Clinical Trial Results:
A Longitudinal, Biomarker Study of Anti-VEGF, to Explore the Relationship Between Aqueous Humor Composition and Multimodal Retinal Imaging in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2020-003515-10 |
Trial protocol |
CZ PL IT |
Global end of trial date |
19 Dec 2022
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Aug 2025
|
First version publication date |
28 Aug 2025
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
BP41783
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel, Switzerland, CH-4058
|
||
Public contact |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., +41 616878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., +41 616878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
19 Dec 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
19 Dec 2022
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The purpose of this study was to explore the aqueous humor (AH) biomarkers and multimodal retinal imaging features before and during a six-month treatment period with aflibercept in subjects with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All study subjects were required to read and sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Apr 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 106
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Korea, Republic of: 62
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Colombia: 10
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 11
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 16
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czechia: 4
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
209
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
31
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
60
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
133
|
||
85 years and over |
16
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
A total of 116 subjects with nAMD and 93 subjects with DME took part in the study across 36 sites in the United States, the Republic of Korea, Colombia, Italy, Poland, and the Czech Republic from 12 April 2021 to 19 December 2022. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Subjects with nAMD and DME who were treatment-naïve in the study eye received aflibercept as an intravitreal (IVT) injection. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
nAMD-treatment Naive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 milligrams (mg), as an IVT injection, every 4 weeks (Q4W) for the first 3 doses, and thereafter once every 8 weeks (Q8W) up to Week 24. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Aflibercept
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Eylea®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravitreal use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 3 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
DME-treatment Naive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 5 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Aflibercept
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Eylea®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravitreal use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 5 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
nAMD-treatment Naive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 milligrams (mg), as an IVT injection, every 4 weeks (Q4W) for the first 3 doses, and thereafter once every 8 weeks (Q8W) up to Week 24. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
DME-treatment Naive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 5 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
nAMD-treatment Naive
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 milligrams (mg), as an IVT injection, every 4 weeks (Q4W) for the first 3 doses, and thereafter once every 8 weeks (Q8W) up to Week 24. | ||
Reporting group title |
DME-treatment Naive
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 5 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Scores at the Specified Timepoints [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
BCVA was measured using the set of three Precision Vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity (VA) examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicated an improvement in VA. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was an exploratory study that was not designed for formal hypothesis testing. No comparisons were made between the nAMD and DME cohorts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in BCVA Scores at the Specified Timepoints [2] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
BCVA was measured using the set of three Precision Vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicated an improvement in VA. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Day 112 and Day 168
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was an exploratory study that was not designed for formal hypothesis testing. No comparisons were made between the nAMD and DME cohorts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in BCVA Scores Based on Mixed-effect Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
BCVA was measured using the set of three Precision Vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicated an improvement in VA. The analysis was performed using an MMRM. Adjusted mean is reported here. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Day 56, and Day 168;
DME: Day 112, Day 168, and Early Termination Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Central Subfield Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The absence of IRF in the study eye (defined as IRF absent or definite outside center subfield only) was assessed by the central reading center using Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). The percentage of subjects with absence of IRF and a two-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval (CI) was reported. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in the Central Subfield Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The absence of SRF in the study eye (defined as SRF absent or definite outside center subfield only) was assessed by the central reading center using SD-OCT. The percentage of subjects with absence of SRF and a two-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact CI was reported. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Assessed From Internal Limiting Membrane to Bruch's Membrane (ILM-BM) Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CST was defined as an objective measurement of retinal thickness in the central 1 millimeter (mm) diameter of macula. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the BM (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in CST Assessed From ILM-BM Over Time | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CST was defined as an objective measurement of retinal thickness in the central 1 mm diameter of macula. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the BM (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Day 112 and Day 168
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
CST Assessed From ILM to Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CST was defined as an objective measurement of retinal thickness in the central 1 mm diameter of macula. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the RPE (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in CST Assessed From ILM-RPE Over Time | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CST was defined as an objective measurement of retinal thickness in the central 1 mm diameter of macula. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the RPE (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Day 112 and Day 168
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Center Point Thickness (CPT) Assessed From ILM-BM Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CPT was defined as the measurement of retinal thickness at the very center of the fovea. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the BM (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in CPT Assessed From ILM-BM Over Time | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CPT was defined as the measurement of retinal thickness at the very center of the fovea. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the BM (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Day 112 and Day 168
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
CPT Assessed From ILM-RPE Over Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CPT was defined as the measurement of retinal thickness at the very center of the fovea. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the RPE (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Baseline, Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in CPT Assessed From ILM-RPE Over Time | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CPT was defined as the measurement of retinal thickness at the very center of the fovea. It is the distance between the ILM (inner layer of retina) and the RPE (outer layer) and was assessed using SD-OCT by the central reading center. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the study. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point. 9999 = No subjects were analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
nAMD: Day 56 and Day 168;
DME: Day 112 and Day 168
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of DME Subjects With ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) Over Time [3] | ||||||||
End point description |
The ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The DRSS ranges from level 10 (no diabetic retinopathy) to level 85 (advanced diabetic retinopathy), where higher scores indicate a higher risk of vision loss. The ETDRS-DRSS score of each subject's study eye was assessed using fundus photography-7 modified fields (FP-7M) taken by trained personnel by the central reading center. The percentage of subjects with a ≥2-step improvement from baseline was summarized along with a two-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact CI. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the DME-treatment naïve arm.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
At Day 168
|
||||||||
Notes [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: This end point was only applicable to the cohort of patients with DME. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of DME Subjects With ≥3-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over Time [4] | ||||||||
End point description |
The ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The DRSS ranges from level 10 (no diabetic retinopathy) to level 85 (advanced diabetic retinopathy), where higher scores indicate a higher risk of vision loss. The ETDRS-DRSS score of each subject's study eye was assessed using FP-7M taken by trained personnel by the central reading center. The percentage of subjects with a ≥3-step improvement from baseline was summarized along with a two-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact CI. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the DME-treatment naïve arm.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
At Day 168
|
||||||||
Notes [4] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: This end point was only applicable to the cohort of patients with DME. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Retinal Volume Between ILM-BM Over Time in DME Subjects [5] | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
The retinal volume between ILM and BM in the study eye was assessed using SD-OCT. Volume of retinal thickness within the central 3 mm radius is presented here. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the DME-treatment naïve arm. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: This end point was only applicable to the cohort of patients with DME. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Retinal Volume Between ILM-BM Over Time in DME Subjects [6] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The retinal volume between ILM and BM, in the study eye, was assessed using SD-OCT. Change from baseline in volume of retinal thickness within the central 3 mm radius is presented here. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the DME-treatment naïve arm. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||
Notes [6] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: This end point was only applicable to the cohort of patients with DME. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Retinal Volume Between ILM-RPE Over Time in DME Subjects [7] | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
The retinal volume between ILM and RPE in the study eye was assessed using SD-OCT. Volume of retinal thickness within the central 3 mm radius is presented here. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the DME-treatment naïve arm. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: This end point was only applicable to the cohort of patients with DME. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Retinal Volume Between ILM-RPE Over Time in DME Subjects [8] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The retinal volume between ILM and RPE, in the study eye, was assessed using SD-OCT. Change from baseline in volume of retinal thickness within the central 3 mm radius is presented here. ITT population included all subjects enrolled in the DME-treatment naïve arm. Number analyzed is the number of subjects with data available for analysis. n = number of subjects with data available for analysis at the specified time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 112 and Day 168
|
||||||||||||
Notes [8] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: This end point was only applicable to the cohort of patients with DME. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Up to approximately 8.5 months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety population included all subjects enrolled in the study who performed at least one study assessment or had one sample taken on Day 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
DME-treatment Naive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 5 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
nAMD-treatment Naive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received aflibercept, 2 mg, as an IVT injection, Q4W for the first 3 doses, and thereafter once Q8W up to Week 24. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
09 Mar 2021 |
The following updates were made as per the amendment, version 2: The Schedule of Activities for nAMD and DME was updated, anthropometric measures and a clarification on when to perform the pregnancy test were added; An inclusion criterion for all subjects was added to align female participation with the
recommendation of the local prescribing information; Exclusion criteria for all subjects were updated to align with the recommendation of the local prescribing information with additional examples of excluded diseases and information about exclusion of COVID-19 positive subjects, and to exclude subjects with aphakia or implantation of intraocular lens outside of the capsular bag in the study eye; An exclusion criterion for nAMD population was updated with additional examples of excluded ocular diseases other than nAMD; Exclusion criteria for DME population were updated with a clarification that one rescreening is permitted and with additional examples of ocular diseases other than DME; Reporting of post-study AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were updated. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |