Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Subjects with Prurigo Nodularis

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-004293-25
    Trial protocol
    GB   SE   DE   HU   AT   DK   IT   PL  
    Global end of trial date
    21 Feb 2023

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    18 Jul 2024
    First version publication date
    18 Jul 2024
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    RD.06.SPR.202685
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    IND number: 117122
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Galderma S.A.
    Sponsor organisation address
    Avenue Gratta-Paille 2, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1018
    Public contact
    Clinical Trial Information Desk, CTD Coordinator Galderma R&D S.A., CTA.coordinator@galderma.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trial Information Desk, CTD Coordinator Galderma R&D S.A., CTA.coordinator@galderma.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    11 Apr 2023
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    21 Feb 2023
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab (CD14152) compared to placebo in subjects greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age with prurigo nodularis (PN) after a 16 week treatment period.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This clinical study was conducted in accordance with the protocol, the Declaration of Helsinki, and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practices (ICH GCP), and in compliance with other applicable regulatory requirements.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    15 Aug 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 21
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 17
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 24
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 14
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 99
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 31
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 67
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    286
    EEA total number of subjects
    195
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    204
    From 65 to 84 years
    82
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The study was conducted at 77 active sites in 10 countries.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 286 subjects were randomised to receive either nemolizumab (CD14152) or placebo.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Nemolizumab
    Arm description
    Subjects weighing less than (<) 90 kilogram (kg) received two subcutaneous (SC) injections of 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection once for every 4 weeks (Q4W). Subjects weighing greater than or equal to (>=) 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Nemolizumab
    Investigational medicinal product code
    CD14152
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects weighing less than < 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >= 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Subjects weighing <90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >=90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects weighing < 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >= 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Started
    190
    96
    Treated
    187
    95
    Completed
    168
    85
    Not completed
    22
    11
         Physician decision
    -
    1
         Other- site permanently closing
    -
    1
         Adverse event
    11
    4
         Randomised but not treated
    3
    1
         Subject's request
    8
    4

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Nemolizumab
    Reporting group description
    Subjects weighing less than (<) 90 kilogram (kg) received two subcutaneous (SC) injections of 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection once for every 4 weeks (Q4W). Subjects weighing greater than or equal to (>=) 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects weighing <90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >=90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    Nemolizumab Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    190 96 286
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    57.5 ( 12.77 ) 57.6 ( 13.36 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    110 56 166
        Male
    80 40 120
    Ethinicity
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    4 5 9
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    184 88 272
        Unknown
    1 0 1
        Not Reported
    1 3 4
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    1 0 1
        Asian
    10 2 12
        Black or African American
    18 10 28
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 0
        White
    160 81 241
        More than one race
    0 0 0
        Other
    1 2 3
        Not Reported
    0 1 1
    Region of Enrollment
    Units: Subjects
        Europe
    141 71 212
        North America
    49 25 74

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Nemolizumab
    Reporting group description
    Subjects weighing less than (<) 90 kilogram (kg) received two subcutaneous (SC) injections of 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection once for every 4 weeks (Q4W). Subjects weighing greater than or equal to (>=) 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects weighing <90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >=90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Primary: Number of Subjects With Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 16
    End point description
    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the subjects to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as the average of 7 consecutive days of data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing if less than 4 days of data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT population included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 16
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    111
    16
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [1]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    40.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    29.4
         upper limit
    50.8
    Notes
    [1] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomised stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomisation [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Primary: Number of Subjects With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 16
    End point description
    IGA success is defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1), and a reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 2 points at week 16. Full scale is scored from 0-4, higher score indicates more severe symptoms. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT population included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 16
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    50
    7
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0025 [2]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    14.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.7
         upper limit
    22.6
    Notes
    [2] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from CMH test using the randomised stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomisation [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Adverse Events, Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Adverse Events, Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence, new or worsening of any pre-existing condition, in a clinical study subject administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs: AES with an onset date on or after the start date of the IMP administration. AESIs: skin-related events (SRE) (except exacerbation and infective exacerbation of PN) or injection site reactions (ISRs) as per common terminology criteria for AEs (Grade 3: ulceration or necrosis; severe tissue damage; operative intervention indicated, Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5: death ). An SAE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; results in persistent disability; requires in-patient hospitalisation congenital anomaly; is medically significant. Safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline up to Week 32
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    187
    95
    Units: subjects
        TEAEs
    134
    62
        SAEs
    32
    19
        AESIs
    21
    10
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4
    End point description
    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the subjects to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT population included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 4
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    78
    6
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [3]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    31.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    23
         upper limit
    40.4
    Notes
    [3] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from CMH test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16
    End point description
    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the subjects to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to Week 16, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT population included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    65
    4
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [4]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    30.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    22.3
         upper limit
    38.7
    Notes
    [4] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from CMH test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 16
    End point description
    The SD NRS is a scale to report the degree of subject sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to 10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being ‘no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)’ and 10 being ‘I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis’. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 16
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    95
    11
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [5]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    38
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    27.8
         upper limit
    48.2
    Notes
    [5] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from CMH test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4
    End point description
    The SD NRS is a scale to be used by the subject to report the degree of their sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being ‘no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)’ and 10 being ‘I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis’. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/ after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 4
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    59
    5
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [6]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    22.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    14.7
         upper limit
    30.7
    Notes
    [6] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from CMH test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4
    End point description
    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the subjects to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders. ITT population included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4
    End point values
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    190
    96
    Units: subjects
    41
    1
    Statistical analysis title
    Nemolizumab versus Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the endpoints were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
    Comparison groups
    Nemolizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [7]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Strata adjusted percentage difference
    Point estimate
    18.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    12.3
         upper limit
    25
    Notes
    [7] - A 2-sided p-value was derived from CMH test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization [< 90 kg, >= 90 kg]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From Baseline up to Week 32
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    25.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Nemolizumab
    Reporting group description
    Subjects weighing < 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >= 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks. Nemolizumab: Subjects received either 30 mg or 60 mg dose of nemolizumab as SC injection.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects weighing < 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Subjects weighing >= 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks. Placebo: Subjects received matching placebo as SC injection.

    Serious adverse events
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 187 (11.23%)
    10 / 95 (10.53%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Basal cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder neoplasm
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Vocal cord polyp
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depressed mood
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Panic disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Subdural haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Coronary artery disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac sarcoidosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiogenic shock
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Arachnoid cyst
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tension headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pancreatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholecystitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Neurodermatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 187 (2.14%)
    2 / 95 (2.11%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pemphigoid
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 187 (1.07%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 187 (1.07%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intervertebral disc protrusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Acarodermatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 187 (1.07%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Campylobacter colitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    COVID-19 pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 187 (0.00%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Type 2 diabetes mellitus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 187 (0.53%)
    0 / 95 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Nemolizumab Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    61 / 187 (32.62%)
    38 / 95 (40.00%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 187 (6.95%)
    2 / 95 (2.11%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    2
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 187 (4.81%)
    5 / 95 (5.26%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    6
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 187 (3.21%)
    5 / 95 (5.26%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    5
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Neurodermatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 187 (8.02%)
    18 / 95 (18.95%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    21
    Eczema
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 187 (5.35%)
    1 / 95 (1.05%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    1
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 187 (7.49%)
    14 / 95 (14.74%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    14
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 187 (5.88%)
    8 / 95 (8.42%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    8

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    25 Jun 2020
    Following changes were made: Included Galderma R&D, LLC as sponsor; Updated sponsor signatory; Updated number of sites; Included secondary objectives; Reordered primary endpoints; Updated key secondary endpoints; Updated secondary endpoints; Updated number of subjects and randomization ratio; Updated weight cutoff for dosing; Updated duration of study; Updated IC2 PN definition; Updated IC4 (prev IC5) methods of contraception; Updated IC5 (prev IC6) women of non-childbearing potential; Updated EC2 active pruritic conditions; Updated EC7 infections; Included EC 24-27 optional biopsy sampling; Updated PD sample collection, including biopsies; Updated statistical methods; Updated AESIs to include COVID-19; Updated reasons for study drug discontinuation; Included details of study drug discontinuation due to COVID-19; Clarified self-injection; Updated hypersensitivity reaction monitoring; Included details of CYP450 substrates; Updated collection timepoints in Schedule of Assessments; Updated pregnancy test footnote in Schedule of Assessments; Included subject sleep diary endpoint details; Updated medical history of asthma screening assessment; Included guidance appendix for study conduct and subject safety during COVID-19 pandemic; Updated PAS appendix.
    22 Dec 2020
    Following changes were made: Updated the number of study sites from 60 to 70; Clarified the methods of contraception; Clarified that females of non-childbearing potential with the absence of menstrual bleeding for 1 year before screening without any other medical reason must have had a confirmed follicle-stimulating hormone level in the postmenopausal range; Added, if PEF was < 80% of the predicted value at screening in subjects without any history of asthma or in subjects with history of asthma but with the ACT score >19, PEF testing could have been repeated once within 48 hours; Added that subjects with positive HCV antibody from previous exposure/infection did not need to be excluded if a negative PCR confirmed there was no active infection. Additionally, in the event of rescreening, serology test results performed within 6 weeks before the baseline visit, could be used to assess eligibility; Clarified excluded prior treatments; Clarified current and history of untreated or inadequately treated active or latent TB infection, and rescreening procedures; Clarified that the investigational drug exclusion period was 8 weeks or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever was longer; Clarified that rescue with oral psoralen required discontinuation of study drug; Added rationale for placebo-controlled design; Updated prohibited therapy and information on permitted non-live vaccinations (seasonal, emergency, COVID-19); Clarified management of subjects with either symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19; Clarified permitted rescue therapies to include systemic corticosteroids and gabapentinoids; Deleted residual error in self-injection description from the schedule of assessments footnote; Clarified PK parameters and analyses; Updated the form for PD sample recording; Corrected the error in the sample size calculation (to power at 5%); Updated guidance for management of subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    19 Nov 2021
    Following changes were made: Added the secondary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of subjects with PP NRS improvement >= 4 from baseline and IGA success at Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24; Updated restricted prior treatments, prohibited therapy, and ADA assay information to be harmonised with other protocols in the nemolizumab program; Specified that ADA was to be determined using validated ECLIA (not ELISA).

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 02 05:53:54 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA