Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44379   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7391   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase 3 Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Antiretroviral Activity, Safety, and Tolerability of Doravirine/Islatravir Once-Daily in HIV-1 Infected Treatment-Naïve Participants

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-000590-23
    Trial protocol
    ES   FR   DE   IT  
    Global end of trial date
    29 Jan 2025

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    25 Jan 2026
    First version publication date
    25 Jan 2026
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    MK-8591A-020
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04233879
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    jRCT: jRCT2031210024
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
    Sponsor organisation address
    126 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, United States, 07065
    Public contact
    Clinical Trials Disclosure, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@msd.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trials Disclosure, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@msd.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    29 Jan 2025
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    17 Nov 2022
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    29 Jan 2025
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multisite clinical study of a once-daily fixed dose combination (FDC) of 100 mg doravirine/0.75 mg islatravir (DOR/ISL [also known as MK-8591A]) in treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection. The primary objectives are to evaluate the antiretroviral activity, safety, and tolerability of DOR/ISL compared to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). The primary hypothesis is that DOR/ISL is noninferior or superior to BIC/FTC/TAF treatment based on the percentage of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) <50 copies/mL at Week 48.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in conformance with Good Clinical Practice standards and applicable country and/or local statutes and regulations regarding ethical committee review, informed consent, and the protection of human subjects participating in biomedical research.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    28 Feb 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety
    Long term follow-up duration
    27 Months
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 35
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Chile: 67
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Colombia: 37
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 41
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 26
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Israel: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 31
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Japan: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 108
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 76
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Taiwan: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 112
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    599
    EEA total number of subjects
    174
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    594
    From 65 to 84 years
    5
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Treatment-naïve participants living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy were enrolled.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 599 participants were randomized in the study and 597 received at least 1 dose of study intervention. The safety analyses were conducted using all participants as treated population, which included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Base Study (Day 1 to Week 144)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL
    Arm description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    doravirine (DOR)/islatravir (ISL)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    MK-8591A
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg DOR/0.75 mg ISL fixed dose combination (FDC) single tablet taken once daily by mouth.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to fixed dose combination (FDC) DOR/ISL
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo to FDC DOR/ISL in a single tablet taken orally, once daily

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to BIC/FTC/TAF
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo to BIC/FTC/TAF in a single tablet taken orally, once daily.

    Arm title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Arm description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Bictegravir (BIC)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF)
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    50 mg BIC, 200 mg FTC, and 25 mg TAF combined in a single tablet, taken orally once daily.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Started
    298
    301
    Treated
    298
    299
    Completed
    59
    34
    Not completed
    239
    267
         Adverse event, serious fatal
    3
    -
         Physician decision
    11
    7
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    35
    34
         Unknown
    6
    30
         Sponsor Decision
    168
    179
         Lost to follow-up
    16
    17
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Extension Study (Week 144 to 168)
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL
    Arm description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    doravirine (DOR)/islatravir (ISL)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    MK-8591A
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg DOR/0.75 mg ISL fixed dose combination (FDC) single tablet taken once daily by mouth.

    Arm title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Arm description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Bictegravir (BIC)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF)
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    50 mg BIC, 200 mg FTC, and 25 mg TAF combined in a single tablet, taken orally once daily.

    Number of subjects in period 2 [1]
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Started
    21
    27
    Completed
    0
    1
    Not completed
    21
    26
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    -
         Sponsor Decision
    20
    25
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period.
    Justification: Subset of participants who completed the base study may have been eligible to enter the study extension. The extension was optional, and, in many cases, participants declined or chose to switch to another study.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Total
    Number of subjects
    298 301 599
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    295 299 594
        From 65-84 years
    3 2 5
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Age Continuous
    Units: Years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    34.7 ( 11.0 ) 35.7 ( 10.9 ) -
    Sex: Female, Male
    Units: Participants
        Female
    77 71 148
        Male
    221 230 451
    Race (NIH/OMB)
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    2 2 4
        Asian
    16 20 36
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 0
        Black or African American
    86 90 176
        White
    171 169 340
        More than one race
    23 19 42
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 1 1
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    123 112 235
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    171 184 355
        Unknown or Not Reported
    4 5 9
    Baseline Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Level
    The Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. Participants were stratified into the following baseline HIV-1 RNA levels: ≤100,000 copies/mL, >100,000 copies/mL or missing.
    Units: Subjects
        ≤100,000 copies/mL
    244 239 483
        >100,000 copies/mL
    54 60 114
        Missing
    0 2 2
    Baseline Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Count
    Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline by a central laboratory. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. Participants were stratified into the following baseline CD4+ T-cell counts: <200 cells/mm^3, ≥200 cells/mm^3, or missing.
    Units: Subjects
        <200 cells/mm^3
    61 60 121
        ≥200 cells/mm^3
    237 239 476
        Missing
    0 2 2

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.
    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Primary: Percentage of Participants with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL at Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL at Week 48
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 was presented using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 48
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    88.9
    88.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF v Group 1: DOR/ISL
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [1]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Treatment Difference
    Point estimate
    0.46
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -4.73
         upper limit
    5.6
    Notes
    [1] - Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 2-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was less than 10 percentage points. Estimated differences, CIs, & p-value for treatment differences in percent response were calculated using Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by stratum with CMH weights; multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI corresponds to 1-sided Type 1 error of 0.02495

    Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 48
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE up to Week 48 was reported. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Up to approximately 48 weeks
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    90.6
    86.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [2]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Percentage Difference
    Point estimate
    4.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.8
         upper limit
    9.6
    Notes
    [2] - Difference between treatment groups (Group 1: DOR/ISL and Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF). Miettinen & Nurminen method was used to generate percentage difference and the associated 95%CI.

    Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE up to Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE up to Week 48
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE up to Week 48 were reported. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Up to approximately 48 weeks
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    7.4
    3.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [3]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Percentage Difference
    Point estimate
    4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.4
         upper limit
    7.9
    Notes
    [3] - Difference between treatment groups (Group 1: DOR/ISL and Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF). Miettinen & Nurminen method was used to generate percentage difference and the associated 95%CI.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 96

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 96
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 96 was presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 96
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    51.7
    57.9
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [4]
    P-value
    = 0.945 [5]
    Method
    Miettinen and Nurminen method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -6.42
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -14.21
         upper limit
    1.46
    Notes
    [4] - Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 2-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was less than 10 percentage points. The multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI is shown corresponding to a 1-sided Type 1 error of 0.02495. Estimated Difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.
    [5] - The estimated differences, CIs and p-value for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 144

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 144
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 144 was presented using the Data as Observed (DAO) missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available for this outcome measure at Week 144. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 144
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    41
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    64.1
    82.9
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    80
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [6]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -19.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -38
         upper limit
    0.2
    Notes
    [6] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The CIs for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Estimated Difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 48
    End point description
    The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL was determined. The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 48 was presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 48
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    88.6
    86.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [7]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Treatment Difference
    Point estimate
    2.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.23
         upper limit
    7.48
    Notes
    [7] - Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 2-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI was less than 10 percentage points. The estimated differences, CIs and p-value for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 48
    End point description
    The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL was determined. The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 48 was presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 48
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    89.6
    88.6
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [8]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Treatment Difference
    Point estimate
    0.83
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -4.25
         upper limit
    5.9
    Notes
    [8] - Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 2-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI was less than 10 percentage points. The estimated differences, CIs and p-value for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 96

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 96
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 96 was presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 96
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    51.0
    57.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [9]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -6.74
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -14.53
         upper limit
    1.15
    Notes
    [9] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The estimated differences, and confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Estimated difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 96

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 96
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 96 was presented using the FDA Snapshot missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 96
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    52.3
    58.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    597
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [10]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -6.41
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -14.2
         upper limit
    1.46
    Notes
    [10] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The estimated differences, and confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Estimated difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 144

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 144
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 144 was presented using the DAO missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available for this outcome measure at Week 144. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 144
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    41
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    64.1
    82.9
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    80
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [11]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -19.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -38
         upper limit
    0.2
    Notes
    [11] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The CIs for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Estimated difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 144

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 144
    End point description
    The Abbott RealTime PCR assay with a reliable lower limit of quantification of 40 copies/mL was used to measure the HIV-1 RNA level in blood samples obtained at each visit. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at Week 144 was presented using the DAO missing data approach. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available for this outcome measure at Week 144. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 144
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    41
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    64.1
    82.9
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    80
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [12]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -19.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -38
         upper limit
    0.2
    Notes
    [12] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The CIs for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by stratum with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Estimated difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.

    Secondary: Mean Change from Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Counts at Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean Change from Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Counts at Week 48
    End point description
    Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline and at Week 48 by a central laboratory. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at Week 48 using the Data as Observed (DAO) approach was presented. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available, including baseline data available for CD4+ T-cell count at Week 48. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    263
    263
    Units: cells/mm^3
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    182.4 (162.0 to 202.7)
    233.5 (211.8 to 255.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Mean Change from Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Counts at Week 96

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean Change from Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Counts at Week 96
    End point description
    Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline and at Week 96 by a central laboratory. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at Week 96 using the Data as Observed (DAO) approach was presented. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available, including baseline data available for CD4+ T-cell count at Week 96. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    159
    168
    Units: cells/mm^3
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    217.05 (187.52 to 246.58)
    319.92 (290.53 to 349.32)
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    327
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [13]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -91.75
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -132.59
         upper limit
    -50.9
    Notes
    [13] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The CIs for mean difference in CD4+ T-cell count change from baseline were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models adjusted by baseline CD4+ T-cell count, stratum, and treatment group. Mean difference is Treatment difference for DOR/ISL group minus BIC/FTC/TAF group.

    Secondary: Mean Change from Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Counts at Week 144

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean Change from Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-Cell Counts at Week 144
    End point description
    Plasma CD4+ T-cell count was measured in cells/mm^3 for baseline and at Week 144 by a central laboratory. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean change from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count at Week 144 using the Data as Observed (DAO) approach was presented. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available, including baseline data available for CD4+ T-cell count at Week 144. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    32
    Units: cells/mm^3
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    239.6 (177.4 to 301.8)
    350.9 (265.7 to 436.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    56
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [14]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -111.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -218.8
         upper limit
    -4.8
    Notes
    [14] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The CIs for mean difference in CD4+ T-cell count change from baseline were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models adjusted by baseline CD4+ T-cell count, stratum, and treatment group. Mean Difference is Treatment Difference (DOR/ISL minus BIC/FTC/TAF) .

    Secondary: Incidence of Viral Resistance-Associated Substitutions (RASs) at Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Incidence of Viral Resistance-Associated Substitutions (RASs) at Week 48
    End point description
    RASs was defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The number of participants who demonstrated RASs at Week 48 was presented. The analysis population consisted of participants with data available at Week 48. Per protocol, participants who met the definition of confirmed virologic rebound or incomplete virologic response, or who discontinued study intervention for another reason and had HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL at the time of discontinuation. Among such participants, those with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL were included. Participants for whom available genotypic or phenotypic data showed evidence of resistance, irrespective of viral load, were also included. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 48
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    6
    Units: Participants
    1
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Incidence of Viral RASs at Week 96

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Incidence of Viral RASs at Week 96
    End point description
    RASs was defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The number of participants who demonstrated RASs at Week 96 was presented. The analysis population consisted of participants with data available at Week 96. Per protocol, participants who met the definition of confirmed virologic rebound or incomplete virologic response, or who discontinued study intervention for another reason and had HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL at the time of discontinuation. Among such participants, those with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL were included. Participants for whom available genotypic or phenotypic data showed evidence of resistance, irrespective of viral load, were also included. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 96
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    5
    9
    Units: Participants
    2
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Incidence of Viral RASs at Week 144

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Incidence of Viral RASs at Week 144
    End point description
    RASs was defined as participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL and/or genotypic or phenotypic analysis of data showing evidence of resistance to the study drug administered. The number of participants who demonstrated RASs at Week 144 was presented. The analysis population consisted of participants with data available at Week 144. Per protocol, participants who met the definition of confirmed virologic rebound or incomplete virologic response, or who discontinued study intervention for another reason and had HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL at the time of discontinuation. Among such participants, those with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL were included. Participants for whom available genotypic or phenotypic data showed evidence of resistance, irrespective of viral load, were also included. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 144
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    5
    9
    Units: Participants
    2
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 96

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 96
    End point description
    Body weight was measured at baseline and at Week 96. Participants removed their shoes and wore a single layer of clothing at each measurement. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean change from baseline in body weight at Week 96 was presented. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of intervention and had data available, including baseline data available, for this outcome measure at Week 96. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    189
    201
    Units: kilogram
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    3.31 (2.45 to 4.18)
    4.13 (3.15 to 5.11)
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    390
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [15]
    P-value
    = 0.268 [16]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    -0.74
    Confidence interval
         level
    97%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.19
         upper limit
    0.71
    Notes
    [15] - Superiority will be concluded if the upper bound of the 2-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI was less than 0. The CIs for treatment difference were calculated from ANCOVA models with terms for baseline weight, sex, race, stratum & treatment. A 2-sided p-value was calculated using ANCOVA model. The CIs at week 96 is 97% corresponds to a 1-sided Type 1 error of 0.015.
    [16] - A 2-sided p-value was calculated using the Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model.

    Secondary: Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48
    End point description
    Body weight was measured at baseline and at Week 48. Participants removed their shoes and wore a single layer of clothing at each measurement. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean change from baseline in body weight at Week 48 was presented. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available, including baseline data available, for this outcome measure at Week 48. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    270
    268
    Units: kilogram
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    3.45 (2.83 to 4.06)
    3.32 (2.68 to 3.96)
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    538
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [17]
    P-value
    = 0.73 [18]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Treatment Difference
    Point estimate
    0.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.71
         upper limit
    1.02
    Notes
    [17] - Superiority will be concluded if the upper bound of the 2-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI was less than 0. A 2-sided p-value was calculated using the Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. ANCOVA model was used to generate treatment difference and the associated 95%CI.
    [18] - A 2-sided p-value was calculated using the Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one or more AEs is presented. Per protocol, pregnancy-related AEs collected for enrolled participants are reported separately and are presented in the AE module. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to approximately 47 months
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    96.6
    94.0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 144

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 144
    End point description
    Body weight was measured at baseline and at Week 144. Participants removed their shoes and wore a single layer of clothing at each measurement. Baseline measurements were defined as the Day 1 value of each participant. The mean change from baseline in body weight at Week 144 was presented. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention and had data available, including baseline data available, for this outcome measure at Week 144. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    42
    Units: kilogram
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    4.55 (2.40 to 6.70)
    3.55 (-1.46 to 8.56)
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference between treatment groups
    Comparison groups
    Group 1: DOR/ISL v Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    82
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [19]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Estimated Difference
    Point estimate
    1.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -4.07
         upper limit
    6.24
    Notes
    [19] - Type of statistical test 'other' denotes no hypothesis testing was conducted. The CIs for treatment difference were calculated from the Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models with terms for baseline weight, sex, race, stratum and treatment.

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE is presented. Per protocol, pregnancy-related AEs collected for enrolled participants are reported separately and are presented in the AE module. The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Participants were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study intervention received. The final analysis for this outcome is presented here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to approximately 38 months
    End point values
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF
    Number of subjects analysed
    298
    299
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    14.1
    9.0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Up to approximately 47 months
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    All cause mortality: all randomized participants; AEs: all randomized participants who got ≥1 dose of study drug. Reported by base & extension. Per protocol, participants with drops in CD4+/total lymphocyte count reported as ‘post treatment follow up’; all pregnancy-related AEs & infant SAEs collected & reported by arm that participants enrolled.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    27.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 48-Week 96
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 0 - Week 48
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Open-Label Extension Week 144 - Week 168
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Post-Treatment Follow-Up
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 0 - Week 48
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 48 - Week 96
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 96 - Week 144
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 96-Week 144
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Post-Treatment Follow-Up
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with HIV-1 that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg bictegravir [BIC], 200 mg emtricitabine [FTC], 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) and placebo to FDC DOR/ISL QD from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label BIC/FTC/TAF up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive QD BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Reporting group title
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Open-Label Extension Week 144-Week 168
    Reporting group description
    Treatment-naïve participants living with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) that had not received ≤10 days of prior antiretroviral therapy received blinded fixed dose combination (FDC) Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) (100 mg doravirine [DOR]/0.75 mg islatravir [ISL]) and placebo to Bictegravir/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine (BIC/FTC/TAF) once daily (QD) from Day 1 to Week 96, and open-label DOR/ISL up to Week 144. At Week 144, participants who consent to enter the optional open-label study extension continued to receive open-label QD FDC of DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.75 mg) for an additional 24 weeks, up to Week 168.

    Serious adverse events
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 48-Week 96 Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 0 - Week 48 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Open-Label Extension Week 144 - Week 168 Group 1: DOR/ISL Post-Treatment Follow-Up Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 0 - Week 48 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 48 - Week 96 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 96 - Week 144 Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 96-Week 144 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Post-Treatment Follow-Up Group 1: DOR/ISL Open-Label Extension Week 144-Week 168
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 266 (5.26%)
    19 / 298 (6.38%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    3 / 112 (2.68%)
    16 / 299 (5.35%)
    13 / 267 (4.87%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    3 / 146 (2.05%)
    1 / 128 (0.78%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    2
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    2
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hodgkin's disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertensive emergency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Deep vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
    Abortion spontaneous
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Abortion incomplete
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gestational hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    1 / 128 (0.78%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Immune system disorders
    Drug hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    3 / 298 (1.01%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Major depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicidal behaviour
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicidal ideation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicide attempt
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Investigations
    CD4 lymphocytes decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Liver function test increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Ankle fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Craniofacial fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hand fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gun shot wound
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Poisoning
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suture rupture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Stab wound
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Exomphalos
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Angina unstable
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pericarditis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Migraine
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Febrile convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    1 / 128 (0.78%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Enteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oesophagitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholelithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute kidney injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Intervertebral disc protrusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Abdominal wall abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Abscess limb
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute hepatitis B
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Appendicitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    2 / 299 (0.67%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bacterial infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    2 / 298 (0.67%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    COVID-19 pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cytomegalovirus colitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Disseminated tuberculosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diverticulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infectious pleural effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lymphogranuloma venereum
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neurosyphilis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peritonitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peritonsillar abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia pneumococcal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary tuberculosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Scrotal abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Scrotal cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Septic shock
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 266 (0.38%)
    0 / 298 (0.00%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diabetes mellitus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 266 (0.00%)
    1 / 298 (0.34%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    0 / 299 (0.00%)
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 48-Week 96 Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 0 - Week 48 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Open-Label Extension Week 144 - Week 168 Group 1: DOR/ISL Post-Treatment Follow-Up Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 0 - Week 48 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 48 - Week 96 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Base Study Week 96 - Week 144 Group 1: DOR/ISL Base Study Week 96-Week 144 Group 2: BIC/FTC/TAF Post-Treatment Follow-Up Group 1: DOR/ISL Open-Label Extension Week 144-Week 168
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    115 / 266 (43.23%)
    146 / 298 (48.99%)
    2 / 27 (7.41%)
    8 / 112 (7.14%)
    141 / 299 (47.16%)
    124 / 267 (46.44%)
    37 / 143 (25.87%)
    42 / 146 (28.77%)
    2 / 128 (1.56%)
    3 / 21 (14.29%)
    Investigations
    CD4 lymphocytes decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    28 / 266 (10.53%)
    2 / 298 (0.67%)
    1 / 27 (3.70%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 299 (0.33%)
    25 / 267 (9.36%)
    14 / 143 (9.79%)
    12 / 146 (8.22%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    35
    2
    1
    0
    1
    28
    17
    13
    0
    0
    Weight increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 266 (0.75%)
    19 / 298 (6.38%)
    1 / 27 (3.70%)
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    18 / 299 (6.02%)
    8 / 267 (3.00%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    19
    1
    1
    18
    8
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Lymphocyte count decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    64 / 266 (24.06%)
    27 / 298 (9.06%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    12 / 299 (4.01%)
    55 / 267 (20.60%)
    24 / 143 (16.78%)
    25 / 146 (17.12%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    3 / 21 (14.29%)
         occurrences all number
    75
    28
    0
    0
    12
    62
    27
    29
    0
    3
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Accidental overdose
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 266 (2.63%)
    17 / 298 (5.70%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    16 / 299 (5.35%)
    17 / 267 (6.37%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    3 / 146 (2.05%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    21
    0
    0
    24
    24
    1
    3
    0
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 266 (4.89%)
    31 / 298 (10.40%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    34 / 299 (11.37%)
    13 / 267 (4.87%)
    2 / 143 (1.40%)
    2 / 146 (1.37%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    36
    0
    1
    38
    15
    2
    2
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 266 (2.26%)
    26 / 298 (8.72%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    20 / 299 (6.69%)
    5 / 267 (1.87%)
    2 / 143 (1.40%)
    2 / 146 (1.37%)
    1 / 128 (0.78%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    28
    0
    0
    21
    5
    2
    2
    1
    0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 266 (1.50%)
    13 / 298 (4.36%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    2 / 112 (1.79%)
    19 / 299 (6.35%)
    3 / 267 (1.12%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    14
    0
    2
    20
    3
    1
    1
    0
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 266 (4.14%)
    16 / 298 (5.37%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    14 / 299 (4.68%)
    5 / 267 (1.87%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    2 / 146 (1.37%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    17
    0
    0
    16
    6
    0
    3
    0
    0
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 266 (7.52%)
    42 / 298 (14.09%)
    1 / 27 (3.70%)
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    47 / 299 (15.72%)
    29 / 267 (10.86%)
    3 / 143 (2.10%)
    2 / 146 (1.37%)
    1 / 128 (0.78%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    21
    45
    1
    0
    49
    29
    3
    2
    1
    0
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 266 (5.26%)
    15 / 298 (5.03%)
    0 / 27 (0.00%)
    7 / 112 (6.25%)
    15 / 299 (5.02%)
    11 / 267 (4.12%)
    4 / 143 (2.80%)
    4 / 146 (2.74%)
    0 / 128 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    16
    0
    8
    18
    11
    4
    4
    0
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    08 Jun 2020
    Amendment 01: The protocol was amended to: (1) update the hypothesis testing strategy in the statistical analysis plan, (2) update the prohibited concomitant therapies, and (3) allow participants to rescreen one time following approval from the Sponsor.
    30 Jun 2021
    Amendment 02: The protocol was amended to: (1) extend study intervention (open-label) from 96 weeks to 144 weeks for all participants; (2) provide an option for Group 2 to receive open-label DOR/ISL from Week 144 to Week 156; (3) offer the option to continue study intervention for participants who become pregnant; and (4) add a discontinuation criterion if a participant chooses to breastfeed.
    22 Feb 2022
    Amendment 04: The protocol was amended to: (1) increase the frequency of monitoring of CD4+ T-cell and total lymphocyte counts and to specify the management of participants who meet protocol-defined decreases in CD4+ T-cell and/or total lymphocyte counts, given the findings of decreases in CD4+ T-cell and total lymphocyte counts in clinical studies evaluating ISL and (2) to update the timing of when the Sponsor will be unblinded to individual participants' treatment assignments.
    04 Dec 2022
    Amendment 05: This protocol was amended to allow participants who continue to benefit (as determined by the Investigator) from their assigned study intervention, to continue their assigned study intervention through a study extension after Week 144. This extension will continue for up to 24 additional weeks (up to maximum Week 168) or until the participant has the option to enroll in a DOR/ISL 100 mg/0.25 mg study; whichever is sooner. Participants choosing not to enroll in a DOR/ISL 100 mg/0.25 mg study, will transition to commercially available ART as soon as possible.
    20 May 2024
    Amendment 06: The protocol was amended to revise the post-treatment management of participants with specific decreases in CD4+ T-cell or total lymphocyte counts. The recovery criteria were revised to account for normal physiologic variability in CD4+ T-cell or total lymphocyte counts and the frequency of monitoring was updated to minimize the burden on study participants.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Feb 05 03:45:05 CET 2026 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA