Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    MRX-502: Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Maralixibat in the Treatment of Subjects with Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) – MARCH-PFIC.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-001211-22
    Trial protocol
    GB   DE   FR   HU   PL   AT   BE   IT  
    Global end of trial date
    01 Sep 2022

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    02 Jun 2023
    First version publication date
    02 Jun 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    MRX-502
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03905330
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Mirum Pharmaceuticals
    Sponsor organisation address
    950 Tower Lane, Suite 1050 , Foster City, United States, CA 94404
    Public contact
    Chief Scientific Officer, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 1 6506674085, medinfo@mirumpharma.com
    Scientific contact
    Chief Scientific Officer, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 1 6506674085, medinfo@mirumpharma.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    Yes
    EMA paediatric investigation plan number(s)
    EMEA-001475-PIP03-17
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    06 Dec 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    01 Sep 2022
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    01 Sep 2022
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of maralixibat versus placebo on the severity of pruritus in participants with PFIC2. - To evaluate the efficacy of maralixibat versus placebo on total serum bile acid (sBA) levels in participants with PFIC2 - To evaluate the efficacy of maralixibat versus placebo on the proportion of responders for the ItchRO(Obs) pruritus score in participants with PFIC2 and participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC5, and PFIC6) - To evaluate the efficacy of maralixibat versus placebo on the sBA responder rate in participants with PFIC2 and participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC5, and PFIC6) - To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of maralixibat versus placebo in all participants who receive at least 1 dose of study medication.
    Protection of trial subjects
    All study participants (caregivers as applicable) were required to read and sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF). Participants were re-consented to the most current version of the ICF(s) during their participation in the study
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    17 Jun 2019
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Scientific research
    Long term follow-up duration
    2 Years
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Brazil: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Colombia: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Mexico: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Singapore: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Turkey: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Lebanon: 13
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 22
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    93
    EEA total number of subjects
    22
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    22
    Children (2-11 years)
    65
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    6
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    A total of 93 participants were enrolled at 29 sites in 16 countries (Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, France, Germany, Italy, Lebanon, Mexico, Poland, Singapore, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The screening period starts when informed consent (or assent as applicable) is signed. The duration of the screening period is up to 6 weeks during which all procedures listed for the screening visit must be completed. A total of 125 patients were screened for the study. 32 of these patients were screen failures

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Dose Escalation and stable dosing Period (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    After an unblinded screening period of up to 6 weeks, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either maralixibat or placebo. The investigator or assigned site staff will access the IRT to randomize the subject and dispense the study medication. The double-blind Dose Escalation treatment period will comprise of 4–6 weeks (maximum 6 weeks). The Baseline characteristics are taken prior to randomization.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    Primary Cohort MRX
    Arm description
    After an unblinded screening period of up to 6 weeks, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either maralixibat or placebo. The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps. Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks) and a 7 days Safety Follow-up period for subjects discontinuing early and for subjects not enrolling into the extension Study MRX-503
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Maralixibat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    MRX
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps: • Dose level 1: 150 μg/kg maralixibat BID for 1 week • Dose level 2: 300 μg/kg maralixibat BID for 1 week • Dose level 3: 450 μg/kg maralixibat BID for 1 week • Dose level 4: 600 μg/kg maralixibat BID for the remaining duration of the study Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks)

    Arm title
    Primary Cohort Placebo
    Arm description
    Participants received a corresponding placebo
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps: • Dose level 1: 150 μg/kg placebo BID for 1 week • Dose level 2: 300 μg/kg placebo BID for 1 week • Dose level 3: 450 μg/kg placebo BID for 1 week • Dose level 4: 600 μg/kg placebo BID for the remaining duration of the study Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks)

    Arm title
    PFIC Cohort MRX
    Arm description
    After an unblinded screening period of up to 6 weeks, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either maralixibat or placebo. The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps. Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks) and a 7 days Safety Follow-up period for subjects discontinuing early and for subjects not enrolling into the extension Study MRX-503.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Maralixibat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    MRX
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps: • Dose level 1: 150 μg/kg maralixibat BID for 1 week • Dose level 2: 300 μg/kg maralixibat BID for 1 week • Dose level 3: 450 μg/kg maralixibat BID for 1 week • Dose level 4: 600 μg/kg maralixibat BID for the remaining duration of the study Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks)

    Arm title
    PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Arm description
    Participants received a corresponding placebo
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps: • Dose level 1: 150 μg/kg placebo BID for 1 week • Dose level 2: 300 μg/kg placebo BID for 1 week • Dose level 3: 450 μg/kg placebo BID for 1 week • Dose level 4: 600 μg/kg placebo BID for the remaining duration of the study Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks)

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Primary Cohort MRX Primary Cohort Placebo PFIC Cohort MRX PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Started
    14
    17
    33
    31
    Completed
    13
    15
    32
    28
    Not completed
    1
    2
    1
    3
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    1
    1
    2
         Disease progression
    -
    1
    -
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Dose Escalation and stable dosing Period
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Dose Escalation and stable dosing Period Total
    Number of subjects
    93 93
    Age categorical
    Most participants (61 [65.6%]) were 1 to <6 years of age.
    Units: Subjects
        1 to <6 years
    61 61
        6 to <13 years
    26 26
        13 to 18 years
    6 6
    Age continuous
    The mean (SD) age was 4.7 (3.85) years and ranged from 1 to 17 years of age.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    4.7 ± 3.85 -
    Gender categorical
    For the full cohort, there were more females (51 [54.8%]) than males (42 [45.2%])
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    51 51
        Male
    42 42
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Primary Cohort MRX
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease-causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function.(PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels)

    Subject analysis set title
    Primary Cohort Placebo
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease-causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function.(PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels)

    Subject analysis set title
    PFIC Cohort MRX
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC6.

    Subject analysis set title
    PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC6.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Primary Cohort MRX Primary Cohort Placebo PFIC Cohort MRX PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects
    14
    17
    33
    31
    Age categorical
    Most participants (61 [65.6%]) were 1 to <6 years of age.
    Units: Subjects
        1 to <6 years
    9
    11
    22
    19
        6 to <13 years
    2
    5
    8
    11
        13 to 18 years
    3
    1
    3
    1
    Age continuous
    The mean (SD) age was 4.7 (3.85) years and ranged from 1 to 17 years of age.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.3 ± 5.24
    4.2 ± 3.56
    4.9 ± 4.10
    4.4 ± 3.61
    Gender categorical
    For the full cohort, there were more females (51 [54.8%]) than males (42 [45.2%])
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    7
    11
    16
    18
        Male
    7
    6
    17
    13

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Primary Cohort MRX
    Reporting group description
    After an unblinded screening period of up to 6 weeks, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either maralixibat or placebo. The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps. Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks) and a 7 days Safety Follow-up period for subjects discontinuing early and for subjects not enrolling into the extension Study MRX-503

    Reporting group title
    Primary Cohort Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received a corresponding placebo

    Reporting group title
    PFIC Cohort MRX
    Reporting group description
    After an unblinded screening period of up to 6 weeks, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either maralixibat or placebo. The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) consisted of the following weekly steps. Followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks) and a 7 days Safety Follow-up period for subjects discontinuing early and for subjects not enrolling into the extension Study MRX-503.

    Reporting group title
    PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received a corresponding placebo

    Subject analysis set title
    Primary Cohort MRX
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease-causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function.(PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels)

    Subject analysis set title
    Primary Cohort Placebo
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease-causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function.(PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels)

    Subject analysis set title
    PFIC Cohort MRX
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC6.

    Subject analysis set title
    PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC6.

    Primary: Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score Primary Cohort

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score Primary Cohort
    End point description
    The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and Weeks 15–26, using 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity scores (Mixed Model Repeated Measures). The baseline average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score is defined as the 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score prior to the first dose of the study medication.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 15 through Week 26, using 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity scores.
    End point values
    Primary Cohort MRX Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    17
    Units: Between 0-4
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -1.669 (-2.230 to -1.107)
    -0.623 (-1.137 to -0.109)
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs)
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference between maralixibat and placebo treatment groups in the mean change in the average ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and Weeks 15–26
    Comparison groups
    Primary Cohort MRX v Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    31
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0092
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Least-Square mean
    Point estimate
    -1.046
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.811
         upper limit
    -0.28
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.3739

    Secondary: Mean change in total sBA level Primary Cohort

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean change in total sBA level Primary Cohort
    End point description
    Mean change in total sBA level between baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22, and 26
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22, and 26
    End point values
    Primary Cohort MRX Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    Units: μmol/L
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -175.536 (-256.716 to -94.356)
    11.187 (-58.073 to 80.446)
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean Change in Total sBA Level
    Comparison groups
    Primary Cohort Placebo v Primary Cohort MRX
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    29
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0013
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Least-Square mean
    Point estimate
    -186.723
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -293.454
         upper limit
    -79.992
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    51.9501

    Secondary: Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)
    End point description
    Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and Week 15 through Week 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 15 through Week 26
    End point values
    PFIC Cohort MRX PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    33
    31
    Units: Between 0-4
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -1.787 (-2.157 to -1.418)
    -0.612 (-1.004 to -0.219)
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs)
    Statistical analysis description
    PFIC Cohort
    Comparison groups
    PFIC Cohort MRX v PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    64
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Least-Square mean
    Point estimate
    -1.176
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.707
         upper limit
    -0.645
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.2651

    Secondary: Mean change in total sBA level PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean change in total sBA level PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)
    End point description
    Mean change in total sBA level between baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22, and 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22, and 26
    End point values
    PFIC Cohort MRX PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    31
    31
    Units: μmol/L
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -157.489 (-200.276 to -114.703)
    2.913 (-42.320 to 48.146)
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean Change in Total sBA Level
    Comparison groups
    PFIC Cohort MRX v PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    62
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Least-Square mean
    Point estimate
    -160.403
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -220.836
         upper limit
    -99.97
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    30.1827

    Secondary: Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders Primary Cohort

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders Primary Cohort
    End point description
    Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders from Week 15 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC2 using the average value from the three 4-week periods (Weeks 15-18, 19-22, and 23-26). The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 15 to Week 26 using the average value from the three 4-week periods (Weeks 15-18, 19-22, and 23-26)
    End point values
    Primary Cohort MRX Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    17
    Units: Number of responders
    8
    4
    Statistical analysis title
    Proportion of ItchRO responders
    Comparison groups
    Primary Cohort MRX v Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    31
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.0736
    Method
    Barnard's exact test
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Proportion of sBA responders Primary Cohort

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of sBA responders Primary Cohort
    End point description
    Proportion of sBA responders from Week 18 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC2, using the average value from Weeks 18, 22, and 26 values. The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Awerage value from Weeks 18, 22, and 26
    End point values
    Primary Cohort MRX Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    17
    Units: Number of responders
    7
    1
    Statistical analysis title
    Proportion of sBA responders
    Comparison groups
    Primary Cohort MRX v Primary Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    31
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0047
    Method
    Barnard's exact test
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)
    End point description
    Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders from Week 15 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6). The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Week 15 to Week 26
    End point values
    PFIC Cohort MRX PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    33
    31
    Units: Number of responders
    21
    8
    Statistical analysis title
    Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders
    Comparison groups
    PFIC Cohort MRX v PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    64
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0023
    Method
    Barnard's exact test
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Proportion of sBA responders PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of sBA responders PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6)
    End point description
    Proportion of sBA responders from Week 18 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4, and PFIC6). The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 18 to Week 26
    End point values
    PFIC Cohort MRX PFIC Cohort Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    33
    31
    Units: Number of responders
    17
    2
    Statistical analysis title
    Proportion of sBA responders
    Comparison groups
    PFIC Cohort Placebo v PFIC Cohort MRX
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    64
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    Barnard's exact test
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Baseline to EOT
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    22.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Safety Population
    Reporting group description
    All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

    Serious adverse events
    Safety Population
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 93 (8.60%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Investigations
    Blood bilirubin increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Accidental exposure to product
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Seizure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Coagulopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholestasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 93 (2.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastroenteritis viral
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Vitamin K deficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 93 (1.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Safety Population
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    90 / 93 (96.77%)
    Investigations
    Blood bilirubin increased
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 93 (10.75%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    Alanine aminotransferase increased
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 93 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    Vitamin E decreased
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 93 (7.53%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    Vitamin D decreased
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 93 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    International normalised ratio increased
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 93 (5.38%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    30 / 93 (32.26%)
         occurrences all number
    39
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    36 / 93 (38.71%)
         occurrences all number
    67
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 93 (13.98%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 93 (8.60%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 93 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 93 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hyperbilirubinaemia
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 93 (5.38%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Rhinorrhoea
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 93 (13.98%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    Cough
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 93 (12.90%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 93 (13.98%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    Infections and infestations
    Upper respiratory tract infection
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 93 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    Influenza
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 93 (8.60%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    Coronavirus infection
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 93 (7.53%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    Nasopharyngitis
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 93 (7.53%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    Gastroenteritis
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 93 (5.38%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Vitamin D deficiency
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 93 (8.60%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    Vitamin E deficiency
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 93 (7.53%)
         occurrences all number
    7

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    29 Apr 2019
    To avoid the inclusion of subjects with a mild or intermittent from of cholestasis, the Inclusion Criteria 6 and Exclusion Criteria 1 were amended with further clarification on the expectation of Chronic nature of cholestasis for subjects to be allowed in the study, as well as further clarification for the supplemental cohort. On top of that, changes to clarify and align the timing of pregnancy testing in different sections of the protocol were made .
    22 Nov 2019
    In order to improve the safety of study participants and to reflect other changes in the protocol, an urinary pregnancy test was added to visit 4,6 and 8, as well as a PIC and CIC to EOT/ET, a clinical scratch scale to the screening and a Lipid Panel. Furthermore, Exclusion Criteria# 2 (to exclude subjects with recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis to avoid enrolling subjects who have intermittent spontaneous near-normalization of pruritus and sBA or remission of peritus), Exclusion Criteria #3 (Exclusion of subjects with pruritus of non-cholestatic origins, as this would directly confound the primary endpoint of the study.), and a questionnaire as an anchor for further ItchRo validation were added to the Protocol. Further Clarifications were also provided for, Exclusion Criteria #6 (Patients should not be excluded unless they have an imminent need for liver transplant.), Exclusion criteria # 11 (Excusing patients with possible malignant liver mass.), for when subjects should be discontinued (Subjects should only be discontinued if there is an imminent need for a liver transplant.), and of the permitted dose adaptations for permitted treatments (Dose adaptations of permitted treatments are allowed if the body weight changes during the study.), as well as updates on the volume of blood that is to be drawn. Finally, the option of long-term follow-up on disease progression for subjects who discontinue prematurely, the clarification that subjects should be informed about the extension study MRX-503 prior to Visit 9, and the correction of inconsistency in the duration for which female subjects should use contraception after their last dose of study medication were added.
    16 Jun 2020
    Various texts were added, revised, and deleted in order to provide reference to the appendix for management of study procedures during the global pandemic, allow subjects to meet inclusion age criterion by baseline to allow for earlier screening of subjects, clarify that criterion only applies to the primary cohort, clarify that subjects must have pruritus to be eligible, include subjects with intermittent cholestasis in the supplemental cohort, exclude any phenylbuterates, deleted criterion for exclusion of administration of growth hormones, instruct sites to follow country-specific guidelines for acceptable methods of contraception, update the description of study medication packaging to current form, revise limit of propylene glycol exposure(the maximum aily exposure stated in the study protocol is 25mg/kg/day; after recalculation, the maximum may be ≤26 mg/kg/day for BID dosing), and to add expedited safety reporting as a reason for unblinding of treatment assignment.
    10 May 2022
    Changes made to the Protocol include, clarifying the rational of the Study, updating the secondary objectives and endpoints, as well as the exploratory objectives and endpoints to better capture clinically meaningful measures in the primary cohort and the broader PFIC population, specifying that the SAP will detail how the assignment of siblings occurs, including a blinded validation analysis of the ItchRO to confirm the responder definition, clarifying sample size calculation and that the ITT population will include all randomized subjects, defining of analysis groups, clarifying the scoring of ItchRO(Obs) and ItchRO(Pt) severity scores, and how to construct monthly scores, Updating the hypothesis tests to be performed due to the adjustment of the secondary endpoint, and finally providing guidance regarding COVID-19 vaccinations.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 01:47:53 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA