Clinical Trial Results:
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of EP547 in Subjects with Cholestatic Pruritus Due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2021-002526-25 |
Trial protocol |
FR ES |
Global end of trial date |
05 Sep 2024
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
31 Jul 2025
|
First version publication date |
31 Jul 2025
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
EP-547-201
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Escient Pharmaceuticals
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
10578 Science Center Drive, Suite 250, San Diego, United States, 92121
|
||
Public contact |
Kristin Taylor, Sr VP, Head of Clinical Development, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 1 858 6178220, clinicaltrials@escientpharma.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Kristin Taylor, Sr VP, Head of Clinical Development, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 1 858 6178220, clinicaltrials@escientpharma.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
05 Sep 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
05 Sep 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of EP547 compared to placebo on pruritus as assessed by the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of Good Clinical Practice, according to the International Council for Harmonisation Guidelines.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
14 Nov 2022
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 34
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 6
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Israel: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 1
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
61
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
11
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
53
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
8
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Participants were enrolled at 29 study sites across the United States, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Canada, Israel, Belgium, and the Netherlands. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
DB Treatment Period (Weeks 1-6)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Data analyst | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral placebo 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind (DB) Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug switched to oral EP547 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
25 mg tablets
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
EP547
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
25 mg tablets
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
EP547 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral EP547 100 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug received oral EP547 100 mg QD for an additional 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
EP547
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
25 mg tablets
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Open-label Extension Period (Weeks 7-12)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral placebo 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind (DB) Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug switched to oral EP547 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
25 mg tablets
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
EP547 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral EP547 100 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug received oral EP547 100 mg QD for an additional 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
EP547
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
25 mg tablets
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral placebo 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind (DB) Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug switched to oral EP547 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
EP547 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral EP547 100 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug received oral EP547 100 mg QD for an additional 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Placebo 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral placebo 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind (DB) Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug switched to oral EP547 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||
Reporting group title |
EP547 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral EP547 100 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug received oral EP547 100 mg QD for an additional 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral placebo 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind (DB) Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug switched to oral EP547 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | ||
Reporting group title |
EP547 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral EP547 100 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and were still receiving study drug received oral EP547 100 mg QD for an additional 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score up to Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment assignment. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM=mixed effects model for repeated measures.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; up to Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Full Analysis Set [2] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
EP547:Placebo Based on MMRM | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD v EP547 100 mg QD; EP547 100 mg QD
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
57
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.4577 | ||||||||||||
Method |
MMRM | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least square mean difference (LSMD) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.46
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.77 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.68 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.609
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the 5-D Itch Scale total score at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The 5-D Itch Scale is a multidimensional (degree, duration, direction, disability, distribution) questionnaire measuring changes in pruritis. The duration, degree, and direction domain scores range from 1 (no pruritus) to 5 (most severe pruritus). The disability domain includes 4 items assessing itching impact on daily activities: sleep, leisure/social activities, housework/errands, and work/school. Disability domain score=highest score on any of the 4 categories (1 [no pruritis] to 5 [most severe pruritis]). For the distribution domain, 16 body parts are listed to determine the distribution of itching over the last 2 weeks; the number of affected body parts is tallied (potential sum=0-16); the sum is sorted into 5 thresholds: 0-2 is assigned a score of 1; 3-5, a score of 2; 6-10, a score of 3; 11-13, a score of 4; 14-16, a score of 5. Higher scores indicate more severe pruritis. The 5 domain scores are summed to get a total 5-D score: 5 (no pruritus) to 25 (most severe pruritus).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. [4] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with improvement in pruritus as defined by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate their impression of overall change in pruritus in the past 7 days compared to before they started taking study drug using the PGI-C, a 7-point scale ranging from “much improved” to “much worse,” with higher scores indicating less improvement in pruritus. Participants that reported a change in their itch of "minimally improved" or better were considered to be responders in terms of "improvement in pruritus." Exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) confidence intervals have been reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. [6] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with a reduction in WI-NRS score ≥2 from Baseline at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) confidence intervals have been reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed [8] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with improvement in pruritus severity from Baseline as defined by change in Patient Global Impress of Severity (PGI-S) at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their pruritus in the past 7 days using the PGI-S, a 4-point scale ranging from “none” to “severe.” Participants that reported a positive shift in their categorical assessment of itch compared to their Baseline level (e.g., “severe” at Visit 2 [Day 1] with a shift to “moderate” at Visit 6 [Week 6]) were considered to be responders in terms of “improvement in pruritus." Exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) confidence intervals have been reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [9] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. [10] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with a reduction in WI-NRS score ≥3 from Baseline at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) confidence intervals have been reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [11] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. [12] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with a reduction in WI-NRS score ≥4 from Baseline at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) confidence intervals have been reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [13] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. [14] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with a WI-NRS score <4 at Week 6 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) confidence intervals have been reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 6
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [15] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. [16] - Full Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Open-label Extension Period: Number of participants with any TEAE, any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, any related TEAE, and any TEAE that led to discontinuation of study drug | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug. Analysis was conducted in the Open-label Extension Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Open-Label Extension Period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [17] - Open-label Extension Analysis Set [18] - Open-label Extension Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, any related TEAE, and any TEAE that led to discontinuation of study drug | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug. Safety Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to the end of Week 6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [19] - Safety Analysis Set. Analysis was based on the treatment actually received. [20] - Safety Analysis Set. Analysis was based on the treatment actually received. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of participants with any serious TEAE, any ≥Grade 3 serious TEAE, any related serious TEAE, and any serious TEAE that led to discontinuation (discon) of study drug | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. A serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence, that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospital admission or prolongs hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. Serious TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the serious TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to the end of Week 6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [21] - Safety Analysis Set [22] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Open-label Extension Period: Number of participants with any serious TEAE, any ≥Grade 3 serious TEAE, any related serious TEAE, and any serious TEAE that led to discontinuation of study drug | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. A serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence, that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospital admission or prolongs hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. Serious TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the serious TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [23] - Open-label Extension Analysis Set [24] - Open-label Extension Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of participants with any treatment-emergent (TE) adverse event of special interest (AESI), any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, any related TE AESI, and any TE AESI that led to discontinuation of study drug | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. AESI were considered to be any clinically meaningful new, worsening from Baseline, or abnormal laboratory findings or symptoms suggestive of acute kidney injury (AKI) (e.g., “blood urea increased” or “protein urine present” AEs as identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] Query [SMQ] “Acute renal failure”). TE AESIs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the AE AESIs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to the end of Week 6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [25] - Safety Analysis Set [26] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Open-label Extension Period: Number of participants with any treatment-emergent (TE) AESI, any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, any related TE AESI, and any TE AESI that led to discontinuation of study drug | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. AESI were considered to be any clinically meaningful new, worsening from Baseline, or abnormal laboratory findings or symptoms suggestive of acute kidney injury (AKI) (e.g., “blood urea increased” or “protein urine present” AEs as identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] Query [SMQ] “Acute renal failure”). TE AESIs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the AE AESIs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [27] - Open-label Extension Analysis Set [28] - Open-label Extension Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with any clinically meaningful changes from Baseline in vital sign measurements | |||||||||
End point description |
Vital sign measurements included measurements for blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator determined if changes were clinically meaningful.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to the end of Week 12
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [29] - Safety Analysis Set [30] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with any clinically meaningful changes from Baseline in clinically meaningful in clinical laboratory test results | |||||||||
End point description |
Clinical laboratory test results included results for clinical hematology, chemistry, coagulation, and thyroid function parameters . The investigator determined if changes were clinically meaningful.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to the end of Week 12
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [31] - Safety Analysis Set [32] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with any clinically significant changes from Baseline in electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters | |||||||||
End point description |
ECG parameters included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS duration, or QT interval. The investigator determined if changes were clinically significant.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to the end of Week 12
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [33] - Safety Analysis Set [34] - Safety Analysis Set |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Plasma concentration of EP547 and metabolites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The lower level of quantitation = 0.01 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) for EP547 and 0.005 μg/mL for EP3583. Analysis was conducted in members of the Pharmcokinetic Set, comprised of all participants who received at least 1 dose of EP547 and provided adequate blood samples for bioanalysis.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
predose and 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 3; predose on Weeks 1, 2, and 6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [35] - Pharmokinetic Set [36] - Pharmokinetic Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
12 weeks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
For participants who received placebo up to Week 6 and then switched to EP547, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at onset of the event.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants were randomized to receive oral placebo 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind (DB) Treatment Period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
EP547
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received oral EP547 100 mg QD for 6 weeks in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. Participants who received placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and completed the period received oral EP547 100 mg QD for an additional 6 weeks in the Open-Label Extension Period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
17 Nov 2021 |
The primary purpose of the amendment was to implement changes to the study population, include additional safety monitoring, and
incorporate operational changes. |
||
20 Apr 2022 |
The primary purpose of the amendment was to increase opportunities for remote visits to ease participant burden associated with participating in this clinical study. Previously, participants were able to attend study visits at a physical study site as well as remotely (hybrid model) where allowed per regulatory/local requirements. This amendment introduced another option that allowed all visits to be conducted remotely at a virtual site (decentralized model) where allowed per regulatory/local requirements. |
||
02 Oct 2023 |
The primary purpose of the amendment was to adjust the eligibility criteria for estimated glomerular filtration rate, change the contraceptive requirements, decrease the required duration of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment, expand the drug interaction information, and to revise the description of the primary endpoint analysis. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |