Clinical Trial Results:
Placebo-controlled crossover study of the ability of Naloxegol to reverse opioid effect on colonic motor patterns in healthy volunteers
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-000013-20 |
Trial protocol |
BE |
Global end of trial date |
04 Jun 2019
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 Oct 2023
|
First version publication date |
26 Oct 2023
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2018-000013-20
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
KULeuven UZLeuven Targid
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium, 3000
|
||
Public contact |
Jan Tack, KU Leuven - Targid, 0032 16344225, jan.tack@kuleuven.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
jan Tack, KU Leuven - Targid, 0032 16344225, jan.tack@kuleuven.be
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
10 Jan 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
04 Jun 2019
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Jun 2019
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of Naloxegol compared to placebo on colonic motility, in combination with the presence or absence of a mu-opioid agonist, codeine. This will be investigated in HVs using high-resolution colonic manometry. Our objective is to correlate colonic motor patterns or a decrease in overall colonic motility to the symptoms in opioid induced constipation.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
healthy volunteers
sedation
catheter placement performed by experienced gastroenterologist
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
08 May 2018
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 15
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
15
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
15
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
15
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
15 healthy volunteers | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Normal bowel habit No organic or functional disease affecting the gastrointestinal system. No previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy No intake of laxatives or other medications. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall period
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Subject | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
No
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
naloxegol | |||||||||
Arm description |
Upon awakening, participants received naloxegol or matching placebo | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
naloxegol
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants underwent a colonoscopy after a half dose of standard PEG preparation for colonic manometry catheter placement. Upon awakening, participants received naloxegol 25mg or matching placebo.
In addition, placebo or 60 mg codeine was administered orally, followed by another intake of half this dose one-hour post-prandial.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
placebo | |||||||||
Arm description |
Upon awakening, participants received naloxegol or matching placebo | |||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
placebo
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants underwent a colonoscopy after a half dose of standard PEG preparation for colonic manometry catheter placement. Upon awakening, participants received naloxegol or matching placebo. In addition, placebo or 60 mg codeine was administered orally, followed by another intake of half this dose one-hour post-prandial
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
naloxegol
|
||
Reporting group description |
Upon awakening, participants received naloxegol or matching placebo | ||
Reporting group title |
placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Upon awakening, participants received naloxegol or matching placebo |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
reversal effects of a peripheral-acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) on colonic motor patterns | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
3 study conditions
naloxegol/placebo, placebo/codeine, or naloxegol/codeine
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - one participant was omitted from the analysis because of a missing trace [2] - one participant was omitted from the analysis because of a missing trace |
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Colonic pressure waves | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Colonic pressure waves (PWs) were evaluated during sleep, in the fasted state, after a standardized bread meal (645 kcal), and after intraluminal administration of 10 mg bisacodyl.
We analyzed the number and direction of propagation of short PWs (over 3-4 sensors), long PWs (>4 sensors), and high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs; long PWs with an amplitude of ≥100 mmHg for at least 1 sensor and 2 sensors of ≥90 mmHg).
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
naloxegol v placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
28
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [3] | |||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | |||||||||
Method |
Friedman test | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [3] - Both short and long synchronous PWs did not occur statistically significantly more or less in one of the 3 conditions, for all time periods. The same result was found for the antegrade PWs in all time periods. Postprandially, long retrograde PWs occurred statistically significantly less often with naloxegol/placebo compared to placebo/codeine (p=0.04). Additionally, short retrograde PWs occurred less often with naloxegol/placebo than with placebo/codeine (p=0.03). |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
For each individual, corresponds to timeframe of study participation (from signing of informed consent until last visit).
|
||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
23
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: there were no adverse events in this study |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |