Clinical Trial Results:
RANOLAZINE IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY: A PILOT STUDY
ASSESSING THE EFFECTS ON EXERCISE CAPACITY, DIASTOLIC FUNCTION AND SYMPTOMATIC STATUS
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-004507-20 |
Trial protocol |
ES DE IT |
Global end of trial date |
14 Nov 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
25 May 2016
|
First version publication date |
25 May 2016
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
MEIN/11/RAN-HCM/001
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
MENARINI International Operations Luxembourg S.A.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
1, Avenue de la Gare, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, L-1611
|
||
Public contact |
Menarini International Operations Luxembourg S.A., Medical Scientific Management, +352 264976,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Menarini Corporate Medical Department, Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, +39 055 56801,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
12 Mar 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
14 Nov 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary study objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of ranolazine in improving the Exercise capacity in patients affected by symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SHCM) using the V02 peak technique
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP)
guidelines and local law requirements
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
02 Jul 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 13
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 14
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 53
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
80
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
80
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
66
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
14
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Total recruitment period (first patient in to last patient in) : 02.07.2012-12.06.2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Between 02 Jul 2012 and 12 Jun 2014, a total of 119 patients were screened for inclusion in the MEIN/11/RAN HCM/001 study. These included 39 patients (32.8%) who failed screening and were not included in the study. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Patients were blinded to the study drug they received. The blinding was assured by using matching placebo to guarantee the maintenance of double-blind conditions.
The ranolazine PR tablets and the matching placebo tablets were manufactured with the same shape and attributes (appearance, colour, etc.) in order to maintain the blind.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Ranolazine 500/750/1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Ranolazine PR (prolonged release) was administered at the initial dose of 500 mg/ bid. After 7 days, the dose was up-titrated to 750 mg bid, if the drug was well tolerated (Visit 2). One further titration up to 1000 mg bid was performed after another 7 days (Visit 3), if the drug was well tolerated. If the up-titration to 750 mg or 1000 mg bid was not advisable, patients continued with 500 or 750 mg bid, respectively, throughout the remainder of the study. After the titration phase (2 weeks, Visits 2 and 3) the treatment phase was composed of 3 visits (Visits 4, 5, and 6) at Week 4, Week 12 and Week 20 respectively, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ranolazine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ranolazine was provided as prolonged release (PR) tablets to be taken orally and to be swallowed whole, without breaking, chewing, or crushing. Study drug was taken twice daily (bid), in the morning and in the evening, at approximately the same time each day, with a glass of water and with or without food.
Ranolazine PR was administered at the initial dose of 500 mg/ bid. After 7 days, the dose was up-titrated to 750 mg bid, if the drug was well tolerated (Visit 2). One further titration up to 1000 mg bid was performed after another 7 days (Visit 3), if the drug was well tolerated. If the up-titration to 750 mg or 1000 mg bid was not advisable, patients continued with 500 or 750 mg bid, respectively, throughout the remainder of the study.
Ranolazine was provided in 3 dosage strengths:
• 500 mg tablet
• 750 mg tablet
• 1000 mg tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo 500/750/1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
The matching placebo tablets (Placebo to Match, PTM) were provided in the same manner as 3 solid dosage film-coated, biconvex tablets. The 3 placebo tablets included: • 500 mg tablet • 750 mg tablet • 1000 mg tablet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The matching placebo tablets (Placebo to Match, PTM) were provided in the same manner as 3 solid dosage film-coated, biconvex tablets. The 3 placebo tablets included:
• 500 mg tablet
• 750 mg tablet
• 1000 mg tablet
Placebo was provided as prolonged release (PR) tablets to be taken orally and swallowed whole, without breaking, chewing, or crushing. It was taken twice daily (bid), in the morning and in the evening, at approximately the same time each day, with a glass of water and with or without food.
It was administered at the initial dose of 500 mg/ bid. After 7 days, the dose was up-titrated to 750 mg bid, if it was well tolerated (Visit 2). One further titration up to 1000 mg bid was performed after another 7 days (Visit 3) if well tolerated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ranolazine 500/750/1000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Ranolazine PR (prolonged release) was administered at the initial dose of 500 mg/ bid. After 7 days, the dose was up-titrated to 750 mg bid, if the drug was well tolerated (Visit 2). One further titration up to 1000 mg bid was performed after another 7 days (Visit 3), if the drug was well tolerated. If the up-titration to 750 mg or 1000 mg bid was not advisable, patients continued with 500 or 750 mg bid, respectively, throughout the remainder of the study. After the titration phase (2 weeks, Visits 2 and 3) the treatment phase was composed of 3 visits (Visits 4, 5, and 6) at Week 4, Week 12 and Week 20 respectively, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo 500/750/1000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The matching placebo tablets (Placebo to Match, PTM) were provided in the same manner as 3 solid dosage film-coated, biconvex tablets. The 3 placebo tablets included: • 500 mg tablet • 750 mg tablet • 1000 mg tablet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Ranolazine ITT/Safety population
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients. Patients erroneously registered twice or more into the study were accounted for only once. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure. For patients registered twice or more the first assigned treatment was taken as reference.
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs. Patients were analysed according to the treatment actually received. In this particular study the safety population corresponds to the ITT population where this latter is considered the population that included all randomized patients.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Ranolazine PP population
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The PP population consisted of the randomized patients who:
i) did not have major deviations from inclusion and exclusion criteria;
ii) received at least 80% and not more than 120% of the expected amount of the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure;
iii) completed all the planned study visits and were evaluated for the primary endpoint of the study at the final visit.
Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo ITT/Safety population
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients. Patients erroneously registered twice or more into the study were accounted for only once. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure. For patients registered twice or more the first assigned treatment was taken as reference.
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs. Patients were analysed according to the treatment actually received
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo PP population
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The PP population consisted of the randomized patients who:
i) did not have major deviations from inclusion and exclusion criteria;
ii) received at least 80% and not more than 120% of the expected amount of the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure;
iii) completed all the planned study visits and were evaluated for the primary endpoint of the study at the final visit.
Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Ranolazine 500/750/1000
|
||
Reporting group description |
Ranolazine PR (prolonged release) was administered at the initial dose of 500 mg/ bid. After 7 days, the dose was up-titrated to 750 mg bid, if the drug was well tolerated (Visit 2). One further titration up to 1000 mg bid was performed after another 7 days (Visit 3), if the drug was well tolerated. If the up-titration to 750 mg or 1000 mg bid was not advisable, patients continued with 500 or 750 mg bid, respectively, throughout the remainder of the study. After the titration phase (2 weeks, Visits 2 and 3) the treatment phase was composed of 3 visits (Visits 4, 5, and 6) at Week 4, Week 12 and Week 20 respectively, | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo 500/750/1000
|
||
Reporting group description |
The matching placebo tablets (Placebo to Match, PTM) were provided in the same manner as 3 solid dosage film-coated, biconvex tablets. The 3 placebo tablets included: • 500 mg tablet • 750 mg tablet • 1000 mg tablet | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Ranolazine ITT/Safety population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients. Patients erroneously registered twice or more into the study were accounted for only once. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure. For patients registered twice or more the first assigned treatment was taken as reference.
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs. Patients were analysed according to the treatment actually received. In this particular study the safety population corresponds to the ITT population where this latter is considered the population that included all randomized patients.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Ranolazine PP population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The PP population consisted of the randomized patients who:
i) did not have major deviations from inclusion and exclusion criteria;
ii) received at least 80% and not more than 120% of the expected amount of the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure;
iii) completed all the planned study visits and were evaluated for the primary endpoint of the study at the final visit.
Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo ITT/Safety population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients. Patients erroneously registered twice or more into the study were accounted for only once. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure. For patients registered twice or more the first assigned treatment was taken as reference.
The safety population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs. Patients were analysed according to the treatment actually received
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo PP population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The PP population consisted of the randomized patients who:
i) did not have major deviations from inclusion and exclusion criteria;
ii) received at least 80% and not more than 120% of the expected amount of the treatment assigned at the end of the randomization procedure;
iii) completed all the planned study visits and were evaluated for the primary endpoint of the study at the final visit.
Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change of VO2 peak after 5 months of treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary efficacy assessment was VO2 peak evaluation using the cardiorespiratory test technique, after5 months at the maximum reached dosage of ranolazine, or placebo.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After 20 weeks of treatment (visit 6)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Ranolazine vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
This was a superiority study: the treatment with ranolazine would be considered superior to placebo if the comparison between treatments at the end of the study obtained statistical significance in the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranolazine PP population v Placebo PP population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
60
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.746 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The hypothesis was tested using the F test (two-way ANCOVA, with treatment and baseline values as covariates), using a two-sided alpha level of 5%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in E/E’ ratio (lateral) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Evaluation of E/E’ ratio (ratio between the early mitral valve flow velocity and the early diastolic lengthening velocities) changes with treatment using the tissue Doppler (TD) technique at the lateral annulus
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After 20 weeks of treatment (visit 6)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in concentration of prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in proBNP concentration after 5 months of treatment with ranolazine or placebo was a secondary efficacy endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After 20 weeks of treatment (visit 6)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in MLWHFQ total score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The change in symptomatic status evaluation as determined with the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) after 5 months of treatment
with ranolazine or placebo was a secondary endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After 20 weeks of treatment (visit 6)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in E/E’ ratio (septal) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Evaluation of E/E’ ratio (ratio between the early mitral valve flow velocity and the early diastolic lengthening velocities) changes with treatment using the tissue Doppler (TD) technique at the septal annulus
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After 20 weeks of treatment (visit 6)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Safety measurements are recorded at each visit from Visit 2 (-7 days) to Visit 6 (20 weeks; end of study) during the treatment phase
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
At each visit the investigator assessed any occurring subjective or objective AE. Adverse events communicated by the patient or by the patient’s relatives or delegates through phone calls, letters or e-mails were also recorded.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
15.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ranolazine 500/750/1000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Ranolazine PR (prolonged release) was administered at the initial dose of 500 mg/ bid. After 7 days, the dose was up-titrated to 750 mg bid, if the drug was well tolerated (Visit 2). One further titration up to 1000 mg bid was performed after another 7 days (Visit 3), if the drug was well tolerated. If the up-titration to 750 mg or 1000 mg bid was not advisable, patients continued with 500 or 750 mg bid, respectively, throughout the remainder of the study. After the titration phase (2 weeks, Visits 2 and 3) the treatment phase was composed of 3 visits (Visits 4, 5, and 6) at Week 4, Week 12 and Week 20 respectively, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo 500/750/1000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The matching placebo tablets were provided in the same manner as 3 solid dosage film-coated, biconvex tablets. The 3 placebo tablets included: • 500 mg tablet • 750 mg tablet • 1000 mg tablet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
29 Sep 2011 |
This protocol amendment was implemented to provide contact details for the study pharmacovigilance representative at the CRO, and to add the name of the Study Medical Expert to the Investigator’s Approval page.
In addition, typographical errors were corrected, including an incorrect mathematical symbol in the description of the null hypothesis.
|
||
13 Jan 2012 |
This protocol amendment was implemented in order to implement changes requested by Ethics Committees and Health Authorities during the approval phase, and to increase compliance with the SmPC.
Changes were made to the eligibility criteria, including exclusion of patients using CYP3A4 inducers and patients who were hypersensitive to ranolazine (or its excipients), modification of the definition of alcoholism, and introduction of mandatory GFR calculation as part of the assessment of renal impairment.
The parameters to be assessed during clinical laboratory assessment were clarified.
Prohibition of grapefruit juice and CYP3A4 inducers was added due to their capacity to affect ranolazine metabolism.
The severity of newly developed renal sufficiency requiring dose reduction was changed from mild severe to mild-moderate.
The description of adverse reactions was updated to reflect the description provided in the updated SmPC.
Verification of eligibility criteria (including laboratory tests) within 3 days of screening was introduced prior to provision of the patients’ drug supply.
The description of the efficacy variables was clarified to indicate that efficacy variables should be assessed at the maximum dosage reached.
The description of the Modified Bruce exercise treadmill test protocol was amended to clarify that testing was to be carried out by suitably qualified individuals with training in basic life support, and with the requirement of a written emergency plan.
In addition, changes were made to reflect changes in the study team, to clarify text and correct typographical errors.
|
||
12 Mar 2012 |
This protocol amendment was implemented following the availability of new data on ranolazine drug interactions, and to change the cardiopulmonary assessment from a treadmill test to a cycle ergometer. In addition, the title of the study was modified to include the “RESTYLE-HCM” name.
Based on recent data showing that ranolazine can increase plasma concentrations of metformin by 1.8-fold, a maximum daily dose of 1000 mg metformin was introduced. In addition, the dose of simvastatin was limited to 20 mg once daily, due to the involvement of CYP3A4 in its metabolism. Eligibility criteria were modified accordingly.
The description of the procedure for unblinding was clarified.
The schedule of events was modified to clarify that physical examinations, ECGs, and assessments of E/E’ ratio and pro-BNP were to take place before the VO2 peak evaluation, and to add recording of concomitant diseases and medications to Visits 2 and 3.
The cardiopulmonary test to be employed was changed from the Treadmill test (Bruce modified) to the Cyclo ergometer test, based on the majority of study sites being more familiar with this test; both techniques were considered to be equally appropriate and comparable with regard to the determination of VO2 peak.
In addition, changes were made to clarify text and correct typographical errors.
|
||
03 Dec 2013 |
This PA was implemented in order to add details to text describing certain evaluations (Holter ECG monitoring, pro-BNP analysis, etc), to extend the enrolment period further, to update the protocol according to the updated ranolazine SmPC, and to describe administrative changes.
The enrolment period was increased from 18 months to 24 months.
Clarification was made in the exclusion criteria that QTc would be calculated according to the Bazets method (...).
A central review was introduced for ECG parameters (...), whilst clarifying that local evaluations should also be maintained.
Details were provided on the data to be collected during the cardiopulmonary exercise test and VO2 peak evaluation.
The definition of SAE was amended to include medically important conditions, and clarification was made that hospitalizations planned at the time of obtaining informed consent would not be reported as SAEs. It was also clarified that assessments of expectedness of AEs were to be made based on the ranolazine SmPC rather than the IB, as the SmPC is updated more frequently. The definition of SUSAR was also updated to reflect the definition provided in CT3. Clarification was made that clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings were to be considered as AEs. In addition, the text describing SAE reporting and AE management was updated.
Descriptions of 24-h Holter ECG monitoring and proBNP evaluation were added (...).
(...)Text describing AR was updated according to the most recent version of the ranolazine SmPC. (...) In addition, atorvastatin was added to the list of drugs metabolised by CYP3A4 that could undergo a dose reduction when co-administered with ranolazine. (...) Details of the study team were updated. (...) The appendices were updated with the most recent version of the Declaration of Helsinki, and with a list of CROs and Consultants involved in the study conduct.
Changes were made to clarify text and correct typographical errors. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
No limitations or caveats are applicable to this summary |