Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus Desvenlafaxine in Adult Patients Suffering from Major Depressive Disorder with Partial Response to SSRI Treatment

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-002704-41
    Trial protocol
    CZ   EE   LV   BG   SK   BE   ES  
    Global end of trial date
    04 Feb 2022

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    22 Feb 2023
    First version publication date
    22 Feb 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    18498A
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04448431
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    H. Lundbeck A/S
    Sponsor organisation address
    Ottiliavej 9, Valby, Denmark, 2500
    Public contact
    LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com, H. Lundbeck A/S, +45 36301311, LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
    Scientific contact
    LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com, H. Lundbeck A/S, +45 36301311, LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    04 Feb 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    04 Feb 2022
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of the trial was to compare the efficacy of vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine after 8 weeks of treatment, on depressive symptoms in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have responded partially to monotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice and in accordance with the ethical principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    18 Jun 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 132
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 32
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czechia: 73
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Estonia: 20
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Latvia: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Mexico: 27
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 150
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Slovakia: 53
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ukraine: 83
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    605
    EEA total number of subjects
    213
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    598
    From 65 to 84 years
    7
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    605 participants were enrolled in the study. 603 participants received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Vortioxetine
    Arm description
    Participants received 10 milligrams (mg) vortioxetine once daily for the first week. At the end of Week 1 (Day 7), the dose was increased to 20mg/day. The dose may have been adjusted (10 or 20mg/day) at unscheduled visits or at the end of Week 4 (Day 28) (only once) based on the participant's response and the investigator’s clinical judgement. No dose changes were permitted after Week 4. The dose remained fixed until the end of the treatment period (Week 8, Day 56). From Week 8, participants received placebo once daily for one week.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo was administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Vortioxetine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Vortioxetine was administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description.

    Arm title
    Desvenlafaxine
    Arm description
    Participants received a fixed dose of 50mg once daily during the treatment period. In order to maintain the blind, a dose adjustment could have been requested based on the participant’s response and the investigator’s clinical judgement, however, the dose of desvenlafaxine remained fixed. From Week 8, participants received 50mg desvenlafaxine or placebo every other day for one week.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo was administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Desvenlafaxine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Desvenlafaxine was administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Started
    312
    293
    Received at least 1 dose of study drug
    310
    293
    Completed
    295
    284
    Not completed
    17
    9
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    5
    3
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    6
    3
         Not specified
    2
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -
         Lack of efficacy
    1
    1
         Not treated
    2
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Vortioxetine
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 10 milligrams (mg) vortioxetine once daily for the first week. At the end of Week 1 (Day 7), the dose was increased to 20mg/day. The dose may have been adjusted (10 or 20mg/day) at unscheduled visits or at the end of Week 4 (Day 28) (only once) based on the participant's response and the investigator’s clinical judgement. No dose changes were permitted after Week 4. The dose remained fixed until the end of the treatment period (Week 8, Day 56). From Week 8, participants received placebo once daily for one week.

    Reporting group title
    Desvenlafaxine
    Reporting group description
    Participants received a fixed dose of 50mg once daily during the treatment period. In order to maintain the blind, a dose adjustment could have been requested based on the participant’s response and the investigator’s clinical judgement, however, the dose of desvenlafaxine remained fixed. From Week 8, participants received 50mg desvenlafaxine or placebo every other day for one week.

    Reporting group values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine Total
    Number of subjects
    312 293 605
    Age Categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    307 291 598
        From 65-84 years
    5 2 7
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Gender Categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    216 212 428
        Male
    96 81 177
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Asian
    3 0 3
        Black
    0 1 1
        Not reported
    10 6 16
        Other
    14 14 28
        White
    285 272 557
    Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
    The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Items in the scale assess apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Participants with valid baseline scores are presented here (Vortioxetine n=309; Desvenlafaxine n=293)
    Units: Score on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    30.65 ( 3.702 ) 30.69 ( 3.922 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Vortioxetine
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 10 milligrams (mg) vortioxetine once daily for the first week. At the end of Week 1 (Day 7), the dose was increased to 20mg/day. The dose may have been adjusted (10 or 20mg/day) at unscheduled visits or at the end of Week 4 (Day 28) (only once) based on the participant's response and the investigator’s clinical judgement. No dose changes were permitted after Week 4. The dose remained fixed until the end of the treatment period (Week 8, Day 56). From Week 8, participants received placebo once daily for one week.

    Reporting group title
    Desvenlafaxine
    Reporting group description
    Participants received a fixed dose of 50mg once daily during the treatment period. In order to maintain the blind, a dose adjustment could have been requested based on the participant’s response and the investigator’s clinical judgement, however, the dose of desvenlafaxine remained fixed. From Week 8, participants received 50mg desvenlafaxine or placebo every other day for one week.

    Primary: Change from Baseline to Week 8 in Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline to Week 8 in Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
    End point description
    The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Items in the scale assess apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). Definitions of severity are provided at 2-point intervals. The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Analysis was performed on the Full-analysis set (FAS) – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    286
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -13.61 ( 0.51 )
    -13.14 ( 0.52 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Vortioxetine vs. Desvenlafaxine
    Comparison groups
    Vortioxetine v Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.4196
    Method
    Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.47
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.61
         upper limit
    0.67
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.58

    Secondary: Percentage of MADRS Responders at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of MADRS Responders at Week 8
    End point description
    Response was defined as a ≥50% decrease in MADRS total score from baseline. The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Items in the scale assess apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    286
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    43.4
    36.7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Week 8
    End point description
    Remission was defined as a MADRS total score ≤10. The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Items in the scale assess apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    286
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    18.0
    20.3
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline to Week 8 in MADRS Anhedonia Factor Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline to Week 8 in MADRS Anhedonia Factor Score
    End point description
    The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Items in the scale assess apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The anhedonia factor score is based on 5 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, concentration difficulties, lassitude, and inability to feel) and ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores representing more severe symptoms. Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    286
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -8.11 ( 0.32 )
    -7.80 ( 0.33 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinical Global Impression – Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Global Impression – Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8
    End point description
    The CGI-I provides the clinician’s impression of the participant's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assesses the participant's condition relative to a Baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). In all cases, the assessment was made independent of whether the rater believed the improvement was drug-related. Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    286
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    2.31 ( 0.07 )
    2.40 ( 0.07 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline to Week 8 in Clinical Global Impression – Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline to Week 8 in Clinical Global Impression – Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score
    End point description
    The CGI-S provides the clinician’s impression of the participant’s current state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this participant population to rate the severity of the participant's current mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (Normal - not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    286
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -1.54 ( 0.06 )
    -1.41 ( 0.07 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Total Score to Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Total Score to Week 8
    End point description
    The DSST is a cognitive test designed to assess psychomotor speed of performance requiring visual perception, spatial decision-making, and motor skills. The DSST is sensitive to cognitive impairments affecting attention, processing speed, and executive function (including working memory). The DSST consists of 133 digits and requires the participant to substitute each digit with a simple symbol in a 90-second period. Each correct symbol is counted, and the total score ranges from 0 (less than normal functioning) to 133 (greater than normal functioning). Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    295
    285
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    9.72 ( 0.89 )
    9.53 ( 0.91 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Participant's Probability of Choosing Hard Task For Each Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Trial at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Participant's Probability of Choosing Hard Task For Each Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Trial at Week 8
    End point description
    The EEfRT is a neuropsychological task to assess willingness to make efforts to obtain a monetary reward under different conditions of reward probability and magnitude. The participant is given an opportunity to choose between two tasks with different levels of difficulty: a “hard task” and an “easy task” option, which require different amounts of repeated manual button pressing. For easy-task choices, the participant is eligible to win a fixed amount of monetary reward on each trial if he/she successfully completes the task. For hard-task choices, the participant is eligible to win higher amounts that vary per trial within a range (“reward magnitude”). Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    284
    276
    Units: Probability
        number (not applicable)
    0.31
    0.32
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: EEfRT: Proportion of Hard Choice Tasks at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EEfRT: Proportion of Hard Choice Tasks at Week 8
    End point description
    The EEfRT is a neuropsychological task to assess willingness to make efforts to obtain a monetary reward under different conditions of reward probability and magnitude. The participant is given an opportunity to choose between two tasks with different levels of difficulty: a “hard task” and an “easy task” option, which require different amounts of repeated manual button pressing. For easy-task choices, the participant is eligible to win a fixed amount of monetary reward on each trial if he/she successfully completes the task. For hard-task choices, the participant is eligible to win higher amounts that vary per trial within a range (“reward magnitude”). Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    284
    276
    Units: Proportion
        arithmetic mean (standard error)
    0.33 ( 0.01 )
    0.34 ( 0.01 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) Total Score
    End point description
    The FAST is a clinician-rated clinical outcome assessment tool designed to assess difficulty in functioning. The FAST consists of 24 items in 6 specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships, leisure time. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The items are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 72 (severe difficulty), with higher scores reflecting more serious difficulties. Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    296
    288
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -15.79 ( 0.85 )
    -14.15 ( 0.85 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline to Week 8 in FAST Sub-domain Scores

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline to Week 8 in FAST Sub-domain Scores
    End point description
    The FAST is a clinician-rated clinical outcome assessment tool designed to assess difficulty in functioning. The FAST consists of 24 items in 6 specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships, leisure time. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    301
    290
    Units: Score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Autonomy (n= 300, 290)
    -2.52 ( 0.23 )
    -2.05 ( 0.24 )
        Occupational Functioning (n= 295, 288)
    -2.91 ( 0.25 )
    -2.49 ( 0.25 )
        Cognitive Functioning (n= 301, 290)
    -3.17 ( 0.32 )
    -2.74 ( 0.33 )
        Financial Issues (n= 301, 290)
    -0.61 ( 0.13 )
    -0.60 ( 0.14 )
        Interpersonal Relationships (n= 301, 290)
    -3.77 ( 0.36 )
    -3.22 ( 0.37 )
        Leisure Time (n= 301, 290)
    -1.40 ( 0.17 )
    -1.47 ( 0.17 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Long Form Subscales

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Long Form Subscales
    End point description
    The Q-LES-Q Long Form is a participant self-rated scale designed to measure the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily life. It consists of 93 items to measure: physical health, feelings, work, household duties, school, leisure time activities, social relations, and general activities. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Raw scores for each category are converted to a 1 to 100 scale with higher scores representing higher quality of life. Analysis was performed on the FAS – all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a valid baseline and at least 1 valid post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable (MADRS). Here, 'number of subjects analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this endpoint. ‘n’ signifies participants evaluable for specified category.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 8
    End point values
    Vortioxetine Desvenlafaxine
    Number of subjects analysed
    301
    290
    Units: Score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Work (n= 195, 195)
    17.70 ( 1.81 )
    16.83 ( 1.84 )
        Household Duties (n= 287, 276)
    14.29 ( 1.84 )
    14.22 ( 1.89 )
        School (n= 33, 36)
    11.12 ( 6.41 )
    18.73 ( 5.84 )
        Leisure Time (n= 301, 290)
    20.78 ( 2.05 )
    20.92 ( 2.10 )
        Social Relations (n= 301, 290)
    16.10 ( 1.69 )
    15.56 ( 1.73 )
        Physical Health (n= 301, 290)
    17.79 ( 1.70 )
    16.63 ( 1.74 )
        Feelings (n= 301, 289)
    17.20 ( 1.73 )
    16.46 ( 1.78 )
        General Activities (n= 301, 290)
    17.99 ( 1.57 )
    17.12 ( 1.61 )
        Satisfaction with Medication (n= 246, 222)
    27.46 ( 1.66 )
    23.81 ( 1.72 )
        Overall Satisfaction and Contentment (n= 301, 290)
    24.96 ( 2.24 )
    23.63 ( 2.30 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to Week 12. Adverse Events were not reported after Day 56 (Visit 5) unless they were Serious Adverse Events.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    24.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Desvenlafaxine
    Reporting group description
    Participants received a fixed dose of 50mg once daily during the treatment period. In order to maintain the blind, a dose adjustment could have been requested based on the participant’s response and the investigator’s clinical judgement, however, the dose of desvenlafaxine remained fixed. From Week 8, participants received 50mg desvenlafaxine or placebo every other day for one week.

    Reporting group title
    Vortioxetine
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 10 milligrams (mg) vortioxetine once daily for the first week. At the end of Week 1 (Day 7), the dose was increased to 20mg/day. The dose may have been adjusted (10 or 20mg/day) at unscheduled visits or at the end of Week 4 (Day 28) (only once) based on the participant's response and the investigator’s clinical judgement. No dose changes were permitted after Week 4. The dose remained fixed until the end of the treatment period (Week 8, Day 56). From Week 8, participants received placebo once daily for one week.

    Serious adverse events
    Desvenlafaxine Vortioxetine
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 293 (0.34%)
    0 / 310 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 293 (0.34%)
    0 / 310 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Desvenlafaxine Vortioxetine
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    61 / 293 (20.82%)
    85 / 310 (27.42%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    25 / 293 (8.53%)
    30 / 310 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    29
    34
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 293 (5.46%)
    16 / 310 (5.16%)
         occurrences all number
    18
    16
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    27 / 293 (9.22%)
    62 / 310 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    29
    75

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 17:23:13 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA