Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2a Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of REGN3500 Monotherapy and Combination of REGN3500 Plus Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-001543-30 |
Trial protocol |
DE BE ES NL |
Global end of trial date |
28 Jul 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Aug 2021
|
First version publication date |
08 Aug 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
R3500-AD-1798
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03736967 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, United States, 10591
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trials Administrator, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 001 844-734-6643, clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trials Administrator, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 001 844-734-6643, clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
28 Jul 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
28 Jul 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of REGN3500 monotherapy compared with placebo treatment in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Nov 2018
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 33
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 40
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Korea, Republic of: 54
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 46
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czechia: 28
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
206
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
106
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
194
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
12
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
A total of 299 subjects were screened at sites in Republic of Korea, United States of America, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Belgium, and Spain. Out of 299 subjects, 206 subjects met eligibility criteria and randomized in this study. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to 1 of the 4 treatment groups: Placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W); REGN3500 300 milligrams (mg) Q2W; Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W and combination of REGN3500 300 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo Q2W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo matched to REGN3500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of placebo matched to REGN3500 on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo matched to Dupilumab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of placebo matched to dupilumab on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
REGN3500 300 mg Q2W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo matched to Dupilumab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of placebo matched to dupilumab on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
REGN3500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Itepekimab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of REGN3500 on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 on Day 1 and then 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose 300 mg and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 Q2W up to Week 14. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo matched to REGN3500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of placebo matched to REGN3500 on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dupilumab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
REGN668
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of Dupilumab on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg and 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg Q2W up to Week 14. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
REGN3500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
REGN3500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Itepekimab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of REGN3500 on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dupilumab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
REGN668
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received SC injection of Dupilumab on different quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas), upper thighs, and upper arms so that the same site was not injected for 2 consecutive administrations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
REGN3500 300 mg Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 on Day 1 and then 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose 300 mg and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg and 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Placebo Q2W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||
Reporting group title |
REGN3500 300 mg Q2W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||
Reporting group title |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 on Day 1 and then 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose 300 mg and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 Q2W up to Week 14. | ||
Reporting group title |
REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg and 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg Q2W up to Week 14. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, “Number of Subjects Analysed” signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Due to the premature discontinuation of the study, all analyses were change from hypothesis testing to descriptive. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Due to the premature discontinuation of the study, all analyses were change from hypothesis testing to descriptive. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index- 50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-50 (≥ 50% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index- 50 (EASI-50) ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-50 (≥ 50% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index- 75 (EASI-75) ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-75 (≥ 75% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index- 75 (EASI-75) ≥75% Improvement From Baseline Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and it was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index- 90 (EASI-90) ≥90% Improvement From Baseline Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-90 (≥90% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index- 90 (EASI-90) ≥90% Improvement From Baseline Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-90 (≥90% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Absolute change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Absolute change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Both Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score 0 or 1 (on the 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5 point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Subjects with both IGA score of "0" or "1"and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing IGA score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Both Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score 0 or 1 (on the 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5 point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Subjects with both IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Subjects were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Subjects were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Subjects were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percent change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Subjects were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analyzed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction from Baseline) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥4 Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Subjects were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percentage of subjects with improvement of weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS from baseline to Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and subjects with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction from Baseline) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥4 Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Subjects were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percentage of subjects with improvement of weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS from baseline to Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported. FAS included all randomized subjects and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Here, "Number of Subjects Analysed" signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to Onset of Effect on Pruritus (≥4-point reduction of weekly average of daily peak Pruritus NRS from baseline) | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Peak Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool used by subjects to report intensity of pruritus (itch) during a 24-hour recall period. Subjects were asked the following question: For maximum itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable,' how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?"
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [4] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [5] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [6] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized |
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [8] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [9] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [10] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized |
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Involvement at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [11] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [12] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [13] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized [14] - Due to premature discontinuation, all analyses were changed to descriptive and were not summarized |
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) From Baseline up to Week 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a study drug which may/may not have a causal relationship with study drug. Serious AE: any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-subject hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. TEAE was defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included: SAEs and Non-SAEs. AESI included: Anaphylactic reactions; Systemic/severe hypersensitivity reactions; Malignancy; Helminthic infections; Suicide-related events; Severe injection site reactions; Mycosis fungoides/other forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; Conjunctivitis and significant ALT elevation. Safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) From Baseline up to Week 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a study drug which may/may not have a causal relationship with study drug. Serious AE: any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-subject hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. TEAE was defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included: SAEs and Non-SAEs. AESI included: Anaphylactic reactions; Systemic/severe hypersensitivity reactions; Malignancy; Helminthic infections; Suicide-related events; Severe injection site reactions; Mycosis fungoides/other forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; Conjunctivitis and significant ALT elevation. SAF included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to week 36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The laboratory measurements included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis and pregnancy testing. Number of subjects with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Clinical significance was decided by investigator. SAF included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to week 36
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Vital sign assessment included blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature and respiration rate. Number of subjects with clinically significant changes form baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator. SAF included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to week 36
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
ECG recordings included ventricular heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, corrected QT interval. Number of subjects with clinically significant changes from baseline in ECG were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator. SAF included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to week 36
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Physical Examination Findings | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Number of subjects with clinically significant changes from baseline in physical examination findings were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator. SAF included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to week 36
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Positive Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN3500 and Dupilumab | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Treatment-Emergent (TE) ADA: any positive post baseline assay response when baseline results were negative/missing. TE ADA responses were further classified as: - persistent (treatment-emergent positive ADA response detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period [based on nominal sampling time], with no ADA-negative samples in-between, regardless of any missing samples or a positive response at the last ADA sampling time point),- indeterminate (a positive assay response at the last collection time point only, regardless of any missing samples), - transient (not persistent/indeterminate, regardless of any missing samples). The ADA analysis set (AAS) included all subjects who received any study drug and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result in the respective ADA assays, after the first dose of the study drug. Here, “Number of Subjects Analysed” signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to week 36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500 was reported. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all randomized subjects who received any study drug (active or placebo [safety analysis set]) and who had at least 1 non-missing study drug concentration result following the first dose of study drug. Here, "n" signifies those subjects who were evaluable at given time points.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [15] - Data was reported for REGN3500 300 mg Q2W and REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W arms only [16] - Data was reported for REGN3500 300 mg Q2W and REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W arms only |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Serum Concentration of Functional Dupilumab | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Serum Concentration of Functional Dupilumab was reported. PK analysis set included all randomized subjects who received any study drug (active or placebo [safety analysis set]) and who had at least 1 non-missing study drug concentration result following the first dose of study drug. Here, "n" signifies those subjects who were evaluable at given time points.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [17] - Data was reported for Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W and REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W arms only [18] - Data was reported for Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W and REGN3500 300 mg + Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W arms only |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
All Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the end of study (Week 36) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product (IP).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
SAF included all randomized subjects who received any study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
23
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of placebo matched to REGN3500 and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
REGN3500 300 mg Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab (loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 1 SC injection of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
REGN3500 300 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg (300 mg loading dose) and 2 SC injections of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg (600 mg loading dose) on Day 1 and then 2 SC injections of REGN3500 at a dose of 150 mg and 1 SC injection of Dupilumab at a dose of 300 mg Q2W up to Week 14. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
03 Sep 2018 |
• Modified exclusion criterion #4 to decrease the length of the washout period from 12 weeks or 5 half-lives
• Added an inclusion criteria of an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 was moderate and 4 was severe) at screening and baseline visits
• Updated the randomization to include stratification by baseline disease severity (moderate [IGA=3] vs. severe [IGA=4] AD)
• As per FDA comments, subject sample was positive in the REGN3500 ADA assay at Week 16 or the first time point analyzed, the Week 4 pharmacokinetic (PK) sample may be analyzed in the anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay
• As per FDA request, physical examination added at Week 16 |
||||||
10 Dec 2018 |
• Revised text regarding onsite monitoring after each administration of study drug to indicate that the minimum 30 minutes monitoring may be extended to up to 2 hours as per country-specific requirements
• Revised Inclusion Criterion number 1 to add an upper age limit of 75 years
• Added text in Exclusion Criterion number 12 to specify that patients with a positive tuberculosis (TB) QuantiFERON test result will be excluded from the study
• Added myocardial infarction, unstable arterial hypertension, unstable angina, and cerebrovascular accident as examples of uncontrolled cerebrocardiovascular conditions that will exclude a subject from the study |
||||||
23 Jan 2019 |
• Added secondary safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints |
||||||
17 Jul 2019 |
• The secondary safety endpoints were updated to include “incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to REGN3500 and dupilumab over time” to reflect that this endpoint will be analyzed and to align with other ongoing studies in the REGN3500 clinical program
• The neutrophil count qualifying for permanent discontinuation of study drug was changed from “≤0.5×10^3 per microliter (mcl)” to “≤1.0×10^3/mcl"
• The exclusion criteria were updated to more broadly exclude subjects who have previously participated in any anti-IL-33 antibody class
• Language was added to clarify that for the primary endpoint, the analysis will be comparing the REGN3500 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) monotherapy treatment group to the placebo group |
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
As a result of the decision to terminate the study, all statistical analyses were descriptive and no hypothesis testing was performed. |