Clinical Trial Results:
Prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of piperacillin on organ functions and survival in the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-000136-17 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
06 Jan 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
02 Oct 2021
|
First version publication date |
02 Oct 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
Target_ZKSJ0085
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Bachstraße 18, Jena, Germany, 07743
|
||
Public contact |
Institute for infectious diseases and infection control jena, PD Dr. med. Stefan Hagel, Jena University Hospital; +49 3641 9-324590; Stefan.Hagel@med.uni-jena.de, 03641 9- 324590, Stefan.Hagel@med.uni-jena.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
Institute for infectious diseases and infection control jena, PD Dr. med. Stefan Hagel, Jena University Hospital; +49 3641 9-324590; Stefan.Hagel@med.uni-jena.de, 03641 9- 324590, Stefan.Hagel@med.uni-jena.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
20 Oct 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
06 Jan 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 Jan 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
As the primary goal of the study, it needs to be established whether an optimisation of antimicrobial therapy by individual dose adjustment of the test substance Piperacillin has a beneficial impact on organ function in severe sepsis or septic shock and whether it is superiour to dosage following prescribing information. This should be examined on the basis of global morbidity measurement (mean total SOFA-score).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
(S)AEs have been documend and reported as appropriate. According to protocol, patients were followed up.
Pre-determined safety-relevant data were submitted to the DSMB at regular intervals, on the basis of which recommendations for the continuation of the study were made. Furthermore, adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in both study arms.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
30 Sep 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 253
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
253
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
253
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
98
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
155
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Recruitment: 26.01.2017 to 09.12.2020 in 10 study Centers, all in Germany | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
1020 patients were screened. 254 patients could be randomized. There was no declaration of consent for a patient who had already been randomized to the TDM group, so that a total of 253 patients were included in the analysis . | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Single blind | |||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject | |||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Masking: open-Label; Doctor open, Patient blinded
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
PipTDM (Experimental Group) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
In the experimental group, the continuous intravenous infusion of the test substance (Piperacillin / Tazobactam (TZP)) was carried out after bolus administration with regular determination of the serum concentration of piperacillin with subsequent, patient-specific dose adjustment of piperacillin / tazobactam, in relation to the sepsis pathogen. Continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam is guided by an algorithm-based daily TDM at the 4xMIC of the infecting organism, starting 24 hours after the loading dose. Starting on day 1 after randomization up to and including day 10 or ending of the therapy with piperacillin, the daily determination of the serum concentration of piperacillin was carried out with an individual dose adjustment tailored to the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen causing the sepsis. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Infusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
- Patients without pretretement with piperacillin: After randomization a bolus of TZP (4.5g) over 30 minutes and immediately afterwards continuous intravenous infusion of TZP, depending on the current kidney function in the following dosage (running rate perfusor, 4.5g. ) / 50ml NaCl 0.9%):
• eGFR ≥ 20 ml / min 13.5 g / 24 h (6.3 ml / h)
• eGFR <20 ml / min 9 g / 24 h (4.2 ml / h)
- Patients with pretrement with piperacillin within the last 24 hours: bolus administration was omitted, after randomization continuous intravenous infusion of piperacillin / tazobactam, depending on the current kidney function in the following dosage (flow rate perfusor, 4.5g / 50ml NaCl 0.9%):
• eGFR ≥ 20 ml / min 13.5 g / 24 h (6.3 ml / h)
• eGFR < 20 ml/min 9g/24h (4.2 ml / h)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
PipKon (Control Group) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
In the control group, the continuous intravenous infusion of the test substance after bolus administration in the dose according to the technical information. In the case of renal insufficiency, the dosage was adjusted according to the product information. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Infusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
- Patients without pretreatment with piperacillin: After randomization, a bolus of piperacillin / tazobactam (4.5g) was given over 30 minutes and immediately afterwards continuous intravenous infusion of TZP, depending on the renal function, in the following dosage (FRP, 4.5g / 50ml NaCl 0.9%), was started:
• eGFR ≥ 20 ml / min 13.5g / 24 h (6.3 ml / h)
• eGFR <20 ml / min 9g / 24 h (4.2 ml / h)
- Patients with pretreatment with piperacillin: bolus administration was omitted, after randomization the cont. intrav. infusion of TZP was carried out, depending on the kidney function in the follow. dosage (FRP, 4.5g / 50ml NaCl 0.9%):
• eGFR ≥ 20 ml / min 13.5g / 24 h (6.3 ml / h)
• eGFR <20 ml / min 9g / 24 h (4.2 ml/h)
If the kidney function changed in the further course of therapy, the dosage of TZP in the control group was adjusted according to the following specifications:
• eGFR ≥ 20 ml/min or cont. RRT: 13.5g/24 h (6,3 ml/h)
• eGFR < 20 ml/min or iHD: 9g/24 h (4,2 ml/h)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PipTDM (Experimental Group)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
In the experimental group, the continuous intravenous infusion of the test substance (Piperacillin / Tazobactam (TZP)) was carried out after bolus administration with regular determination of the serum concentration of piperacillin with subsequent, patient-specific dose adjustment of piperacillin / tazobactam, in relation to the sepsis pathogen. Continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam is guided by an algorithm-based daily TDM at the 4xMIC of the infecting organism, starting 24 hours after the loading dose. Starting on day 1 after randomization up to and including day 10 or ending of the therapy with piperacillin, the daily determination of the serum concentration of piperacillin was carried out with an individual dose adjustment tailored to the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen causing the sepsis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
In the control group, the continuous intravenous infusion of the test substance after bolus administration in the dose according to the technical information. In the case of renal insufficiency, the dosage was adjusted according to the product information. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
primary analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated in the intent-to-treat population, to which all randomized patients belong according to their randomly assigned group membership. Base data and target values were group-specific described by suitable statistical parameters (mean value, standard deviation, 25th, 50th, 75th percentile, interquartile range, absolute and relative frequencies). The primary outcome measure is the SOFA score. It is included in the analysis as an individual mean over the course of day 1 after randomization until discharge from the ITS or until death, but no more than day 10. The difference between the intervention arms was evaluated confirmatory using a mixed linear model. Fixed factors are intervention and the SOFA score at the time of randomization (baseline).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
PipTDM (Experimental Group)
|
||
Reporting group description |
In the experimental group, the continuous intravenous infusion of the test substance (Piperacillin / Tazobactam (TZP)) was carried out after bolus administration with regular determination of the serum concentration of piperacillin with subsequent, patient-specific dose adjustment of piperacillin / tazobactam, in relation to the sepsis pathogen. Continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam is guided by an algorithm-based daily TDM at the 4xMIC of the infecting organism, starting 24 hours after the loading dose. Starting on day 1 after randomization up to and including day 10 or ending of the therapy with piperacillin, the daily determination of the serum concentration of piperacillin was carried out with an individual dose adjustment tailored to the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen causing the sepsis. | ||
Reporting group title |
PipKon (Control Group)
|
||
Reporting group description |
In the control group, the continuous intravenous infusion of the test substance after bolus administration in the dose according to the technical information. In the case of renal insufficiency, the dosage was adjusted according to the product information. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
primary analysis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated in the intent-to-treat population, to which all randomized patients belong according to their randomly assigned group membership. Base data and target values were group-specific described by suitable statistical parameters (mean value, standard deviation, 25th, 50th, 75th percentile, interquartile range, absolute and relative frequencies). The primary outcome measure is the SOFA score. It is included in the analysis as an individual mean over the course of day 1 after randomization until discharge from the ITS or until death, but no more than day 10. The difference between the intervention arms was evaluated confirmatory using a mixed linear model. Fixed factors are intervention and the SOFA score at the time of randomization (baseline).
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA-Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
It should be determined whether and to what extent the TDM-based piperacillin therapy represents a benefit for the patient's organ function.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
individually averaged from day 1 after randomization to discharge from ITS or until death, but no more than day 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Chi-square test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipKon (Control Group) v PipTDM (Experimental Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.389 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
28-days Mortality | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
28 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Chi-square test | |||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.435 | |||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
length of hospital stay | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to 28 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
kaplan-Meier analysis | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipKon (Control Group) v PipTDM (Experimental Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.486 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
length of ICU stay | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to 28 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
kaplan-Meier analysis | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.698 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA Subscore: Respiratory | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
day 1 to 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.445 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA Subscore: central nervous system | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
day 1 to 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.31 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA Subscore: liver function | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
day 1 to 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.872 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA Subscore: cardiovascular system | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
day 1 to 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.808 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA Subscore: blood coagulation | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
day 1 to 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.541 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SOFA Subscore: renal function | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
day 1 to 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.404 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of vasopressor free days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.141 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of mechanical ventilation free days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.06 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of renal replacement therapy free days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.329 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
cumultative dose Pip/Taz | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from day 1 to day 10
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.35 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
cumultative dose Pip/Taz per day | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
dose of piperacillin / tazobactam per day
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.119 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
duration of antibiotica therapy | |||||||||
End point description |
duration of antibiotika therapy
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
day
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | |||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.81 | |||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of antibiotics free days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
number of days without antibiotics (up to day 14)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney-U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PipTDM (Experimental Group) v PipKon (Control Group)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
249
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.194 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
The detection of AEs begins with the first dose of test medication after randomization. The end of AE detection is reached 24h after the last test medication (max. day 10)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
22
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PipTDM group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The dose adjustment of piperacillin/tazobactam follows a predefined scheme depending on the measured Piperacillin concentration. Starting on day 1 after randomization, the daily determination of the piperacillin concentration is carried out, individually adjusted to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen causing the sepsis. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PipKon group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Piperacillin/tazobactam is also administered in this study arm, . In accordance with in-house Standards, depending on the kidney function in the following dosage (flow rate perfusor, 4.5g / 50ml NaCl 0.9%). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
06 Oct 2017 |
Changes in the protocol included the deletion of the principal exclusion criteria "Renal insufficiency (acute or chronic) with renal replacement therapy or the need for renal replacement therapy expected within the following 6 hours after randomization" and the extension of the duration of the study from 18 Months to 36 Months. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |