Clinical Trial Results:
The ASCEND Study: A Phase III, Multicenter, Double Blinded Vehicle Controlled Study of TMB-001 - with a Parallel Optional Maximal Use Arm - in the Treatment of RXLI (Xlinked) or ARCI Ichthyosis in Subjects Aged ≥6 Years
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2022-000459-35 |
Trial protocol |
DE FR IT |
Global end of trial date |
23 Sep 2024
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Jun 2025
|
First version publication date |
28 Jun 2025
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
TMB01-301
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT05295732 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Timber Pharmaceuticals, Inc
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
7 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ, United States, 07940
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Disclosure, LEO Pharma A/S, 45 4494 5888, disclosure@leo-pharma.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Disclosure, LEO Pharma A/S, 45 4494 5888, disclosure@leo-pharma.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
24 Feb 2025
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
17 Jun 2024
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Sep 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To ascertain the efficacy of TMB-001 0.05% topical ointment as a treatment for congenital ichthyosis (CI) compared with Vehicle during a 12-week treatment.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in accordance with the protocol and consensus ethical principles derived from international guidelines including the Declaration of Helsinki (2013), CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines, applicable ICH GCP Guidelines, and other applicable laws and regulations.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
21 Jun 2022
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 20
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 23
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 22
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 7
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 44
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
116
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
65
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
24
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
29
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
58
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
5
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
34 sites across the United States, Canada, Germany, France, and Italy enrolled subjects, and 33 of these sites randomized subjects. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
34 study centers recruited subjects. | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
double-blind period
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
TMB-001 0.05% | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
In the first 3 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, subjects were randomized to TMB-001 0.05% QD with use of mandatory standardized bland emollient (Cetaphil™). For the last 9 weeks of the 12 week double-blind primary dosing period, the subjects continued with TMB-001 0.05% at the increased dosing frequency of BID. Mandatory bland emollient was discontinued. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
TMB-001 0.05%
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Ointment
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use, Topical use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
QD for 3 weeks in period 1 and then BID for 9 weeks in period 2
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Vehicle | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
For the first 3 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, subjects were randomized to Vehicle QD treatment, with use of mandatory standardized bland emollient (Cetaphil™). For the last 9 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, the subjects continued with Vehicle at the increased dosing frequency of BID. Mandatory bland emollient was discontinued. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vehicle
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Ointment
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
QD for 3 weeks in period 1 and then BID for 9 weeks in period 2
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Open-label
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
TMB-001 0.05% QD | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
At Week 12, TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment responders (who had achieved a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline) were re-randomized (1:1 ratio) to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID or TMB-001 0.05% QD. Subjects with less than a 1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline were discontinued from the study. Vehicle-treated subjects who achieved <1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline by week 12, were eligible to cross over to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment. Subjects with a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline on vehicle were discontinued from the study. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
TMB-001 0.05%
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Ointment
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use, Topical use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
TMB-001 0.05% QD for 12 weeks.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
TMB-001 0.05% BID | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
At Week 12, TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment responders (who had achieved a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline) were re-randomized (1:1 ratio) to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID or TMB-001 0.05% QD. Subjects with less than a 1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline were discontinued from the study. Vehicle-treated subjects who achieved <1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline by week 12, were eligible to cross over to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment. Subjects with a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline on vehicle were discontinued from the study. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
TMB-001 0.05%
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Ointment
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use, Topical use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
TMB-001 0.05% BID for 12 weeks.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period. Justification: TMB-001 0.05% treated subjects with less than a 1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline were discontinued from the study. Vehicle-treated subjects with a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline were discontinued from the study. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
TMB-001 0.05%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
In the first 3 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, subjects were randomized to TMB-001 0.05% QD with use of mandatory standardized bland emollient (Cetaphil™). For the last 9 weeks of the 12 week double-blind primary dosing period, the subjects continued with TMB-001 0.05% at the increased dosing frequency of BID. Mandatory bland emollient was discontinued. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
For the first 3 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, subjects were randomized to Vehicle QD treatment, with use of mandatory standardized bland emollient (Cetaphil™). For the last 9 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, the subjects continued with Vehicle at the increased dosing frequency of BID. Mandatory bland emollient was discontinued. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Maximal Use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The optional maximal use arm part of the trial was conducted under the same protocol number for operational reasons, but with separate design, objective, and patients. Adult and pediatric subjects, at a subset of preselected centers, were enrolled in an open-label Optional Maximal Use Arm to evaluate the systemic exposure and safety of TMB-001 0.05% for the treatment of congenital ichthyosis under maximal use conditions. Initially, adult and pediatric subjects with congenital ichthyosis were dosed for 14 days with TMB-001 0.05% BID. Following an interim pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and based on the exposure data for subjects aged ≥12 years, pediatric subjects aged 6 to 11 years began dosing with TMB-001 0.05% BID for 14 days. Following the 14-day PK assessment period, subjects received TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment for 10 weeks to provide additional safety and limited efficacy data.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
TMB-001 0.05%
|
||
Reporting group description |
In the first 3 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, subjects were randomized to TMB-001 0.05% QD with use of mandatory standardized bland emollient (Cetaphil™). For the last 9 weeks of the 12 week double-blind primary dosing period, the subjects continued with TMB-001 0.05% at the increased dosing frequency of BID. Mandatory bland emollient was discontinued. | ||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle
|
||
Reporting group description |
For the first 3 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, subjects were randomized to Vehicle QD treatment, with use of mandatory standardized bland emollient (Cetaphil™). For the last 9 weeks of the 12-week double-blind primary dosing period, the subjects continued with Vehicle at the increased dosing frequency of BID. Mandatory bland emollient was discontinued. | ||
Reporting group title |
TMB-001 0.05% QD
|
||
Reporting group description |
At Week 12, TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment responders (who had achieved a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline) were re-randomized (1:1 ratio) to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID or TMB-001 0.05% QD. Subjects with less than a 1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline were discontinued from the study. Vehicle-treated subjects who achieved <1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline by week 12, were eligible to cross over to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment. Subjects with a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline on vehicle were discontinued from the study. | ||
Reporting group title |
TMB-001 0.05% BID
|
||
Reporting group description |
At Week 12, TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment responders (who had achieved a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline) were re-randomized (1:1 ratio) to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID or TMB-001 0.05% QD. Subjects with less than a 1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline were discontinued from the study. Vehicle-treated subjects who achieved <1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline by week 12, were eligible to cross over to 12 weeks of open-label treatment with TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment. Subjects with a ≥1-point reduction in IGA score from baseline on vehicle were discontinued from the study. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Maximal Use
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The optional maximal use arm part of the trial was conducted under the same protocol number for operational reasons, but with separate design, objective, and patients. Adult and pediatric subjects, at a subset of preselected centers, were enrolled in an open-label Optional Maximal Use Arm to evaluate the systemic exposure and safety of TMB-001 0.05% for the treatment of congenital ichthyosis under maximal use conditions. Initially, adult and pediatric subjects with congenital ichthyosis were dosed for 14 days with TMB-001 0.05% BID. Following an interim pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and based on the exposure data for subjects aged ≥12 years, pediatric subjects aged 6 to 11 years began dosing with TMB-001 0.05% BID for 14 days. Following the 14-day PK assessment period, subjects received TMB-001 0.05% BID treatment for 10 weeks to provide additional safety and limited efficacy data.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportions of subjects with ≥2-point changes from Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)-scaling and fissuring scores in the Treatment Area at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
statistical analysis 1 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
TMB-001 0.05% v Vehicle
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
116
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.39 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
treatment difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-1
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-18.4 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
16.5 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With IGA Scores | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects with IGA scores of clear or almost clear at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in IGA-scaling Severity Sub-score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects who achieve IGA-scaling severity sub-score improvement ≥ 2-points from Baseline to Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Worst Itch-Quality of Life (QoL) Scores | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects with ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Worst Itch-QoL scores at Week 12 in subjects with baseline WI-NRS of ≥7 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (I-NRS) and Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) is an 0-10 scale where 0 is "no itching" and 10 is "worst itch imaginable".
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Visual Index of Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects who achieve 50% reduction from Baseline in VIIS-scaling scores at Week 12 in all areas with Baseline VIIS score ≥3 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity Score is a 0-4 scale where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in VIIS Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects who achieve 25% reduction from Baseline in VIIS-scaling scores at Week 12 in all areas with Baseline VIIS score ≥3 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity Score is a 0-4 scale where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in IGA-fissuring Severity Sub-scores | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects achieving ≥2 point improvement in IGA-fissuring severity sub-scores from Baseline to Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in IGA Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportions of subjects achieving ≥2-point improvement from Baseline in IGA scores at Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in VIIS Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects who achieve 50% reduction from Baseline in VIIS-scaling scores at Week 24 in all areas with Baseline VIIS score ≥3 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing. Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity Score is a 0-4 scale where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Ichthyosis Quality of Life (IQoL)-32 Scores | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportions of subjects with ≥11-point changes from Baseline in IQOL-32 scores at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. The IQoL-32 is a questionnaire containing 32, each scored from 0 to 4 ('not applicable', 'not at all', 'a little', 'a lot', 'tremendously') for a total score that varies between 0 and 128. A higher score, the higher impact on quality of life.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) or Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Scores | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects with reduction from Baseline in DLQI or CDLQI ≥4 points at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects in adult subjects with Baseline scores ≥11 and pediatric subjects with Baseline scores of ≥13. The age-appropriate questionnaire contains 10 questions scored from 0 (no impact of skin disease on QoL) to 30 (maximum impact on QoL).
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Itch-Quality of Life Scores - WI-NRS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportions of subjects with WI-NRS improvement ≥4 points from Baseline in Itch-QoL scores (in subjects with Baseline WI-NRS ≥7) at Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in DLQI or CDLQI Scores | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of changes from Baseline in DLQI or CDLQI at Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing in adult subjects with Baseline scores ≥11 and pediatric subjects with Baseline scores of ≥13. The age-appropriate questionnaire contains 10 questions scored from 0 (no impact of skin disease on QoL) to 30 (maximum impact on QoL).
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in IQoL-32 Scores | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Proportions of subjects with ≥11-point change from Baseline in IQoL-32 at Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing in adult subjects. The IQoL-32 is a questionnaire containing 32, each scored from 0 to 4 ('not applicable', 'not at all', 'a little', 'a lot', 'tremendously') for a total score that varies between 0 and 128. A higher score, the higher impact on quality of life.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
To Investigate the Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Local Skin Reactions (LSRs) With Topically Applied TMB-001 0.05% Ointment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects experiencing LSRs through Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
To Investigate the Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects experiencing TEAEs through Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
To Investigate the Proportion of Subjects Experiencing LSRs With Topically Applied TMB-001 0.05% Ointment. | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects experiencing LSRs through Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
To Investigate the Proportion of Subjects Experiencing TEAEs | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects experiencing TEAEs through Week 24.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
To Investigate the Proportion of Subjects Demonstrating Clinically Confirmed Allergic Contact Dermatitis | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportion of subjects demonstrating clinically confirmed allergic contact dermatitis by patch testing through Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
during week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - Cmax After Multiple Dosing - Adults | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
maximal observed plasma concentration. Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Mean values are presented.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - Cmax After Multiple Dosing - Adolescents | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
maximal observed plasma concentration. Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Mean values are presented.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - AUC0-24 After Multiple Dosing - Adults | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
AUC0-24 = area under the curve over the first 24 hours post dose. Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Mean values are presented.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - AUC0-24 After Multiple Dosing - Adolescents | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
AUC0-24 = area under the curve over the first 24 hours post dose. Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Mean values are presented.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - Tmax After Multiple Dosing - Adults | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Tmax = time to maximal plasma concentration. Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Median values are presented.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - Tmax After Multiple Dosing - Adolescents | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Tmax = time to maximal plasma concentration. Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Median values are presented.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Isotretinoin, Tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin - Steady State Concentration After Multiple Dosing - Children | ||||||||||
End point description |
Assessment of concentrations of isotretinoin, tretinoin, 4-oxo-tretinion and 4-oxo-isotretinoin. Values for the metabolites 4-Oxo-Isotretinoin, Tretinoin and 4-oxo-tretinoin could not be plotted due to the sparse sampling schedule.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Assessment of the Exposure of TMB-001 and Oral Isotretinoin - Cmax | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Cmax: maximal observed plasma concentration. The exposure levels observed for TMB-001 0.05% topical ointment after multiple dosing were compared with the cross-trial for PK parameters obtained for oral isotretinoin (single dose 80 mg) in healthy volunteers.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Assessment of the Exposure of TMB-001 and Oral Isotretinoin - AUC0-24 | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
AUC0-24: area under the curve over the first 24 hours post dose The exposure levels observed for TMB-001 0.05% topical ointment after multiple dosing were compared with the cross-trial for PK parameters obtained for oral isotretinoin (single dose 80 mg) in healthy volunteers.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
14 days
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Safety and Tolerability - LSRs | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
Local skin reactions (burnings/stinging, erythema, erosions and edema) are reported as LSRs.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal Use Arm: Safety and Tolerability - TEAEs | ||||||||||
End point description |
Local safety are reported as severe TEAEs related to treatment area.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Itch-Quality of Life scores - I-NRS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Comparison of proportions of subjects with I-NRS improvement ≥4 points from Baseline in Itch-QoL scores (in subjects with Baseline I-NRS ≥7) at Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No data available. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
24 weeks for the phase 3 trial part (TMB-001 0.005% and vehicle arms) and 12 weeks for the Maximal use arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
TEAEs. An AE is defined as treatment emergent if the AE start on or after treatment start until 30 days after treatment end date.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
TMB-001 0.05%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Safety Population = all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study medication. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Safety Population = all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study medication. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Maximal Use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Safety population = all subjects enrolled in the maximal use arm who received at least 1 dose of study medication. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
25 Jul 2022 |
Monthly UPT, INRS daily, Risk section |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |