E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Body processes [G] - Bones and nerves physological processes [G11] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of REGN5069 compared to placebo in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee who have a history of inadequate joint pain relief or intolerance to current analgesic therapy. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
The secondary objectives of the study are: - To characterize the concentrations of functional REGN5069 in serum over time when patients are treated for up to 12 weeks - To assess the safety and tolerability of REGN5069 compared with placebo when patients are treated for up to 12 weeks - To measure levels of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against REGN5069 following multiple IV administrations |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Generally in good health at the screening visit 2. Body mass index (BMI) ≤39 kg/m2 at the screening visit 3. Clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria (Altman, 1986) with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) at the index joint at the screening visit 4. Moderate-to-severe pain in the index joint 5. A history of inadequate pain relief from or intolerance to analgesics used for OA |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Diagnosis of systemic diseases that may affect joints 2. History or presence of osteonecrosis, destructive arthropathy, neuropathic joint arthropathy, pathologic fractures in any shoulder, hip, or knee joint(s), hip dislocation (prosthetic hip dislocation is eligible), or knee dislocation (patella dislocation is eligible) at the screening visit. Presence of subchondral insufficiency fracture on screening films or MRI as assessed by the central imaging reader. 3. Is scheduled for a joint replacement surgery to be performed during the study period 4. Received an intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid in any joint within 90 days prior to the screening visit 5. Systemic (ie, IV, oral, or intramuscular) corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the screening visit. Intra-articular corticosteroids in the index joint within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit, or to any other joint within 30 days prior to the screening visit(topical, intranasal, or inhaled corticosteroids are permitted). 6. History or presence at the screening visit of multiple sclerosis, autonomic neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy 7. Significant concomitant illness including, but not limited to, psychiatric, cardiac, renal, hepatic, neurological, endocrinological, metabolic, or lymphatic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect the patient’s participation in the study 8. History of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndromes, transient ischemic attack, or cerebrovascular accident within 12 months prior to the screening visit
Note: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary endpoint of the study is the change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC pain subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
The secondary efficacy endpoints of the study are: Change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC total score (based on the full survey) in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo* Change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC physical function subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo* Change from baseline to week 12 in the Patient Global Assessment score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo* Change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC stiffness subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo* Percentage of patients treated with REGN5069, compared to that of patients treated with placebo, who had a response at week 12, with response defined as an improvement by ≥30% in the WOMAC pain subscale scores*
The secondary safety endpoints of the study are: The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo throughout the study duration** The incidence of imaging abnormalities consistent with accelerated arthropathies as assessed by X-ray and MRI in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo throughout the study duration** Presence of anti-REGN5069 antibody development in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo throughout the study duration** |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
*Baseline to Week 12 **Through study completion (36 weeks) |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | Yes |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | Yes |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | Yes |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 3 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 6 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 21 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Bulgaria |
Czech Republic |
Georgia |
Germany |
Moldova, Republic of |
Poland |
Romania |
Slovakia |
Spain |
Ukraine |
United Kingdom |
United States |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
Last Patient Last Phone Call |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 24 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 28 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |