Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

    • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).

    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43876   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7294   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo- and active Comparator-Controlled Study to evaluate Efficacy and Safety of MR308 in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Abdominal Hysterectomy Surgery under General Anaesthesia (STARDOM2).

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    		 2016-000593-38
    Trial protocol
    		 ES   SK   LV   PL   BG  
    Global end of trial date
    29 Jun 2018

    Results information
    Results version number
    		 v1(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Apr 2019
    First version publication date
    04 Apr 2019
    Other versions

    Trial information

    		 Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    MR308-3502
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    		 -
    US NCT number
    		 -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    		 -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Mundipharma Research Ltd.
    Sponsor organisation address
    194-198 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB4 0GW
    Public contact
    Clinical Operations, Mundipharma Research Ltd., +44 1223 424900, info@contact-clinical-trials.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Operations, Mundipharma Research Ltd., +44 1223 424900, info@contact-clinical-trials.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    29 Jun 2018
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    29 Jun 2018
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    29 Jun 2018
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To demonstrate the efficacy of MR308 doses in the treatment of acute moderate to severe pain. Efficacy was assessed by showing superiority of MR308 doses over placebo and non-inferiority compared with tramadol, followed by superiority over tramadol and superiority over celecoxib based on the Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 0-4 hours (SPID4).
    Protection of trial subjects
    Protection of trial subjects: 1) Inclusion criteria: - If a female was of child-bearing potential, she had to use highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study, be not breastfeeding, and have negative pregnancy tests prior to receiving IMP. - The subject had to be alert and calm, spontaneously payed attention to caregiver, e.g. Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS) = 0 (Sessler et al., 2002 & Ely et al., 2003). 2) Exclusion criteria: - Several exclusion criteria excluded subjects who were at risk from the use of IMP (e.g. those with hypersensitivity) or the study methods (please refer to protocol) 3) Dscontinuation: The Investigator(s) or subjects themselves were able to stop study treatment at any time for safety or personal reasons. The participation of an individual subject could be terminated prematurely if subjects were taking the maximum rescue medication dose of 4000 mg Paracetamol per day and still reported uncontrolled pain or if any condition ocurred which, in the opinion of the Investigator, no longer permitted a safe participation in the study. 4) Safety was assessed throughout the study by evaluation of the incidence of adverse events and clinically significant changes on laboratory safety results, vital signs, physical examination, and electrocardiograms (ECGs).
    Background therapy
    		 Background therapy: Paracetamol (Acetaminophen), taken orally, was the rescue pain medication during the Double-blind Period of the study. The rescue medication was supplied to the subject with the IMP at randomisation and could be taken up to four times a day and the maximum daily dose of 4 g in divided doses up to Visit 8. A single dose of rescue medication was defined as 1000 mg (two tablets). At the discretion of the Investigator, the paracetamol dose may have been lowered to 500 mg (1 tablet), if the Investigator or subject felt that the dose was higher than what may be required to provide adequate analgesic effect.
    Evidence for comparator
    		 The new co-crystal MR308 combines two well-known active principles, tramadol and celecoxib. The analgesic effect is expected to occur at lower doses than those of the approved constituents drugs of MR308 (tramadol hydrochloride and celecoxib) for the treatment of acute pain. Therefore it was compared to both constituents, tramadol and celecoxib.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Dec 2016
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 272
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 28
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 254
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 195
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Latvia: 123
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belarus: 153
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 113
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    1138
    EEA total number of subjects
    872
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    1093
    From 65 to 84 years
    45
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    		 Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    		 This study was conducted at 65 sites in 7 countries: 5 sites in Belarus, 12 sites in Bulgaria, 13 sites in Hungary, 3 sites in Latvia, 11 sites in Poland, 11 sites in Russia and 10 sites in Spain. The first patient was recruited on 05-Apr-2017, the last visit of the last patient was on 29-Jun-2018.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    		 The Screening Period may have taken up to 28 days. Subjects, who did not comply with all screening inclusion and exclusion criteria, withdrew their consent prior to the planned abdominal surgery (Visit 2) and all other subjects who discontinued the study before being randomised were considered Screening Failures.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Treatment Period/Double-Blind Phase (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    		 Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    		 Double blind
    Roles blinded
    		 Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    The test IMP MR308 tablets and tramadol capsules were over-encapsulated to have the same appearance. In order to maintain the blind, subjects randomised to MR308 and celecoxib treatment arms were given twice daily additional placebo capsules to match the posology of the active comparator, tramadol, which was given four times daily. Subjects randomised to any treatment arm (including placebo) took their study treatment four times daily.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    		 MR308 100 mg
    Arm description
    		 Subjects received MR308 100 mg (44 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 56 mg of celecoxib) bid.
    Arm type
    		 Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tramadol/Celecoxib 100 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    MR308 100 mg
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    MR308 100 mg (44 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 56 mg of celecoxib). Subjects received two over-encapsulated tablets with active treatment and two placebo capsules daily. Total daily dose: 200 mg MR308 (88 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 112 mg of celecoxib).

    Arm title
    		 MR308 150 mg
    Arm description
    		 Subects received MR308 150 mg (66 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 84 mg of celecoxib) bid.
    Arm type
    		 Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tramadol/Celecoxib 150 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    MR308 150 mg
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    MR308 150 mg (66 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 84 mg of celecoxib). Subjects received two over-encapsulated tablets with active treatment and two placebo capsules daily. Total daily dose: 300 mg MR308 (132 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 168 mg of celecoxib).

    Arm title
    		 MR308 200 mg
    Arm description
    		 Subjects received MR308 200 mg (88 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 112 mg of celecoxib) bid.
    Arm type
    		 Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tramadol/Celecoxib 200 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    MR308 200 mg
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    MR308 200 mg (88 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 112 mg of celecoxib). Subjects received two over-encapsulated tablets with active treatment and two placebo capsules daily. Total daily dose: 400 mg MR308 (176 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 224 mg of celecoxib).

    Arm title
    		 Tramadol
    Arm description
    		 Subjects received Tramadol 100 mg IR qid.
    Arm type
    		 Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tramadol 100 mg IR
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Tramadol 100 mg
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Tramadol hydrochloride immediate release 100 mg. Subjects received 4 over-encapsulated capsules with active treatment daily. Total daily dose: 400 mg tramadol.

    Arm title
    		 Celecoxib
    Arm description
    		 Subjects received Celecoxib 100 mg bid
    Arm type
    		 Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Celecoxib 100 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Celecoxib 100 mg
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Celecoxib 100 mg. Subjects received one capsule of 100 mg celecoxib per intake for two times a day plus 2 intakes of placebo capsules to maintain the blind. Total daily dose: 200 mg celecoxib.

    Arm title
    		 Placebo
    Arm description
    		 Subjects receied placebo.
    Arm type
    		 Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Placebo
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects received 4 doses of placebo per day.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    		MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo
    Started
    207
    207
    208
    208
    206
    102
    Completed
    195
    197
    196
    193
    190
    95
    Not completed
    12
    10
    12
    15
    16
    7
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    9
    6
    7
    8
    11
    5
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    2
    2
    4
    6
    4
    1
         Non-compliance with study drug
    -
    -
    -
    1
    -
    1
         Lack of efficacy
    1
    2
    1
    -
    -
    -
         Protocol deviation
    -
    -
    -
    -
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    		 Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    MR308 100 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received MR308 100 mg (44 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 56 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    MR308 150 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subects received MR308 150 mg (66 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 84 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    MR308 200 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received MR308 200 mg (88 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 112 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    Tramadol
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received Tramadol 100 mg IR qid.

    Reporting group title
    Celecoxib
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received Celecoxib 100 mg bid

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects receied placebo.

    Reporting group values
    		 MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    		 207 207 208 208 206 102 1138
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    		 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    		 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    		 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    		 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    		 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    		 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    		 0
        From 65-84 years
    		 0
        85 years and over
    		 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    		 48.2 ( 7.54 ) 48.2 ( 6.03 ) 48.5 ( 7.43 ) 48.7 ( 7.51 ) 48.1 ( 6.25 ) 48.7 ( 7.13 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    		 207 207 208 208 206 102 1138
        Male
    		 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    End points

    		 Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    MR308 100 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received MR308 100 mg (44 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 56 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    MR308 150 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subects received MR308 150 mg (66 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 84 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    MR308 200 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received MR308 200 mg (88 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 112 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    Tramadol
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received Tramadol 100 mg IR qid.

    Reporting group title
    Celecoxib
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received Celecoxib 100 mg bid

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects receied placebo.

    Primary: SPID4

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 SPID4
    End point description
    The primary efficacy endpoint was the SPID4. SPID4 is derived as the weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (baseline pain – current pain), measured at different time points via the Pain Intensity - Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS, range of scores: 0-100 mm). Time between two consecutive measurements was used for weighting. Larger values indicate larger pain relief. LOCF imputation was employed.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Sum of pain intensity difference between baseline (pre-dose) and 4 hour post-dose.
    End point values
    		 MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    207
    207
    208
    208
    205
    102
    Units: PI-VAS score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    60.93 ( 67.265 )
    60.98 ( 65.302 )
    68.60 ( 66.589 )
    73.89 ( 74.174 )
    67.00 ( 71.900 )
    46.89 ( 62.080 )
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 100 mg over placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    309
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [1]
    P-value
    		 = 0.069 [2]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [1] - Test for superiority of the MR308 dose over placebo regarding SPID4
    [2] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 150 mg over placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    309
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [3]
    P-value
    		 = 0.011 [4]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [3] - Test for superiority of the MR308 dose over placebo regarding SPID4
    [4] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 200 mg over placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    310
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [5]
    P-value
    		 = 0.003 [6]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [5] - Test for superiority of the MR308 dose over placebo regarding SPID4
    [6] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Non-inferiority of MR308 100 mg versus tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 non-inferiority [7]
    P-value
    		 < 0.001 [8]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [7] - Test for non-inferiority of the MR308 dose over placebo regarding SPID4
    [8] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of non-inferiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=40mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Non-inferiority of MR308 150 mg versus tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 150 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 non-inferiority [9]
    P-value
    		 < 0.001 [10]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [9] - Test for non-inferiority of the MR308 dose over placebo regarding SPID4
    [10] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of non-inferiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=40mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Non-inferiority of MR308 200 mg versus tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 200 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    416
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 non-inferiority [11]
    P-value
    		 < 0.001 [12]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [11] - Test for non-inferiority of the MR308 dose over placebo regarding SPID4
    [12] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of non-inferiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=40mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 100 mg over tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [13]
    P-value
    		 = 0.034 [14]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [13] - Test for Superiority over tramadol regarding SPID4
    [14] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 150 mg over tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 150 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [15]
    P-value
    		 = 0.206 [16]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [15] - Test for Superiority over tramadol regarding SPID4
    [16] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 200 mg over tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 200 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    416
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [17]
    P-value
    		 = 0.385 [18]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [17] - Test for Superiority over tramadol regarding SPID4
    [18] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 100 mg over celecoxib
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Celecoxib
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    412
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [19]
    P-value
    		 = 0.1 [20]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [19] - Test for Superiority over celecoxib regarding SPID4
    [20] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 150 mg over celecoxib
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    Celecoxib v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    412
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [21]
    P-value
    		 = 0.392 [22]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [21] - Test for Superiority over celecoxib regarding SPID4
    [22] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Superiority of MR308 200 mg over celecoxib
    Statistical analysis description
    The comparison of all MR308 doses with placebo, tramadol and celecoxib based on SPID4 was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and QPI (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre as a random effect and pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate. Covariance parameters were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed (common across all treatment arms) and the Kenward and Roger’s method for fixed effects degrees
    Comparison groups
    Celecoxib v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    413
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority [23]
    P-value
    		 = 0.4 [24]
    Method
    		 ANCOVA
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [23] - Test for Superiority over celecoxib regarding SPID4
    [24] - Raw P-value from one-sided test of superiority for testing the Null Hypothesis that the differences of means is >=0mm*h

    Secondary: 50% responder at 4 hours

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 50% responder at 4 hours
    End point description
    50% responder at 4 hours, defined as subjects with a reduction in pain intensity (PI-VAS) from 0 hours at 4 hours of at least 50%.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to 4 hours after the first dose.
    End point values
    		 MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    207
    207
    208
    208
    206
    102
    Units: 50% Responders
    48
    51
    64
    64
    49
    18
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 100 mg vs placebo at 4 h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    309
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.423 [25]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.31
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.678
         upper limit
    		 2.518
    Notes
    [25] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 150 mg vs placebo at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    309
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.081 [26]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.79
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.931
         upper limit
    		 3.431
    Notes
    [26] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 200 mg vs placebo at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    310
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.017 [27]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 1.148
         upper limit
    		 4.144
    Notes
    [27] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 100 mg vs tramadol at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.2 [28]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.73
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.448
         upper limit
    		 1.183
    Notes
    [28] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 150 mg vs tramadol at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Tramadol v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.987 [29]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.618
         upper limit
    		 1.605
    Notes
    [29] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 200 mg vs tramadol at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Tramadol v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    416
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.409 [30]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.22
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.765
         upper limit
    		 1.933
    Notes
    [30] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 100 mg vs celecoxib at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Celecoxib
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    413
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.57 [31]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.87
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.525
         upper limit
    		 1.426
    Notes
    [31] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 150 mg vs celecoxib at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Celecoxib v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    413
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.505 [32]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.721
         upper limit
    		 1.941
    Notes
    [32] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.
    Statistical analysis title
    		 50% Responder MR308 200 mg vs celecoxib at 4h
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of being a 50% responder at 4h was analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Celecoxib v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    414
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.132 [33]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.44
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.895
         upper limit
    		 2.331
    Notes
    [33] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1.

    Secondary: Rescue medication during the first 4 hours

    		 Close Top of page
    End point title
    		 Rescue medication during the first 4 hours
    End point description
    Use of at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4 hours
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (pre-dose) to 4 hours post dose.
    End point values
    		 MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    207
    207
    208
    208
    206
    102
    Units: Number of subjects who used rescue medic
    43
    33
    35
    38
    41
    28
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 100 mg vs placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    309
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.139 [34]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.64
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.36
         upper limit
    		 1.154
    Notes
    [34] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 150 mg vs placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    309
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.006 [35]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.42
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.231
         upper limit
    		 0.776
    Notes
    [35] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 200 mg vs placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    310
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.019 [36]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.49
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.266
         upper limit
    		 0.887
    Notes
    [36] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 100 mg vs tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Tramadol
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.594 [37]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.688
         upper limit
    		 1.92
    Notes
    [37] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 150 mg vs tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Tramadol v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    415
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.306 [38]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.76
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.441
         upper limit
    		 1.294
    Notes
    [38] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 200 mg vs tramadol
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Tramadol v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    416
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.6 [39]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.87
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.51
         upper limit
    		 1.476
    Notes
    [39] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 100 mg vs celecoxib
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    MR308 100 mg v Celecoxib
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    413
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.794 [40]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.07
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.646
         upper limit
    		 1.769
    Notes
    [40] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 150 mg vs celecoxib
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Celecoxib v MR308 150 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    413
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.193 [41]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.413
         upper limit
    		 1.196
    Notes
    [41] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1
    Statistical analysis title
    		 Use of RM in first 4h - 200 mg vs celecoxib
    Statistical analysis description
    The probability of using at least one dose of rescue medication during the first 4h were each analysed using respective logistic regression models with treatment and QPI group (moderate, severe) as fixed effects, centre (pooling) applied as necessary as random effect und pre-dose (0h) PI-VAS as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Celecoxib v MR308 200 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    414
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    		 superiority
    P-value
    		 = 0.423 [42]
    Method
    		 Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    		 Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.81
    Confidence interval
         level
    		 95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    		 0.477
         upper limit
    		 1.364
    Notes
    [42] - P-value from two-sided test of no difference for testing the Null Hypothesis that the Odds Ratio is 1

    Adverse events

    		 Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    AEs were collected from the time the informed consent was signed until the follow-up visit, which took place at least 7 days after the subject’s last dose of IMP.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    AEs were recorded by non-elicited reporting at each study visit.
    Assessment type
    		 Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    		 MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    19.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    MR308 100 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received MR308 100 mg (44 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 56 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    MR308 150 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subects received MR308 150 mg (66 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 84 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    MR308 200 mg
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received MR308 200 mg (88 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 112 mg of celecoxib) bid.

    Reporting group title
    Tramadol
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received Tramadol 100 mg IR qid.

    Reporting group title
    Celecoxib
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects received Celecoxib 100 mg bid

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    		 Subjects receied placebo.

    Serious adverse events
    		 MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 207 (0.97%)
    3 / 205 (1.46%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    3 / 208 (1.44%)
    3 / 206 (1.46%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Aponeurosis contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Deep vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Extravasation blood
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 206 (0.49%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 207 (0.48%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ileus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 207 (0.48%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 206 (0.49%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subileus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Abdominal wall abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 207 (0.48%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 206 (0.00%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal colic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 207 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 206 (0.49%)
    0 / 102 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2%
    Non-serious adverse events
    		 MR308 100 mg MR308 150 mg MR308 200 mg Tramadol Celecoxib Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    63 / 207 (30.43%)
    60 / 205 (29.27%)
    62 / 208 (29.81%)
    82 / 208 (39.42%)
    67 / 206 (32.52%)
    30 / 102 (29.41%)
    Investigations
    Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 207 (1.93%)
    6 / 205 (2.93%)
    4 / 208 (1.92%)
    9 / 208 (4.33%)
    8 / 206 (3.88%)
    1 / 102 (0.98%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    6
    4
    9
    8
    1
    Aspartate aminotransferase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 207 (2.42%)
    4 / 205 (1.95%)
    3 / 208 (1.44%)
    6 / 208 (2.88%)
    6 / 206 (2.91%)
    1 / 102 (0.98%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    4
    3
    6
    6
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Somnolence
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 207 (5.31%)
    13 / 205 (6.34%)
    13 / 208 (6.25%)
    22 / 208 (10.58%)
    8 / 206 (3.88%)
    8 / 102 (7.84%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    18
    13
    23
    11
    10
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 207 (3.38%)
    7 / 205 (3.41%)
    7 / 208 (3.37%)
    12 / 208 (5.77%)
    5 / 206 (2.43%)
    5 / 102 (4.90%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    9
    8
    13
    6
    6
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue11
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 207 (5.31%)
    10 / 205 (4.88%)
    8 / 208 (3.85%)
    6 / 208 (2.88%)
    12 / 206 (5.83%)
    9 / 102 (8.82%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    13
    9
    6
    14
    11
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 207 (1.45%)
    5 / 205 (2.44%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    6 / 206 (2.91%)
    2 / 102 (1.96%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    5
    0
    0
    6
    2
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 207 (0.97%)
    4 / 205 (1.95%)
    6 / 208 (2.88%)
    5 / 208 (2.40%)
    3 / 206 (1.46%)
    1 / 102 (0.98%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    4
    6
    5
    3
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 207 (3.38%)
    7 / 205 (3.41%)
    9 / 208 (4.33%)
    30 / 208 (14.42%)
    14 / 206 (6.80%)
    9 / 102 (8.82%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    7
    9
    35
    16
    9
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 207 (4.83%)
    12 / 205 (5.85%)
    10 / 208 (4.81%)
    22 / 208 (10.58%)
    6 / 206 (2.91%)
    5 / 102 (4.90%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    12
    10
    25
    7
    5
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 207 (0.97%)
    7 / 205 (3.41%)
    7 / 208 (3.37%)
    16 / 208 (7.69%)
    11 / 206 (5.34%)
    4 / 102 (3.92%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    7
    8
    22
    11
    8
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 207 (0.97%)
    3 / 205 (1.46%)
    4 / 208 (1.92%)
    6 / 208 (2.88%)
    3 / 206 (1.46%)
    2 / 102 (1.96%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    4
    7
    6
    3
    3

    More information

    		 Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)
    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    25 Sep 2017
    The Protocol Amendment introduced changes following clarification from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that the study is required to have confirmatory testing against the celecoxib arm, unlike the exploratory analysis that was planned in the original protocol.

    Interruptions (globally)
    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats
    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 11 05:09:28 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA