Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel dose group trial to investigate efficacy and safety of multiple doses of oral BI 690517 over 14 weeks, alone and in combination with empagliflozin, in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2021-001434-19
    Trial protocol
    BE   FI   IT   NO   SE   CZ   HU   ES   DK   BG   GR   PT   PL  
    Global end of trial date
    10 Jul 2023

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Oct 2024
    First version publication date
    21 Jul 2024
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    1378.5
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT05182840
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Boehringer Ingelheim
    Sponsor organisation address
    Binger Strasse 173, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 55216
    Public contact
    Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center, Boehringer Ingelheim, 001 18002430127, clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
    Scientific contact
    Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center, Boehringer Ingelheim, 001 18002430127, clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    01 Aug 2023
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    19 Jun 2023
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    10 Jul 2023
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The main objectives of the trial were to demonstrate the efficacy of BI 690517, alone and in combination with empagliflozin, and to characterise the BI 690517 dose-response relationship in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) by assessing three doses and placebo.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Only subjects that met all the study inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were to be entered in the study. All subjects were free to withdraw from the clinical trial at any time for any reason given. Close monitoring of all subjects was adhered to throughout the trial conduct. Rescue medication was allowed for all subjects as required.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    02 Feb 2022
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 128
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 24
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Brazil: 204
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 36
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 20
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    China: 21
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czechia: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 30
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 43
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Greece: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hong Kong: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 41
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    India: 63
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Japan: 84
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Korea, Republic of: 21
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Malaysia: 31
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Mexico: 70
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Norway: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Philippines: 127
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 75
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Portugal: 22
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 58
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 24
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Switzerland: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Türkiye: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 518
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    1714
    EEA total number of subjects
    346
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    764
    From 65 to 84 years
    950
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    In the run-in period patients got empagliflozin or placebo to empagliflozin. The run-in period was followed by a second randomization at which patients were 1:1:1:1 randomized to a treatment period to receive one of three doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 in combination with the background medication assigned in the run-in period.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Due to limitations of the EudraCT Results Form 2 patients who did not complete the Run-in period (RP) for the Placebo arm are entered under the milestone completed of the RP. The 2 patients who did not complete the RP were mistakenly randomized to the treatment period (TP) but were not treated during the TP with BI 690517 or placebo to BI 690517.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Run-in period
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients, investigators and everyone involved in trial conduct or analysis or with any other interest in this double-blind trial remained blinded with regard to the randomised treatment assignments.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Run-in period: 10 mg Empa
    Arm description
    Patients received during the run-in period 10 milligrams (mg) of empagliflozin (Empa) once daily orally for 8 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received during the run-in period one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of empagliflozin (Empa) once daily orally for 8 weeks.

    Arm title
    Run-in period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg
    Arm description
    Patients received during the run-in period placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) once daily orally for 8 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received during the run-in period one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) once daily orally for 8 weeks.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Run-in period: 10 mg Empa Run-in period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg
    Started
    356
    358
    Treated with Empa or Placebo to Empa
    356
    357
    Completed
    332
    332
    Not completed
    24
    26
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    5
    5
         No reason available
    2
    2
         Burden of study procedures
    2
    2
         Other reason but not sponsor termination
    14
    16
         Change of residence
    1
    -
         Not treated
    -
    1
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Screened for treatment period
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients, investigators and everyone involved in trial conduct or analysis or with any other interest in this double-blind trial remained blinded with regard to the randomised treatment assignments.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Run-in period: 10 mg Empa
    Arm description
    Patients received during the run-in period 10 milligrams (mg) of empagliflozin (Empa) once daily orally for 8 weeks.
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Arm title
    Run-in period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg
    Arm description
    Patients received during the run-in period placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) once daily orally for 8 weeks.
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Number of subjects in period 2
    Run-in period: 10 mg Empa Run-in period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg
    Started
    332
    332
    Completed the RP and screened for TP
    332
    330
    Entered to TP without completing the RP
    0 [1]
    2 [2]
    Completed
    298
    288
    Not completed
    34
    44
         Did not meet Treatment Period eligibility criteria
    34
    44
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Only 2 patients in the arm were eligible for this milestone.
    [2] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: None of the patients who in this arm were eligible for this milestone.
    Period 3
    Period 3 title
    Treatment period
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes [3]
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients, investigators and everyone involved in trial conduct or analysis or with any other interest in this double-blind trial remained blinded with regard to the randomised treatment assignments.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 690517 film-coated tablets 3 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 3 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 690517 film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 orally for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 690517 film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received two film-coated tablets of 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 (total BI 690517 dose=20 mg) orally for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to BI 690517 film-coated tablets 3 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 3 mg of placebo to BI 690517 orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to BI 690517 film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received either one film-coated tablet of 10 mg of placebo to BI 690517 or 2 film-coated tablets of 10 mg of placebo to BI 690517 orally for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of placebo to empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 690517 film-coated tablets 3 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 3 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of placebo to empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 690517 film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of placebo to empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 690517 film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received two film-coated tablets of 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 (total BI 690517 dose=20 mg) orally for 14 weeks.

    Arm title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Arm description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to BI 690517 film-coated tablets 3 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 3 mg of placebo to BI 690517 orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to BI 690517 film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received either one film-coated tablet of 10 mg of placebo to BI 690517 or 2 film-coated tablets of 10 mg of placebo to BI 690517 orally for 14 weeks.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Empagliflozin film-coated tablets 10 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received one film-coated tablet of 10 milligrams (mg) of placebo to empagliflozin once daily (QD) orally for 14 weeks.

    Notes
    [3] - Period 1 is not the baseline period. It is expected that period 1 will be the baseline period.
    Justification: Baseline characteristics are reported for the participants who started the Treatment Period. 586 subjects were randomized to treatment period.
    Number of subjects in period 3 [4]
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Started
    76
    74
    74
    74
    71
    72
    72
    73
    Got BI 690517/Placebo to BI 690517
    76
    73
    74
    74
    70
    71
    72
    73
    Completed
    63
    50
    55
    58
    61
    54
    48
    66
    Not completed
    13
    24
    19
    16
    10
    18
    24
    7
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    4
    16
    12
    6
    4
    8
    16
    5
         Did not get BI/Placebo to BI
    -
    1
    -
    -
    1
    1
    -
    -
         No reason available
    -
    1
    -
    2
    -
    1
    -
    -
         Protocol deviation
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    1
    -
         Burden of study procedures
    -
    -
    1
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
         Change of residence
    -
    -
    -
    1
    -
    -
    -
    -
         Other but not sponsor termination
    8
    6
    6
    7
    5
    8
    7
    2
         Reason missing
    1
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    Notes
    [4] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: Out of 1714 participants that were screened only 714 were randomized to the Run-in period.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517 Total
    Number of subjects
    76 74 74 74 71 72 72 73 586
    Age categorical
    Randomised Set (RS): included all entered and randomised patients based on the treatment groups they were randomised to at the randomisation prior to the treatment period (i.e. at second randomisation (R2)), regardless of being treated by BI 690517 or not.
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    32 30 40 35 32 30 29 39 267
        From 65-84 years
    41 44 33 39 37 41 42 34 311
        85 years and over
    3 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 8
    Age Continuous
    Randomised Set (RS): included all entered and randomised patients based on the treatment groups they were randomised to at the randomisation prior to the treatment period (i.e. at second randomisation (R2)), regardless of being treated by BI 690517 or not.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    65.4 ( 11.2 ) 64.4 ( 12.3 ) 61.8 ( 12.2 ) 63.4 ( 10.3 ) 64.4 ( 11.8 ) 64.8 ( 9.9 ) 64.3 ( 10.7 ) 62.3 ( 11.4 ) -
    Sex: Female, Male
    Randomised Set (RS): included all entered and randomised patients based on the treatment groups they were randomised to at the randomisation prior to the treatment period (i.e. at second randomisation (R2)), regardless of being treated by BI 690517 or not.
    Units: Participants
        Male
    49 44 54 43 51 49 45 55 390
        Female
    27 30 20 31 20 23 27 18 196
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
    Randomised Set (RS): included all entered and randomised patients based on the treatment groups they were randomised to at the randomisation prior to the treatment period (i.e. at second randomisation (R2)), regardless of being treated by BI 690517 or not.
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    25 21 12 20 22 21 18 24 163
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    51 53 62 54 49 51 54 49 423
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Race (NIH/OMB)
    Randomised Set (RS): included all entered and randomised patients based on the treatment groups they were randomised to at the randomisation prior to the treatment period (i.e. at second randomisation (R2)), regardless of being treated by BI 690517 or not.
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    0 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 13
        Asian
    17 27 20 19 23 15 19 16 156
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
        Black or African American
    9 6 7 10 3 9 9 10 63
        White
    49 35 45 42 42 45 40 44 342
        More than one race
    1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) at baseline
    UACR is a ratio between two measured substances i.e., albumine and creatinine and it is calculated as: (Urine albumin (milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL)))/(urine creatinine gram (g)/deciliter (dL))= UACR in mg/g. Albuminuria is present when UACR is greater than 30 mg/g and is a marker for chronic kidney disease (CKD). UACR measurements were collected on 2 consecutive days at 3 timepoints from Week -2 to Week 0 (i.e. Week 6-8 of Run-in period) for treatment period baseline. The randomised set (RS) was used to report the UACR at baseline.
    Units: milligram/gram
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    780.3 ( 828.8 ) 740.8 ( 915.0 ) 695.4 ( 748.0 ) 801.4 ( 1132.3 ) 934.0 ( 1363.6 ) 646.2 ( 685.2 ) 785.0 ( 885.7 ) 684.4 ( 715.1 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Run-in period: 10 mg Empa
    Reporting group description
    Patients received during the run-in period 10 milligrams (mg) of empagliflozin (Empa) once daily orally for 8 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Run-in period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg
    Reporting group description
    Patients received during the run-in period placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) once daily orally for 8 weeks.
    Reporting group title
    Run-in period: 10 mg Empa
    Reporting group description
    Patients received during the run-in period 10 milligrams (mg) of empagliflozin (Empa) once daily orally for 8 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Run-in period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg
    Reporting group description
    Patients received during the run-in period placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) once daily orally for 8 weeks.
    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Subject analysis set title
    3 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 3 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 3 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    10 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 10 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 10 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 10 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    20 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 20 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 20 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 20 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    Placebo to BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period Placebo to BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + Placebo to BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period Placebo to BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    3 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 3 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 3 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    BI 690517 3 mg
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 3 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 3 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    3 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 3 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 3 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    10 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 10 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 10 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 10 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    20 mg BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period 20 milligram (mg) of BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + 20 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period 20 mg BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Subject analysis set title
    Placebo to BI 690517
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    This arm includes patients who received during the Treatment Period Placebo to BI 690517 + 10 mg Empagliflozin (i.e. arm "Treatment period: 10 mg empagliflozin + Placebo to BI 690517" in the Participant Flow) and patients who received during the Treatment period Placebo to BI 690517 + Placebo matching Empagliflozin 10 mg (i.e. arm "Treatment period: Placebo to empagliflozin 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517" in the Participant Flow).

    Primary: Change from treatment period baseline in log transformed Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) measured in First Morning Void (FMV) urine after 14 weeks - all patients

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from treatment period baseline in log transformed Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) measured in First Morning Void (FMV) urine after 14 weeks - all patients
    End point description
    The adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval) in log transformed FMV UACR from baseline at 14 weeks is presented. The adjusted means and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which includes the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient. Full Analysis Set (FAS): This patient set included all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 (3mg QD, 10 mg QD or 20 mg QD) or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6, 7 or 8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: log transformed FMV UACR
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -0.235 (-0.355 to -0.114)
    -0.553 (-0.681 to -0.425)
    -0.487 (-0.616 to -0.357)
    -0.066 (-0.184 to 0.051)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [1]
    P-value
    = 0.0499
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.168
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.337
         upper limit
    0
    Notes
    [1] - Least Squares Mean of "3 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [2]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.486
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.66
         upper limit
    -0.313
    Notes
    [2] - Least Squares Mean of "10 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 5
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of BI 690517 and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod). MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v 10 mg BI 690517 v 20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    503
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [3]
    P-value
    = 0 [4]
    Method
    MCPMod linear model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [3] - Null hypothesis: The dose-response curve is flat across the 3 BI 690517 doses and the placebo. Linear model fit assumption: No assumption is needed.
    [4] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of BI 690517 and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod). MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v 10 mg BI 690517 v 20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    503
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [5]
    P-value
    = 0 [6]
    Method
    MCPMod Emax model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [5] - Null hypothesis: The dose-response curve is flat across the 3 BI 690517 doses and the placebo. Emax model fit assumption: 80% of the maximum effect is achieved at 10 mg.
    [6] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 6
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of BI 690517 and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod). MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v 10 mg BI 690517 v 20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    503
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [7]
    P-value
    = 0.0003
    Method
    MCPMod exponential model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [7] - Null hypothesis: The dose-response curve is flat across the 3 BI 690517 doses and the placebo. Exponential model fit assumption: 15% of the maximum effect is achieved at 10 mg.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [8]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.421
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.596
         upper limit
    -0.246
    Notes
    [8] - Least Squares Mean of "20 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo to BI 690517".

    Primary: Percent change of FMV UACR from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% CI) back transformed from MMRM estimate - all patients

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent change of FMV UACR from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% CI) back transformed from MMRM estimate - all patients
    End point description
    Percent change of first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% confidence interval (CI)) back transformed from mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) estimate for all patients is presented. Percent change of FMV UACR= (FMV UACR at Week 14-FMV UACR at baseline)*100/(FMV UACR at baseline). MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient. Full analysis set was used for the analysis of this endpoint.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: percent change of FMV UACR
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    -20.9 (-29.9 to -10.8)
    -42.5 (-49.4 to -34.6)
    -38.5 (-46.0 to -30.0)
    -6.4 (-16.8 to 5.3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [9]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -15.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -28.6
         upper limit
    0
    Notes
    [9] - Median of "3 mg BI 690517" - Median of "Placebo to BI 690517"
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [10]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -34.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -44.9
         upper limit
    -21.8
    Notes
    [10] - Median of "10 mg BI 690517" - Median of "Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [11]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -38.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -48.3
         upper limit
    -26.8
    Notes
    [11] - Median of "10 mg BI 690517" - Median of "Placebo to BI 690517".

    Primary: Change from baseline to Week 14 in the log transformed FMV UACR − patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline to Week 14 in the log transformed FMV UACR − patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin [12]
    End point description
    The adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval) in log transformed first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline at 14 weeks for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented. The adjusted means and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which includes the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient. This endpoint is reported for the patients in the full analysis set who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in period and had UACR measurement at baseline and at least one post-baseline UACR measurement while still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
    Notes
    [12] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: log transformed FMV UACR
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -0.254 (-0.441 to -0.068)
    -0.496 (-0.693 to -0.299)
    -0.455 (-0.666 to -0.245)
    -0.027 (-0.208 to 0.155)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [13]
    P-value
    = 0.0867
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.227
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.488
         upper limit
    0.033
    Notes
    [13] - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [14]
    P-value
    = 0.0027
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.429
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.707
         upper limit
    -0.151
    Notes
    [14] - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 6905177" - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [15]
    P-value
    = 0.0007
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.469
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.737
         upper limit
    -0.201
    Notes
    [15] - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".

    Primary: Percent change of FMV UACR from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% CI) back transformed from MMRM estimate − patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent change of FMV UACR from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% CI) back transformed from MMRM estimate − patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin [16]
    End point description
    Percent change of first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% confidence interval (CI)) back transformed from mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) estimate for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented. Percent change of FMV UACR= (FMV UACR at Week 14-FMV UACR at baseline)*100/(FMV UACR at baseline). MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient. This endpoint is reported for the patients in the FAS who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in period and had UACR measurement at baseline and at least one post-baseline UACR measurement while still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
    Notes
    [16] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: percent change of FMV UACR
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    -22.4 (-35.6 to -6.5)
    -39.1 (-50.0 to -25.8)
    -36.6 (-48.6 to -21.7)
    -2.6 (-18.8 to 16.8)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [17]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -20.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -38.6
         upper limit
    3.4
    Notes
    [17] - Median of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" - median of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [18]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -34.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -50.7
         upper limit
    -14
    Notes
    [18] - Median of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 6905177" - median of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Median of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" - median of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517"
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -37.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -52.2
         upper limit
    -18.2

    Primary: Change from baseline to Week 14 in the log transformed FMV UACR − patients with background therapy of empagliflozin

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline to Week 14 in the log transformed FMV UACR − patients with background therapy of empagliflozin [19]
    End point description
    The adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval) in log transformed first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline at 14 weeks for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented. The adjusted means and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which includes the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient. This endpoint is reported for the patients in the FAS who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period and had UACR measurement at baseline and at least one post-baseline UACR measurement while still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
    Notes
    [19] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: log transformed FMV UACR
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -0.210 (-0.366 to -0.055)
    -0.614 (-0.783 to -0.445)
    -0.516 (-0.675 to -0.357)
    -0.112 (-0.264 to 0.040)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [20]
    P-value
    = 0.3737
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.098
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.316
         upper limit
    0.119
    Notes
    [20] - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [21]
    P-value
    = 0.0004
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.404
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.625
         upper limit
    -0.184
    Notes
    [21] - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The difference of adjusted means and 95 % confidence interval were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models for repeated measures ((REML)−based MMRM) which included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [22]
    P-value
    < 0.0001
    Method
    MMRM
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.502
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.73
         upper limit
    -0.275
    Notes
    [22] - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" - Least Squares Mean of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".

    Primary: Percent change of FMV UACR from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% CI) of MMRM estimate − patients with background therapy of empagliflozin

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent change of FMV UACR from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% CI) of MMRM estimate − patients with background therapy of empagliflozin [23]
    End point description
    Percent change of first morning void (FMV) urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 14 based on adjusted median (95% confidence interval (CI)) back transformed from mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) estimate for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is presented. Percent change of FMV UACR= (FMV UACR at Week 14-FMV UACR at baseline)*100/(FMV UACR at baseline). MMRM included the fixed effects of treatment at each visit, baseline (continuous) at each visit, and baseline, visit, treatment, background medication (empagliflozin or placebo matching empagliflozin) and randomisation stratum as main effects, as well as random effects of patient. This endpoint is reported for the patients in the FAS who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period and had UACR measurement at baseline and at least one post-baseline UACR measurement while still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period.
    Notes
    [23] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: percent change of FMV UACR
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    -19.0 (-30.6 to -5.4)
    -45.9 (-54.3 to -35.9)
    -40.3 (-49.1 to -30.0)
    -10.6 (-23.2 to 4.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [24]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -9.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -27.1
         upper limit
    12.7
    Notes
    [24] - Median of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" - median of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [25]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -33.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -46.5
         upper limit
    -16.8
    Notes
    [25] - Median of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" - median of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Median of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" - median of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -39.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -51.8
         upper limit
    -24

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Multiple imputation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Multiple imputation
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression. This endpoint is reporting statistics for the Full Analysis Set (FAS). FAS included all randomised patients who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: Participants
    40
    73
    66
    24
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [26]
    P-value
    = 0.0136 [27]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.16
         upper limit
    3.72
    Notes
    [26] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [27] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [28]
    P-value
    = 0 [29]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.48
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.09
         upper limit
    9.71
    Notes
    [28] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [29] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [30]
    P-value
    = 0 [31]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    7.02
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.94
         upper limit
    12.49
    Notes
    [30] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [31] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Missing as non−responder

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Missing as non−responder
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders. This endpoint is reporting statistics for Full Analysis Set (FAS). FAS included all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 (3mg QD, 10 mg QD or 20 mg QD) or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6, 7 or 8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: Participants
    40
    62
    57
    23
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [32]
    P-value
    = 0.0111 [33]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.19
         upper limit
    3.88
    Notes
    [32] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [33] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [34]
    P-value
    = 0 [35]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.21
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.88
         upper limit
    9.44
    Notes
    [34] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [35] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [36]
    P-value
    = 0 [37]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.33
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.49
         upper limit
    11.49
    Notes
    [36] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [37] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 week - all patients - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 week - all patients - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF)
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14. This endpoint is reporting statistics for Full Analysis Set (FAS). FAS included all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 (3mg QD, 10 mg QD or 20 mg QD) or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6, 7 or 8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
    End point values
    10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517 BI 690517 3 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    121
    121
    133
    128
    Units: Participants
    67
    73
    31
    45
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    BI 690517 3 mg v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [38]
    P-value
    = 0.0348 [39]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.04
         upper limit
    3.09
    Notes
    [38] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [39] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [40]
    P-value
    = 0 [41]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.02
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.91
         upper limit
    8.67
    Notes
    [40] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [41] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [42]
    P-value
    = 0 [43]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.4
         upper limit
    7.08
    Notes
    [42] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [43] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - complete case analysis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - complete case analysis
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available. All randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (i.e. Week 6, 7 or 8 of Run-in period) and one post-baseline measurement at Week 12-14 when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    124
    107
    106
    127
    Units: Participants
    40
    62
    57
    23
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    251
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [44]
    P-value
    = 0.0111 [45]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.19
         upper limit
    3.88
    Notes
    [44] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [45] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    234
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [46]
    P-value
    = 0 [47]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.33
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.49
         upper limit
    11.49
    Notes
    [46] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [47] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    233
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [48]
    P-value
    = 0 [49]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.21
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.88
         upper limit
    9.44
    Notes
    [48] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [49] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Multiple imputation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Multiple imputation [50]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo to BI 690517 who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo to BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
    Notes
    [50] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: Participants
    19
    31
    30
    10
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [51]
    P-value
    = 0.0419 [52]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.44
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.03
         upper limit
    5.74
    Notes
    [51] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [52] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [53]
    P-value
    = 0 [54]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.64
         upper limit
    14.25
    Notes
    [53] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [54] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [55]
    P-value
    = 0 [56]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.09
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.64
         upper limit
    14.08
    Notes
    [55] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [56] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder [57]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders. This endpoint reports statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [57] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: Participants
    19
    28
    25
    9
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [58]
    P-value
    = 0.0195 [59]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.88
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.19
         upper limit
    7.02
    Notes
    [58] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [59] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [60]
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [61]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.39
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.6
         upper limit
    15.67
    Notes
    [60] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [61] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [62]
    P-value
    = 0 [63]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.38
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.65
         upper limit
    15.35
    Notes
    [62] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [63] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in FMV urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in FMV urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF) [64]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void (FMV) urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14. This endpoint reports statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
    Notes
    [64] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: Participants
    22
    31
    32
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [65]
    P-value
    = 0.0767 [66]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.03
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.93
         upper limit
    4.42
    Notes
    [65] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [66] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [67]
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [68]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.69
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.15
         upper limit
    10.24
    Notes
    [67] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [68] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [69]
    P-value
    = 0.0003 [70]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.11
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.89
         upper limit
    8.91
    Notes
    [69] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [70] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - complete case analysis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - complete case analysis [71]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available. This endpoint reports statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (i.e. Week 6, 7 or 8 of Run-in period) and one post-baseline measurement at Week 12-14 when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [71] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    61
    56
    50
    66
    Units: Participants
    19
    28
    25
    9
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [72]
    P-value
    = 0.0195 [73]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.88
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.19
         upper limit
    7.02
    Notes
    [72] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [73] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    116
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [74]
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [75]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.39
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.6
         upper limit
    15.67
    Notes
    [74] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [75] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    122
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [76]
    P-value
    = 0 [77]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.38
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.65
         upper limit
    15.35
    Notes
    [76] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [77] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Multiple imputation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Multiple imputation [78]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression. This endpoint reports statistics for all randomised patients to of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
    Notes
    [78] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: Participants
    21
    42
    36
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [79]
    P-value
    = 0.1398 [80]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.82
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.82
         upper limit
    4.04
    Notes
    [79] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa+ 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [80] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [81]
    P-value
    = 0 [82]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    8.42
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.73
         upper limit
    19.02
    Notes
    [81] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [82] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [83]
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [84]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.98
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.28
         upper limit
    10.9
    Notes
    [83] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    [84] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder [85]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [85] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: Participants
    21
    34
    32
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [86]
    P-value
    = 0.1884 [87]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.71
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.77
         upper limit
    3.79
    Notes
    [86] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [87] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [88]
    P-value
    = 0.0003 [89]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.46
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2
         upper limit
    9.94
    Notes
    [88] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [89] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [90]
    P-value
    = 0 [91]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.94
         upper limit
    15.72
    Notes
    [90] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [91] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - complete case analysis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - complete case analysis [92]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (i.e. Week 6, 7 or 8 of Run-in period) and one post-baseline measurement at Week 12-14 when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [92] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    51
    56
    61
    Units: Participants
    21
    34
    32
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [93]
    P-value
    = 0.1884 [94]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.71
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.77
         upper limit
    3.79
    Notes
    [93] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [94] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    112
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [95]
    P-value
    = 0 [96]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.94
         upper limit
    15.72
    Notes
    [95] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [96] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    117
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [97]
    P-value
    = 0.0003 [98]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.46
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2
         upper limit
    9.94
    Notes
    [97] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa+ 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [98] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients -multiple imputation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients -multiple imputation
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 week. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression. This endpoint is reporting statistics for the Full Analysis Set (FAS). FAS included all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6, 7 or 8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: Participants
    68
    82
    81
    46
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [99]
    P-value
    = 0.0024 [100]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.32
         upper limit
    3.61
    Notes
    [99] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [100] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [101]
    P-value
    = 0 [102]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.87
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.29
         upper limit
    6.55
    Notes
    [101] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [102] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [103]
    P-value
    = 0 [104]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.05
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.39
         upper limit
    6.86
    Notes
    [103] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [104] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Missing as non−responder

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Missing as non−responder
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders. This endpoint is reporting statistics for the Full Analysis Set (FAS). FAS included all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6, 7 or 8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: Participants
    67
    71
    70
    44
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [105]
    P-value
    = 0.0019 [106]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.26
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.35
         upper limit
    3.77
    Notes
    [105] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [106] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [107]
    P-value
    = 0 [108]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.67
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.12
         upper limit
    6.35
    Notes
    [107] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [108] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [109]
    P-value
    = 0 [110]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.81
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.2
         upper limit
    6.59
    Notes
    [109] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517"
    [110] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF)
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14. This endpoint is reporting statistics for Full Analysis Set (FAS). FAS included all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6, 7 or 8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    128
    121
    121
    133
    Units: Participants
    67
    87
    85
    53
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [111]
    P-value
    = 0.0418 [112]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.67
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.02
         upper limit
    2.74
    Notes
    [111] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [112] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [113]
    P-value
    = 0 [114]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.58
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.11
         upper limit
    6.05
    Notes
    [113] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [114] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    254
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [115]
    P-value
    = 0 [116]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.91
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.3
         upper limit
    6.65
    Notes
    [115] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [116] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - complete case analysis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - all patients - complete case analysis
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (i.e. Week 6, 7 or 8 of Run-in period) and one post-baseline measurement at Week 12-14 when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    End point values
    3 mg BI 690517 10 mg BI 690517 20 mg BI 690517 Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    124
    107
    106
    127
    Units: Participants
    67
    71
    70
    44
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    3 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    251
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [117]
    P-value
    = 0.0019 [118]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.26
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.35
         upper limit
    3.77
    Notes
    [117] - Odds ratio of "3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [118] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    20 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    233
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [119]
    P-value
    = 0 [120]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.67
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.12
         upper limit
    6.35
    Notes
    [119] - Odds ratio of "20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [120] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    10 mg BI 690517 v Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    234
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [121]
    P-value
    = 0 [122]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.81
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.2
         upper limit
    6.59
    Notes
    [121] - Odds ratio of "10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Placebo to BI 690517".
    [122] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Multiple imputation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Multiple imputation [123]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo to BI 690517 who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo to BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
    Notes
    [123] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: Participants
    33
    35
    39
    22
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [124]
    P-value
    = 0.0285 [125]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.09
         upper limit
    4.45
    Notes
    [124] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [125] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistica analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [126]
    P-value
    = 0.0002 [127]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.97
         upper limit
    8.72
    Notes
    [126] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [127] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [128]
    P-value
    = 0.0038 [129]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.41
         upper limit
    5.96
    Notes
    [128] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [129] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder [130]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [130] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: Participants
    32
    32
    32
    20
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [131]
    P-value
    = 0.0116 [132]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.56
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.23
         upper limit
    5.31
    Notes
    [131] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [132] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [133]
    P-value
    = 0.0004 [134]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.07
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.86
         upper limit
    8.91
    Notes
    [133] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [134] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [135]
    P-value
    = 0.0032 [136]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.46
         upper limit
    6.52
    Notes
    [135] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [136] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in FMV urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in FMV urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF) [137]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void (FMV) urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. LOCF uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received placebo to empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
    Notes
    [137] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    65
    61
    59
    69
    Units: Participants
    28
    41
    41
    25
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    134
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [138]
    P-value
    = 0.4092 [139]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.34
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.67
         upper limit
    2.69
    Notes
    [138] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [139] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    128
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [140]
    P-value
    = 0.0002 [141]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.04
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.92
         upper limit
    8.49
    Notes
    [140] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [141] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    130
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [142]
    P-value
    = 0.0005 [143]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.66
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.77
         upper limit
    7.58
    Notes
    [142] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [143] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Multiple imputation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Multiple imputation [144]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The multiple imputation filled in missing values at Week 14 based on other data observed in the same patient using regression. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the multiple imputation approach.
    Notes
    [144] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: Participants
    35
    47
    42
    24
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [145]
    P-value
    = 0.0348 [146]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.16
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.06
         upper limit
    4.43
    Notes
    [145] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [146] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [147]
    P-value
    = 0 [148]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    6.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.73
         upper limit
    13.57
    Notes
    [147] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [148] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [149]
    P-value
    = 0.0007 [150]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.58
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.71
         upper limit
    7.52
    Notes
    [149] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [150] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Missing as non−responder [151]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. The missing as non-responder imputes patients with missing Week 14 data as non-responders. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [151] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: Participants
    35
    39
    38
    24
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [152]
    P-value
    = 0.0578 [153]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.98
         upper limit
    4.14
    Notes
    [152] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [153] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [154]
    P-value
    = 0.0022 [155]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.54
         upper limit
    7.16
    Notes
    [154] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [155] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [156]
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [157]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.23
         upper limit
    11.78
    Notes
    [156] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [157] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks -patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - complete case analysis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks -patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin - complete case analysis [158]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of placebo matching empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (i.e. Week 6, 7 or 8 of Run-in period) and one post-baseline measurement at Week 12-14 when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [158] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    61
    56
    50
    66
    Units: Participants
    32
    32
    32
    20
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [159]
    P-value
    = 0.0116 [160]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.56
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.23
         upper limit
    5.31
    Notes
    [159] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [160] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    116
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [161]
    P-value
    = 0.0004 [162]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.07
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.86
         upper limit
    8.91
    Notes
    [161] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [162] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg+Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    122
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [163]
    P-value
    = 0.0032 [164]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.46
         upper limit
    6.52
    Notes
    [163] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [164] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - complete case analysis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - complete case analysis [165]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Complete case analysis used patients with both baseline and Week 14 data available. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who had received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (i.e. Week 6, 7 or 8 of Run-in period) and post-baseline measurement at Week 12-14 when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and at Week 12-14 of the Treatment Period.
    Notes
    [165] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    51
    56
    61
    Units: Participants
    35
    39
    38
    24
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [166]
    P-value
    = 0.0578 [167]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.98
         upper limit
    4.14
    Notes
    [166] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [167] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    117
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [168]
    P-value
    = 0.0022 [169]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.54
         upper limit
    7.16
    Notes
    [168] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [169] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    112
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [170]
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [171]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.23
         upper limit
    11.78
    Notes
    [170] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [171] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response I, defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward [172]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response I for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response I was defined as decrease of at least 30% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF) uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 14. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
    Notes
    [172] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: Participants
    23
    36
    41
    17
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [173]
    P-value
    = 0.214 [174]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.62
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.76
         upper limit
    3.46
    Notes
    [173] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [174] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [175]
    P-value
    = 0 [176]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    5.43
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.52
         upper limit
    11.71
    Notes
    [175] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [176] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [177]
    P-value
    = 0.0003 [178]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.93
         upper limit
    8.85
    Notes
    [177] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [178] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Secondary: UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    UACR response II, defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks - patients with background therapy of empagliflozin - Last observation on treatment carried forward [179]
    End point description
    Number of patients with UACR response II for patients with background therapy of empagliflozin in the Run-in period is reported. UACR response II was defined as decrease of at least 15% absolute change in First Morning Void urine of UACR from treatment period baseline to 14 weeks. Last observation on treatment carried forward (LOCF) uses the last value observed on treatment to substitute all missing values until Week 12-14. This endpoint is reporting statistics for all randomised patients to one of 3 doses of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517 who received empagliflozin during the Run-in Period and who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR at Week -2, -1, or 0 (Week 6,7,8 of the Run-in Period) and at least one post-baseline measurement when patients were still on treatment with BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    UACR measurements from baseline (Week 6,7 or 8 of the Run-in period) and Week 6, Week 10 and Week 12-14 of Treatment period were used for the last observation carried forward approach.
    Notes
    [179] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint is reporting statistics only for the patients who received empagliflozin during the Run-in period.
    End point values
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects analysed
    63
    60
    62
    64
    Units: Participants
    39
    46
    44
    28
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    127
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [180]
    P-value
    = 0.0342 [181]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.17
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.06
         upper limit
    4.44
    Notes
    [180] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [181] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [182]
    P-value
    = 0.0023 [183]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.19
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.52
         upper limit
    6.73
    Notes
    [182] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [183] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were calculated based on logistic regression of binary outcome adjusting for treatment, and stratification factors as covariates. Randomisation stratification was used, which is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) levels at screening.
    Comparison groups
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 v Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [184]
    P-value
    = 0.0003 [185]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    4.23
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.93
         upper limit
    9.24
    Notes
    [184] - Odds ratio of "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517" vs. "Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517".
    [185] - P-value was rounded to four decimal places.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From first study drug administration in the treatment period until end of the residual effect period (i.e. 7 days for empagliflozin and BI 690517), up to 15 weeks.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Adverse events were planned in the protocol and statistical analysis plan to be reported for the treated set. Treated Set (TS): This patient set included all patients who received at least one dose of BI 690517 or placebo matching BI 690517.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    26.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 milligrams (mg) of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 20 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 20 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 10 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 10 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received 3 mg of BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received 3 mg BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received placebo matching empagliflozin (Empa) 10 milligrams (mg) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and placebo matching empagliflozin 10 mg for 14 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Reporting group description
    This arm includes patients who received 10 mg of empagliflozin (Empa) during the run-in period and met the eligibility criteria to enter the treatment period. In the treatment period patients received placebo matching BI 690517 once daily (QD) orally in combination with 10 mg of empagliflozin QD orally. Patients received placebo matching BI 690517 and 10 mg empagliflozin for 14 weeks.

    Serious adverse events
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 76 (5.26%)
    5 / 74 (6.76%)
    7 / 73 (9.59%)
    6 / 72 (8.33%)
    4 / 71 (5.63%)
    3 / 70 (4.29%)
    3 / 73 (4.11%)
    7 / 74 (9.46%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    1
    0
    1
    1
    1
    0
    0
    2
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Adenocarcinoma of colon
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Squamous cell carcinoma of lung
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Transitional cell carcinoma metastatic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Aortic thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Coeliac artery occlusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Phlebitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Sudden death
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pleural effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Haematuria traumatic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiac failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Coronary artery disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac failure congestive
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    1 / 70 (1.43%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypertensive heart disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intracardiac thrombus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebral infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ischaemic cerebral infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pancreatitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombosis mesenteric vessel
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Diabetic foot
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute kidney injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    2 / 72 (2.78%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal artery stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemorrhage urinary tract
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal mass
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subcapsular renal haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    1 / 70 (1.43%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Endocrine disorders
    Adrenal insufficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
    2 / 73 (2.74%)
    2 / 72 (2.78%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    1 / 70 (1.43%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Glucocorticoid deficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Abscess soft tissue
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dengue fever
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diverticulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Erysipelas
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyelonephritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory syncytial virus infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypoglycaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyperkalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypercalcaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyponatraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    1 / 72 (1.39%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolic syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    0 / 70 (0.00%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 20 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 10 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + 3 mg BI 690517 Treatment period: Placebo to Empa 10 mg + Placebo to BI 690517 Treatment period: 10 mg Empa + Placebo to BI 690517
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 76 (14.47%)
    19 / 74 (25.68%)
    20 / 73 (27.40%)
    25 / 72 (34.72%)
    16 / 71 (22.54%)
    15 / 70 (21.43%)
    9 / 73 (12.33%)
    13 / 74 (17.57%)
    Investigations
    Cortisol decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 76 (2.63%)
    0 / 74 (0.00%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    2 / 72 (2.78%)
    4 / 71 (5.63%)
    3 / 70 (4.29%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    1
    2
    4
    3
    0
    1
    Glomerular filtration rate decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 76 (5.26%)
    7 / 74 (9.46%)
    8 / 73 (10.96%)
    6 / 72 (8.33%)
    7 / 71 (9.86%)
    1 / 70 (1.43%)
    3 / 73 (4.11%)
    2 / 74 (2.70%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    7
    8
    6
    7
    1
    4
    2
    Vascular disorders
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 76 (0.00%)
    2 / 74 (2.70%)
    4 / 73 (5.48%)
    0 / 72 (0.00%)
    0 / 71 (0.00%)
    1 / 70 (1.43%)
    0 / 73 (0.00%)
    1 / 74 (1.35%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    4
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 76 (1.32%)
    4 / 74 (5.41%)
    1 / 73 (1.37%)
    3 / 72 (4.17%)
    1 / 71 (1.41%)
    2 / 70 (2.86%)
    2 / 73 (2.74%)
    4 / 74 (5.41%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    1
    5
    1
    2
    2
    5
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperkalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 76 (6.58%)
    7 / 74 (9.46%)
    11 / 73 (15.07%)
    17 / 72 (23.61%)
    7 / 71 (9.86%)
    8 / 70 (11.43%)
    4 / 73 (5.48%)
    5 / 74 (6.76%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    7
    11
    20
    8
    8
    6
    10

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    25 Oct 2021
    Global protocol amendment 1 included the following changes in the protocol. The screening period was extended from 14 to 21 days to allow for any allowed repetition of screening procedures. The Flowchart was changed to detect and mitigate the potential risk of adrenal insufficiency by addition of extensive serum and urine cortisol sampling and addition of an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) challenge test (on an as-needed basis based on cortisol levels); serum cortisol was added to the list of hormones to be tested in safety laboratory parameters. The Flowchart was changed to allow pre-screening for urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) subject to pre-screening informed consent. Legal adult age (according to local legislation) as part of the inclusion criteria was added on top of 18+ years of age. Patients who needed to or wished to continue the intake of restricted medications or any drug considered likely to interfere with the safe conduct of the trial were excluded. An exclusionary criterion regarding intake biotin or related preparations was introduced. Patients who had taken Vitamin B7, Vitamin H, or coenzyme-R at doses ≥5 mg/day (including food supplements) within 72 h of Visit 1 or who planned to take above dosesof biotin during the trial were excluded. The original cut off value of increase in serum cortisol of 200 nmol/L at 30 min postinjection was modified to absolute cortisol value of <18 μg/dL (496.6 nmol/L) at 30 min (± 5 min) after injection of ACTH at Visit 1 to follow the Cosyntropin label and relevant United States (US) guidelines. Any clinically relevant abnormal laboratory value was expanded to specifically include a serum cortisol level <5 μg/dL (138.0 nmol/L) at Visit 1 or until first randomization to exclude those patients at greater risk of adrenal insufficiency.
    25 Oct 2021
    Global protocol amendment 1 continued: Added requirements for discontinuation of trial treatment (BI 690517/placebo) in patients who develop Cushing’s syndrome, adrenal insufficiency (including cortisol level <18 μg/dL 30 min (±5 min) after ACTH application), or cortisol levels <3 μg/dL (82.8 nmol/L) at any point in the trial should. Added requirement to permanently discontinue patients who permanently discontinue empagliflozin/placebo during the randomised run-in period due to any reason. Adrenal insufficiency and Cushing’s syndrome were added as an AESI to the protocol. Requirements for ACTH challenge tests during the study and at the end of treatment were added. The shipment of trial medication from the site to the patient’s home was allowed to support regular visits performed at the patient’s home specified by the Flowchart. Management of eGFR decrease was specified. Management of serum cortisol decrease was specified.
    30 Mar 2022
    Global protocol amendment 2 included the following changes. Flowchart was modified to remove 24-hour urine sample at EOT for patients who discontinue prematurely before initiation of treatment with BI 690517/placebo. Inclusion criteria on chronic kidney disease as baseline condition was simplified to include patients with any kind of diagnosed chronic kidney disease according to Investigator’s opinion and that diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) could be reached by standard clinical method and no biopsy was required. An additional criterion mandating screening of patients before the second randomization to treatment period was added to exclude patients with known hepatic cirrhosis (Child Pugh A, B or C), or other liver disease causing impaired liver function according to investigator’s judgement. An additional criterion was added to exclude those patients with CKD in whom no benefit to treatment with BI 690517 was expected due to underlying causes of CKD attributed to either of the following: CKD secondary due to malignancy (e.g. Cast-Nephropathy, AL-amyloidosis), CKD secondary to infectious disease (e.g. Hepatitis-/HIV-associated), autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clarification was provided regarding unblinding status at last patient last visit primary endpoint snapshot. Methotrexate was added to the restricted medications list.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue May 06 15:31:01 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA