Clinical Trial Results:
CHEMOIMMUNE - A Phase II study evaluating an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody (pembrolizumab) in lymphopenic metastatic breast cancer patients treated with metronomic cyclophosphamide
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-002736-33 |
Trial protocol |
FR |
Global end of trial date |
18 Sep 2019
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
18 Mar 2021
|
First version publication date |
18 Mar 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ET16-073
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03139851 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Centre Léon Bérard
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
28 rue Laennec, LYON, France, 69008
|
||
Public contact |
Dr O. TREDAN, Centre Léon Bérard, 33 4 78 78 28 28, DRCIreglementaire@lyon.unicancer.fr
|
||
Scientific contact |
Dr O. TREDAN, Centre Léon Bérard, 33 4 78 78 28 28, DRCIreglementaire@lyon.unicancer.fr
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
16 Jan 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
18 Sep 2019
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
18 Sep 2019
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
-Safety run-in phase:
To evaluate the safety of a combination therapy using pembrolizumab in association with metronomic cyclophosphamide.
-Phase II:
To demonstrate the efficacy of a combined treatment associating pembrolizumab with metronomic cyclophosphamide in terms of 24-week Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR24w) as per RECIST 1.1.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Study treatments will continue to be administered as long as patient experiences clinical benefit in the opinion of the investigator or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression as determined by the investigator after an integrated assessment of radiographic data and clinical status or withdrawal of consent.
The investigator will have to inform the patient of the study treatment, the objectives and the design of the study, as well as the biological samples collection, provide the patient information leaflet / Informed consent form, answer to any questions that the patient may have and ensure that she understands the potential risks and benefits of participating in the study before signing the informed consent form.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Sep 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 20
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
20
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
20
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
20
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
At screening, a complete physical examination should be performed as per institutional practice with a measure of weight. During the study, a limited, symptom-oriented physical examinations should be performed. PS will be measured using the ECOG Scale. Vitals signs to be recorded include blood pressure, temperature, respiratory rate and pulse rate. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Safety run-in phase
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
safety run-in phase | ||||||
Arm description |
A safety run-in phase aiming to evaluate the safety of the combination therapy pembrolizumab + metronomic cyclophosphamide based on the occurrence of severe toxicities. | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Pembrolizumab
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients will receive cyclophosphamide (50 mg/day, daily, per os) and pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously [IV]). A cycle is defined as an interval of 21 days.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
Two-stage phase II
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Two-stage phase II | ||||||
Arm description |
A two-stage phase II aiming to evaluate the clinical activity of the combination therapy pembrolizumab + metronomic cyclophosphamide. The first 6 patients enrolled in the safety run-in phase will be part of the Phase II analysis. | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Pembrolizumab
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients will receive cyclophosphamide (50 mg/day, daily, per os) and pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously [IV]). A cycle is defined as an interval of 21 days.
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
safety run-in phase
|
||
Reporting group description |
A safety run-in phase aiming to evaluate the safety of the combination therapy pembrolizumab + metronomic cyclophosphamide based on the occurrence of severe toxicities. | ||
Reporting group title |
Two-stage phase II
|
||
Reporting group description |
A two-stage phase II aiming to evaluate the clinical activity of the combination therapy pembrolizumab + metronomic cyclophosphamide. The first 6 patients enrolled in the safety run-in phase will be part of the Phase II analysis. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Primary end point [1] | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Safety run-in phase
To evaluate the safety of a combination therapy using pembrolizumab in association with metronomic cyclophosphamide.
Phase II
To demonstrate the efficacy of a combined treatment associating pembrolizumab with metronomic cyclophospha
|
|||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The analysis of the safety run-in phase will be performed after 6 weeks of follow-up of the first 6th patients. Phase II: At the end of Stage INB, an interim efficacy analysis will be performed with analysis of data from the first 18 evaluable patients. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
The investigator collects (spontaneous patient report or questionning) and immediately notifies the sponsor of all SAEs, in a written report, wether or not theay are deemed to be attributable to research and wich occur during the study.
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
21.0
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: All patients experienced at least one AE: 14 patients (70%) had at least one event related to Pembrolizumab, and 16 patients (80%) had at least one event related to Cyclophosphamide. 12 patients experienced at least one AE grade ≥3, 15% of patients had at least one AE grade ≥3 related to Pembrolizumab, 40% of patients had at least one AE grade ≥3 related to Cyclophosphamide. No Immune related AE (irAE) was reported. No toxic death was reported. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
13 Oct 2017 |
Update of adverse events related to pembrolizumab (new AE including new irAE / imAE)
Tumor biopsies : addition of criteria and precisions in order to perform tumor biopsies (to be performed as per investigator judgement , irradiated lesion should not be biopsied |
||
17 Jan 2018 |
Update of dose modifications, supportive care in case of related AEs to pembrolizumab
Addition of an exploratory objective: to explore the levels of TGFβ (bioactive and non-bioactive) in serum, plasma and platelets of breast cancer patients |
||
04 Jun 2018 |
Modification of criteria I10 (ASAT and ALAT tolerated up to 5 ULN in case of liver metastases and suppression of LDH criteria) |
||
16 Jan 2019 |
Update of adverse events related to pembrolizumab (new AE)
Update of Data protection Section, following the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) |
||
18 Sep 2019 |
Suppression of irRC criteria for endpoints of secondary objectives |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |