Clinical Trial Results:
PREOPERATIVE LOCALLY APPLIED OESTROGEN IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: CHANGES IN SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE OUTCOME: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-000410-30 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
27 Aug 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
23 Sep 2021
|
First version publication date |
23 Sep 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
EstrogenPOP2
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Medical University of Vienna
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria,
|
||
Public contact |
Urogynecological Department, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 0043 140400 29620,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Urogynecological Department, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 0043 140400 29620,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Feb 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
27 Aug 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
27 Aug 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Primary Objective
• To demonstrate treatment efficacy of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in comparison to placebo, measured by a subjective questionnaire
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study intervention of applying vaginal cream is not associated with pain or distress.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Nov 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 103
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
103
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
103
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
63
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
38
|
||
85 years and over |
2
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Recruitment took place over a 31-month period between January 2017 and August 2020 in two urogynaecology centers in east Austria (Medical University of Vienna and University Hospital Tulln). One hundred and twenty women were randomised to receive either vaginal estrogen cream (n =60) or placebo cream (n=60). Once the target sample size was reached, | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
All eligible patients were referred by a gynecologist and seen by an urogynecologist at the study centers. 176 women were assessed for eligibility. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Subject | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Estrogen | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Linoladiol
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Vaginal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The active ingredient of Linoladiol® Estradiol-Emulsion is 0.10mg estradiol in 1g cream and is chemically and biologically identical to endogenous human estradiol.
Women were instructed to use the cream (estrogen as well as placebo) intravaginally with the enclosed applicator once daily for one week, every 48 hours for the following week, and then twice weekly for the remaining 4 weeks (=total treatment duration 6 weeks).
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Vaginal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo cream contained cetyl alcohol, probylene glycol, triglycerides, hostacerin T3, polysorbate, almond oil, benzyl alcohol and purified water.
Women were instructed to use the cream (estrogen as well as placebo) intravaginally with the enclosed applicator once daily for one week, every 48 hours for the following week, and then twice weekly for the remaining 4 weeks (=total treatment duration 6 weeks).
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Estrogen
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
estrogen in women with prolapse
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
103 of 120 (86%) women provided primary analysis data.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Estrogen
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
estrogen in women with prolapse
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
103 of 120 (86%) women provided primary analysis data.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Difference of prolapse domain score and other pelvic floor domain scores baseline minus 6 weeks of estrogen treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
assessment from January 2017 and August 2020
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: Tables BJOG revised.docx) |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference of prolapse domain score and other pelv | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Estrogen v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
103
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
- | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
- | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
January 2017 October 2020
|
||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
subjects
|
||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |