Clinical Trial Results:
An open, single-arm trial to assess the clinical activity of recMAGE-A3 + AS15 in patients with unresectable MAGE-A3-positive metastatic cutaneous melanoma
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-004007-64 |
Trial protocol |
DE IE FR ES IT FI |
Global end of trial date |
16 Sep 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v3(current) |
This version publication date |
24 Dec 2020
|
First version publication date |
24 Mar 2016
|
Other versions |
v1 , v2 |
Version creation reason |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
111476
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT00942162 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Rue de l’Institut 89, Rixensart, Belgium, B-1330
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trials Call Center, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, 44 2089904466, GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trials Call Center, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, 44 2089904466, GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Apr 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 Apr 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
16 Sep 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the clinical activity of the MAGE-A3 ASCI study product in terms of the 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) in patients with MAGE-A3-positive, unresectable stage III or stage IV M1a melanoma tumors presenting the predictive GS.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The patients will be observed closely for at least 30 minutes following the administration of treatments, with appropriate medical treatment readily available in case of a rare anaphylactic reaction.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
14 Aug 2009
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 24
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 24
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 29
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Ireland: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 25
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 11
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Russian Federation: 6
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 2
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
125
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
95
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
60
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
65
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
During the screening the following steps occurred: check for inclusion/exclusion criteria, contraindications/precautions, medical history of the patients and signing informed consent forms. | ||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
125 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
123 | ||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
no study treatment received: 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Overall Study Group | ||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients planned to receive intramuscularly up to 24 doses of MAGE-A3 ASCI (the study product), in 4 cycles. | ||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Immunotherapeutic GSK2132231A
|
||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||
Other name |
recMAGE-A3 recombinant protein + immunological Adjuvant System
|
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and suspension for suspension for injection
|
||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
6 administrations in Cycle 1, at 2-week intervals (Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10); 6 administrations in Cycle 2, at 3-week intervals (Weeks 14, 17, 20, 23, 26 and 29); 4 administrations in Cycle 3 at 6-week intervals (Weeks 33, 39, 45 and 51) and 4 administrations in Cycle 4 at 3-months (12-weeks) intervals, followed by 4 further administrations at 6-months (24-weeks) intervals at Months 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: While 125 subjects were enrolled, only 123 started the study, as 2 subjects did not receive treatment and were excluded. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Study Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients planned to receive intramuscularly up to 24 doses of MAGE-A3 ASCI (the study product), in 4 cycles. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
GSK2132231A GS+ Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Subset of patients with the pre-specified gene signature, receiving the MAGE-A3 ASCI product. Gene-signature sub-grouping was based on patients having a potentially predictive gene signature, as assessed at screening.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
GSK2132231A GS- Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Subset of patients without the pre-specified gene signature, receiving the MAGE-A3 ASCI product. Gene-signature sub-grouping was based on patients having a potentially predictive gene signature, as assessed at screening.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
GSK2132231A GS-unknown Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Subset of patients with unknown status as regards GS signature, receiving the MAGE-A3 ASCI product. Gene-signature sub-grouping was based on patients having a potentially predictive gene signature, as assessed at screening.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Overall Study Group
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients planned to receive intramuscularly up to 24 doses of MAGE-A3 ASCI (the study product), in 4 cycles. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
GSK2132231A GS+ Group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subset of patients with the pre-specified gene signature, receiving the MAGE-A3 ASCI product. Gene-signature sub-grouping was based on patients having a potentially predictive gene signature, as assessed at screening.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
GSK2132231A GS- Group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subset of patients without the pre-specified gene signature, receiving the MAGE-A3 ASCI product. Gene-signature sub-grouping was based on patients having a potentially predictive gene signature, as assessed at screening.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
GSK2132231A GS-unknown Group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subset of patients with unknown status as regards GS signature, receiving the MAGE-A3 ASCI product. Gene-signature sub-grouping was based on patients having a potentially predictive gene signature, as assessed at screening.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
One-year overall survival rate (OSR) estimated by complete case method [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) in the GS+ Population would be above 50% (target = 71%), a proportion which was reported together with its 95% confidence interval (CI).
Maximum 1-year OSR of any currently available treatment in the MAGE-A3-positive population = 50% (P0). This median OS of 12 months is based on the observed median OS for MAGE-A3-positive patients, whose tumor did not present the predictive GS.
The target 1-year OSR for patients presenting the predictive GS = 71% (P1). This corresponds to a median OS of 24 months when assuming an exponential distribution of OS.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Month 0 to Month 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The scope of this primary endpoint was descriptive, no statistical analyses were conducted. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients reported with serious adverse events (SAEs) [2] | ||||||||
End point description |
Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity.
Events which were part of the natural course of the disease under study (i.e., disease progression, recurrence) were captured as part of the clinical activity outcome variables in this study; therefore these did not need to be reported as SAEs. Progression/recurrence of the tumor in a patient was recorded as part of the clinical assessment data collection, and deaths due to progressive disease was recorded on a specific form, but not as an SAE. However, if the investigator considered that there was a causal relationship between treatment or protocol design/procedures and the disease progression/recurrence, then the event was reported as an SAE. Any new primary cancer (non-related to the cancer under study) was reported as an SAE.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the entire study period (From Month 0 to Month 49)
|
||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The scope of this primary endpoint was descriptive, no statistical analyses were conducted. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with diseases characteristics by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Cancer staging (characteristics and categories) as by the categorization by the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 2002.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the entire study period (From Month 0 to Month 49)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Progression-free survival (PFS) by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
From study start to Month 24, each patient being censored out of the analysis at 1st report of disease progression or death. PFS was defined and calculated as the time from first treatment to either the first progression of the disease or the date of death, whichever occurred first. In case a patient went off protocol treatment, the date of first documented progression (if applicable) was to be used as date of progression. Patients still alive with no evidence of disease progression at the time of their last visit or for whom date of first documented progression was not applicable, were censored at the time of the last examination. PFS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Month 0 to Month 24
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Kaplan-Meier estimates of the Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Months 6, 12 and 24, by Gene Signature | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
PFS was defined as the time from the date of registration of the patient to either the date of disease progression or the date of death (for whatever reason), whichever comes first. Patients alive and without disease progression were censored at the date of their last tumor evaluation. The PFS estimates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and expressed as the percentage of patients who did not progress and were alive at a given time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall survival (OS) by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
OS was defined as defined as the time from registration of the patient until death, with patients alive at the time of analysis censored at the time of the last contact.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to 5 years from the time of registration
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to treatment failure (TTF) by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The TTF was defined as the time from registration of the patient until the date of the last treatment administration, irrespective of the reason for study treatment discontinuation.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the 24 months period (From Month 0 to Month 24).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Best overall response (BOR) by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The best overall response was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence, except for confirmed objective response, which was reported as BOR independently of its time of occurrence. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI and/or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions without any new lesions and/or progression of existing non-target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progression of Disease (PD) without any new lesions and/or progression of existing non-target lesions; PD, >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; NE = Non-evaluable response.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the 24 months period (From Month 0 to Month 24)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Duration of response (CR or PR) by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Duration of response was measured from the time when the measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was recorded first) were met until the first date that recurrent or PD was objectively documented (taking as reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started).
Note: As there was only one patient analyzed in the GS- Subgroup, the median duration of response was not calculated for this latter subgroup. When only 1 subject is analyzed, the lower limit (LL) and the upper limit (UL) are entered equal to the geometric mean concentration (GMC) value as the confidence interval could not be calculated with only 1 subject analyzed.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the 24 months period (From Month 0 to Month 24)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Duration of stable disease (SD), or Time-to-Progression (TTP) by GS | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The duration of stable disease (SD), or TTP, was tabulated for patients whose best response was SD. The minimal time interval required between 2 measurements for determination of SD was 12 weeks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the 24 months period (From Month 0 to Month 24)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of seropositive patients for anti-MAGE-A3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Seropositive patients were those patients with anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations ≥ 27 ELISA units per millilitre (EL.U/mL).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PRE = Pre any dose, PII(W4) = Post-Dose 2 (Week 4), PVI(W12) = Post-Dose 6 (Week 12), PXII(W31) = Post-Dose 12 (Week 31), PXVI(W54) = Post-Dose 16 (Week 54), PXVII(M18) = Post-Dose 17 (Month 18), PXXIV(M49) = Post-Dose 24 (Month 49).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and expressed in ELISA units per millilitre (EL.U/mL). When only 1 subject is analyzed, the lower limit (LL) and the upper limit (UL) are entered equal to the geometric mean concentration (GMC) value as the confidence interval could not be calculated with only 1 subject analyzed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PRE = Pre any dose, PII(W4) = Post-Dose 2 (Week 4), PVI(W12) = Post-Dose 6 (Week 12), PXII(W31) = Post-Dose 12 (Week 31), PXVI(W54) = Post-Dose 16 (Week 54), PXVII(M18) = Post-Dose 17 (Month 18), PXXIV(M49) = Post-Dose 24 (Month 49).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of seropositive patients for protein D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Seropositive patients were those patients with anti-PD antibody concentrations ≥ 100 EL.U/mL.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PRE = Pre any dose, PII(W4) = Post-Dose 2 (Week 4), PVI(W12) = Post-Dose 6 (Week 12), PXII(W31) = Post-Dose 12 (Week 31), PXVI(W54) = Post-Dose 16 (Week 54), PXVII(M18) = Post-Dose 17 (Month 18), PXXIV(M49) = Post-Dose 24 (Month 49)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Concentrations of antibodies against protein D (Anti-PD) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Anti-PD antibody concentrations were presented ad geometric mean concentrations (GMTs) and expressed in EL.U/mL. When only 1 subject is analyzed, the lower limit (LL) and the upper limit (UL) are entered equal to the geometric mean concentration (GMC) value as the confidence interval could not be calculated with only 1 subject analyzed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PRE = Pre any dose, PII(W4) = Post-Dose 2 (Week 4), PVI(W12) = Post-Dose 6 (Week 12), PXII(W31) = Post-Dose 12 (Week 31), PXVI(W54) = Post-Dose 16 (Week 54), PXVII(M18)= Post-Dose 17 (Month 18), PXXIV(M49) = Post-Dose 24 (Month 49)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Anti-MAGE-A3 antibody response | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Anti-MAGE-A3 antibody response defined as:
For initially seronegative patients: post-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 27 EL.U/mL.
For initially seropositive patients: post-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 2 fold the pre-vaccination antibody concentration
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PII(W4) = Post-Dose 2 (Week 4), PVI(W12) = Post-Dose 6 (Week 12), PXII(W31) = Post-Dose 12 (Week 31), PXVI(W54) = Post-Dose 16 (Week 54), PXVII(M18) = Post-Dose 17 (Month 18), PXXIV(M49) = Post-Dose 24 (Month 49)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Anti-PD antibody response | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Anti-PD antibody response defined as:
For initially seronegative patients: post-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 100 EL.U/mL.
For initially seropositive patients: post-vaccination antibody concentration ≥ 2 fold the pre-vaccination antibody concentration
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PII(W4) = Post-Dose 2 (Week 4), PVI(W12) = Post-Dose 6 (Week 12), PXII(W31) = Post-Dose 12 (Week 31), PXVI(W54) = Post-Dose 16 (Week 54), PXVII(M18) = Post-Dose 17 (Month 18), PXXIV(M49) = Post-Dose 24 (Month 49)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards ALT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards AST laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards ALK laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Bilirubine (BIL) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards BIL laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Creatinine (CREA) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards CREA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Hemoglobin (HGB) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards HGB laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Leukocytes (LEU) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards LEU laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G4, and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Lymphopenia (LYM) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards LYM laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1, G2 and G3. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Neutrophils (NEU) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards NEU laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3 and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with abnormal Platelets (PLT) values by maximum grade | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The status of each patient as regards PLT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G4, and Unknown (UNK).
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From study start to study end (Month 0 - Month 49), each patient being censored out of the analysis at time of death.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients with autoimmune diseases or immune-mediated inflammatory disorders | ||||||||
End point description |
Auto-immune diseases or immune-mediated inflammatory disorders were tabulated during the whole duration of the study (up to 30 days after the last administration of the study treatment).
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the whole study period (From Month 0 to Month 49)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients reported with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) by maximum grade. | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The assessed AEs were ASCI-related adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.
Grade 1 = Mild AE; Grade 2 = Moderate AE; Grade 3 = Severe AE; Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 = Death due to AE.
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Through 30 days after the last administration of the study treatment, approximately 49 months
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients reported with unsolicited AE(s) | ||||||||
End point description |
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Through 30 days after the last administration of the study treatment, approximately 49 months
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
AEs up to 30 days post treatment; SAEs during the entire study period (from Month 0 to Month 49).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
As planned per study protocol, safety was assessed in the overall population regardless of GS status.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Study Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients planned to receive intramuscularly up to 24 doses of MAGE-A3 ASCI (the study product), in 4 cycles. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
27 Jan 2011 |
The main changes in Amendment 1 concern:
1. The addition of an interim analysis for the early assessment of the predictive value of the gene signature (Statistical analysis, Section 10). The interim analysis will assess all available safety and clinical activity data at the time at least 36 enrolled patients have been followed up for one year or have died. Amongst these 36 patients, 18 should have a tumor with the predictive gene signature. The original version of the protocol specified a fixed sample size study of 51 patients with the predictive gene signature having started protocol treatment and having been followed for at least 1 year (or having died). The implementation of a group sequential test design with two stages in the amendment leads to an increase in final sample size from 51 to 53 patients with the predictive gene signature having started protocol treatment and having been followed for at least 1 year (or having died). Assumptions and details of the statistical considerations are described below in Section 10.3. Moreover, in this amendment, it has been specified that the final analysis will take place approximately one year after last patient’s first visit and that updated analysis of overall survival will be performed on a yearly basis until all patients have been followed up for 5 years.
2. Contact information for reporting SAEs has been updated.
3. A new section (Section 6.3.7) has been introduced describing all the remaining Visits/procedures to be performed by patients withdrawn from study treatment.
4. An appendix was added with recommendations for biopsy collection (refer to Appendix B).
|
||
08 Sep 2014 |
Amendment 2:
The main changes in Amendment 2 :
• Removal of all active follow-up visits and procedures,
• Removal of blood sampling for humoral immunological response and PBMC collection at the end of Cycle 4,
• Clarifications regarding the decision to not perform further testing on samples already collected in the study but not tested yet, in the following sections:
• Synopsis,
• Objectives,
• Biologicals sample handling and analysis,
• Translational Research,
• Secondary endpoints,
• Analysis of immunogenicity,
• Translational research analysis.
• The section ‘Final analysis’ was updated.
|
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |