Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    The Safety and Efficacy of COMP360 in Participants with Treatment-Resistant Depression (P-TRD)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2017-003288-36
    Trial protocol
    GB   CZ   DE   PT   NL   IE   DK   ES  
    Global end of trial date
    27 Sep 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    22 Apr 2023
    First version publication date
    22 Apr 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    COMP 001
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03775200
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    COMPASS Pathfinder Limited
    Sponsor organisation address
    3rd Floor, 1 Ashley Road, Altrincham, Cheshire, United Kingdom, WA14 2DT
    Public contact
    Guy Goodwin, COMPASS Pathways, Ltd, +44 7443 136539, info@compasspathways.com
    Scientific contact
    Guy Goodwin, COMPASS Pathways, Ltd, +44 7443 136539, info@compasspathways.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    22 Sep 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    27 Sep 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of COMP360 (25 mg and 10 mg) compared to 1 mg, administered under supportive conditions to adult participants with TRD, in improving depressive symptoms, as assessed by the change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline. Baseline was defined as the assessment score obtained on Day -1. The primary timepoint was Week 3. The MADRS was also analysed for the change from baseline to Day 2, and Weeks 1, 6, 9, and 12.
    Protection of trial subjects
    During the screening period, participants who are on antidepressant medications will be expected to complete the taper at least 2 weeks prior to Baseline (V2). Participants will be given a choice of the tapering rate. During the tapering period all participants will be supported by the study clinician. The designated study team member will be in frequent contact with the participants to monitor for withdrawal and worsening of depression symptoms. All participants will be evaluated for safety at the clinic weekly for a minimum of 3 weeks prior to COMP360 administration to ensure safe discontinuation of current antidepressant therapy required by the protocol. Participants’ companions (friend or family member) will be educated about the signs of worsening of depression and suicidality, and instructed on ways to contact the study team in case of significant worsening of depression. The COMP360 administration session will be supported by a trained therapist who will be present with the participant at all times until discharge. Rescue medications are allowed during the study as described in the protocol. Efficacy and safety assessments including Adverse Events are performed throughout the study up to the end of study.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    03 Jan 2019
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy
    Long term follow-up duration
    1 Years
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 96
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 50
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Portugal: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 33
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czechia: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ireland: 11
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    233
    EEA total number of subjects
    98
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    226
    From 65 to 84 years
    7
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Participants were outpatients recruited from general practitioners and specialised psychiatric services. All participants were then seen weekly for at least 3 weeks prior to the COMP360 Session (V3) to ensure the safe discontinuation of current antidepressant therapy. Rescreening of participants considered not eligible was allowed.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    428 [1]
    Number of subjects completed
    233

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Inclusion/exclusion criteria: 156
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Lost to follow-up: 1
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Not specified: 38
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: The number of patients listed as started is the number of patients screened, whereas the number of patients enrolled is the number of patients who were randomized.
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Bottles (each containing 5 capsules for a single dose administration) for each participant will be assigned according to unique identifiers by IWRS programmed with blind-breaking instructions. Study assessments were performed by investigators who were blinded to treatment assignment.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    COMP360 25mg
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    COMP360
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Psilocybin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    COMP360 25mg single dose treatment: 5 × 5 mg capsules

    Arm title
    COMP360 10mg
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    COMP360
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Psilocybin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    COMP360 10mg single dose treatment: 2 × 5 mg capsules and 3 × placebo capsules

    Arm title
    COMP360 1mg
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    COMP360
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Psilocybin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    COMP360 1 mg single dose treatment: 1 × 1 mg capsule and 4 × placebo capsules

    Number of subjects in period 1
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Started
    79
    75
    79
    Completed
    74
    66
    69
    Not completed
    5
    9
    10
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    2
    6
    6
         Physician decision
    -
    -
    1
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    2
    2
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -
    2
         Lack of efficacy
    -
    1
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    COMP360 25mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    COMP360 10mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    COMP360 1mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg Total
    Number of subjects
    79 75 79 233
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        From 18-34 years
    24 29 31 84
        From 35-64 years
    52 44 46 142
        From 65-84 years
    3 2 2 7
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    40.2 ± 12.19 40.6 ± 12.76 38.7 ± 11.71 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    35 34 43 112
        Male
    44 41 36 121
    Prior Psilocybin Experience
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    5 5 4 14
        No
    74 70 75 219
    Number of Failed Treatment for Current Episode
    Units: Subjects
        One
    0 1 1 2
        Two
    66 62 63 191
        Three
    8 9 11 28
        Four
    4 2 3 9
        Unknown
    1 1 1 3
    MADRS Baseline Severity Categories
    Units: Subjects
        Subthreshold (<= 10)
    0 1 1 2
        Mild (11 to 19)
    0 1 1 2
        Moderate (20 to 30)
    33 19 18 70
        Severe (>= 31)
    46 54 59 159
    HAM-D 17 Baseline Severity Categories
    Units: Subjects
        Moderate (18-23)
    57 49 59 165
        Severe (>= 24)
    22 26 20 68
    Length of Current Depressive Episode (Months)
    Units: Subjects
        <1 year
    12 10 10 32
        ≥1 year to <2 years
    33 28 33 94
        ≥2 years
    34 37 36 107
    BMI
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    26.52 ± 6.134 28.26 ± 8.203 27.26 ± 6.025 -
    Baseline MADRS Total Score
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    31.9 ± 5.41 33.0 ± 6.31 32.7 ± 6.24 -
    Baseline HAM-D 17 Total Score
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    21.8 ± 3.04 22.4 ± 2.77 22.2 ± 2.93 -
    Number of Lifetime Depression Episodes
    Units: Episodes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    7.3 ± 8.58 7.8 ± 9.09 5.7 ± 4.35 -
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Main Efficacy Analysis Set (Full Analysis Set-FAS)
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All participants randomised who receive study drug and have at least 1 post-dose efficacy assessment. Outputs based on this analysis set will use the treatment the study participant was randomised to.

    Subject analysis set title
    Secondary Efficacy Analysis Set (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    All participants in the FAS who do not have a protocol deviation (PD) that is thought to significantly affect the integrity of the participant’s efficacy data.

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety Analysis Set
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All randomised participants who receive study drug. Outputs based on this analysis set will use the actual treatment received by the study participant.

    Subject analysis set title
    Randomised Analysis Set
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    All randomised participants, whether or not they receive study drug.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Main Efficacy Analysis Set (Full Analysis Set-FAS) Secondary Efficacy Analysis Set (Per Protocol Analysis Set) Safety Analysis Set Randomised Analysis Set
    Number of subjects
    233
    210
    233
    233
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        From 18-34 years
    84
    84
    84
        From 35-64 years
    142
    142
    142
        From 65-84 years
    7
    7
    7
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    39.8 ± 12.19
    ±
    39.8 ± 12.19
    39.8 ± 12.19
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    112
    112
    112
        Male
    121
    121
    121
    Prior Psilocybin Experience
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    14
    14
    14
        No
    219
    219
    219
    Number of Failed Treatment for Current Episode
    Units: Subjects
        One
    2
    2
    2
        Two
    191
    191
    191
        Three
    28
    28
    28
        Four
    9
    9
    9
        Unknown
    3
    3
    3
    MADRS Baseline Severity Categories
    Units: Subjects
        Subthreshold (<= 10)
    2
    2
    2
        Mild (11 to 19)
    2
    2
    2
        Moderate (20 to 30)
    70
    70
    70
        Severe (>= 31)
    159
    159
    159
    HAM-D 17 Baseline Severity Categories
    Units: Subjects
        Moderate (18-23)
    165
    165
    165
        Severe (>= 24)
    68
    68
    68
    Length of Current Depressive Episode (Months)
    Units: Subjects
        <1 year
    32
    32
    32
        ≥1 year to <2 years
    94
    94
    94
        ≥2 years
    107
    107
    107
    BMI
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    27.34 ± 6.858
    ±
    27.34 ± 6.858
    27.34 ± 6.858
    Baseline MADRS Total Score
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    32.5 ± 5.99
    ±
    32.5 ± 5.99
    32.5 ± 5.99
    Baseline HAM-D 17 Total Score
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    22.2 ± 2.92
    ±
    22.2 ± 2.92
    22.2 ± 2.92
    Number of Lifetime Depression Episodes
    Units: Episodes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.9 ± 7.63
    ±
    6.9 ± 7.63
    6.9 ± 7.63

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    COMP360 25mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    COMP360 10mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    COMP360 1mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Subject analysis set title
    Main Efficacy Analysis Set (Full Analysis Set-FAS)
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All participants randomised who receive study drug and have at least 1 post-dose efficacy assessment. Outputs based on this analysis set will use the treatment the study participant was randomised to.

    Subject analysis set title
    Secondary Efficacy Analysis Set (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    All participants in the FAS who do not have a protocol deviation (PD) that is thought to significantly affect the integrity of the participant’s efficacy data.

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety Analysis Set
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All randomised participants who receive study drug. Outputs based on this analysis set will use the actual treatment received by the study participant.

    Subject analysis set title
    Randomised Analysis Set
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    All randomised participants, whether or not they receive study drug.

    Primary: Change in MADRS total score from Baseline (Day -1) to 3 weeks post COMP360.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in MADRS total score from Baseline (Day -1) to 3 weeks post COMP360.
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day -1) to 3 weeks post COMP360.
    End point values
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    79
    75
    79
    Units: Points
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -12.0 (-14.6 to -9.3)
    -7.9 (-10.6 to -5.2)
    -5.4 (-8.1 to -2.7)
    Statistical analysis title
    Hypothetical Estimand (25mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    Mixed Model for Repeated Measures model includes treatment, visit, pooled study site, treatment*visit, baseline (day -1) MADRS total score and an unstructured correlation. Data after the start of new treatment for depression or withdrawal (lack of efficacy or adverse event) was imputed 100 times under MNAR. Remaining missing data were imputed under MAR using MCMC methods with a non-informative prior. The imputed datasets were analysed using the MMRM model and estimates pooled using Rubin's rules
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 25mg v COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    158
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    LS Mean Difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -6.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -10.2
         upper limit
    -2.9
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    1.86
    Statistical analysis title
    Hypothetical Estimand (10mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    Mixed Model for Repeated Measures model includes treatment, visit, pooled study site, treatment*visit, baseline (day -1) MADRS total score and an unstructured correlation. Data after the start of new treatment for depression or withdrawal (lack of efficacy or adverse event) was imputed 100 times under MNAR. Remaining missing data were imputed under MAR using MCMC with a non-informative prior. The imputed datasets were analysed using the MMRM model and estimates pooled using Rubin's rules.
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 1mg v COMP360 10mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    154
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.184
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    LS Mean Difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -2.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.2
         upper limit
    1.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    1.87

    Secondary: The proportion of participants with a response (defined as a ≥ 50% improvement in MADRS total score from Baseline) at Week 3 post COMP360

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The proportion of participants with a response (defined as a ≥ 50% improvement in MADRS total score from Baseline) at Week 3 post COMP360
    End point description
    A MADRS responder is a participant with a ≥ 50% reduction in baseline MADRS total score at Week 3 post COMP 360.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 3 post COMP360
    End point values
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    73
    63
    60
    Units: Subjects
    29
    14
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    Composite Estimand (25mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    A GLMM using a binomial distribution and a logit link was fit. The model included treatment, pooled study site, visit, treatment*visit, baseline (day -1) MADRS total score as covariates and an unstructured correlation. Participants starting new treatment for depression or withdrawing (lack of efficacy or adverse event) were imputed as non-responders. Missing MADRS values imputed using MAR methods for the primary endpoint were dichotomised. Results were pooled using Rubin's rules
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 25mg v COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.014
    Method
    Generalised Linear Mixed Model
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.2
         upper limit
    6.6
    Statistical analysis title
    Composite Estimand (10mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    A GLMM using a binomial distribution and a logit link was fit. The model included treatment, pooled study site, visit, treatment*visit, baseline (day -1) MADRS total score as covariates and an unstructured correlation. Participants starting new treatment for depression or withdrawing (lack of efficacy or adverse event) were imputed as non-responders. Missing MADRS values imputed using MAR methods for the primary endpoint were dichotomised. Results were pooled using Rubin's rules.
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 1mg v COMP360 10mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    123
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.709
    Method
    Generalised Linear Mixed Model
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.5
         upper limit
    3

    Secondary: The proportion of participants with remission (defined as a MADRS total score ≤ 10) at Week 3 post COMP360

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The proportion of participants with remission (defined as a MADRS total score ≤ 10) at Week 3 post COMP360
    End point description
    Remitters are defined as having a MADRS total score ≤ 10 at Week 3 post COMP360.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 3 post COMP360
    End point values
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    73
    63
    60
    Units: Subjects
    23
    7
    6
    Statistical analysis title
    Composite Estimand (25mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    A GLMM using a binomial distribution and a logit link was fit. The model included treatment, pooled study site, visit, treatment*visit, baseline (day -1) MADRS total score as covariates and an unstructured correlation. Participants starting new treatment for depression or withdrawing (lack of efficacy or adverse event) were imputed as non-remitters. Missing MADRS values imputed using MAR methods for the primary endpoint were dichotomised. Results were pooled using Rubin's rules.
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 25mg v COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.002
    Method
    Generalised Linear Mixed Model
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.8
         upper limit
    12.8
    Statistical analysis title
    Composite Estimand (10mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    A GLMM using a binomial distribution and a logit link was fit. The model included treatment, pooled study site, visit, treatment*visit, baseline (day -1) MADRS total score as covariates and an unstructured correlation. Participants starting new treatment for depression or withdrawing (lack of efficacy or adverse event) were imputed as non-remitters. Missing MADRS values imputed using MAR methods for the primary endpoint were dichotomised. Results were pooled using Rubin's rules.
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 1mg v COMP360 10mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    123
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.723
    Method
    Generalised Linear Mixed Model
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.4
         upper limit
    3.9

    Secondary: The proportion of participants who have a sustained response at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The proportion of participants who have a sustained response at Week 12
    End point description
    Sustained responders are participants meeting the MADRS response criteria (a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MADRS total score) at any visit up to and including week 3 and also at all visits after week 3 until week 12.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Week 12
    End point values
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    46
    44
    44
    Units: Subjects
    16
    4
    8
    Statistical analysis title
    Composite Estimand (25mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    A logistic regression with treatment and baseline (day -1) MADRS total score as covariates was fit. Participants starting new treatment for depression or withdrawing (lack of efficacy or adverse event) were imputed as non-responders. Sustained responder status for all other participants was derived from the multiple imputed dataset as obtained for the main analysis of the Composite Strategy estimand of the MADRS responder endpoint. Results were pooled across imputations using Rubin's rules.
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 25mg v COMP360 1mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    90
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.081
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.9
         upper limit
    5.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Composite Estimand (10mg vs 1mg)
    Statistical analysis description
    A logistic regression with treatment and baseline (day -1) MADRS total score as covariates was fit. Participants starting new treatment for depression or withdrawing (lack of efficacy or adverse event) were imputed as non-responders. Sustained responder status for all other participants was derived from the multiple imputed dataset as obtained for the main analysis of the Composite Strategy estimand of the MADRS responder endpoint. Results were pooled across imputations using Rubin's rules.
    Comparison groups
    COMP360 1mg v COMP360 10mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    88
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.46
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.2
         upper limit
    2

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From ICG sign-off to last study event
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Any AEs occurring before the start of treatment (ie, before the dose of the IP on Day 0 [V3]) was recorded in the medical history. Any AE ongoing at V10 (EOS/ET) was followed until resolution or no longer considered clinically significant by the investigator.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    23.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    COMP360 25mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    COMP360 10mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    COMP360 1mg
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 79 (6.33%)
    6 / 75 (8.00%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Hospitalisation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
    1 / 75 (1.33%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Drug withdrawal syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
    0 / 75 (0.00%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Intentional self-injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 79 (2.53%)
    2 / 75 (2.67%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicidal ideation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 79 (2.53%)
    2 / 75 (2.67%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    2 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicidal behaviour
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 79 (3.80%)
    0 / 75 (0.00%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Adjustment disorder with anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
    0 / 75 (0.00%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
    0 / 75 (0.00%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
    1 / 75 (1.33%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    COMP360 25mg COMP360 10mg COMP360 1mg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    60 / 79 (75.95%)
    51 / 75 (68.00%)
    50 / 79 (63.29%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    27 / 79 (34.18%)
    16 / 75 (21.33%)
    20 / 79 (25.32%)
         occurrences all number
    34
    22
    30
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 79 (7.59%)
    1 / 75 (1.33%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    1
    Paraesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 79 (3.80%)
    4 / 75 (5.33%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    4
    1
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 79 (15.19%)
    5 / 75 (6.67%)
    7 / 79 (8.86%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    5
    8
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 79 (22.78%)
    7 / 75 (9.33%)
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    7
    4
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
    2 / 75 (2.67%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    1
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 79 (10.13%)
    11 / 75 (14.67%)
    14 / 79 (17.72%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    11
    16
    Anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 79 (8.86%)
    13 / 75 (17.33%)
    3 / 79 (3.80%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    16
    3
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
    5 / 75 (6.67%)
    5 / 79 (6.33%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    5
    5
    Euphoric mood
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
    5 / 75 (6.67%)
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    5
    5
    Depressed mood
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 79 (3.80%)
    5 / 75 (6.67%)
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    5
    5
    Suicidal ideation
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 79 (6.33%)
    3 / 75 (4.00%)
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    3
    5
    Mood altered
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 79 (8.86%)
    3 / 75 (4.00%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    3
    1
    Irritability
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
    2 / 75 (2.67%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    1
    Panic reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 79 (5.06%)
    1 / 75 (1.33%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    1
    1
    Thinking abnormal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
    4 / 75 (5.33%)
    0 / 79 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 79 (7.59%)
    0 / 75 (0.00%)
    3 / 79 (3.80%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    0
    4
    Myalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 79 (6.33%)
    2 / 75 (2.67%)
    1 / 79 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    2
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    31 Oct 2017
    Version 2.0
    03 Apr 2018
    Version 3.0
    22 Jul 2019
    Version 4

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322843
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 08:40:43 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA