Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase 3, 4-Week, Parallel Group, Double Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ARQ-151 Cream 0.15% Administered QD in Subjects with Atopic Dermatitis
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2021-006902-61 |
Trial protocol |
PL |
Global end of trial date |
30 Sep 2022
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Nov 2024
|
First version publication date |
08 Nov 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ARQ-151-311
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT04773587 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
IND: 135681 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
3027 Townsgate Rd #300, Westlake Village,, United States, 91361
|
||
Public contact |
Arcutis Medical Information, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc., +1 (844) 692-6729, information@arcutis.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Arcutis Medical Information, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc., +1 (844) 692-6729, information@arcutis.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Sep 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Sep 2022
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Sep 2022
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ARQ-151 cream vs vehicle applied once a day for 4 weeks by subjects with atopic dermatitis (eczema). This was a parallel group, double blind, vehicle-controlled study in which ARQ-151 cream or vehicle is applied once daily for 4 weeks to subjects with atopic dermatitis.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH Good Clinical Practice, and all applicable local laws/regulations.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Jan 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 24
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 132
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 498
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
654
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
24
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
130
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
166
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
324
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
34
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
This study was conducted at 65 centers in the United States, Canada, and Poland. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Assessor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Roflumilast Cream 0.15% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied roflumilast cream 0.15% once daily (QD) for 4 weeks. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Roflumilast cream 0.15%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Applied to affected areas QD for 4 weeks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Vehicle Cream | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied vehicle cream QD for 4 weeks. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vehicle Cream
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Applied to affected areas QD for 4 weeks.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied roflumilast cream 0.15% once daily (QD) for 4 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied vehicle cream QD for 4 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied roflumilast cream 0.15% once daily (QD) for 4 weeks. | ||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle Cream
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied vehicle cream QD for 4 weeks. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) Success at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants achieving vIGA-AD "success" is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. vIGA-AD "success" is defined as a vIGA-AD score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' PLUS a 2-grade improvement from Baseline. The vIGA-AD is astatic evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (reported only in integers of 0 to 4 where 0 is clear),with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in vIGA-AD Success at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15% v Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [1] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.96
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.881 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.647 | ||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of vIGA-AD Success at Week 4 in Participants With "Moderate" Baseline Scores | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with moderate baseline scores achieving vIGA-AD "success" is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. vIGA-AD "success" is defined as a vIGA-AD score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' PLUS a 2-grade improvement from Baseline in participants with a 'moderate' baseline vIGA-AD score. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (0 'clear' to 4 'severe'), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants who were included in the "moderate" baseline vIGA-AD group during randomization are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in vIGA-AD Success at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Vehicle Cream v Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
492
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.67
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.64 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.359 | ||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Stratified by pooled study site with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of a 4-Point Reduction in the Average, Weekly WI-NRS at Week 4 in Participants ≥12 Years of Age With Baseline WI-NRS ≥ 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants ≥12 years of age with a baseline WI-NRS ≥4 achieving WI-NRS success at Week 4 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. The WI-NRS is a simple, single item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participant experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). All randomized participants ≥12 years of age with a baseline WI-NRS ≥4 are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
WI-NRS Success at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15% v Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
413
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0089 [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.98
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.186 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.319 | ||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of a 4-Point Reduction in the Average, Weekly WI-NRS at Week 2 in Participants ≥12 Years of Age With Baseline WI-NRS ≥ 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants ≥12 years of age with a baseline WI-NRS ≥4 achieving WI-NRS success at Week 2 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. The WI-NRS is a simple, single item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participant experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). All randomized participants ≥12 years of age with a baseline WI-NRS ≥4 are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 2
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
WI-NRS Success at Week 2 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Vehicle Cream v Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
413
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0016 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.81
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.45 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
5.457 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of a 4-Point Reduction in the Average, Weekly WI-NRS at Week 1 in Participants ≥12 Years of Age With Baseline WI-NRS ≥ 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants ≥12 years of age with a baseline WI-NRS ≥4 achieving WI-NRS success at Week 1 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. The WI-NRS is a simple, single item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participant experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). All randomized participants ≥12 years of age with a baseline WI-NRS ≥4 are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
WI-NRS Success at Week 1 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Vehicle Cream v Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
413
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0159 [4] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
3.81
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.161 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
12.511 | ||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of ≥ 75% Reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants achieving EASI-75 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. EASI-75 is a ≥75% reduction from the baseline EASI score. EASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single total score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). To calculate the EASI, the sum of the severity rating (0 to 3 with 3 being the most severe) for four clinical signs are multiplied with the numerical value of the area affected and with the percentage of the four body areas. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
EASI-75 at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Vehicle Cream v Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [5] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
3.17
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
2.102 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.795 | ||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of vIGA-AD Score of ‘Clear’ or ‘Almost Clear’ at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants scoring 'clear' or 'almost clear' on vIGA-AD at Week 4 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (0 'clear' to 4 'severe'), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
vIGA-AD 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' at Week 4 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15% v Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [6] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.56
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.707 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.843 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of vIGA-AD Success at Week 2 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants achieving "success" on the VIGA-AD at Week 2 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. vIGA-AD "success" is defined as a vIGA-AD score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' PLUS a 2-grade improvement from Baseline. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (0 'clear' to 4 'severe'), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 2
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
vIGA-AD Success at Week 2 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Vehicle Cream v Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
4.28
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
2.31 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
7.926 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of vIGA-AD Success at Week 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants achieving "success" on the VIGA-AD at Week 1 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. vIGA-AD "success" is defined as a vIGA-AD score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' PLUS a 2-grade improvement from Baseline. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (0 'clear' to 4 'severe'), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
vIGA-AD Success at Week 1 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15% v Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [7] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
25.41
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
2.815 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
229.388 | ||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of vIGA-AD Score of ‘Clear’ or ‘Almost Clear’ at Week 2 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants scoring 'clear' or 'almost clear' on vIGA-AD at Week 2 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (0 'clear' to 4 'severe'), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 2
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
vIGA-AD 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' at Week 2 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15% v Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [8] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
3.62
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
2.217 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
5.911 | ||||||||||||
Notes [8] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Achievement of vIGA-AD Score of ‘Clear’ or ‘Almost Clear’ at Week 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants scoring 'clear' or 'almost clear' on vIGA-AD at Week 1 is presented with multiple imputation of missing observations. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation of qualitative overall AD severity. This global assessment scale is an ordinal scale with five severity grades (0 'clear' to 4 'severe'), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. All randomized participants are included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
vIGA-AD 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' at Week 1 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Vehicle Cream v Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
654
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0002 [9] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
3.46
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.705 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
7.007 | ||||||||||||
Notes [9] - Stratified by pooled study site and vIGA-AD randomization strata with multiple imputation of missing observations |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Up to approximately 29 days
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast Cream 0.15%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied roflumilast cream 0.15% QD for 4weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with mild to moderate AD applied vehicle cream QD for 4 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: There were no nonserious adverse events meeting the cutoff threshold. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |