enrollment of the first 3 patients - Early Data Safety Monitroing Board (DSMB) meeting, regular DSMB meetings throughout the trial and ad hoc DSMB meetings - Reporting of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) according to the reporting rules of serious adverse events - Dose de-escalation rules for CV8102 are implemented into the clinical trial for patients experiencing CTCAE Grade ≥ 3 adverse drug reactions - Premature withdrawal from study treatment in case of unacceptable toxicities - Capturing of selected safety data including autoimmune diseases, adverse drug reactions and outcome after liver transplantation during non-interventional follow-up - Patients with a history of or active autoimmune diseases were excluded from treatment with IMA970A and CV8102. Additionally, special precautions for IMA970A and CV8102 vaccinations and CY treatment were specified in detail in the protocol and the Investigator's Brochure and explained to investigators during Site Initiation.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    02 Oct 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 14
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    22
    EEA total number of subjects
    22
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    10
    From 65 to 84 years
    12
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Between 2017 and 2019, 82 patients were screened at six study centers in Italy, Germany, Belgium, The United Kingdom, and Spain of whom 22 were assigned to receive study treatment.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    In Screening S1, patients were screened for HLA typing, demographics and disease characteristics either before (S1.1) or during (S1.2) standard treatment for HCC and recovery phase. Still eligible patients entered the main Screening S2 for final eligibility check and baseline assessments (e.g. CT/MRI, medical history, blood sampling, ECG, ECOG).

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Non-randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    No blinding procedures were performed in this open-label, single arm trial.

    Arms
    Arm title
    Trial Treatment (IMA970A, CV8102 and CY)
    Arm description
    Within this single arm trial to investigate safety, tolerability and immunogenecity , all eligible patients were assigned to receive a pre-treatment wirh CY followed by vaccinations with IMA970A and CV8102.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    IMA970A
    Investigational medicinal product code
    IMA970A
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intradermal use
    Dosage and administration details
    IMA970A is a cocktail of 17 synthetic TUMAPs with the ability to elicit T-cell responses. It consists of 7 human HLA-A*02 Class I-binding peptides, 5 HLA-A*24 Class I-binding peptides, 4 HLA-DR Class II-binding peptides, and 1 HLA-A*02 Class I-binding peptide from HBV core antigen (marker peptide). The dose per each intradermal vaccination was 400 μg of each peptide. Overall, a total of 9 vaccinations were scheduled; the first 4 vaccinations were applied at weekly intervals (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22), and the remaining 5 vaccinations were given in 3-weekly intervals (Days 43, 64, 85, 106, and 127). All vaccinations were preferably to be applied intradermally to the same initially selected vaccination site (the skin of the inner side of the thighs or the upper arms) in order to target the same draining lymph nodes with all vaccinations. IMA970A was to be injected first, followed by CV8102 as close as possible to the injection site of IMA970A about 10 minutes later.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CV8102
    Investigational medicinal product code
    CV8102
    Other name
    RNAdjuvant
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intradermal use
    Dosage and administration details
    CV8102 is a novel RNA-based immuno-stimulatory adjuvant. It is composed of a purified, single-stranded, non-coding, long-chain RNA (R2025) and a small, arginine-rich cationic peptide (CR12C) that form particles (complexes) of approximately 100 nm size optimized for enhanced immune-stimulatory activity. The starting dose was 50 µg per intradermal injection, which could be reduced to 25 µg in the case of intolerability.Overall, a total of 9 vaccinations were scheduled; the first 4 vaccinations were applied at weekly intervals (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22), and the remaining 5 vaccinations were given in 3-weekly intervals (Days 43, 64, 85, 106, and 127). All vaccinations were preferably to be applied intradermally to the same initially selected vaccination site (the skin of the inner side of the thighs or the upper arms) in order to target the same draining lymph nodes with all vaccinations. IMA970A was to be injected first, followed by CV8102 10 minutes later.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Endoxan
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Cyclophosphamide
    Other name
    CY
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Cyclophosphamide (CY) is an immunomodulatory agent and was administered intravenously as a single pre-vaccination infusion at a low dose of 300 mg/m2 body surface area in order to enhance the immune response to vaccination by means of reducing inhibitory regulatory T cells.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Trial Treatment (IMA970A, CV8102 and CY)
    Started
    22
    Completed
    20
    Not completed
    2
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Overall trial
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Overall trial Total
    Number of subjects
    22 22
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    10 10
        From 65-84 years
    12 12
        85 years and over
    0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    65.7 ( 8.8 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    2 2
        Male
    20 20
    HLA-A*02 status
    Patients were to be HLA-A*02 and/or HLA-A*24 positive.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    5 5
        Positive
    16 16
        No result
    1 1
    HLA-A*24 status
    Patients were to be HLA-A*02 and/or HLA-A*24 positive.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    16 16
        positive
    5 5
        No result
    1 1
    HBV status
    Enrollment of patients infected with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was possible. Infected patients were to be treated with antiviral therapy before enrolment. Serology was done to assess HBV infection and to determine viral load in patients infected. Direct-acting antivirals were allowed to be applied as medically indicated.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    15 15
        Positive
    7 7
    HCV status
    Enrollment of patients infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was possible. Infected patients were to be treated with antiviral therapy before enrolment. Serology was done to assess HCV infection and to determine viral load in patients infected. Direct-acting antivirals were allowed to be applied as medically indicated.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    18 18
        Positive
    4 4
    Confirmation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
    HCC diagnosis was to be confirmed by biopsy or resected tissue (histopathological diagnosis) or imaging findings (non-invasive criteria).
    Units: Subjects
        by biopsy or resected tissue
    5 5
        by imaging
    16 16
        by both
    1 1
    BCLC status
    The study population consisted of adult patients with confirmed HCC at very early, early, and intermediate "Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer" (BCLC) stage after adequate standard treatment for HCC.
    Units: Subjects
        0 (very early stage)
    1 1
        A (early stage)
    11 11
        B (intermediate stage)
    10 10
    Child-Pugh Stage
    One main main criterion for inclusion was Child-Pugh A5-6 and B7 disease or no liver function impairment
    Units: Subjects
        5-6 points
    19 19
        7 points
    3 3
    Anti-tumor therapy (before start of trial treatment)
    Anti-tumor medication administered prior to start of study treatment was reported in only 1 SAF patient (4.5%; sorafenib administered about 2 years before study enrollment), while anti-tumor procedures prior to treatment start were documented as: TACE in 10 patients (45.6%), hepatectomy in 9 patients (40.9%), microwave therapy in 7 patients (31.8%), highfrequency ablation in 6 patients (27.3%), PEI in 3 patients (13.6%), thermal ablation in 2 patients (9.1%), radioembolization in 1 patient (4.5%), and radiotherapy in 1 patient (4.5%; multiple specifications per patient were possible).
    Units: Subjects
        one previous therapy
    12 12
        2 previous therapies
    7 7
        3 previous therapies
    2 2
        4 previous therapies
    0 0
        5 previous therapies
    1 1
    Currently indicated standard therapy
    Patients to be enrolled after any standard treatment (e.g., hepatic resection, RFA, TACE, and SIRT) and without any evidence of active disease that warrant further treatment. Thus, no standard anti-tumor therapy was to be indicated for the next 3 months. Please note that patients listed on the liver transplantation waiting list were allowed to be enrolled in the study.
    Units: Subjects
        None
    21 21
        liver transplantation
    1 1
        any anti-tumor treatment indicated
    0 0
    Body height
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    169.2 ( 7.7 ) -
    Body weight
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    78.68 ( 13.47 ) -
    Body mass index
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    27.49 ( 4.38 ) -
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All enrolled patients having received at least once study drug (i.e. CY, IMA970A, or CV8102)

    Subject analysis set title
    Immune-response evaluable population (IRE)
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All patients who had received the first 7 vaccinations.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Safety analysis set (SAF) Immune-response evaluable population (IRE)
    Number of subjects
    22
    21
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    10
    10
        From 65-84 years
    12
    11
        85 years and over
    0
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    65.7 ( 8.8 )
    65.5 ( 9.0 )
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    2
    2
        Male
    20
    19
    HLA-A*02 status
    Patients were to be HLA-A*02 and/or HLA-A*24 positive.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    5
    4
        Positive
    16
    16
        No result
    1
    1
    HLA-A*24 status
    Patients were to be HLA-A*02 and/or HLA-A*24 positive.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    16
    16
        positive
    5
    4
        No result
    1
    1
    HBV status
    Enrollment of patients infected with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was possible. Infected patients were to be treated with antiviral therapy before enrolment. Serology was done to assess HBV infection and to determine viral load in patients infected. Direct-acting antivirals were allowed to be applied as medically indicated.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    15
    14
        Positive
    7
    7
    HCV status
    Enrollment of patients infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was possible. Infected patients were to be treated with antiviral therapy before enrolment. Serology was done to assess HCV infection and to determine viral load in patients infected. Direct-acting antivirals were allowed to be applied as medically indicated.
    Units: Subjects
        Negative
    18
    17
        Positive
    4
    4
    Confirmation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
    HCC diagnosis was to be confirmed by biopsy or resected tissue (histopathological diagnosis) or imaging findings (non-invasive criteria).
    Units: Subjects
        by biopsy or resected tissue
    5
    5
        by imaging
    16
    15
        by both
    1
    1
    BCLC status
    The study population consisted of adult patients with confirmed HCC at very early, early, and intermediate "Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer" (BCLC) stage after adequate standard treatment for HCC.
    Units: Subjects
        0 (very early stage)
    1
    1
        A (early stage)
    11
    10
        B (intermediate stage)
    10
    10
    Child-Pugh Stage
    One main main criterion for inclusion was Child-Pugh A5-6 and B7 disease or no liver function impairment
    Units: Subjects
        5-6 points
    19
    18
        7 points
    3
    3
    Anti-tumor therapy (before start of trial treatment)
    Anti-tumor medication administered prior to start of study treatment was reported in only 1 SAF patient (4.5%; sorafenib administered about 2 years before study enrollment), while anti-tumor procedures prior to treatment start were documented as: TACE in 10 patients (45.6%), hepatectomy in 9 patients (40.9%), microwave therapy in 7 patients (31.8%), highfrequency ablation in 6 patients (27.3%), PEI in 3 patients (13.6%), thermal ablation in 2 patients (9.1%), radioembolization in 1 patient (4.5%), and radiotherapy in 1 patient (4.5%; multiple specifications per patient were possible).
    Units: Subjects
        one previous therapy
    12
    12
        2 previous therapies
    7
    6
        3 previous therapies
    2
    2
        4 previous therapies
    0
    0
        5 previous therapies
    1
    1
    Currently indicated standard therapy
    Patients to be enrolled after any standard treatment (e.g., hepatic resection, RFA, TACE, and SIRT) and without any evidence of active disease that warrant further treatment. Thus, no standard anti-tumor therapy was to be indicated for the next 3 months. Please note that patients listed on the liver transplantation waiting list were allowed to be enrolled in the study.
    Units: Subjects
        None
    21
    20
        liver transplantation
    1
    1
        any anti-tumor treatment indicated
    0
    0
    Body height
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    169.2 ( 7.7 )
    169.1 ( 7.9 )
    Body weight
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    78.68 ( 13.47 )
    78.90 ( 13.76 )
    Body mass index
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    27.49 ( 4.38 )
    27.59 ( 4.46 )

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Trial Treatment (IMA970A, CV8102 and CY)
    Reporting group description
    Within this single arm trial to investigate safety, tolerability and immunogenecity , all eligible patients were assigned to receive a pre-treatment wirh CY followed by vaccinations with IMA970A and CV8102.

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All enrolled patients having received at least once study drug (i.e. CY, IMA970A, or CV8102)

    Subject analysis set title
    Immune-response evaluable population (IRE)
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All patients who had received the first 7 vaccinations.

    Primary: Safety: Overview of TEAEs by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of TEAEs by maximum severity [1]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    21
        CTC Grade 2
    11
        CTC Grade 3
    5
        CTC Grade 4
    1
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of SAEs by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of SAEs by maximum severity [2]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AEs)
        CTC Grade 1
    1
        CTC Grade 2
    2
        CTC Grade 3
    0
        CTC Grade 4
    1
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of TEAEs leading to any action with any study drug

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of TEAEs leading to any action with any study drug [3]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing),
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        delay of further vaccinations
    2
        premature discontinuation of vaccinations
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of TEAEs by relation to study drugs

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of TEAEs by relation to study drugs [4]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), 'Study drug' includes IMA970A, CV8102 and CY.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        related to CY, IMA970A and/or CV8102
    20
        related to IMA970A and/or CV8102
    20
        related to CY
    4
        related to CV8102
    20
        related to IMA970A
    20
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of SAEs by relation to study drugs

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of SAEs by relation to study drugs [5]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), 'Study drug' includes IMA970A, CV8102 and CY.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        related to CY, IMA970A and/or CV8102
    2
        related to IMA970A and/or CV8102
    2
        related to CY
    1
        related to CV8102
    2
        related to IMA970A
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of TEAEs related to CY, IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of TEAEs related to CY, IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity [6]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    20
        CTC Grade 2
    5
        CTC Grade 3
    2
        CTC Grade 4
    1
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of TEAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of TEAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity [7]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0). The causality assessments made for IMA970A and CV8102 separately were almost always identical.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    20
        CTC Grade 2
    4
        CTC Grade 3
    2
        CTC Grade 4
    1
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of TEAEs related to CY by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of TEAEs related to CY by maximum severity [8]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    3
        CTC Grade 2
    2
        CTC Grade 3
    0
        CTC Grade 4
    0
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of SAEs related to CY, IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of SAEs related to CY, IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity [9]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    1
        CTC Grade 2
    0
        CTC Grade 3
    0
        CTC Grade 4
    1
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of SAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of SAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by maximum severity [10]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0). The causality assessments made for IMA970A and CV8102 separately were almost always identical.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [10] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    1
        CTC Grade 2
    0
        CTC Grade 3
    0
        CTC Grade 4
    1
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: Overview of SAEs related to CY by maximum severity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: Overview of SAEs related to CY by maximum severity [11]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing), Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) with similar intensity were counted only once in the severity analyses. Severity grading according to the US National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [11] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        CTC Grade 1
    1
        CTC Grade 2
    0
        CTC Grade 3
    0
        CTC Grade 4
    0
        CTC Grade 5
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: All TEAEs by System of Organ Class (SOC), if at least 2 patients were involved

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: All TEAEs by System of Organ Class (SOC), if at least 2 patients were involved [12]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing). Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same SOC) were counted only once.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [12] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        Gen. disorders and administration site conditions
    21
        Gastrointestinal disorders
    8
        Infections and infestations
    4
        Vascular disorders
    4
        Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    3
        Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    2
        Endocrine disorders
    2
        Hepatobiliary disorders
    2
        Investigations
    2
        Musculoskeletal a. connective tissue disorders
    2
        Nervous system disorders
    2
        Reproductive system and breast disorders
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: All TEAEs by Preferred Term (PT), if at least 2 patients were involved

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: All TEAEs by Preferred Term (PT), if at least 2 patients were involved [13]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing). Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) were counted only once
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [13] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        Injection site erythema
    16
        Injection site oedema
    10
        Fatigue
    9
        Injection site pruritus
    6
        Pyrexia
    5
        Influenza like illness
    4
        Injection site pain
    4
        Injection site warmth
    3
        Nausea
    2
        Vomiting
    2
        Ascites
    2
        Diarrhoea
    2
        Hypertension
    2
        Injection site induration
    2
        Skin hyperpigmentation
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: All TEAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by SOC, if at least 2 patients were involved

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: All TEAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by SOC, if at least 2 patients were involved [14]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing). Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same SOC) were counted only once
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    AEs occurring between start of CY and Visit 10/EOV (or last vaccination, if Visit 10/EOV is missing).
    Notes
    [14] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        Gen. disorders and administration site conditions
    20
        Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Safety: All TEAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by PT, if at least 2 patients were involved

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety: All TEAEs related to IMA970A and/or CV8102 by PT, if at least 2 patients were involved [15]
    End point description
    The main safety analysis is based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing). Repeatedly occurring AEs (i.e., same preferred term) were counted only once.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    All TEAEs by Preferred Term (PT), if at least 2 patients were involved
    Notes
    [15] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'safety' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    Units: Patients withs adverse events (AE)
        Injection site erythema
    16
        Injection site oedema
    10
        Fatigue
    6
        Injection site pruritus
    6
        Pyrexia
    4
        Injection site pain
    4
        Injection site warmth
    3
        Influenza like illness
    2
        Injection site induration
    2
        Skin hyperpigmentation
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Tolerability: Evaluation of local tolerability 5 min. after injections

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Tolerability: Evaluation of local tolerability 5 min. after injections [16]
    End point description
    The evaluation of local tolerability was performed in 21 SAF patients (i.e., completely missing data for 1 patient).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Pre-defined signs of local reactions (intolerability) were assessed after vaccination at each vaccination day (i.e., both 5 minutes and 2 hours after the CV8102 injection).
    Notes
    [16] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'tolerability' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    Units: Patients with specific local sign
        Erythema
    15
        Itching
    3
        Induration
    1
        Warmth
    2
        Edema
    9
        Ulceration / necrosis
    1
        Pain
    0
        Other
    5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Tolerability: Evaluation of local tolerability 2 hours after injection

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Tolerability: Evaluation of local tolerability 2 hours after injection [17]
    End point description
    The evaluation of local tolerability was performed in 21 SAF patients (i.e., completely missing data for 1 patient).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Pre-defined signs of local reactions (intolerability) were assessed after vaccination at each vaccination day (i.e., both 5 minutes and 2 hours after the CV8102 injection).
    Notes
    [17] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'tolerability' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    Units: Patients with specific local sign
        Erythema
    14
        Itching
    0
        Induration
    0
        Warmth
    2
        Edema
    6
        Ulceration / necrosis
    0
        Pain
    0
        Other
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Tolerability: Evaluation of systemic tolerability 2 hours after injections

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Tolerability: Evaluation of systemic tolerability 2 hours after injections [18]
    End point description
    The evaluation of systemic tolerability was performed in 21 SAF patients (i.e., completely missing data for 1 patient).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Pre-defined signs of systemic reactions (intolerability) were assessed after vaccination at each vaccination day (2 hours after the CV8102 injection).
    Notes
    [18] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'tolerability' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    Units: Patients with specific systemic sign
        Inflammatory symptoms
    0
        Flu-like symptoms
    0
        Signs of autoimmune reactions
    0
        Other
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Immunogenicity: Vaccine-induced TUMAP responses (Class I TUMAPs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Immunogenicity: Vaccine-induced TUMAP responses (Class I TUMAPs) [19]
    End point description
    Primary immunomonitoring analysis (immunogenicity of study treatment) was performed in a total of 19 immune-response evaluable (IRE) patients that were evaluable for immune responses to the 12 Class I and 4 Class II TUMAPs contained in IMA970A. At least one VI response to Class I was observed in 13 (68.4%) patients, respectively; more than one VI response was seen in 7 (36.8%) patients, respectively. Expressed as a total sum, 21 Class I responses (9.2% relative to the 228 Class I TUMAP exposures among the 19 evaluable patients) were mounted by the vaccinations. Mean number of vaccine-induced responses was 1.1 ± 0.9 (Median: 1.0; range: 1 to 3). Thus, the ex vivo measured immunogenicity of the Class I TUMAPs contained in IMA970A turned out to be rather moderate.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    A vaccine-induced (VI) TUMAP response was regarded as "positive", if a positive VI TUMAP response was observed for at least one post-vaccination time point (visit pool).
    Notes
    [19] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'immunogenicity' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Immune-response evaluable population (IRE)
    Number of subjects analysed
    19
    Units: Patients with response
        Patients with ≥ 1 VI response
    13
        Patients with > 1 VI response
    7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Immunogenicity: Vaccine-induced TUMAP responses (Class II TUMAPs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Immunogenicity: Vaccine-induced TUMAP responses (Class II TUMAPs) [20]
    End point description
    Primary immunomonitoring analysis (immunogenicity of study treatment) was performed in a total of 19 immune-response evaluable (IRE) patients that were evaluable for immune responses to the 12 Class I and 4 Class II TUMAPs contained in IMA970A. At least one VI response to Class II TUMAPs were observed in 10 (52.6%) patients; more than one VI response was seen in 5 (26.3%) patients. Expressed as a total sum, 18 Class II responses (23.7% relative to the 76 Class II TUMAP exposures) were mounted by the vaccinations. Mean number of vaccine-induced responses was 0.9 ± 1.1 (Median: 1.0; range: 1 to 3). Thus, the ex vivo measured immunogenicity of the Class II TUMAPs contained in IMA970A turned out to be rather moderate.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    A vaccine-induced (VI) TUMAP response was regarded as "positive", if a positive VI TUMAP response was observed for at least one post-vaccination time point (visit pool).
    Notes
    [20] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: All study analyses were done descriptively, i.e., no confirmatory hypothesis testing was performed, during this single-arm first-in-man phase I/II trial. Only descriptive summary analysis for this end point 'immunogenicity' and no statistical testing were performed.
    End point values
    Immune-response evaluable population (IRE)
    Number of subjects analysed
    19
    Units: Patients with response
        Patients with ≥ 1 VI response
    10
        Patients with > 1 VI response
    5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) defined as any AE that started or deteriorated on/after the day of the 1st administration of any study medication (i.e. CY pre-treatment 2-4 days before 1st vaccination) until EOV or last vaccination, if EOV is missing.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    AEs were recorded by asking specifically whether patients had noticed any unexpected or unusual symptoms or because of relevant findings in clinical assessments (e.g. blood sampling, vitals signs, phys. examinations). All AEs were documented in CRF; SAEs and AEs of Special Interest (AESIs) were additionally to be reported within 24 hours to sponso
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    20.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Reporting group description
    all enrolled patients having received at least once study drug (i.e. CY, IMA970A, or CV8102)

    Serious adverse events
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 22 (18.18%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Investigations
    Lipase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Hepatic encephalopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Ascites
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hepatic cirrhosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Safety analysis set (SAF)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 22 (95.45%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 22 (40.91%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    Influenza like illness
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 22 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    Injection site erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 22 (72.73%)
         occurrences all number
    128
    Injection site induration
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Injection site oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 22 (45.45%)
         occurrences all number
    52
    Injection site pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 22 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    Injection site pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 22 (27.27%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    Injection site warmth
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 22 (13.64%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 22 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Ascites
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 22 (13.64%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 22 (13.64%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin hyperpigmentation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Infections and infestations
    Conjunctivitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    2

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    15 May 2015
    With this Amendment, the following changes from the original protocol (Version 1.1) were implemented:: - The protocol was amended to only include patients with Child-Pugh A5-6 and B7 disease. Thus, patients with Child-Pugh B8 and B9 were no longer allowed to be enrolled. - It was clarified that, according to medical practice, patients with HBV infection should be treated with antiviral therapy before enrolment. - An additional sentence was added in the section on special precautions for CY to indicate that "Cyclophosphamide should not be administered to patients with a leukocyte count below 2,500 cells/microliter (cells/mm3) and/or a platelet count below 50,000 cells/mm3". - Administrative changes in study personnel were implemented.
    24 Sep 2018
    The Amendment implemented the following changes from the protocol: - New Screening 1 sequence to enable S1 during the standard treatment and recovery phase (screening option S1.2 added) - Exclusion Criterion No. 1 was modified to additionally allow for screening Option 1.2, where patients might have been to sign their first informed consent during or immediately after the standard treatment. - Time window between screening 1 (S1 procedures according to screening option S1.1) and start of the currently indicated standard treatment was extended by additional 4 weeks. - Duration of standard treatment and recovery phase, for both screening options S1.1 and S1.2, was extended by additional 4 weeks - A statement was added that a sample size of about 20 patients would be sufficient to estimate safety- and immunogenicity-related endpoints - Tumor assessment according to mRECIST is no longer mandatory but optional. Additionally, imaging of pelvis is only mandatory at baseline, thereafter optional, if no lesion was found in this area. - Enrollment timelines were prolonged to allow patient enrollment as expected. - The allocation of a patient ID could be done before signing IC1 for individual patients due to organizational needs (e.g., coordination of PBMC sampling). - The use of use of paracetamol (acetaminophen) for the treatment or prophylaxis of flu-like symptoms was permitted Further clarifications and minor adjustments that patients were allowed to be re-screened (e.g. for HLA-typing) and to have more than one standard therapy and that inhaled or nasally applied steroids, as well as topical steroids outside the planned vaccination area, during S2 and paracetamol (acetaminophen) for the treatment or prophylaxis of flu-like symptoms were permitted. description of drug preparation/application was improved and more detailed. Minor re-phrasing.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 04:22:30 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA