Clinical Trial Results:
A PHASE II DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF VEGF INHIBITOR AXITINIB MONOTHERAPY WITH EARLY DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED ULTRASOUND MONITORING IN CHEMOREFRACTORY THIRD LINE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER- AxMUS-C
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-002598-49 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
15 Sep 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Sep 2022
|
First version publication date |
08 Sep 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Final report |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CRO1885
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Imperial College
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Du Cane Road, London, United Kingdom, W12 0HS
|
||
Public contact |
Becky Ward, Imperial College Joint Research Office, +44 203 312 2242, becky.ward@imperial.ac.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Becky Ward, Imperial College Joint Research Office, +44 203 312 2242, becky.ward@imperial.ac.uk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
29 Oct 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
15 Sep 2018
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
15 Sep 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether an absence of vascular (blood-supply) shutdown in the tumour, in metastatic colorectal cancer, using contrast enhanced ultrasound, in patients taking Axitinib will quickly select out patients who are not going to obtain benefit from this drug. This group of non-responsive patients should have a similar overall survival as the placebo group, whereas the patients on Axitinib who do have vascular tumour shutdown on contrast enhanced ultrasound should obtain significant benefit.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
N/A
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
17 Sep 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 52
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
52
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
52
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
38
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
14
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were recruited in Hammersmith Hospital between 17/09/2012 and 25/07/2016 | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 60 participants were screened with colorectal cancer and liver metastases were screened for eligibility, of which 52 were randomised, but one of these patients was actually a screen fail and a further 8 were considered screen failures and not randomised at all | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Treatment (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Carer | ||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Randomised to axitinib or placebo in a 2:1 ratio
|
||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Axitinib | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Axitinib
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
5mg BD increased fortnightly by a dose level up to 10mg or as tolerated - taken with food 12 hours apart
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Tablet taken twice daily
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Screenfails | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Axitinib
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Screenfails
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Axitinib
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Screenfails
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
CEHPI responders
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients on axitinib who were found to have CEHPI >20% reduction at 2 weeks compared with baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
CEHPI non-responders
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients who received axitinib treatment who were not found to have CEHPI >20% reduction at 2 weeks compared with baseline
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Progression-free survival [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
05/09/2012 - 15/09/2018
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Screen fails (arm) were not assessed for any end point |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
PFS: Drug vs Placebo |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Comparison of progression-free survival curves | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Axitinib
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
48
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0021 [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Survival curves are significantly different |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Progression-free survival of patients who were considered CEHPI responders at 2 weeks of treatment [3] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
CEHPI is defined as the Contrast Enhanced Hepatic Perfusion Index and is a means of measuring the ratios of arterial to portal venous flow. It is assessed using ultrasound imaging. This is able to analyse differential blood flow in liver metastases that are responding and also detect differences in the distributable flow from the portal vein and hepatic artery.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
05/09/2012 - 15/09/2018
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Only one arm was assessed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Axitinib Patients (CEHPI>20% Reduction at 2 weeks) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Comparison of PFS for CEPHI Responders Vs CEPHI No | ||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CEHPI responders v CEHPI non-responders
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0558 [4] | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Survival curves are not statistically different |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall survival between treatment and placebo arms [5] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
05/09/2012 - 15/09/2018
|
||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Screen fails (arm) were not assessed for any end point |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
Overall Survival: Drug vs Placebo |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Comparison of OS of Drug Vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Axitinib v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3173 [6] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Survival curves are not statistically different |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Up to 30 days following end of treatment
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
1.1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: There were no non-serious adverse events |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
12 Aug 2016 |
At this time, Pfizer is making a switch from providing commercial image debossed tablets and matching debossed placebo to non-debossed tablets and matching non-debossed placebo with the intent to secure the commercial supply chain. It is therefore necessary to change from the cross-reference currently in place that references Study A4061032: Axitinib (Ag-013736) as Second Line Therapy For Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Axis Trial, EudraCT 2008-001451-21 to a new Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier - Quality (IMPD-Q). |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |