Clinical Trial Results:
Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of givinostat in ambulant patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-000401-36 |
Trial protocol |
GB BE DE NL IT ES FR |
Global end of trial date |
22 Feb 2022
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
07 Jan 2023
|
First version publication date |
07 Jan 2023
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
DSC/14/2357/48 (EDYPIS)
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03373968 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
IND: 126598 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
ITALFARMACO S.p.A.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Via dei Lavoratori 54, Cinisello Balsamo , Italy, 20092
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Transparency Manager, Italfarmaco S.p.A., +39 02 66041503, info@italfarmaco.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Transparency Manager, Italfarmaco S.p.A., +39 02 66041503, info@italfarmaco.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
10 Aug 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
22 Feb 2022
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
22 Feb 2022
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To establish the effects of givinostat versus placebo administered chronically over 18 months to slow disease progression in ambulant DMD subjects
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was conducted under the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, and in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Consolidated Guideline on Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
06 Jun 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Serbia: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 15
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Israel: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 43
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 23
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 13
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 9
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 14
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 15
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 37
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
179
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
106
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
155
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
24
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Subjects were randomised in 2:1 ratio of givinostat versus placebo. 118 subjects were enrolled in the givinostat group, and 61 subjects were enrolled in the placebo group. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 359 subjects were screened. 36 subjects passed screening but were not randomised. 144 failed screening. 179 subjects were randomized with a 2:1 ratio: 118 subjects in the givinostat group, and 61 in the placebo group. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Subjects receiving givinostat or placebo received medication indistinguishable in appearance. Personnel involved in the study
(Investigators, nurses, all other site personnel, clinical research associates (CRAs), Medical Monitors, project managers, and personnel involved in data management) remained blinded at all times, unless under exceptional circumstances when knowledge of the study drug was essential for treating the subject, such as in case of an AE.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Givinostat | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Givinostat oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily (bid). | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Givinostat
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
TF2357
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for oral suspension
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The oral suspension of givinostat (10 mg/mL) was to be dosed in fed condition as described below: Givinostat or placebo starting dose > or =10 and < 12.5 kg of weight: 13.3 mg bid = 1.3 ml oral suspension bid > or =12.5 and < 20 kg: 16.7 mg bid =1.7 ml oral suspension bid > or = 20 and < 25 kg: 20 mg bid = 2.0 ml oral suspension bid > or = 25 and < 30 kg: 23.3 mg bid = 2.3 ml oral suspension bid > or = 30 and < 40 kg:
26.7 mg bid = 2.7 ml oral suspension bid > or = 40 and < 50 kg: 33.3 mg bid = 3.3 ml oral suspension bid > > or = 50 and < 60 kg: 36.7 mg bid = 3.7 ml oral suspension bid > or = 60 and < 70 kg: 40 mg bid = 4 ml oral suspension bid > or = 70 kg: 46.7 mg bid = 4.7 ml oral suspension bid
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily (bid). | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for oral suspension
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The oral suspension of placebo, manufactured to mimic givinostat, was to be dosed in fed condition as described for givinostat.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Givinostat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Givinostat oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily (bid). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily (bid). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Givinostat ITT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Givinostat oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily
givinostat: The oral suspension of givinostat (10 mg/mL) was to be dosed in fed condition as described below:
Givinostat or placebo starting dose
• > or =10 and < 12.5 kg of weight: 13.3 mg bid = 1.3 ml oral suspension bid
• > or =12.5 and < 20 kg: 16.7 mg bid =1.7 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 20 and < 25 kg: 20 mg bid = 2.0 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 25 and < 30 kg: 23.3 mg bid = 2.3 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 30 and < 40 kg: 26.7 mg bid = 2.7 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 40 and < 50 kg: 33.3 mg bid = 3.3 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 50 and < 60 kg: 36.7 mg bid = 3.7 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 60 and < 70 kg: 40 mg bid = 4 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 70 kg: 46.7 mg bid = 4.7 ml oral suspension bid
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily
placebo: the oral suspension of placebo, manufactured to mimic givinostat, was to be dosed in fed condition as
described for givinostat.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Givinostat
|
||
Reporting group description |
Givinostat oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily (bid). | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily (bid). | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Givinostat ITT
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Givinostat oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily
givinostat: The oral suspension of givinostat (10 mg/mL) was to be dosed in fed condition as described below:
Givinostat or placebo starting dose
• > or =10 and < 12.5 kg of weight: 13.3 mg bid = 1.3 ml oral suspension bid
• > or =12.5 and < 20 kg: 16.7 mg bid =1.7 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 20 and < 25 kg: 20 mg bid = 2.0 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 25 and < 30 kg: 23.3 mg bid = 2.3 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 30 and < 40 kg: 26.7 mg bid = 2.7 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 40 and < 50 kg: 33.3 mg bid = 3.3 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 50 and < 60 kg: 36.7 mg bid = 3.7 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 60 and < 70 kg: 40 mg bid = 4 ml oral suspension bid
• > or = 70 kg: 46.7 mg bid = 4.7 ml oral suspension bid
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo ITT
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily
placebo: the oral suspension of placebo, manufactured to mimic givinostat, was to be dosed in fed condition as
described for givinostat.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean Change From Baseline in 4 Standard Stairs (4SC) Climb After 18 Months of Treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The time (in seconds) to climb 4 standard-sized stairs is a TFT that represents stair-climbing ability. The test was evaluated by qualified functional evaluators (ie, physiotherapists) who were different from the site personnel who reviewed subjects’ safety results. The test was performed in a standardized manner described in a specific site manual.
Baseline 4SC was the measurement taken at the randomization assessment, unless this was missing, in which case baseline was taken as the last non missing value recorded prior to or on the date of first study treatment. The shorter the time, the better the outcome.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
18 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Log transformation applied
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0345 [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
generalised least square mean ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.86
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.745 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.989 | ||||||||||||
Notes [1] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in 4SC at Month 18 with baseline values for: 4SC, time to rise from floor, time to run/walk 10 metres, distance walked in 6 minutes and re-derived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. [2] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from ANCOVA model on change from baseline in 4SC at Month 18 with baseline values for the above-mentioned parameters as covariates, with steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean Change From Baseline in Time to Rise From Floor After 18 Months of Treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
An analysis of time (in seconds) to rise from the floor by change from baseline at 18 months is presented for the Target Population in the ITT analysis set. The shorter the time, the better the outcome
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
18 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [3] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3044 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
difference in least square means | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-3.28
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-9.573 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.018 | ||||||||||||
Notes [3] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in time to rise from the Floor at Month 18 with baseline values for: 4SC, time to rise from floor, time to run/walk 10 m, distance walked in 6 minutes and re-derived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Six-minute Walking Test (6MWT) After 18 Months of Treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
The 6-Minute Walk Test is a useful measure of functional capacity targeted at people with at least moderately severe impairment.
A modified version of the 6MWT recommended by American Thoracic Society (2002) for use in adults was performed.
The longer the walked distance the better the outcome.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
18 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [4] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3723 [5] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
difference in least square means | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
9.96
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-12.071 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
31.983 | ||||||||||||
Notes [4] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in distance walked at the end of the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) at Month 18 with baseline values for: 4SC, time to rise from floor, time to run/walk 10 metres, distance walked in 6 minutes and re-derived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification actors. [5] - LS means, CIs, p-values were obtained from analysis of covariance model on change from baseline in distance walked at the end of the 6MWT at Month18. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean Change From Baseline in Total North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score After 18 Months of Treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The total North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) is a 17-item rating scale that is used to measure functional motor abilities in ambulant children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). It is usually used to monitor the progression of the disease and treatment effects. The 17 items of the NSAA, ranging from standing to running 10 meters, were graded using the standard score card with each assessment rated as 0 – unable to achieve independently, 1 – modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 – normal with no obvious modification
of activity. This scale is ordinal with 0 as the minimum score (indicating full dysfunctionality, i.e. the worst outcome) and with 34 as the maximum score indicating fully-independent function (the best outcome).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
18 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [6] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0209 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
difference in least square means | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.91
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.295 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.533 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in total NSAA score at Month 18 with baseline values for: total NSAA score, 4SC, time to rise from floor, time to run/walk 10 metres, distance walked in 6 minutes and re-derived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Cumulative Loss of Function on the NSAA | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analysis of cumulative loss of function on the NSAA over 18 months of treatment is presented for the Target Population in the ITT analysis set. It has been expressed as estimated cumulative failures.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
over 18 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [7] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0202 [8] | ||||||||||||
Method |
negative binomial regression model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Ratio of cumulative failures] | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.61
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.408 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.927 | ||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Estimated cumulative failures, ratio of cumulative failures, CIs, and p-values are obtained from a negative binomial regression on the subject cumulative number of failures across all post-baseline visits. Total failed items at baseline, baseline values for: 4SC, time to rise from floor, time to run/walk 10 metres, distance walked in 6 minutes and re-derived age at first dose were included as independent covariates, with treatment group and steroid use included as indep classification factors. [8] - Estimated cumulative failures, their ratio were obtained from a negative binomial regression on the cumulative N of failures across all visits. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean Change From Baseline of Muscle Strength Normalized Overtime | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The mean change of muscle strength normalized was evaluated by knee extension and elbow flexion normalized by subject weight, both measured by hand-held myometry (HHM).
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
over 18 months
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Overall knee extension
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [9] | ||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0902 | ||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in least square means] | ||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.19
|
||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.401 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes [9] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in normalized muscle strength at Month 18 with baseline normalised muscle strength and re-derived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Overall elbow flexion
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [10] | ||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1818 | ||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
difference in least square means | ||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.09
|
||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.041 | ||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.213 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes [10] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in normalised muscle strength at Month 18 with baseline normalized muscle strength and re-derived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean Change From Baseline in Vastus Lateralis Muscle Fat Fraction (VL MFF) at 18 Months | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Vastus lateralis muscle fat fraction (VL MFF) was expressed as fat infiltration in this muscle. Fat infiltration was assessed by Magnetic Resonance (MRS).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at 18 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Givinostat vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Givinostat ITT v Placebo ITT
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
114
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [11] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0354 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
difference in least square means | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-2.92
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-5.641 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.204 | ||||||||||||
Notes [11] - LS Means, CIs, and p-values are obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on change from baseline in VL MFF at Month 18 with baseline VL MFF and rederived age at first dose fitted as covariates, with concomitant steroid use and treatment group as independent classification factors. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Mild TEAE Moderate TEAE, Severe TEAE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Adverse Events are unfavorable changes in health, including abnormal laboratory findings, that occur in trial participants during the clinical trial or within a specified period following the trial.
Serious Adverse Events include adverse events that result in death, require either inpatient hospitalization or the prolongation of hospitalization, are life-threatening, result in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity or result in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Other important medical events, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may also be considered Serious Adverse Events if a trial participant's health is at risk and intervention is required to prevent an outcome mentioned.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline through end of study, that is the end of 18° month
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Evaluation of Acceptability/Palatability of the Oral Suspension | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Acceptability and palatability of the oral suspension over time are presented. More in details, child perception of the medicine at the three timepoints hereunder specified; parent perception of the medicine based on the child's reaction at the same three timepoints; and parent problems administering the medication at the same timepoints are reported.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4, EOS, early withdrawal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Throughout the study, Visits 4 and 7 (month 1), at Visit 9 (month 2), at Visit 10 (month 3), at Visit 11 (month 6), at Visit 12 (month 9), at Visit 13 (month 12), at Visit 14 (month 15), at Visit 15 (EOS, month 18) and at the FUV (ie, 4 weeks ± 7 days).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
24.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Givinostat SAF
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Givinostat oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily. The Safety set (SAF) consisted of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the IMP. The SAF population was analyzed according to the actual treatment received and was used to present results on safety data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo SAF
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) twice daily. The Safety set (SAF) consisted of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the IMP. The SAF population was analyzed according to the actual treatment received and was used to present results on safety data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
13 Jul 2016 |
Final Protocol Version 1.0 dated 07 MAY 2016 was amended for the following reasons:
• To amend the wording of an inclusion criterium to limit the exclusion of patient due
to operator error of stopwatch.
• To amend the stratification process at randomization, including 2 additional strata
based on type of steroids because new data suggest that Deflazacort use is associated
with more prolonged time to loss of ambulation and increased frequency of side effects.
• To change the MRI cohort in MR cohort because the magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (MRS) exam was added at the same time points of MRI test. The reason
of the inclusion of MRS is explained in the next bullet point.
• To change the Key secondary endpoints in the MR cohort related to imaging data
using the data from MRS instead of MRI data by 3 point-Dixon technique. Both
teniques are responsive to disease progression, but MRS is considered the gold
standard for quantification of drug effects in vivo, and Fat Fraction measures from
single-voxel spectroscopy have been shown to be associated with function in DMD.
Moreover, MRS is the most direct and sensitive approach to discriminate water and
fat proton component signals in MR.
• To amend the wording of an exclusion criterium related to MR cohort in order to
include also MRS exam.
• To specify the type of Raven progressive matrices to be used for assessing the
cognitive function.
• To better clarify the pharmacokinetics procedures, by limiting the decision of site
personnel to collect the PK samples
• To allow personnel authorized by the Investigator to perform blood collection during
visits 5, 6 and 8 in order to facilitate the management of these visits.
• to correct some typographic mistakes existing in the final protocol version 1.0 (dated 07 MAY 2016). |
||
05 Sep 2016 |
Final Protocol Version 2.0 dated 13 JUL 2016 was amended for the following reasons:
· To address relevant GNAs regarding to the VHP procedure VHP934 (VHP2016102);
· To add the acceptability/palatability test as suggested by PDCO during the PIP
discussion;
· To better clarify the pharmacokinetics sampling and procedures;
· To better clarify the time window of the Visits;
· To update the functional algorithm after an additional discussion was performed with
the statistician to include also 6MWT in the algorithm;
· To specify the videos procedures which will be followed to ensure and maintain
during the study, quality standard of functional evaluators;
· To add “age” as covariate in the statistical analysis as discussed with the PDCO
during the PIP discussion.
. to correct some misleading or unclear sentences existing in the final protocol version 2.0 (dated 13 JUL 2016). |
||
12 Jul 2017 |
Final Protocol Version 3.0 dated 05 SEP 2016 (For European sites) and Final Protocol
Version 3.1 dated 04 OCT 2016 were amended for the main following reasons:
· To address relevant FDA comments regarding to the ‘May Proceed Letter’ (dated
18Oct2016);
· To modify the exclusion criterion n.1 related to the exposure to another
investigational drug (only for the European sites because for the US and Canada sites
the criterion was already amended);
· To modify the exclusion criterion n. 6 related to the ankle joint contractures to render
it more applicable to the target population and to permit the recruitment of a wider
number of children affected by Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy;
· To better clarify the pharmacokinetics sampling and procedures;
· To better clarify the time window of some assessments;
· To add a blood sample for the evaluation of serum biomarkers related to DMD and to
insert them as exploratory assessments and endpoints;
· To add in the schedule of Assessment the possibility to perform the genetic test to
confirm the diagnosis of DMD, as requested in the relevant inclusion criterion.
. to correct some misleading or unclear sentences existing in the final protocol versions 3.0 and 3.1 (dated 05 SEP 2016 and 04 OCT 2016). |
||
19 Oct 2018 |
Final Protocol Version 4.0 dated 12 Jul 2017 is amended for the main following reasons:
1. To address safety issue.
2. To safeguard subject safety, a new exclusion criterion is added to the protocol excluding subjects with triglycerides > 300 mg/dL (3.42 mmol/L).
4. To increase the frequency of thyroid function monitoring (TSH, fT3 and fT4 assessments) to ensure patient safety.
5. To address the IDMC recommendation a complete blood count (CBC) test assessment has to be performed weekly for 8 consecutive weeks if the dose is reduced due to platelet count ≤150 x 109/L and/or white blood cell <3.0 x 109/L and/or hemoglobin <10.0 mg/dL for safety reasons.
6. To guarantee a right safety evaluation, spirometry should be repeated if the test does not meet ATS/ERS criteria and/or the evaluator deems that a valid attempt to perform a correct maneuver has not been made by the subject.
7. To update the Inclusion criterion #6 from “Have time to rise from floor of < 10 seconds at screening” to “Have time to rise from floor ≥ 3 seconds and < 10 seconds at screening”. The “time to rise” lower boundary is selected to avoid subjects who will not have enough function decline in 18 months if on placebo.
8. To update the Inclusion criterion #7 from “Have manual muscle testing (MMT) of quadriceps at screening ≥ Grade 3” to “Have manual muscle testing (MMT) of quadriceps at screening ≥ Grade – 3”, to permit recruiting of a wider no. of subjects.
9. To remove the Inclusion criterion (Criterion #8)
10. To update the Inclusion criterion #9 (#8 in the amended protocol).
11. 11. To update the Exclusion criterion #4 |
||
29 Aug 2019 |
Final Protocol Version 6.0 dated 19 October 2018 is amended for the main following reasons:
1. In the original protocol sample size was calculated using publicly available standard deviation (SD), in particular from DMD Phase 3 study data on ataluren and drisapersen, where subjects have specific DMD genetic mutations (ie. Skippable 51 mutations or non-sense mutations). Since in the current protocol, inclusion of subjects is not depending on type of DMD genetic mutation, in case the Standard Deviation (SD) in the current study population will be lower than the estimated SD stated in the protocol, the sponsor believes appropriate to reduce the sample size of the study. Due to this, statistiscal analysis section is updated accordingly.
2. To update the background of givinostat regarding non clinical studies and clinical experience on risks and benefits section according to the new Investigator Brochure version 20 - July 2019.
3. To correct some typographic mistakes and/or clarify some paragraphs of Protocol version 6.0 (dated 19 Oct 2018) that could be unclear. |
||
08 Apr 2020 |
1. To amend the protocol based on the results of the pre-planned futility interim analysis as described in protocol version 7.0, performed in January 2020: it was concluded that futility on VLFF was not met and the trial should continue.
2. To amend the effect size, in 4SC 18 month change from baseline, from 3 seconds to 2 seconds. The Sponsor considers more appropriate 2 seconds based on the recent analyses performed by C-Tap (Wong B, et al. Action Duchenne International Conference, November 9–11, 2018, Birmingham,
UK), where the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for timed function tests (TFTs) in DMD was estimated at ~1.0 to 1.6 seconds.
3. Update the no. of subjects to be included in the MR cohort following the blinded sample size re-estimation done during the interim analysis in January 2020.
4. To cancel the second interim analysis following the recommendation made by FDA during the Type C meeting in October 2019. Since the second interim analysis has been deleted, the imaging endpoint has been moved to Key efficacy Endpoint.
5. To include an additional analytic method for the NSAA assessment.
6. To update the “Background on DMD” paragraph following the recent NDA approval received by Sarepta for the treatment of DMD boys.
7. To correct some typographic mistakes and/or clarify some paragraphs of Protocol version 7.0 that could be unclear. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
No limitations and caveats are applicable to this summary of results. |