Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43845   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2018-003985-15
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:APD334-301
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2019-10-21
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2018-003985-15
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
    Estudio en fase III, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo, de 52 semanas de duración para evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de etrasimod en sujetos con colitis ulcerosa activa de moderada a grave
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Etrasimod in the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis
    Estudio que evalúa la eficacia y seguridad de Etrasimod en el tratamiento de pacientes con colitis ulcerosa de moderada a grave.
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    ELEVATE UC 52
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberAPD334-301
    A.5.4Other Identifiers
    Name:IND numberNumber:125154
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorArena Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportArena Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    B.4.2CountryUnited States
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationArena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointGiles Hulley
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street Address6154 Nancy Ridge Drive
    B.5.3.2Town/ citySan Diego - CA
    B.5.3.3Post code92121
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.5.4Telephone number0018582104528
    B.5.6E-mailghulley@arenapharm.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameEtrasimod
    D.3.2Product code APD334
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNetrasimod L-arginine
    D.3.9.1CAS number 1206123-97-8
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeAPD334 L-arginine
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameAR401959 L-arginine
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB171412
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number2
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboTablet
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboOral use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Ulcerative Colitis
    Colitis Ulcerosa
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Ulcerative Colitis a form of inflammatory bowel disease.
    Colitis ulcerosa como forma de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Digestive System Diseases [C06]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.1
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10045365
    E.1.2Term Ulcerative colitis
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004856
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.1
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10045366
    E.1.2Term Ulcerative colitis, unspecified
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004856
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    to assess the efficacy of etrasimod on clinical remission in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) after 12 and 52 weeks of treatment.
    El objetivo principal es evaluar la eficacia de etrasimod en la remisión clínica en sujetos con colitis ulcerosa (CU) activa de moderada a grave después de 12 y 52 semanas de tratamiento.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Secondary:
    The secondary objective is to assess the efficacy of etrasimod on clinical response, symptomatic response and remission, endoscopic changes, corticosteroid-free remission, and mucosal healing in subjects with moderately to severely active UC at time points up to 52 weeks of treatment.

    Safety:
    The safety objective is to assess the long-term safety of etrasimod after daily doses of 2 mg for up to 52 weeks in subjects with moderately to severely active UC.

    Other:
    Other objectives include evaluation of etrasimod pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effect of etrasimod on health-related subject-reported outcomes and biomarkers.
    Secundarios:
    El objetivo secundario es evaluar la eficacia de etrasimod en la respuesta clínica, la respuesta y la remisión sintomática, los cambios endoscópicos, la remisión sin corticoesteroides y la curación de la mucosa en sujetos con CU activa de moderada a grave en puntos temporales, hasta un máximo de 52 semanas de tratamiento.

    Seguridad:
    El objetivo de seguridad es evaluar la seguridad a largo plazo de etrasimod tras las dosis diarias de 2 mg durante un máximo de 52 semanas en sujetos con CU activa de moderada a grave.

    Otros:
    Otros objetivos son la evaluación de la farmacocinética (FC) de etrasimod y el efecto de etrasimod sobre los resultados comunicados por el sujeto relacionados con la salud y los biomarcadores.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Men or women 16 to 80 years of age, inclusive, at the time of assent/consent. Enrollment of subjects < 18 years should be conducted only if acceptable according to local law and regulations
    2. Ability to provide written informed consent or assent and to be compliant with the schedule of protocol assessments
    3. Diagnosed with UC ≥ 3 months prior to screening confirmed by endoscopic and histologic evidence
    4. Active UC confirmed by endoscopy with ≥ 10 cm rectal involvement. Subjects with proctitis only at baseline who meet the other eligibility criteria for inclusion, including the endoscopic and rectal bleeding criteria for moderate to severe disease, will be capped at 15% of the total subjects
    5. Moderately to severely active UC defined as MMS of 4 to 9, including an ES of ≥ 2 and RB score ≥ 1
    6. Received a surveillance colonoscopy within 12 months before baseline. Subjects without a surveillance colonoscopy within the prior 12 months will have a colonoscopy at screening (ie, in place of screening proctosigmoidoscopy).
    7. Demonstrated an inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least 1 of the following therapies:
    a. Corticosteroids
    b. Thiopurines
    Biologic therapy or JAK inhibitor therapy
    a. Antitumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) antibodies
    b. Anti-integrin antibodies
    c. JAK inhibitors
    Concomitant treatments:
    8. Subjects are permitted to be receiving a therapeutic dose of the following drugs:
    - Oral 5-ASA compounds provided the dose has been stable for ≥ 2 weeks immediately prior to randomization
    - Oral corticosteroid therapy (prednisone at a stable dose ≤ 20 mg/day, budesonide at a stable dose ≤ 9 mg/day, or equivalent steroid provided the dose has been stable for the 4 weeks immediately prior to the screening endoscopy assessment
    - Immunosuppressive agents such as oral azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine must be discontinued ≥ 2 weeks prior to randomization
    - Probiotics (eg, Culturelle®, Saccharomyces boulardii) provided the dose has been stable for the 2 weeks immediately prior to randomization
    - Antidiarrheal (eg, loperamide, diphenoxylate with atropine) for control of chronic diarrhea
    If oral aminosalicylates or corticosteroids have been recently discontinued, they must have been stopped for at least 2 weeks prior to the endoscopy used for the baseline MMS.
    9. Vital signs at screening and pre randomization taken in the sitting position: heart rate ≥ 50 bpm, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 90 mm Hg, and diastolic BP ≥ 55 mm Hg
    10.Screening and pre randomization 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showing no clinically significant abnormalities
    11.Adequate hematological function defined by white blood cell count ≥ 3.5 × 109/L with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 109/L, lymphocyte count ≥ 0.8 × 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L, and hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL
    12.Adequate hepatic function defined by a total bilirubin level ≤ 1.5 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) range and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels ≤ 3.0 × ULN. Subjects with an isolated total bilirubin and normal AST and ALT diagnosed with Gilbert’s syndrome may participate
    13. Adequate renal function defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 by the CKD-EPI equation at screening
    14. Females must meet either a or b of the following criteria and males must meet criterion c to qualify for the study:
    a. A female who is not of childbearing potential must meet 1 of the following:
    − Postmenopausal, defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause;
    − Permanent sterilization procedure, such as hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy.
    b. A female who is of childbearing potential must agree to using a highly effective contraception method during treatment and for 4 weeks following treatment that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. The following are considered highly effective birth control methods:
    − Combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, which may be oral, intravaginal, or transdermal
    − Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, which may be oral, injected, or implanted
    − Intrauterine device (IUD)
    − Intrauterine hormone-releasing system
    − Bilateral tubal occlusion
    − Vasectomized partner, provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the WOCBP trial participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success.
    − Sexual abstinence. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence is not acceptable.
    c. A male must agree to using condoms during treatment and for 4 weeks following treatment
    1. Hombres o mujeres de 16 a 80 años, ambos inclusive, en el momento de asentimiento/consentimiento. El reclutamiento de los sujetos <18 años puede ser llevado a cabo solo si es aceptable de acuerdo con las leyes y regulaciones locales.
    2. Capacidad de proporcionar el consentimiento informado o asentimiento por escrito y de cumplir con el calendario de evaluaciones del protocolo.
    3. Diagnosticado con CU ≥3 meses antes de la selección y confirmado mediante pruebas endoscópicas e histológicas.
    4. CU activa confirmada mediante endoscopia con afectación rectal ≥10 cm. Los sujetos con proctitis solo al inicio del estudio que cumplan con los otros criterios de elegibilidad para la inclusión, incluidos los criterios de hemorragia endoscópica y rectal para enfermedad moderada a grave, se limitará a un máximo del 15% del total de sujetos.
    5. La CU activa de moderada a grave se define como MMS de 4 a 9, incluida una PE ≥2 y una puntuación de HR ≥1.
    6. Haber realizado una colonoscopia de vigilancia en el plazo de 12 meses antes del inicioA los pacientes sin una colonoscopia de vigilancia realizada en los 12 meses previos, se les realizará una colonoscopia en la selección (es decir, en lugar de la proctosigmoidoscopia de selección)
    proctosigmoidoscopia de selección.
    7. Mostró una respuesta inadecuada, pérdida de respuesta o intolerancia a, al menos, uno de los siguientes tratamientos:
    a. Corticoesteroides
    b. Tiopurinas
    Tratamiento biológico o tratamiento con inhibidores de JAK
    a. Anticuerpos del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (TNFα)
    b. Anticuerpos anti-integrina
    c. Inhibidores de JAK
    Tratamientos concomitantes:
    8. Los sujetos pueden recibir una dosis terapéutica de los siguientes fármacos:
    - Compuestos de 5-ASA por vía oral, siempre que la dosis se haya mantenido estable ≥2 semanas justo antes de la aleatorización
    - Tratamiento con corticoesteroides por vía oral (prednisona a una dosis estable ≤20 mg/día, budesonida a una dosis estable ≤9 mg/día o esteroide equivalente),siempre que la dosis se haya mantenido estable durante las 4 semanas inmediatamente antes de la evaluación de endoscopia de selección.
    - Los inmunodepresores tales como azatioprina o 6-mercaptopurina por vía oral se deben interrumpir ≥2 semanas antes de la aleatorización.
    - Probióticos (por ejemplo, Culturelle®, Saccharomyces boulardii), siempre que la dosis se haya mantenido estable durante las 2 semanas inmediatamente anteriores a la aleatorización.
    - Antidiarreicos (p. ej., loperamida, difenoxilato con atropina), para el control de la diarrea crónica.
    Si los aminosalicilatos o corticoesteroides por vía oral se han interrumpido recientemente, deben haberse detenido durante al menos 2 semanas antes de la endoscopia para la MMS inicial.
    9. Constantes vitales en la selección y antes de la aleatorización tomadas en sedestación: pulso ≥50 lpm, tensión arterial (TA) sistólica ≥90 mmHg y TA diastólica ≥55 mmHg.
    10. Electrocardiograma (ECG) de 12 derivaciones realizado en la selección y antes de la aleatorización que no muestre ausencia de anomalías clínicamente significativas.
    11. Función hematológica adecuada, definida por un recuento de leucocitos ≥3,5 × 109/l, con un recuento absoluto de neutrófilos (RAN) ≥1,5 ×109/l, recuento de linfocitos ≥0,8 × 109/l, recuento de plaquetas ≥100 x 109/l y hemoglobina ≥8 g/dl.
    12. Función hepática adecuada, definida por un nivel de bilirrubina total ≤1,5 x el rango del límite superior de la normalidad (LSN) y niveles de aspartato aminotransferasa (AST) y alanina aminotransferasa (ALT) ≤3,0 x LSN.Los sujetos con una bilirrubina total aislada y AST y ALT normales con diagnóstico de síndrome de Gilbert pueden participar.
    13. Función renal adecuada, definida por una tasa de filtración glomerular estimada ≥30 ml/min/1,73 m2 mediante la ecuación CKD-EPI en la selección.
    14. Las mujeres deben cumplir con uno o más de los siguientes criterios a y b y los hombres deben cumplir el criterio c para calificar para el estudio (por favor referirse al protocolo)
    a. Una mujer que no es potencialmente fértil debe cumplir con uno de los siguientes:
    - Posmenopáusica, definida como ausencia de menstruación durante 12 meses sin una causa médica alternativa;
    - Procedimiento de esterilización permanente, como histerectomía, salpingectomía bilateral u ooforectomía bilateral.
    b. Una mujer en edad fértil debe aceptar el uso de un método anticonceptivo altamente efectivo durante el tratamiento y durante las 4 semanas posteriores al tratamiento, que puede lograr una tasa de fracaso de menos del 1% por año cuando se usa de manera consistente y correcta.
    c. Un hombre debe aceptar el uso de condones durante el tratamiento y durante las 4 semanas posteriores al tratamiento.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Severe extensive colitis as evidenced by:
    - Physician judgment that the subject is likely to require hospitalization for medical care or surgical intervention of any kind for UC within 12 weeks of baseline
    - Current evidence of fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon or recent history (within last 6 months) of toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation
    - Previous total or partial colectomy
    2. Diagnosis of CD or indeterminate colitis or the presence or history of a fistula consistent with CD
    3. Diagnosis of microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, or infectious colitis
    4. Hospitalization for exacerbation of UC requiring intravenous (IV) steroids within 12 weeks of screening
    5. Positive assay or stool culture for pathogens or positive test for Clostridium difficile toxin at screening
    6. Pregnancy, lactation, or a positive serum β-hCG measured during screening
    7. Clinically relevant hematologic, hepatic, neurological, pulmonary, ophthalmological, endocrine, metabolic, psychiatric, or other major systemic disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study difficult or would put the subject at risk
    8. Recent history (within 6 months of the Screening Visit) of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke/transient ischemic attack, decompensated heart failure (requiring inpatient treatment), or New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure
    9. Any history of the following, unless treated with an implanted pacemaker or an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator with pacing:
    - History or presence of symptomatic bradycardia
    - History of sick sinus syndrome or neurocardiogenic syncope
    - Second or third-degree AV block
    - Periods of asystole > 3 seconds
    10. Forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70% of predicted values & FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.70 at screening
    11. Uncontrolled diabetes as determined by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 9% at screening, or subjects with diabetes with significant comorbid conditions such as retinopathy
    12. History of macular edema or retinopathy
    13. Current or past history of active tuberculosis (TB), history of untreated latent TB infection, or test positive for latent TB infection at screening.
    14. Known active bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial infection, or other infection or any major episode of infection that required hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 30 days of screening or during screening or oral antibiotics within 14 days prior to screening.
    15. Have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome or test positive for HIV antibodies at screening
    16. Have acute or chronic hepatitis B infection or test positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) at screening, or negative for HBsAg and positive for antihepatitis B core antibody in conjunction with detectable HBV DNA, or detectable HBV DNA)
    17. Have current hepatitis C infection or test positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) at screening as defined by positive for hepatitis C antibody and detectable HCV RNA
    18. History of an opportunistic infection or serious bacterial, viral, or fungal infections and requiring IV medication(s) ≤ 3 weeks prior to randomization
    19. History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
    20. History of cancer within the last 5 years, including solid tumors and haematological malignancies (except basal cell and in situ squamous cell carcinomas of the skin that have been excised and resolved) or colonic mucosal dysplasia
    21. History of lymphoproliferative disorder, lymphoma, leukemia, myeloproliferative disorder, or multiple myeloma
    22. History of alcohol or drug abuse within 1 year prior to randomization
    23. Hypersensitivity to etrasimod or any of the excipients or placebo compounds
    24. Prior treatment with S1P receptor modulators
    25. Treatment with a biologic agent within 8 weeks or within 5 elimination half-lives for a small-molecule agent, prior to randomization
    26. Treatment with an investigational therapy within 3 months prior to randomization
    27. Treatment failure with ≥ 3 biologic agents or ≥ 2 biologics plus a JAK inhibitor approved for treatment of UC
    28. Treatment with topical rectal 5-ASA, short-chain fatty acid enemas, or steroids within 2 weeks of screening or during screening
    29. Treatment with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, methotrexate, or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) within 16 weeks of screening
    30. Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to randomization
    31. Previous treatment with natalizumab
    32. Previous treatment with lymphocyte-depleting therapies
    33. Previous treatment with D-penicillamine, leflunomide, or thalidomide
    34. Treatment with IV immune globulin or plasmapheresis, within 3 months prior to randomization
    35. Chronic use of therapies that moderately/strongly inhibit/induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 2C9 metabolism and inhibitors of UGT1A7 within 4 weeks prior to randomization
    1. Colitis extensa grave observada mediante:
    • Criterio médico de que es probable que el sujeto requiera hospitalización para atención médica o una intervención quirúrgica de cualquier tipo para la CU (p. ej., colectomía) en las 12 semanas previas al inicio.
    • Pruebas actuales de colitis fulminante, megacolon tóxico o antecedentes recientes (en los últimos 6 meses) de megacolon tóxico o perforación intestinal.
    • Colectomía total o parcial previa.
    2. Diagnóstico de enfermedad de Crohn o colitis indeterminada, o presencia o antecedentes de una fístula coherente con la enfermedad de Crohn.
    3. Diagnóstico de colitis microscópica, colitis isquémica o colitis infecciosa.
    4. Hospitalización por una exacerbación de la CU que requiere esteroides intravenosos (i.v.) en las 12 semanas previas a la selección (una sola dosis administrada de esteroides i.v. es aceptable).
    5. Resultado positivo en ensayo o cultivo de heces (análisis de huevos y parásitos, bacterias) o resultado positivo en una prueba de toxinas de Clostridium difficile en la selección (si C. Difficile es positivo, el sujeto puede ser tratado y repetirse la prueba ≥4 semanas después de la finalización del tratamiento).
    6. Embarazo, lactancia o resultado positivo de β-hCG en suero determinados en la selección.
    7. Enfermedad clínicamente relevante hematológica, hepática, neurológica, pulmonar, oftalmológica, endocrina, metabólica (incluyendo, entre otros, hipo e hiperpotasiemia), psiquiátrica u otra enfermedad sistémica importante que dificulte la aplicación del protocolo, la interpretación del estudio o que pudiera poner en riesgo al sujeto.
    8. Antecedentes recientes (en los 6 meses previos a la visita de selección) de enfermedad cardiovascular, incluidos infarto de miocardio, angina inestable, ictus/ataque isquémico transitorio, insuficiencia cardíaca descompensada (que requiera tratamiento intrahospitalario) o insuficiencia cardíaca de clase III/IV según la New York Heart Association.
    9. Cualquiera de los siguientes antecedentes, a menos que estén tratados con un marcapasos implantado o un desfibrilador cardioversor con estimulación implantado:
    • Antecedentes o presencia de bradicardia sintomática.
    • Antecedentes de síndrome de disfunción sinusal o síncope neurocardiogénico.
    • Bloqueo auriculoventricular (AV) de segundo o tercer grado.
    • Periodos de asistolia >3 segundos.
    10. Volumen espiratorio forzado en 1 segundo (VEF1) o CVF <70 % de los valores previstos y cociente VEF1/FVC <0,70 en la selección.
    11. Diabetes no controlada, determinado por una hemoglobina A1c (HbA1c) >9 % en la selección o sujetos con diabetes y comorbilidades significativas, como retinopatía.
    12. Antecedentes de edema macular o retinopatía.
    13. Tratamiento actual o antecedentes de tuberculosis (TB) activa, antecedentes de infección de TB latente no tratada o un resultado positivo en la prueba de infección de TB latente en la selección. Las siguientes son EXCEPCIONES a este criterio de exclusión:
    • Los sujetos con TB latente, en los que se haya descartado la TB activa, que hayan completado un ciclo adecuado de tratamiento de profilaxis de TB, según las directrices clínicas nacionales/locales o las directrices de la OMS y que no hayan tenido contacto cercano reciente con una persona con TB activa, son aptos para la inscripción en el estudio. Es responsabilidad del investigador comprobar la idoneidad del tratamiento anterior para la TB y aportar la documentación pertinente.
    • Los sujetos con diagnóstico de TB latente en la selección en los que se haya descartado la TB activa y que hayan recibido al menos 4 semanas de un régimen de profilaxis adecuado para la TB, pueden volver a someterse al proceso de selección para su inscripción.
    Nota: Las dos excepciones a este criterio de exclusión descritas anteriormente NO se aplican a los sujetos de países identificados por la OMS como de elevada carga de TB multirresistente, debido al alto riesgo de infección latente con resistencia a múltiples fármacos.
    14. Infección bacteriana, vírica, fúngica, micobacteriana activa conocida u otro tipo de infección (incluida TB o enfermedad micobacteriana atípica) o cualquier episodio importante de infección que requiera hospitalización o tratamiento con antibióticos por vía i.v. en los 30 días anteriores a la selección o durante la selección o antibióticos por vía oral en los 14 días anteriores a la selección. Se permite la infección fúngica del lecho ungueal.
    15. Tener el virus de inmunodeficiencia adquirida (VIH)/síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida o un resultado positivo en la prueba de anticuerpos de VIH en la selección.

    (Por favor referirse al protocolo)
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The primary efficacy endpoints will evaluate etrasimod versus placebo in:
     The proportion of subjects in clinical remission at Week 12
     The proportion of subjects in clinical remission at Week 52
    El criterio de valoración principal de la eficacia evaluará a etrasimod frente al placebo en:
    • La proporción de sujetos con remisión clínica en la semana 12
    • La proporción de sujetos con remisión clínica en la semana 52
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Week 12 & Week 52
    Semana 12 y semana 52
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    The key secondary efficacy endpoints are:
     The proportion of subjects achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 52
     The proportion of subjects achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects, who had not been receiving corticosteroids for ≥ 12 weeks prior to the end of the study (Week 52), with clinical remission at Week 52
     Proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Week 52
     Proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission at both Weeks 12 and 52
    The other secondary endpoints are:
     Proportion of subjects with a clinical response at Week 52
     Proportion of subjects with a clinical response at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects with endoscopic normalization at Week 52
     Proportion of subjects with endoscopic normalization at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects with symptomatic remission at Week 52
     Proportion of subjects with symptomatic remission at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects with non invasive clinical response at Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
     Proportion of subjects with symptomatic response at Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
     Proportion of subjects with remission at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free since Weeks 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48
     Proportion of subjects with clinical remission at Week 52 among subjects in clinical response at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects achieving clinical response at both Weeks 12 and 52
     Proportion of subjects achieving mucosal healing at both Weeks 12 and 52
     Proportion of subjects achieving endoscopic normalization at both Weeks 12 and 52
     Proportions of subjects with clinical response of RB and SF symptom outcomes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
     Proportions of subjects with clinical remission of RB and SF symptom outcomes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52

    Exploratory efficacy endpoints are:
     Proportion of subjects with remission and response using total Mayo Clinic score at Week 12
     Proportion of subjects with remission and response using total Mayo Clinic score at Week 52
     Proportion of subjects with histologic improvement at Week 12 (as defined by the Geboes, Robarts, and Nancy histopathology scores)
     Proportion of subjects with histologic improvement at Week 52 (as defined by the Geboes, Robarts, and Nancy histopathology scores)
     Proportion of subjects with histologic remission at Week 12 (as defined by the Geboes, Robarts, and Nancy histopathology scores)
     Proportion of subjects with histologic remission at Week 52 (as defined by the Geboes, Robarts, and Nancy histopathology scores)
     Time to loss of response, with loss of response defined by:
     A ≥ 2-point increase from Week 12 in the combined SF + RB scores and combined SF + RB score of ≥ 4, on 2 consecutive visits (≥ 7 days apart), and
     Confirmed by centrally read ES ≥ 2 and,
     Confirmation of negative C. difficile testing
     Proportion of subjects with improvement in EIMs at Weeks 12 and 52, in subjects with EIMs at baseline

    Other Efficacy-Related Endpoints
    Health-Related Quality of Life
     Scores and change from baseline at Weeks 12 and 52 in the following:
     IBDQ total score
     UC-PRO/SS
     SF-36, version 2, physical and mental component and domain scores
     WPAI-UC
     Urgency NRS
     Abdominal pain NRS
     Proportion of subjects with UC-related hospitalizations
     Proportion of subjects requiring UC-related surgeries, including colectomy

    Pharmacokinetics
     Plasma concentrations of etrasimod, M3 (AR503641), and other metabolite(s) of interest (if warranted) will be assessed from samples collected prior to dosing and 4 hours (± 15 minutes) post-dose (after 12-lead ECG) on Week 0/Day 1
     Plasma concentrations of etrasimod, M3 (AR503641), and other metabolite(s) of interest (if warranted) will be assessed from samples collected prior to dosing (trough) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52

    Biomarkers
     Change from baseline in level of fecal calprotectin at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
     Change from baseline in level of hs-CRP at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
     Change and percentage change from baseline in lymphocyte counts at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52

    Safety Endpoints
     Incidence and severity of adverse events
     Incidence and severity of laboratory abnormalities, and change from baseline in laboratory values (to include hematology, serum chemistry, coagulation, and urinalysis)
     Incidence of clinically significant vital sign abnormalities and changes from baseline
    Los principales criterios de valoración secundarios de la eficacia son:
    • Proporción de sujetos que consigan una mejoría endoscópica en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos que consigan una mejoría endoscópica en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos que no habían estado recibiendo corticoesteroides durante ≥12 semanas antes de la finalización del estudio (semana 52) y con remisión clínica en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con cicatrización de la mucosa en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con cicatrización de la mucosa en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos que alcanzan la remisión clínica en las semanas 12 y 52.

    Otros criterios de valoración secundarios son:
    • Proporción de sujetos con respuesta clínica en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con respuesta clínica en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos con normalización endoscópica en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con normalización endoscópica en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión sintomática en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión sintomática en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos con respuesta clínica no invasiva en las semanas 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 y 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con respuesta sintomática en las semanas 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 y 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión en la semana 52 y sin corticoesteroides desde las semanas 16, 24, 32, 40 y 48.
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión clínica en la semana 52 de entre todos los sujetos con respuesta clínica en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos que alcanzan la respuesta clínica en las semanas 12 y 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos que alcanzan la curación de la mucosa en las semanas 12 y 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos que alcanzan la normalización endoscópica en las semanas 12 y 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con respuesta clínica en los resultados de los síntomas de HR y FD en las semanas 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 y 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión clínica en los resultados de los síntomas de HR y FD en las semanas 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 y 52.

    Los criterios de valoración exploratorios de la eficacia son:
    • Proporciónde sujetos con remisión y respuesta mediante la puntuación de la clínica Mayo total en la semana 12.
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión y respuesta mediante la puntuación de la clínica Mayo total en la semana 52.
    • Proporción de sujetos con mejora histológica en la semana 12 (según se define por las puntuaciones histológicas de Geboes, Robarts y Nancy).
    • Proporción de sujetos con mejora histológica en la semana 52 (según se define por las puntuaciones histológicas de Geboes, Robarts y Nancy).
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión histológica en la semana 12 (según se define por las puntuaciones histológicas de Geboes, Robarts y Nancy).
    • Proporción de sujetos con remisión histológica en la semana 52 (según se define por las puntuaciones histológicas de Geboes, Robarts y Nancy).
    • El tiempo hasta la pérdida de respuesta, con pérdida de la respuesta definida por:
     un aumento de ≥2 puntos desde la semana 12 en las puntuaciones combinadas de FD + HR y una puntuación combinada de FD + HR de ≥4, en 2 visitas consecutivas (≥7 días de diferencia);
     la confirmación por la lectura central de la PE ≥2; y
     la confirmación de resultado negativo en la prueba de C. Difficile.
    • Proporción de sujetos con mejora en las MEI en las semanas 12 y 52, en sujetos con MEI en el inicio.

    Otros criterios de valoración relacionados con la eficacia
    Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud
    • Puntuaciones y cambio desde el inicio hasta las semanas 12 y 52 en lo siguiente:
     puntuación IBDQ total;
     signos y síntomas de los resultados notificados por el paciente con colitis ulcerosa (UC-PRO/SS);
     cuestionario abreviado de 36 ítems (SF-36), versión 2, componentes físico y mental y puntuaciones de dominio;
     cuestionario para el Deterioro de la Actividad y la Productividad Laboral (WPAI-UC);
     EVN de urgencia;
     EVN del dolor abdominal;
    • Proporción de sujetos con hospitalizaciones relacionadas con la CU; y
    • Proporción de sujetos que requieren cirugía relacionada con la CU, colectomía inclusive.

    Farmacocinética
    • Se evaluarán las concentraciones plasmáticas de etrasimod, M3 (AR503641) y de otros metabolitos de interés (si está justificado) a partir de las muestras recogidas antes de la administración de la dosis y 4 horas (±15 minutos) después de la dosis (después del ECG de 12 derivaciones) en la semana 0/día 1.
    • Se evaluarán las concentraciones plasmáticas de etrasimod, M3 (AR503641) y de otros metabolitos de interés (si está justificado) a partir de las muestras recogidas antes de la administración de la dosis (valor mínimo) en las semanas 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 y 52.

    Biomarcadores (Por favor referirse al protocolo)


    Criterios de valoración de la seguridad (Por favor referirse al protocolo)
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52
    Semanas 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 y 52.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Yes
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic Yes
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic Yes
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic Yes
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group No
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned6
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA253
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Argentina
    Australia
    Austria
    Belarus
    Belgium
    Brazil
    Bulgaria
    Canada
    Chile
    China
    Colombia
    Croatia
    Czech Republic
    Denmark
    Egypt
    Estonia
    France
    Georgia
    Germany
    Hungary
    India
    Israel
    Italy
    Japan
    Korea, Republic of
    Latvia
    Lebanon
    Lithuania
    Mexico
    Moldova, Republic of
    Netherlands
    Poland
    Portugal
    Romania
    Russian Federation
    Serbia
    Slovakia
    South Africa
    Spain
    Switzerland
    Taiwan
    Thailand
    Turkey
    Ukraine
    United Kingdom
    United States
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS.
    Última visita Último Paciente
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months6
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 15
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.4.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Yes
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 15
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 317
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 40
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state22
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 165
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 372
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    NONE. However eligible participants will be given the opportunity to enter an open label extension study (OLE) with etrasimod
    NINGUNO. Los participantes elegibles tendrán la oportunidad de participar en un estudio de extensión abierto abierta (OLE) con etrasimod
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2019-10-21
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2019-10-02
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 18 21:47:54 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA